Samsung Galaxy A7 2016
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A7 2016
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yet another excellent mid-range Samsung handset, the Galaxy A7 2016 is rather big but has definite appeal to media fans who demand a gorgeous screen for enjoying their movies and shows. The camera tech is dependable and solid for the price, although performance and battery charging times lag behind rivals such as the OnePlus 3. And if you’re not fussed about an enormous screen, we’d say go for the Galaxy A5 2016 instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The new Samsung Galaxy A7 for 2016 is a great-looking upgrade over its predecessor, with outstanding battery life and a few other welcome tweaks, but there is no escaping the fact it is overpriced at £399. That’s even more apparent when you consider the better-specced, more fully featured and significantly faster Galaxy S6 is available for £40 less.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)is a beautifully constructed device especially for the price. You need to see and handle one in person to really appreciate the design and quality as the photos and videos don’t really do it justice. It is a powerful smartphone too overall but at the price of Rs 35,000, the smartphone is definitely costly. There are several options from Chinese OEMs that will get you flagship grade specifications (more powerful processor, higher resolution display etc) at a cheaper price but none of them offer the build quality and finish that the A7 offers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For those considering picking up the device in other markets, the Galaxy A7 is a solid smartphone that brings a lot of flagship features to a more affordable package. From its premium design and build quality, to the availability of a fingerprint reader, the Galaxy A7 does tick the right boxes, but it is certainly far from a bargain. Considering how much the budget smartphone landscape has changed in just a short period of time, Samsung may have to reconsider a few things in order to allow the Galaxy A7 a fighting chance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 82% display: 88% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While people were wondering if tablets will kill the desktop PC, phablets snuck in and conquered the world. However, there are as many opinions on the perfect screen size as there are people. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) settles on 5.5", slinking in below the S6 edge+ and matching the iPhone 6s Plus. If that's not enough, the A9 (2016) comes in at 6" and we're expecting a new A8 too.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are two ways to look at the Galaxy A7 (2016). A subjective and irrational one that completely disregards its slightly exaggerated price, and a more objective one that considers all the facts. Fact is that once you pick up the phone you will be tempted to judge it subjectively, it is in fact really that good looking and stylish, well built. It has a good looking display. Its battery lasts a long time.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A5 (2016) and Galaxy A7 (2016) smartphones have been launched in India with price tags of Rs. 29,400 and Rs. 33,400 respectively. Both phones will go on sale starting February 15 and will be available in physical retail as well online through Snapdeal. To woo customers, Samsung also announced a bundled Airtel data plan which will give users up to 30GB of data free over six months.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/04/2016
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/26/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
615 MSM8939: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.