Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 23 scores (from 44 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Really quite an impressive low-cost smartphone with a lot of bang for your buck. Arguably one of the best budget handsets on the market thanks to Samsung's mastery of Super AMOLED display technology and some sterling battery performance, both of which put it ahead of rivals such as the Moto G, while in other areas it's quite comparable with that very capable handset. The trade-off, however, is that the Moto G does get stock Android and timely updates, while Samsung's Galaxy J5 has TouchWiz on-top and requires a bit of extra fettling between software versions.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Best in class of the budget Android category; you will struggle to find battery and display performance this good anywhere else at this price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With better performance and a longer battery life, Samsung’s updated Galaxy J5 is a low-cost marvel android 7.0 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) brings many improvements compared to its successful predecessor and this makes it more than accomplished model. First of all, the device comes with an entirely metal design which is not always seen in this price range. There is a fingerprint sensor built in the hardware Home button. It is quite surprising that we don’t find a USB Type-C port but this is a drawback which can be ignored.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's alphabet soup is making less and less sense. Here we have the Galaxy J5 (2017) that's got a premium metal build, a frugal 14nm chipset, an excellent Super AMOLED display, and Samsung's latest software. How is that lower midrange?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro has 4G supported device with some mid-range features. The device is especially for Samsung lovers because other device lovers will have some issue with its price which is a little bit expensive compared to other smartphones.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It has one of the best interfaces around: sleek and modern-looking, it has Samsung’s excellent apps, and it has a very solid battery life. But its camera and, most importantly, performance are underwhelming. The phone often feels stuttery and the camera lacks in detail and speed. And we know the terrible state of Android updates for phones like the J5 (2017). In such a fiercely competitive market, the J5 (2017) does too little to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 92%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2017
Rating: price: 80% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 60% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 69% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 85%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7870 Octa:
Exynos 7集成八个主频高达1.6 GHz的Cortex-A53核心,采用14纳米工艺制造。它同时集成ARM Mali T830-MP2显卡和双通道内存控制器(LPDDR3-1866)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.