Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦 f/1.9, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS
Price comparison
Average of 18 scores (from 26 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
质感。 前代机型的独特之处在于一体式的铝合金机身。三星现在为它加入了更多的玻璃元素。这款中端智能手机的屏幕也有了改变:它现在分辨率更高,尺寸也更大。这会是成功的整体策略吗?
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A3 is a great mid-range smartphone. It's a tad slow, but we're happy to take a slight dip in performance if it means a gorgeous design, excellent screen, great camera and a long-lasting battery. We'd definitely choose the A3 over the HTC Desire 620 and it's far more attractive overall package than the EE Harrier despite the difference in speed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I suppose we all have that friend who wouldn’t care what hardware or operating system goes into a phone. As long as it looks pretty, they’ll get it. That’s the kind of people who will be drawn by the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), as its gorgeous design and eye-catching display are its most alluring features. Indeed, Samsung has managed to build a device that looks and feels a lot like one of its flagships, despite being of a much lower class.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That’s fine if your interest in smartphones is limited to casual games and productivity. If you want to push things harder, however, the Galaxy A3 becomes something of a harder sell. And especially so given that the 64GB OnePlus 2, which absolutely crushes it in performance terms, has dropped down to £240. There are other reasons you might lean towards the A3, not least of all its size, but if performance is your number one target, it’s hard to give it a full-throated endorsement.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When you come down to cold, hard numbers, there's no denying the OnePlus X is better value for money overall. While I'm not a great fan of the X's overly-textured and rather scratchy metal frame, the draw of Cyanogen OS (which looks identical to vanilla Android) and a 5in, Full HD AMOLED display is hard to resist, particularly if, like me, you're not a great fan of Samsung's TouchWiz interface.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The all-new Samsung Galaxy A3 for 2016 is a great upgrade over the 2015 model with an excellent design and very good battery life. It’s priced higher than its faster rivals, but Samsung phones tend to rapidly drop in price - exactly how much the price goes down will decide this mid-range Android’s fate.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy A3 2016 is essentially a mini Galaxy S6, boasting excellent battery life, strong optics and a great media experience, all wrapped up in a compact and gorgeous 4.7-inch package. If you want a mini mobile or simply can’t afford Samsung’s full-priced flagship phones, this Galaxy A3 refresh will definitely do the job.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 83% performance: 83% features: 52% display: 85% mobility: 66%
Source: Smart Web DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 81% display: 79%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 08/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% features: 85% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2015
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2015
Source: Tutto App Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7578: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
4.70": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.