Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

AMD R9 7950X

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X是拉斐尔系列的快速、高端台式机处理器。它提供基于Zen 4架构的16个内核，支持超线程（32个线程）。这些核心的运行频率从4.5（基础）到5.7 GHz（单核提升）不等。7950X是上市时第二快的Ryzen。

由于改进的架构和现代5纳米工艺，R9 7950X的性能明显优于之前的Ryzen 9 5950X。与英特尔的Raptor Lake Core i9-13900K相比，单核性能略低，多核性能略快。游戏性能略低。

拉斐尔系列仍然采用芯片设计，在5纳米工艺下有两个CCD集群（每个集群有8个可能的核心），在6纳米工艺下有一个IO-die（包括内存控制器和Radeon Graphics iGPU）。

R9 7950X的TDP为170瓦，在应用和游戏中被证明是相当耗电的。

SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameRaphael (Zen 4)
Clock Rate4500 - 5700 MHz
Level 1 Cache1 MB
Level 2 Cache16 MB
Level 3 Cache64 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)170 Watt
Transistor Count9900 Million
Manufacturing TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Voltage Range0.650 - 1.475 V V
Die SizeCCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Max. Temperature95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
GPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/26/2022
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
49.2 pt (82%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.8 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47.1 -4%
Intel Core i9-14900
47.2 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
47.3 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
47.5 -3%
Intel Core i7-14700K
47.6 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
48.1 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900K
49 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
49.2
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
50 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 2%
Intel Core i9-14900K
51.2 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
51.6 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52 6%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 22%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 114     avg: 119.3     median: 121 (68%)     max: 123 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1514     avg: 1856     median: 1991 (37%)     max: 2063 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 25832     avg: 34133     median: 36523 (34%)     max: 38248 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
29289 -14%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -14%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -11%
Intel Core i7-13700K
30745 -10%
Intel Core i9-14900
31070 -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
32172 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33437 -2%
Intel Core i7-14700K
33441 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
34133
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
36291 6%
Intel Core i9-13900K
37310 9%
Intel Core i9-14900K
39400 15%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
40924 20%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
42614 25%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
42744 25%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
61102 79%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 215%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1927     avg: 1995     median: 2000 (85%)     max: 2045 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 748     avg: 775     median: 777 (86%)     max: 795 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 10140     avg: 13338     median: 14241.5 (35%)     max: 14891 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4203     avg: 5563     median: 5947.5 (38%)     max: 6236 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
Intel Core i7-13700K
4508 -19%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -19%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -15%
Intel Core i9-14900
4793 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
4818 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
5008 -10%
Intel Core i7-14700K
5035 -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5396 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5563
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 1%
Intel Core i9-13900K
5798 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
5974 7%
Intel Core i9-14900K
6103 10%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
6335 14%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
6492 17%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
7053 27%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
9706 74%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 185%
0%
100%
03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 316     median: 315.5 (89%)     max: 328 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
306.2 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
308 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -2%
Intel Core i7-14700K
313.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
313.7 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900K
314.1 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900
315 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
315 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
315 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
316
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
322 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
322.2 2%
Intel Core i9-14900K
324.5 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
326 3%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
328 4%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
342 8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
344 9%
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
346 9%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
353 12%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 13%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 47.44     avg: 63.5     median: 68.6 (89%)     max: 69.26 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.63     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.86 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8194     avg: 8436     median: 8448 (51%)     max: 8652 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 58702     avg: 68885     median: 72098 (52%)     max: 72641 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 109401     avg: 125744     median: 130289 (83%)     max: 137543 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15549     avg: 15886     median: 15848 (19%)     max: 16260 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 30.427     avg: 34.7     median: 32.2 (0%)     max: 43.867 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.557     avg: 2     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.423 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 15325     avg: 15726     median: 15614 (25%)     max: 16351 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 120716     avg: 154226     median: 157038 (90%)     max: 161724 MIPS
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7617     avg: 8053     median: 8118 (96%)     max: 8365 MIPS
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 200     avg: 253.9     median: 270.3 (90%)     max: 275 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 360.5     avg: 377.6     median: 381.3 (88%)     max: 387.5 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.3     avg: 41.6     median: 43.5 (76%)     max: 44.5 fps
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.2     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (82%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.1     avg: 4.2     median: 4.5 (77%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 22     avg: 29.5     median: 31.6 (82%)     max: 32.9 GB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 128     avg: 137.8     median: 134 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 87.9     median: 86 (1%)     max: 118 Seconds
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3682     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3984 sec
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 18661     avg: 20944     median: 21063.5 (45%)     max: 22169 Points
+ 48 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.088     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.834 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.291     avg: 14     median: 14 (1%)     max: 14.826 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 309.009     avg: 322     median: 317.7 (1%)     max: 343.848 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 90336     avg: 105612     median: 105860 (81%)     max: 107186 Points
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23510     avg: 34080     median: 35243 (89%)     max: 36767 Points
+ 49 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 78811     avg: 90412     median: 90770 (74%)     max: 100969 Points
+ 48 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79100     avg: 90464     median: 90699.5 (74%)     max: 101249 Points
+ 48 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81936     avg: 92519     median: 92950.5 (77%)     max: 101189 Points
+ 44 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18195     avg: 26105     median: 26451 (67%)     max: 27047 Points
+ 48 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29796     avg: 45175     median: 45892 (82%)     max: 47225 Points
+ 49 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8240     avg: 16497     median: 16972 (72%)     max: 17769 Points
+ 48 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2905     avg: 2979     median: 2972 (76%)     max: 3083 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 16219     avg: 19688     median: 19810 (78%)     max: 21166 points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
491 -98%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16991 -14%
Intel Core i5-14600K
17409 -12%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17457 -11%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -11%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
17575 -11%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
18074 -8%
Intel Core i7-14700K
19147 -3%
Intel Core i7-13700K
19249 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
19688
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
20380 4%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 8%
Intel Core i9-14900K
21326 8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
21383 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
21598 10%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 14%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
25365 29%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1990     avg: 2147     median: 2226 (87%)     max: 2311 points
+ 32 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17785     avg: 23730     median: 23897 (43%)     max: 25159 points
+ 32 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1959     avg: 2770     median: 2120.5 (9%)     max: 22993 points
+ 30 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6501     avg: 22957     median: 23873.5 (75%)     max: 24554 points
+ 30 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7777     avg: 8570     median: 8803 (88%)     max: 9322 points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66320     avg: 84499     median: 85128 (85%)     max: 89678 points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 433     avg: 443.3     median: 444.5 (1%)     max: 457 ms
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 301     avg: 303.9     median: 303 (85%)     max: 309 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 358     avg: 374     median: 374.5 (69%)     max: 396 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2080     avg: 2334     median: 2324.5 (89%)     max: 2513 Points
+ 24 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 186.8     avg: 274.2     median: 287.5 (50%)     max: 335 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 191.9     avg: 284.7     median: 291.5 (53%)     max: 364 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78     avg: 94.1     median: 93 (62%)     max: 123.2 Watt
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.1     avg: 21     median: 20.8 (15%)     max: 25.2 Points per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 19. 05:42:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14627 +0.016s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 14627 +0.136s ... 0.16s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.16s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.032s ... 1.192s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.192s

#11 return log +0s ... 1.192s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X processor

GPD G1

GPD G1 eGPU 评测：配备 8GB VRAM 的外置 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 使用 USB4 或 OCuLink

许多流行的手持设备和迷你 PC 的 3D 功能非常有限，因为它们只配备了 iGPU。这就是 GPD 推出 G1 eGPU 的原因。使用该设备需要一个 USB4 端口或 OcuLink 接口。GPD G1 配备了 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 显卡。我们使用这两种连接方式对该设备进行了广泛的测试，并对其性...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | 32.00" | 1.1 kg
宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A750 OC

宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A750 OC 台式机 GPU 评测--英特尔第二强游戏显卡仅配备 8 GB VRAM

英特尔第二快的 Arc 系列显卡目前售价不到 300 美元。在本次评测中，我们将对其 AMD 和 Nvidia 竞争对手的性能进行分析。我们还将分析该显卡在玩当前游戏时的总体性能。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Arc A750 | 32.00" | 1.1 kg
宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A770 OC

宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A770 OC 台式机显卡评测--配备 16GB VRAM 的英特尔最强游戏显卡性能如何？

Nvidia 和 AMD 这两大巨头往往是游戏行业的首选。但大约一年以来，英特尔也开始在专用台式机 GPU 领域发挥作用。在本次评测中，我们将在当前驱动程序的基础上评估宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A770 OC 的性能。16 GB 的 VRAM，英特尔并不吝啬，其价格也让 Arc 系列的型号非常有吸引力。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel Arc A770 | 32.00" | 1.2 kg
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 台式机显卡评测，配备 12GB VRAM，售价不到 500 欧元

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 台式机显卡评测，配备 12GB VRAM，售价不到 500 欧元

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 是继 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 之后又一款性价比极高的显卡。我们以蓝宝石 Pulse AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 的形式对其进行了评估，通过各种测试和基准来分析它是否是 RX 6700 XT 当之无愧的继任者。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | 32.00" | 1.1 kg
KFA2GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX

KFA2GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 16 GB 台式机显卡评测：配备更多 VRAM 的强大中端 GPU

通过GeForce RTX 4060 Ti，Nvidia 为注重价格的买家带来了一款性能出色、非常高效的显卡。8GB 的型号已经做得很好了，但还是无法抑制人们对更多 VRAM 的呼声。在这篇评测中，你可以了解到配备 16GB VRAM 的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 是否更好。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G | 32.00" | 685 g

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, 32.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 台式机显卡评测：GeForce RTX 4070 性能更实惠

  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7600 台式机 GPU 评测：RDNA3 与 Ada Lovelace 在入门级市场的较量

  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE OEM 台式机显卡评测： 在 Memory:PC 系统中测试 GPU 性能

  Review » 华硕双GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC 台式机显卡评测：适用于全高清游戏的紧凑节俭型 GPU

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click OC 2X 显卡评测：当前入门级 GPU 的功耗超出预期

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX显卡评论：一个紧凑的中端GPU，具有强大的功能和时尚的灯光

  Review » 微星GeForce RTX 4060 Ti桌面显卡回顾： 比RTX4090更大的中端GPU

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer桌面显卡评测：适用于WQHD游戏的经济实惠的GPU，没有大量的RGB

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer桌面显卡评测：一个安静、凉爽、节俭的WQHD游戏GPU

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG桌面显卡评论。Nvidia的第一个Ada Lovelace GPU，价格低于1,000欧元。

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG桌面显卡评测中。安培仍是不错的中端产品

  Review » 微星Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio 16G桌面GPU回顾。上一代高端GPU与RDNA3和Ada Lovelace的较量

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4080 SG桌面GPU回顾。伟大的性能遇到有问题的价格

  Review » 华硕TUFGeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC游戏显卡回顾。安培在2022年的表现如何？

  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX和AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT评论。用于4K游戏的高端RDNA 3 GPU，不会让银行破产

  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX和AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT评论。用于4K游戏的高端RDNA 3 GPU，不会让银行破产

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 28.00"
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7950X和AMD Ryzen 7 7700X评论。超强的性能和效率提升，让猛禽湖一展身手

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 32.00"
  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4090 SG评论。不折不扣的4K游戏，新的Nvidia旗舰机

  Review » 海盗船MP600 GS 2TB固态硬盘回顾。适用于笔记本电脑、台式机和迷你电脑的快速固态硬盘

  Review » PalitGeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC桌面GPU回顾。高端性能与价格相匹配

   » RDNA 3 降价：AMD 似乎在帮助零售商降低 RX 7000 GPU 的价格

   » RDNA 3 降价：AMD 似乎在帮助零售商降低 RX 7000 GPU 的价格

   » RDNA 3 降价：AMD 似乎在帮助零售商降低 RX 7000 GPU 的价格

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)

» AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7900
   12x 3.7 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
   8x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7700
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
   8x 4.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
   6x 4.7 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7600
   6x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
   96x 2.5 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
   64x 2.7 GHz - 4.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
   16x 4.3 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
   12x 4.4 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) R9 7950X 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-12-31)