Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, LED闪光灯
Price comparison
Average of 20 scores (from 29 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
金属弹头。 曾经是塑料,现在是金属:新一代的Galaxy J5给我们更好的质感。不过,它的内在几乎毫无改变。这是否可以算作一次成功的更新呢?
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2016
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 75% features: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 59%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2016
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Computerbild - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 60% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2016
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2016
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 73%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2016
Source: Jagat Review ID→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Moj Android SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 81% display: 82% mobility: 92% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
410 MSM8916: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.