Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/1.9
Price comparison
Average of 38 scores (from 63 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED FHD+. Samsung's Galaxy A series is designed with a certain kind of customer in mind: those who want a smartphone with a simple look and high manufacturing quality. We thoroughly tested the 6-inch Galaxy A6+ and report in this review what buyers can expect. The smartphone is priced at around 370 Euros (~$425; international version ~$350).
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A6+ is good enough phone, but it does lack that extra bit of power, which would have made this unbeatable at this price point. For those who want the newer display, and a better selfie camera at this price point, Galaxy A6+ is certainly an option to consider. But at this price, one expects more from a Samsung phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A6+ misses out on core features that define a mid-range Samsung phone in 2018. There really isn't any reason to consider the device when there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A6 (2018) we recently had over was a little too expensive for our tastes, at least for what it had to offer. Its price went down in the meantime, making it a better deal, and the Galaxy A6+ (2018) has had a similar fate. Not only that, but the plus impresses where the non-plus was okay to very good - display and battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A6+ is a pricey phone if you analyse its spec sheet, but if you crumple that sheet, toss it away, and just use the phone, you might discover you actually like using it. I know I liked the solid build, the fine hi-res display, and its daytime photos, if not for its average performance and night-time photos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Apart from a middling processor, there’s very little that’s not appealing on the Samsung Galaxy A6+. Great cameras, decent battery life, an awesome screen and an aluminium body makes this one of the standout midrange models currently available. Notable is that at the time of publishing a number of cellular providers are offering really decent packages on the A6+. With this phone, at a decent price, the Samsung Galaxy A6+ is the midrange phone to get.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/08/2018
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A6+ camera is a well-packaged phone for its price point. It doesn’t blow your mind off with some extraordinary features, but in this price category, there’s barely any other good option other than Moto X4 and Nokia 7 Plus. If you’re looking for a phone for Rs 25,000-Rs 26,000, Samsung Galaxy A6+ is definitely worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At the end of the day, we feel that with all those inconveniences, Samsung is asking a bit too high a price for the Galaxy A6+. If the company drops the cost slightly, it would be an easier recommendation. Still, if you are looking for a reliable affordable phone with a very good camera, the A6+ will not disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A6+ is a very slim and sleek smartphone with premium build quality. It does take good photos but isn’t enough to justify the price tag it comes with.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadget Diary EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall at 25,990 INR, Samsung Galaxy A6+ feels a bit expensive due to the fact that company used Snapdragon 450. Except that it scores good points in build quality, camera, and display. It is undoubtedly one of the best displays that you will find in the market. Consuming media content on this phone will be amazing for sure.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 72% performance: 68% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 88%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Galaxy A6+ is not the best smartphone in the price range. Samsung has adopted the Infinity display, same as the A8+, the phone’s metal body feels solid in hand, and it has decent rear camera, good selfie camera, and it offers a good battery life as well. However, the Snapdragon 450 SoC and micro USB port without fast charging is disappointing for a phone that costs Rs. 25,990. The Nokia 7 Plus, Moto X4 6GB and even the Galaxy A8+ are better choices in the price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Now, we’ll be completely honest with you, the price tag of the Samsung Galaxy A6+ (2018) is on the expensive side at Php 22,990. As John mentioned in our hands-on and quick review, there’s a ton of competition out there that are offering a little more zip under the hood that’s just slightly more expensive than this device. However, if your loyalties lie with the Korean brand and have your eyes set on the A6+, you might want to check out if its available via your telco’s postpaid plans instead of paying for it straight out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A6+ is only meant for long-term Samsung loyalists looking to buy a phone primarily for multimedia consumption (and not hardcore gaming) on a budget. For everybody else, there are certainly better options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, does the Samsung Galaxy A6+ have more to it than it meets the eye? Well, you could say yes. It is an oddball of a device though — priced at the mid-range segment yet equipped with a budget chipset. Performance is not that bad but for the price you’re paying for, you’ll be left wanting more. Then again, if you can get past that bump, you’ll be left with an elegantly crafted device that has impressive speakers, cameras, and features. Question is, are those advantages enough for the Galaxy A6+ to pry consumers away from more powerful competitors?
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A6+ has a stellar display with deep blacks, punchy colours, and great viewing angles. The battery life is good and so is the build quality. Unlike many smartphones in this price range, the A6+ can be bought from e-commerce sites as well as at offline retail stores.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As we mentioned earlier, the Galaxy A6+ (2018) is priced at Php 22,990. That’s a fairly steep price for the specs, considering that Samsung is facing off against a lot of upstarts at the sub 20K price point that has better hardware on paper. We’ll have to see in our full review if the Galaxy A6+ (2018) really deserves that price tag.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A6+ is priced at Rs. 25,990 in India, and it will go on sale starting May 22 via Paytm Mall, the Samsung India E-Store, Amazon India, and also Samsung's offline retail stores. While the Galaxy A6+ is quite feature-packed, it costs the same as the Nokia 7 Plus (Review), which got top marks from us at Gadgets 360, and has a more powerful processor. We will have to test this phone extensively to see how it fares against the competition. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for our in-depth review of the Galaxy A6+.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 50% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Connect - 8/18
Single Review, , Long, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 74% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 79% features: 69% display: 90% mobility: 88%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 60% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 46% price: 30% features: 30% mobility: 70% workmanship: 30%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 72% features: 72% display: 85% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 69%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2018
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2018
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 70% mobility: 100%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2018
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2018
Source: TechZ VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 450:
较低端的主流八核ARM Cortex-A53 SoC,主频高达1.8 GHz,Adreno 506 GPU,LPDDR3单通道内存控制器以及X9 LTE(Cat.7 300/150 Mbps)调制解调器。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.00":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.