Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

高通Adreno 642L是一款集成在高通骁龙778G SoC中的智能手机和平板电脑GPU。该芯片将于2021年中期上市，并将主要用于中高端安卓设备。

据高通公司称，Adreno 642L GPU的性能比其前辈Adreno 620提高了40%（而SD 780G中642的指定+50%），后者集成在骁龙768G SoC中。这也要归功于该SoC的快速LPDDR4X-4200内存支持。

Adreno 642L支持OpenCL 2.0 FP、OpenGL ES 3.2和Vulkan 1.1。

骁龙778G和642L都是在台积电的现代6纳米UEV工艺下制造的，应能提供良好的电源效率。

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology6 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 38 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.06581 -82%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.09938 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.2266 -38%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3675
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 8961%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4790 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5577 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
782 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
832 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (27%)     max: 5763 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (17%)     max: 6240 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -98%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 540
4231 -25%
ARM Mali-G610 MP3
4258 -25%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6
4689 -17%
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
4798 -15%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
5208 -8%
Qualcomm Adreno 710
5272 -7%
Qualcomm Adreno 630
5424 -4%
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
5565 -2%
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
5606 -1%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
5654
Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT
5895 4%
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
6136 9%
Qualcomm Adreno 642
6148 9%
ARM Mali-G615 MP2
6205 10%
Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR
6226 10%
Qualcomm Adreno 640
7016 24%
Qualcomm Adreno 644
7042 25%
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
7112 26%
Qualcomm Adreno 643
7131 26%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 355%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6320     avg: 6409     median: 6358 (56%)     max: 6798 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 7138     avg: 7328     median: 7238 (43%)     max: 8182 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4967     avg: 5076     median: 5031.5 (25%)     max: 5385 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5134     avg: 5267     median: 5205 (17%)     max: 5807 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1038 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
968 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
192.1 -80%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
319.9 -67%
Qualcomm Adreno 618
590 -39%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
791 -18%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
968
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
104201 10665%
0%
100%
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
7.2 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -98%
...
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
10.8 -21%
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
11 -19%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6
11 -19%
ARM Mali-G610 MP3
12 -12%
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
12 -12%
Qualcomm Adreno 710
12.15 -11%
Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT
12.2 -10%
Apple A11 Bionic GPU
12.3 -10%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
13.4 -2%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
13.63
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
13.67 0%
ARM Mali-G615 MP2
14.5 6%
Qualcomm Adreno 630
15.59 14%
Qualcomm Adreno 644
16.43 21%
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
17.17 26%
Qualcomm Adreno 640
17.45 28%
Qualcomm Adreno 643
18 32%
Qualcomm Adreno 642
18 32%
Samsung Xclipse 530
19 39%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 769%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 3833%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (5%)     max: 89 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 81     avg: 131.6     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (20%)     max: 175807 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (67%)     max: 43000 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
59 59 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
51 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
33.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dota 2 Reborn33.72514.813
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

1
1

1
2
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 10:11:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.027s ... 0.057s

#26 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.051s ... 0.107s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.715s ... 0.823s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.823s

#30 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.834s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.834s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.838s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.176s ... 1.014s

#34 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 1.017s

#35 return log +0s ... 1.017s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 642L graphics card

华为 Nova 11 Pro

华为 Nova 11 Pro 智能手机评测：充电快如离弦之箭的智能手机

华为推出了一款高端高端手机 Nova 11 Pro，它希望以超高速充电、光学变焦和非凡的外观让人信服。目前的制裁措施常常让人在考虑华为手机时不得不重新考虑，但 Nova 11 Pro 可能仍然值得一看。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.78" | 188 g
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机评测

小米Poco X5 Pro评测--拥有108MP和120Hz Flow AMOLED的轻型5G智能手机 (Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition)

就X5 Pro而言，波克公司宣传的内容毫不逊色。凭借强大的Snapdragon芯片组、灵活的AMOLED显示屏和108万像素的摄像头，我们对Poco智能手机的测试所有迹象都很好。但是，这是否足以成为对Poco智能手机的购买建议？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.67" | 181 g
三星Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro

三星Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro回顾。可更换电池的防风雨平板电脑

对于那些想在恶劣天气下使用平板电脑工作的人，三星推出了Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro。它有很多不寻常的功能，如可拆卸电池或无电池操作。在我们的审查中，该设备是否也令人信服？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 10.10" | 674 g
华为Nova 10 Pro评测--配备60MP自拍镜的高端智能手机

华为Nova 10 Pro评测--配备60MP自拍镜的高端智能手机

华为新星10 Pro有许多特点，是一款优秀的上层智能手机的特征。一个吸引人的相机设置，大量的存储，快速的100瓦充电，以及120赫兹的OLED。然而，它也受到众所周知的限制，现在有更大的后果。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.78" | 191 g
Honor 70

Honor 70评论 - 纤细的手机节省了SoC的费用

Honor 70以其不寻常的外观吸引了人们的注意。在我们的测试中，这款奢侈的手机令人信服，但也显示出一些可能成为问题的节约措施.........
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | 6.67" | 178 g

Xiaomi 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米12 Lite 5G智能手机评测--摄像头让一切变得不同

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro揭示。轻量级的户外智能手机，功能强大

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » 评论。Nothing phone（1）--中档价格的透明设计师作品

Motorola Edge 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Edge 30智能手机回顾。具备144赫兹显示屏的轻量级手机

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy M52 5G评测 - 一款强大的120Hz智能手机，注定要失败？

Huawei Nova 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  Review » 华为nova 9智能手机评论。没有5G，但有一些特殊的相机功能

Honor 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 50智能手机的回顾。没有华为就有谷歌

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米11 Lite 5G NE智能手机评论。最畅销的产品得到微调

Motorola Edge 20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Edge 20智能手机评论。轻量级智能手机，显示速度快

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A52s 5G智能手机评论。在其最新版本中拥有更多的力量

Realme GT Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme GT大师版智能手机评测 - 带有5G的设计师作品

Huawei Nova 12s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 12s

Huawei Nova 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 12 Lite

Vivo S17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S17

Honor V Purse: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 7.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor V Purse

Vivo V29: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V29

OnePlus Nord CE3: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord CE3

Huawei Nova 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11

Oppo K11: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K11

Oppo Reno10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno10 Pro

Huawei Nova 11 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 Pro

Huawei Nova 11 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro

Honor 80: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 80

Oppo Reno9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno9

Huawei Pocket S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Pocket S

Huawei Mate 50E: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate 50E

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 10.10", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro

Huawei nova 10: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei nova 10

Huawei Nova 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 Pro

Honor 70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 70

Vivo T1 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 12 Lite

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing Phone (1)

Vivo iQOO Z6 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z6 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Civi 1S: unknown, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi 1S

Huawei P50E: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei P50E

Realme 9 5G SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 5G SE

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

Motorola Edge 30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 30

Vivo T1: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1

Honor 60: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60

Honor 60 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60 Pro

Oppo Reno7 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7

Realme Q3s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q3s

Realme Q3t: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q3t

Oppo K9s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K9s

Xiaomi Civi: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M52

Motorola Edge 5G UW: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 5G UW

Vivo iQOO Z5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z5

Huawei Nova 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 9

Huawei Nova 9 Pro: unknown, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 11 Lite NE 5G

Motorola Edge 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 2021

Honor 50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.57", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

Motorola Edge 20: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20

Honor 50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50 Pro

Realme GT Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Master Edition

Nothing Phone (1): Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone (2a) 发布日期曝光，贝聿铭解释这款智能手机与众不同之处

   » Nothing Phone (1) 现可使用 Nothing OS 2.0 更新，其中包含各种更改和用户界面改进

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco F5 Pro开箱视频和Poco F5现场图片在5月9日发布前浮出水面

   » Poco F5出现在Geekbench 6上，在上市前搭载骁龙7+2代

   » Poco X5 Pro与Poco X4 Pro。小米终于将性能重新摆上台面

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

A18 Pro GPU *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Mali-G615 MP2 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 710 *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 613 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter