Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200

三星Exynos 2200是一款高端SoC，有三个集群的8个内核。一个快速的ARM Cortex-S2，单线程性能高达2.8GHz。三个更慢的ARM Cortex-A710，频率高达2.52 GHz，用于执行性能任务，四个使用ARM Cortex-A510架构的高效内核，频率高达1.82 GHz。

该SoC还集成了一个5G调制解调器，速度高达7.35Gbps（5G NR Sub-6Hz，5G NR mmWave，LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL），与Exynos 2100类似。除此之外，还有一个图像处理器，用于单相机模式下的200mP和8K视频，一个带有双核NPU和DPS的AI引擎和各种GNSS系统（GPS、GLONASS、BeiDou、Galileo）。

作为首创，Exynos 2200集成了一个基于AMD RDNA 2架构的显卡，称为三星Xclipse 920）。

在我们的基准测试中，CPU性能略低于骁龙8代（目前最快的Android SoC）和iPhone 13中的苹果A15。

该芯片是在三星使用EUV的现代4纳米工艺生产的。

SeriesSamsung Exynos
CodenameExynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
Clock Rate1820 - 2800 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Features5G NR Sub-6GHz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat. 24/22, LPDDR5-RAM, Dual-Core NPU, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2
GPUSamsung Xclipse 920 ( - 555 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date01/18/2022
Product Link (external)semiconductor.samsung.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3909     avg: 4039     median: 3978.5 (47%)     max: 4288 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3923     avg: 4120     median: 4085.5 (47%)     max: 4385 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
1601 points (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
3938 points (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1133     avg: 1148     median: 1149.5 (45%)     max: 1161 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -95%
...
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
1070 -7%
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
1087 -5%
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
1088 -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
1105 -4%
Apple A12 Bionic
1118 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
1118 -3%
Apple A12X Bionic
1120 -2%
Apple A12Z Bionic
1122 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1143 0%
Samsung Exynos 2200
1148
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
1170 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
1225 7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1231 7%
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
1246 9%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1246 9%
Google Tensor G3
1267 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
1281 12%
Apple A13 Bionic
1333 16%
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
1392 21%
...
Apple A18 Pro
2437 112%
max:
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
2544 122%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3474     avg: 3600     median: 3579.5 (6%)     max: 3768 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -93%
...
MediaTek Dimensity 8020
3310 -8%
Samsung Exynos 1480
3349 -7%
Apple A13 Bionic
3381 -6%
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
3392 -6%
Google Tensor G3
3462 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3548 -1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
3553 -1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
3571 -1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
3572 -1%
Samsung Exynos 2200
3600
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
3661 2%
Google Tensor G4
3719 3%
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3811 6%
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
3841 7%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3863 7%
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
3874 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
3959 10%
Apple A14 Bionic
4019 12%
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4056 13%
...
Apple M3
10697 197%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 1450%
0%
100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5788     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (58%)     max: 5871 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15209     avg: 15260     median: 15259.5 (15%)     max: 15310 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 840.3     avg: 1306     median: 1408.5 (2%)     max: 1566 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
281.5 ms (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 34055     avg: 42162     median: 41695 (35%)     max: 51202 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
130 Points (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 142     median: 149 (27%)     max: 153 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 704479     avg: 797881     median: 818322 (50%)     max: 850401 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 145904     avg: 195898     median: 208772 (57%)     max: 220142 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
70.5 MB/s (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
685 MB/s (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
41.6 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1300 MB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 31101     avg: 33630     median: 33934.5 (54%)     max: 35551 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12579     avg: 13805     median: 13820.5 (57%)     max: 14998 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12233     avg: 12402     median: 12402 (81%)     max: 12571 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 888     avg: 979     median: 949.5 (36%)     max: 1129 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.24     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (3%)     max: 7.01 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.913 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.10.10.20.30.40.40.50.60.60.70.80.90.911.11.11.21.31.3Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 11:05:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14146 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14146 +0.012s ... 0.021s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.376s ... 0.397s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.397s

#11 return log +0s ... 0.397s

Reviews for the Samsung Exynos 2200 processor

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

三星Galaxy S23 FE 评测--作为粉丝服务的智能手机

时隔一年之后，三星通过Galaxy S23 FE 重新推出了其粉丝版。在我们的测试中，你会发现它到底能给你带来多少 "粉丝服务"，还是仅仅挤进了中端和高端之间。...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.40" | 209 g
三星Galaxy S22+智能手机评论。Galaxy S22的大版本

三星Galaxy S22+智能手机评论。Galaxy S22的大版本

产品名称中的加号（+）意味着额外的功能，而三星Galaxy S22+提供了所需的功能。它提供了区别于著名的Galaxy S22的所有功能，但更进一步，特别是在显示屏和电池方面。...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.60" | 196 g
三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

6.1英寸的三星Galaxy S22是新Galaxy S系列中最小和最实惠的型号。即便如此，它也提供了与其更昂贵的同事相同的高SoC性能，并且在功能方面几乎不相上下。此外，与它的前辈Galaxy S21相比，它有很大的改进。...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.10" | 167 g
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体

通过Galaxy S22 Ultra，三星结合了S系列和Note系列的顶级机型。这款智能手机在所有领域都使用了高端组件，并在超凡脱俗方面大做文章。在我们的测试中，找出这种组合是否成功，以及可能存在一些问题的地方。...
Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | 6.80" | 228 g

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » 三星Galaxy S24 FE 价格泄露预告美国售价接近旗舰机

   » 最新泄露的三星Galaxy S24 FE 细节曝光

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Xclipse 920, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » 三星Galaxy S22、Galaxy S22 Plus 和Galaxy S22 Ultra 开始接受Android 14 与 One UI 6 的更新

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Exynos

» Samsung Exynos 2200
   8x 1.82 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
   8x 2.2 GHz - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1480
   8x 2.05 GHz - 2.75 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 990
   8x 2 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1380
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9825
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9820
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1280
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9810
   8x - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa
   8x 2.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9611
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9610
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9609
   8x 1.6 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7885
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa
   8x 2.1 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7904
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7880
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7884B
   8x 1.56 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5410 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5260 Hexa
   6x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5250 Dual
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7578
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3470 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz
   2x 1.2 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.91 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.84 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.84 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2200
   8x 1.82 GHz - 2.8 GHz
- Apple A13 Bionic
   6x - 2.66 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 9010
   12x 1.55 GHz - 2.3 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
   8x 2.2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 9000
   8x 2.05 GHz - 3.13 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
   8x 2.05 GHz - 3.13 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-04- 4)