Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9611

Samsung Exynos 9611

三星Exynos 9611（或Exynos 7系列9611）是用于基于Android的智能手机和平板电脑的中端SoC。它在两个集群中集成了8个处理器内核（大小核概念）。四个频率高达2.3 GHz的ARM Cortex A73内核可满足要求高的任务，四个频率1.7 GHz的ARM Cortex A53内核可提高能效。与较早的Exynos 9610相比，9611支持摄像头更高的分辨率。

集成的LTE调制解调器支持4G，下载速度高达600 Mbps，上传速度高达150 Mbps。此外，该芯片还集成了802.11ac WiFi和蓝牙5.0。

板载ARM Mali-G72 MP3图形卡提供三个群集，并支持Vulkan，DirectX 12和OpenGL ES 3.2。

Exynos 9611采用10nm FinFET工艺制造，因此具有相对较高的能效，并且还适用于较小的智能手机。

CodenameExynos 7 Series
SeriesSamsung Exynos

Series: Exynos Exynos 7 Series

Samsung Exynos 9611 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96101.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96091.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Clock Rate1700 - 2300 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
GPUARM Mali-G72 MP3
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date11/25/2019
Product Link (external)www.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -7%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -6%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 -3%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -2%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -2%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 0%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743
UNISOC T618
0.475 0%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 1%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 9%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 12%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 174%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13103     avg: 18907     median: 20010 (17%)     max: 20393 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1463     avg: 2115     median: 2260 (27%)     max: 2332 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1402     avg: 2087     median: 2279 (26%)     max: 2336 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347.3     median: 347.5 (14%)     max: 349 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -83%
...
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
299 -14%
Unisoc T7200
305.9 -12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
308.3 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
311 -10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
322.8 -7%
Apple A8
328 -6%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
330.5 -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
344 -1%
Unisoc T7225
346 0%
Samsung Exynos 9611
347.3
Unisoc T7255
350.9 1%
UNISOC Tangula T700
351.5 1%
Mediatek Helio P65
354 2%
Mediatek Helio G88
357 3%
Mediatek Helio G80
357.3 3%
UNISOC T610
357.3 3%
Mediatek Helio G85
358.6 3%
UNISOC Tangula T740
367 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
374.1 8%
...
Apple A18 Pro
2437 602%
max:
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2555 636%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1207     avg: 1310     median: 1323.5 (2%)     max: 1387 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -81%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
1176 -10%
Unisoc T7200
1206 -8%
Mediatek MT8183
1208 -8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
1233 -6%
Mediatek Helio P65
1240 -5%
UNISOC T610
1264 -4%
Mediatek Helio G80
1275 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
1299 -1%
Mediatek Helio G70
1308 0%
Samsung Exynos 9611
1310
Mediatek Helio G85
1311 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
1315 0%
Mediatek Helio G88
1316 0%
UNISOC T618
1332 2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
1338 2%
Unisoc T7225
1340 2%
UNISOC Tangula T700
1342 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
1356 4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
1368 4%
...
Apple M3
10697 717%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 4160%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 349 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1063     avg: 1229     median: 1299 (4%)     max: 1326 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4332     avg: 4863     median: 4786 (6%)     max: 6212 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7442     avg: 9667     median: 9810 (8%)     max: 10687 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 53.4     median: 55 (10%)     max: 57 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 33717     avg: 40479     median: 42118 (35%)     max: 44600 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 29687     avg: 38664     median: 38461 (31%)     max: 44128 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 34020     avg: 38422     median: 36907 (7%)     max: 46247 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 43473     avg: 57908     median: 59090 (21%)     max: 63005 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 152185     avg: 175473     median: 177197 (17%)     max: 187087 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
150124 Points (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5080     avg: 5572     median: 5587 (37%)     max: 5925 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5777     avg: 6166     median: 6144 (31%)     max: 6697 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 23. 03:24:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:30:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11543 +0.015s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 11543 +0.016s ... 0.039s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.3s ... 0.339s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.339s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.339s

Reviews for the Samsung Exynos 9611 processor

Samsung Galaxy M21 2021: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M21 2021

Samsung Galaxy F41: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F41

Samsung Galaxy M21s: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40"
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M21s

Samsung Galaxy M31s: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M31s

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite

Samsung Galaxy M21: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M21

Samsung Galaxy M31: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M31

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

Samsung Galaxy A51: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A51

Samsung Galaxy M30s: ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M30s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Exynos

» Samsung Exynos 2200
   8x 1.82 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
   8x 2.2 GHz - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1480
   8x 2.05 GHz - 2.75 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 990
   8x 2 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1380
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9825
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9820
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1280
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9810
   8x - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa
   8x 2.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9611
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9610
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9609
   8x 1.6 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7885
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa
   8x 2.1 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7904
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7880
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7884B
   8x 1.56 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5410 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5260 Hexa
   6x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5250 Dual
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7578
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3470 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz
   2x 1.2 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ UNISOC T750
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
+ UNISOC Tangula T740
   8x 1.8 GHz - 1.8 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
   8x 2.3 GHz
+ Apple A10 Fusion
   4x 2.34 GHz
+ Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa
   8x 2.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9611
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 9610
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 955
   8x 2.5 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 950
   8x 2.3 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 9609
   8x 1.6 GHz - 2.2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio P70
   8x 2.1 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01-30)