Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.9
Price comparison
Average of 38 scores (from 69 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
令人瞩目的更新。 三星最新发布的中档Galaxy A3智能手机不仅更新了玻璃和金属的一体式设计,而且还做出了重大改进,例如处理器能力的增强和相机性能的改善。这是否足以告诉其竞争对手,谁是赢家?
Source: Know Your Mobile

A really excellent phone with a tremendous amount of bang for your buck. Dominates most every other phone at this price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar

Samsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar

Samsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar

Samsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu

Despite its standing in the company’s current product lineup, for the most part, Samsung hasn’t skimped on quality with this mid-ranger. Its design and build quality are unquestionably excellent with useful inclusions like water resistance, USB-C and a fingerprint sensor to boot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar

Samsung has created another solid mid-range smartphone contender, and this one looks and feels more like its high-end brothers than ever.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Media

Nowadays, finding an Android smartphone with a screen smaller than 5 inches is definitely not an easy task, especially if you insist on good technical specifications. The rich Samsung portfolio, however, includes such feature in Galaxy A3 (2017). It combines the sleek and stylish design of the flagship Galaxy S7 with slightly more compact dimensions, providing a convenient one-hand operation. The downside of the design section, however, is that fingerprints make their way onto the corpus very easily. Additionally, the small body includes a small battery but apparently not bad endurance. Our tests ranked Galaxy A3 (2017) among the models with the best battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Tech Advisor

Overall, the A3's improvements for 2017 are pretty significant and make this nice-size, reasonably priced phone even more appealing for those who like the idea of the Galaxy S7 but can't quite stretch their budget that far. Its waterproofing and fingerprint sensor are both convenient and practical, and the good-looking design makes it easy to forget that this phone has a price tag that's half that of many flagship phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

However, if you’re the kind to shop around, are a big gamer, or tend to read/watch a lot of content on your phone, then it's possible to get more for your money. The obvious alternative is the Lenovo Moto G5 Plus, which has a sharper screen for a lower price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor

Overall, the A3's improvements for 2017 are pretty significant and make this nice-size, reasonably priced phone even more appealing for those who like the idea of the Galaxy S7 but can't quite stretch their budget that far. Its waterproofing and fingerprint sensor are both convenient and practical, and the good-looking design makes it easy to forget that this phone has a price tag that's half that of many flagship phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A3 (2017) is such an exciting phone: it brings a level of sophistication in design and interface that we have not yet seen on affordable phones. Neither have we seen a phone with water resistance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

That's usually good news, it's a clear sign that the phone fills a specific hole in the market. The Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) has the potential to become a quiet hit - it won't put the iPhone 7 and Galaxy S7 out of business, but it will rescue many people from overspending on a flagship they didn't need.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews

Samsung says the Galaxy A3 will retail around the £299 mark. That price point is a tough nut to crack – Wileyfox, Motorola, Honor and others are doing great stuff and arguably offering better value for money than Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Techradar

If you’re looking for a smaller version of the Galaxy A range, this should suit you but there are a few areas which feature slightly disappointing spec.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2017
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 91%
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 97% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Verivox

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 69% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% features: 70% display: 98% mobility: 98%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 98%
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Mag

Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2017
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 76% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Curved

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2017
Source: Android Pit - 2/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2017
Source: Tuexperto

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/12/2017
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 77% features: 70% display: 84% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 60% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 63% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Top for Phone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 86% mobility: 78%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2017
Source: Hitech Vesti

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Product Test

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2017
Source: CNews.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: XT Mobile

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Tinh Te

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Source: Tablet.bg

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone.bg

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Android Portal

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP1:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7870 Octa:
Exynos 7集成八个主频高达1.6 GHz的Cortex-A53核心,采用14纳米工艺制造。它同时集成ARM Mali T830-MP2显卡和双通道内存控制器(LPDDR3-1866)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
4.70": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.