Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/1.9, 1080p 视频拍摄)
Price comparison
Average of 72 scores (from 122 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
防水。 Galaxy A5系列现在进入了第三回合,它需要和强劲的中端竞争机型相对抗。更强的性能,更大的存储空间和防水防尘都可能会成为它的杀手锏。我们将通过测试看看这是否足够帮助它取得先机。
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t pay full price: this Galaxy is good and well specified, but it’s a mid-range device with a premium price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t pay full price: this Galaxy is good and well specified, but it’s a mid-range device with a premium price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A really fantastic phone for the price, with excellent design and build, and has some of the best battery life on the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is an extremely compelling little smartphone, it seems perfectly priced and specced for its niche; to slot in the market where there are people prepared to throw down a few hundred pounds for quality, but who don’t want to bother with more phone than they need at the considerably higher prices flagships command.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung A5 is available from Vodafone in Blue, Black or Gold on pay monthly for £32 monthly (£20 upfront) which gives unlimited calls and texts as well as 1GB of data month, other plans are available.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung galaxy A5 (2017) scores on pretty much everything, except of course the processor. It sports a stunning design, great front and back cameras, and offers an average battery life. Galaxy A5 (2017) shouldn’t disappoint you if you are a regular user and do not play a lot of games of watch a lot of videos on your device. Coming to options in the same price-range, there’s OnePlus 3T which runs Snapdragon 821, Oppo F3 Plus which you can consider.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2017
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As ever, the OnePlus 3T looms large in this mid-range territory, and this remains the top choice if you’re after all-out speed. (Also note that, if you’re desperate for Android 7, you’ll have to wait for an over-the-air update “coming soon”.) Still, there’s so much to like about the A5 that it deserves our Recommended award. It’s waterproof for up to 30 minutes (it has an IP68 rating), you can expand the 32GB of storage by 256GB via the microSD slot, and it’s stylish. Even if it doesn’t quite usurp the OnePlus 3T, its long battery life alone may convince you to buy.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Techaeris EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’re looking for a mid-range smartphone with a decent camera and premium looking design, the Samsung Galaxy A5 is definitely worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 85% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is an extremely compelling little smartphone, it seems perfectly priced and specced for its niche; to slot in the market where there are people prepared to throw down a few hundred pounds for quality, but who don’t want to bother with more phone than they need at the considerably higher prices flagships command.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Galaxy A5 (2017) is a model that slightly exceeds the mid range but this is completely explicable. The smartphone impressed us in the first place with its design which closely resembles that of the flagship Galaxy S lineup. However, the other features are also at the desired high level. A Super AMOLED Full HD display is available and it includes a number of useful modes and features. In fact, Galaxy A5 (2017) is packed with a lot of useful software features so you can often use them. The battery life is also impressive with a capacity of 3000mAh but it definitely performed amazingly in our endurance tests.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I’m in two minds about the Samsung Galaxy A5. On the one hand, Samsung Pay and IP68 certification are really nice. On the other hand, the OnePlus 3T offers dramatically more performance for the same price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A5 is a mid-range phone in flagship clothing, and does a pretty impressive job of balancing the two so you don’t feel like you’re missing out.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is indeed a worthy successor with beautiful build quality, snappy performance, good camera. Even though it has few flaws, the positives in this mobile will overpower this for sure. But what hurts here is the price point. At Rs. 28,990, this is definitely costly and on the other hand, you will get flagship grade smartphones including OnePlus 3T and others from Chinese OEMs with powerful specifications at much cheaper cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Source: Gogi.in EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is a very good handset, it is 7.9mm thick, comfortable to use, powerful and does not heat-up. Battery life is very good. Camera quality is average but there is scope of improvement.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s not a single element that can be pointed out as ‘inferior’, in the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The smartphone is built well, looks premium, offers a good display, a neatly organised interface, and a pretty decent camera. The performance is decent for lightweight usage, and barring load times, is usable under heavy load too. Battery stamina paints a similar picture - while it is not really extensive, the Galaxy A5 will still last you through an entire work day.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Now that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is in the process of being replaced by the S8, those who always wanted an S7 need not worry. The Samsung Galaxy A5 is, I believe, something like ninety per cent of an S7, at much less than ninety per cent of its price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At full price there's not much to recommend the jack of all trades, A5. However, it's already available at $150 discount and that makes it great value. But the fingerprint reader can prove annoying.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung has finally done the midrange smartphone right. Good job.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A5 is a great-looking, great-performing mid-ranger, with plenty of features you’d normally have to pay the big bucks for. Water resistance and USB Type-C really do make the difference, even if camera quality might not be quite up to scratch for the cash.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 28,990 and Rs 33,490, the Galaxy A5 (2017) and A7 (2017) seems to be a tad bit expensive but you get Samsung’s goodwill along with it. While we surely have a stiff competition in this price bracket, both the Galaxy A5 and A7 (2017) look promising. The IP68 certification is definitely a plus and Samsung’s long successful run in camera and display department is expected to continue here as well. But, this is not our final verdict. Stay tuned to our reviews about the smartphones for in-depth analysis.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is an excellent midranger with a combination of Samsung flagship features you won’t find in any other Samsung phone in the market. It ticks all the boxes with great design, IP68 water resistance and other flagship features but isn’t the equal in terms of performance or camera for a full-fledged Samsung flagship like the Galaxy S7 or S7 edge. With Samsung Pay it can even be used as an electronic wallet. Initially priced at RM1699 and now at RM1499 it isn’t nearly as expensive as a full-fledged Samsung flagship either, making it the perfect choice for the trendy young adult who brings his or her phone everywhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Le Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 est le digne successeur de l’excellent smartphone que nous avons testé l’année dernière. En allant encore plus loin sur le design tout en gardant les forces qui ont fait la renommée de la gamme comme le très bon écran ou encore l’excellente autonomie, Samsung assure l’essentiel.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Though the steep price tag remains a head-scratcher for us as higher-tiered phones can be fetched at the same price point.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If, however, you’re someone who isn’t particularly bothered with a smartphone’s camera, then the Galaxy A5 should definitely be on your shortlist. I was genuinely impressed with this phone’s overall performance. The fact that Samsung added water resistance is just a really sweet cherry on top of an already delicious cupcake.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All things considered, the Galaxy A5 (2017) is not a bad phone. It’s a very, very good phone. Get it if you truly care about long battery life, the feature-rich interface and excellent keyboard typing experience. Get it for the looks. For all else, other phones are priced more fairly and offer more bang for the buck.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's so good to see Samsung back on form with a classy, well-rounded handset that'll appeal to younger consumers in particular. The mid-range seems like a hard territory to nail, with the budget manufacturers owning the lower end and the big brands converging on the higher - but this is a strong play from Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s not a perfect mid-range phone, but it consistently hits all the key notes you’d want a device in its class to, and it does so very well. It also does an excellent job of distilling down some of the main draws of the Galaxy S7 flagship, so if you’re looking for a similar experience by way of a premium design, fingerprint sensor and IP68 certification without the same price tag, then the 2017 revision of the A5 certainly delivers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For a phone that costs less than £400, the Galaxy A5 is impressive in its design and build. Even its display and performance punch beyond that price point. In many ways it's a cheaper version of the Galaxy S7, except it doesn't really feel cheap at all when you pick it up. It's solid and quite beautiful.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A5 2017 is a fantastic mid-range phone, with the looks of a flagship and some decent performance and all-round specs. Our only real concern is that Samsung is pricing itself out the market, with just a small difference in price separating this and the Galaxy S7 - we like the new Galaxy A5, but we'd choose the higher-spec Galaxy S7 every time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is latest device of Samsung A series with 32GB ROM and 3GB RAM. Its camera has 16MP lens for front and back camera with 3000 mAh fixed battery. The device has very stylish and sleek design further it has very light weight and a easy to carry device. The Samsung A5 (2017) is perfect for those users who likes to have a slim device with all heavy features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: iTech Post EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is an enhanced version of its predecessor that was released last year. This device costs at $450, depending on where you buy it.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/04/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Those numbers can easily be countered with a few others that ring much more nicely, but let's not get so hung up on the digits. The facts are that the Galaxy A5 (2017) is beautifully-built; it will live through a downpour; it packs a screen that's only bested by flagships, and has battery life to spare. Of course, it's not ideal, and it's not cheap, but you're also unlikely to find a better match for the description in the previous sentence. Well, not unless you dig even deeper into your pocket.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/20/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In fact, the only compromise we can see at this stage is in its Full HD 5.2-inch screen when higher resolutions are fairly widespread. But the display is still sharp and vibrant, so we doubt many will notice or care.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy A range has never been this exciting. Samsung has managed to take a lot of the highlights from the Galaxy S7 and applied them to the mid-range device, which is a great step.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 90%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 82% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 86% features: 90% display: 87% mobility: 88%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2017
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/05/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: MuyComputer ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 95%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Stockisti IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2017
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 65% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 71% features: 83%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 92% features: 83% display: 85% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 68% display: 89% mobility: 89% workmanship: 82%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% mobility: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 90% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Dinside NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 89%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP3:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Exynos 7880: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.