Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.7, 25mm, 1/3.6", 1.22 µm
Price comparison
Average of 99 scores (from 204 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Fine-tuning. The big model of Samsung's flagship series not only offers a larger display, it also offers a dual camera and more RAM. This review reveals whether the higher price is justified and how the Galaxy S9+ fares in comparison to its competitors.
Update: software update improves telephony features.
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Plus is easily one of the best Android tablets you can buy, complicated only by the fact that Tab S9 Ultra takes the top spot. It’s both well-built and is a nippy performer, and it’s packed with software tweaks such as Samsung DeX, that improve its flexibility over regular Android tablets. Ultimately, the Galaxy Tab S9 Plus is a great choice if your budget can’t quite stretch to the Ultra. The cutbacks are minor and you’re still getting an awful lot of tablet for your money – best of all, it’s significantly cheaper than the base 12.9in M2 iPad Pro, comes with more storage and a stylus included in the box.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2023
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is still a gorgeous and almost flawless phone, offering premium specs and features in a sleek and well-made design. There is the issue of it being very similar to its predecessor but we're glad Samsung hasn't dropped the headphone jack and introduced a notch - if it 'aint broke.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and S9+ improve upon the best Android phones of last year in several key ways, including performance, low-light photography and slow-motion video recording. The displays are also brighter than the S8 and S8+, while the stereo speakers are louder and you still get long battery life (though the S9+ is better there).
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's most robust Galaxy S9 of 2018 is still a good buy, but not until after the Galaxy S10 starts selling.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Techaeris EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a great phone and it will be upgrading to Android 9.0 Pie. So if you can wait a few weeks or months, this could end up being a real good deal in the end.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 90% performance: 95% display: 100% mobility: 95% workmanship: 100%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With an overall score of 81 points, the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus achieves an excellent DxOMark Selfie ranking, thanks to very good face exposure, nice skin tones, and clean images with low levels of noise across all light levels in still image mode. Exposure and skin tones are equally good when shooting video, and the very good stabilization system helps keep things steady.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
After reviewing both the 6.2-inch Galaxy S9+ and the 5.8-inch Galaxy S9, we think the S9+ offers enough extra features and performance to justify its higher price tag. Still, the S9 is a solid upgrade over past Samsung phones in its own right and is a good choice for anyone who wants a smaller device or balks at paying more than $750 for a smartphone.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Much of what I’ve noted isn’t all that positive, but that’s not to say either of these phones are bad. They do the main things very well, like general usage, smooth performance, great photos and elegant design. It’s not the sum that’s bad, it’s some of the parts that force compromises.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubt the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is only a minor update on the Galaxy S8. There are important tweaks and changes in certain areas, but if you’re happy with your S8 then there isn’t much here to get excited about.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A very capable flagship with lots to love, but the back-step in battery performance is disappointing. The camera is easily the best on the market by a country mile, as is the display, while CPU performance is also great - however, you do pay quite a lot for all this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A very capable flagship with lots to love, but the back-step in battery performance is disappointing. The camera is easily the best on the market by a country mile, as is the display, while CPU performance is also great - however, you do pay quite a lot for all this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is, hands down, the best Android phone available to buy at the moment if you're looking for the top-end flagship.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The screen is stunning and the camera is clever; but this is still only a minor update in the Galaxy series.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It is, in other words, the first Samsung premium device to actually feel like a premium device when it comes to software too - not just when you read the spec sheet, use the camera or look at it. It's a very good phone that's much less frustrating to use than any of its predecessors.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/25/2018
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The kind of performance I'm now seeing from the Galaxy S9+ means it'll easily last a few days on a single charge if your use of the handset is quite minimalistic; I spent about a day using it for photography from 100% charge and a couple days later it's still on 43%. I'm still going to test it for heavier workloads, however.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You won't find a bigger and better Android phone than the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus, thanks to its oversized 6.2-inch curved screen and low-light-defeating dual-lens camera. Sure, it looks exactly like last year's S8 Plus, but it does fix the fingerprint sensor location (it's now center-aligned on the back) and speakers (now stereo). The new AR Emoji mode is overrated, though, and its higher price is tough to justify. This is for people who want the biggest screen and the best camera on one phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: DP Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The smartphone camera market is moving very rapidly, and the Galaxy S9+ represents a solid entry from one of the world's biggest smartphone manufacturers. On paper, the S9 and S9+ look positively brilliant; dual cameras, optical stabilization, 4K/60p video capture. There's a lot that we like about the Galaxy S9+, but we also found a few things that could stand to be improved.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is a gorgeous and almost flawless phone, offering premium specs and features in a sleek and well-made design. There is the issue of it being very similar to its predecessor but we're glad Samsung hasn't dropped the headphone jack and introduced a notch - if it 'aint broke.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While AR Emoji and other tricks don't impress, the Galaxy S9+'s improved camera, brighter display and faster performance add up to make this a worthy iPhone X rival.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A very capable flagship with lots to love, but the back-step in battery performance is disappointing. The camera is easily the best on the market by a country mile, as is the display, while CPU performance is also great - however, you do pay quite a lot for all this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ might be the second-most (after the standard S9) iterative flagship Samsung’s ever made, and yet it might be the most well-rounded flagship you can buy right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As noted, the Galaxy S9+ costs more than the Galaxy S9. Samsung sells its larger phone for a starting price of $840 while the unlocked S9 is available for $720. (Again, that's for the 64GB model. The 128GB S9 costs $770, while the 128GB S9+ costs $890; you'll pay $840 and $960 for the 256GB version of the S9 and S9+, respectively.) Prices on the two phones vary from carrier to carrier, but generally, you'll find a $120-$130 price difference between the two models.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ should be the best phone of its generation, but a number of small grievances unite to diminish its appeal. It’s technically capable, to be sure, but it’s far from perfect.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Well, as with the Galaxy S8+ before it, the Galaxy S9+ has one of the best displays on the market, while the new Exynos processor is insanely fast.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and S9+ improve upon the best Android phones of last year in several key ways, including performance, low-light photography and slow-motion video recording. The displays are also brighter than the S8 and S8+, while the stereo speakers are louder and you still get long battery life (though the S9+ is better there).
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
After reviewing both the 6.2-inch Galaxy S9+ and the 5.8-inch Galaxy S9, we think the S9+ offers enough extra features and performance to justify its higher price tag. Still, the S9 is a solid upgrade over past Samsung phones in its own right and is a good choice for anyone who wants a smaller device or balks at paying more than $750 for a smartphone.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Our deep dive testing reinforces the feeling that both the Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus are great phones, sitting atop the market as of their release. Their weaknesses are generally relegated to features rather than capabilities, but there’s always room for improvement. These phones have excellent displays, processors, and audio performance, but the rest of their hardware is merely “very good.”
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2018
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On the other hand, the S9 and S9 Plus don’t offer a whole lot from their predecessors. It’s the most minimal refresh we’ve seen from Samsung. And when that happens, it muddles the recommendation. Most will probably agree that the S9’s updates aren’t worth hundreds more. And it doesn’t help that its most highlighted feature, the variable aperture camera, doesn’t actually equate to much. The considerable benefits of the S9 are the dual speakers, wide f/1.5 lens, corrected fingerprint scanner location, and brighter screen. It’ll be up to you if that’s worth the extra dough.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2018
Source: PC Perspective EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall Samsung's Galaxy S9+ looks just like its predecessor - but it is a better phone than last year's version, and an even closer performance competitor to Apple's iPhone 8/8 Plus and X handsets thanks to the very fast Snapdragon 845 in the U.S. version. The camera is again fantastic - perhaps the best ever in a smartphone, and this time around it offers an enhanced slow-motion capability for video as well. The industrial design and construction quality are both world-class, and in general there is nothing to complain about with Samsung's latest flagship, though the rather severely sloping sides of the display due to the curved glass design can be a little distracting when text is displayed on the edges of the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2018
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Bottom line, the Galaxy S9+ is a good phone with largely iterative updates, and especially if you get the Snapdragon version, offers a decent package to those coming from two-year-old handsets.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, the Galaxy S9+ manages to retain the series’ title as the Best Android Flagship out there, but the gap between it and its rivals is closing.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ should be the best phone of its generation, but a number of small grievances unite to diminish its appeal. It’s technically capable, to be sure, but it’s far from perfect.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The screen is stunning and the camera is clever; but this is still only a minor update in the Galaxy series.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A very capable flagship with lots to love, but the back-step in battery performance is disappointing. The camera is easily the best on the market by a country mile, as is the display, while CPU performance is also great - however, you do pay quite a lot for all this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is a gorgeous and almost flawless phone, offering premium specs and features in a sleek and well-made design. There is the issue of it being very similar to its predecessor but we're glad Samsung hasn't dropped the headphone jack and introduced a notch - if it 'aint broke.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’re already a Samsung Galaxy S8+ owner, there’s no strong reason to suggest it as an upgrade unless you want the new slow motion feature, slightly better camera and better CPU performance. For the rests, the Samsung Galaxy S9+ is currently the best Android smartphone you can get if you all have that chunk of money to spend.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Source: Small Business Computing EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is a powerful work companion for Android users who want the look, feel and performance of a premium device. Prices start at $840 for an unlocked phone directly from Samsung. Carrier promotions and incentives may yield bigger savings.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2018
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ will garner a ton of sales as well as accolades and for good reason. It checks all of the boxes when it comes to features you are looking for in a smartphone that is built in 2018 and also has some interesting new features sprinkled in. Samsung has tossed its hat into the ring and it now awaits other manufacturers' challenges. It is still very early in the year and it will be interesting to see just for how long Samsung will be able to hold the crown.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: IT Pro Portal EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 Plus is undoubtedly a seriously impressive device, featuring the biggest and best screen, and most powerful hardware, seen in the company's line-up to date.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
THE LAST WORD The best Android out there, bar none. The S9+ and regular S9 are both great to use and set a high new bar for Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Droid Life EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As I stressed already, though, Samsung is not known for timely software updates. If you value running the latest and greatest Android version, you’ll want to stay away. Beyond that, though, I think you’ll love this phone.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: Gadget Diary EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In India, the Galaxy S9+ costs Rs. 64,900 for the 64GB storage option and Rs. 72,900 for the 256GB storage variant. Yes, it isn’t cheap but it isn’t supposed to be. For the price, the S9+ offers the class-leading camera, excellent design, awesome audio output, the best display and an interesting software experience. Overall, this is certainly an impressive all-rounder from Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's Galaxy S8 was easily the best smartphone released in 2017, though it had a few minor flaws. Come 2018, Samsung has fixed those, added more power, RAM and a camera that's a good order of magnitude (or maybe more) better. I have little hesitation in saying this is the best phone you can buy in 2018, and might be for some time.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Finally the recommendation of the Galaxy S9 will be based on which market you are in and which variant you’ll be able to purchase. The Snapdragon 845 variant in the US, China and Japan is a healthy upgrade over its predecessors and I don’t really have much to say against it as a phone, besides the camera exposure issues. Here Samsung iterated and perfected over the S8, and whether the S9 is worth to you as an upgrade is something you’ll need to decide based on its individual parts, because as a package, the Snapdragon S9s don’t disappoint.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall the Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a good upgrade to the Galaxy S8+. Even though it has the same display, it has slightly smaller bottom bezels, packs a faster processor with 6GB RAM, comes with a better dual-aperture and telephoto rear cameras, which is a huge improvement compared to the S8+, stereo speakers and finally perfect placement of the fingerprint sensor. Samsung finally offers a 256GB version for those who need it. It has the same old front camera and Bixby is still not up to the mark compared to Google Assistant, when it comes to showing the info you need. The camera quality is still not up to the mark when compared to the Pixel 2 series or the iPhone X, especially in low-light, since Pixel 2 images offer better shadow and highlight and portraits are obviously better in Pixel 2.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2018
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung might not have gone for any big gimmicks, that is if you can forget and forgive, the AR emoji. But in the process, it has made the Galaxy S9+ a solid phone with top of the line processing, the best Android camera and the best iteration of almost every other feature that you want in a flagship phone. This is clearly the Android flagship to beat this year. Buy it if you are on a phone that is two years old. For those on last year’s Samsung flagships, it might be better to wait another year.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: BCW - Business Computing World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When it comes down to it, Samsung has yet again put together what is arguably the best all-around Android smartphone available today. Is it better than the Pixel? That depends on what you need and what you value. Personally, the Pixel 2 XL will be sticking in my pocket, but the S9+ comes close to taking its spot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2018
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+, like its predecessor, is an excellent smartphone with a fabulous screen and great performance. It's also more power-efficient and can be charged all the way up to 100 per cent in around 80 minutes.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and S9+ improve upon the best Android phones of last year in several key ways, including performance, low-light photography and slow-motion video recording. The displays are also brighter than the S8 and S8+, while the stereo speakers are louder and you still get long battery life (though the S9+ is better there).
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So currently I'm testing the Samsung Galaxy S9+ for our full review - which will be published soon - while testing the battery I've noticed some rather odd performance issues. I say odd because it's basically a bit sub-par from what I've come to expect from testing previous Samsung Galaxy flagships, in particular the recent Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy S8+, but also going back as far as the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S6 series.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/19/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If we had to choose, we’d recommend the smaller Galaxy S9. Both are great phones — don’t get us wrong — but the S9 is easier to hold without sacrificing too much screen, and it still comes with most of the new camera features Samsung introduced this year. Sure, the S9 Plus is the obvious choice if you want dual cameras, a bigger battery, or more screen, but we think the smaller model will be the right choice for most people.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is certainly more attractive overall compared to the regular model and will no doubt be one of the best phones this year. That said, there’s not a huge amount different compared to last year.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 Plus still features one of the more eye-catching designs among its competitors. Google Pixel 2 may come with machine learning smarts, but it does not fare well in the looks department. The iPhone 8 Plus is the same old iPhone 6 design (with some more glass), but it has a place in the sense that it is one of three new devices that run iOS.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes. The Galaxy S9+ has every ingredient in the book to firmly cement its place as, one of the best high-end flagship smartphones of 2018. And, it's safe to say, that it delivers on almost all the fronts as well. If you're looking to buy a high-end flagship phone right now, the Galaxy S9+ is the phone to buy. There are no two ways about that.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You won't find a bigger and better Android phone than the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus, thanks to its oversized 6.2-inch curved screen and low-light-defeating dual-lens camera. Sure, it looks exactly like last year's S8 Plus, but it does fix the fingerprint sensor location (it's now center-aligned on the back) and speakers (now stereo). The new AR Emoji mode is overrated, though, and its higher price is tough to justify. This is for people who want the biggest screen and the best camera on one phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ offers out-of-the-box functionality that exceeds most other devices. It's one of the leaders of a new generation of hardware, pushing quality design with one of the best displays around. But with prices rising, those with a Galaxy S8+ needn't to rush to upgrade, for while there's a lot that's new, many of the important features Samsung had nailed the last time around.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung hasn’t made any drastic changes to the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ compared to their predecessors, and the company didn’t really need to do much. Last year's design is still stunning, and now, it’s a little more polished. We’ve seen Apple do that with its iPhones for a couple of years at a stretch, so this is nothing new. If you really want to stand out, get either phone in the new Lilac Purple colour option.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubt the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is only a minor update on the Galaxy S8. There are important tweaks and changes in certain areas, but if you’re happy with your S8 then there isn’t much here to get excited about.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is the best Android smartphone available right. It's looks stunning especially because of the astoundingly bright display and a design that blends the display to the rest of the body. But more than that, this time, Samsung has taken a new approach to improving the low-light performance of the camera. The rear camera can switch between two apertures. The camera, if one knows how to take good photos, can produce some high-quality shots under poor lighting, especially in a restaurant on indoors, but there are limitations.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the S9 and S9+, Samsung swing their engineering talent, brand power and their overall focus back towards the camera side of the equation and, while the results of this pivot aren’t by any means poor, the whole thing does come off as a little predictable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Finally, it's worth noting that the price of Samsung's S range is slowly creeping up. Last year, the S8 retailed for S$1,148, while the S8+ was S$1,298. This year, the S9 is S$1,198, and the S9+ starts at $1,348 for the 64GB model, and goes up to S$1,498 for the 256GB model. That's S$100 more than last year's Note8 (albeit it was only made available with 64GB internal storage).
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We mentioned how the S9 makes zero sense if you already have the S8, and the S8 can even make a strong case for itself if you're contemplating between the two right now. It's not quite as easy with the Plus - a whole extra camera makes a difference in a way a second speaker and a 0.4 stop of light really can't.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 94%
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Keeping the design aside, there is a host of improvement over the last year Galaxy S8+ that includes a Dual camera, long-lasting batteries and software improvements. But if you’re looking for an upgrade, this one has everything you’d want from a flagship smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung S9+ is a solid upgrade on last year’s flagship. The package not just has a delicate yet premium design but also has saturated and immersive display, good stereo speakers, best in class processor, ample RAM and storage, impressive camera and a well-performing battery.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Phone calls over the past week were perfect, I regularly maintained a connection while my coworker with an iPhone 7 Plus on T-Mobile lost signal, I took lots of photos on my trip with the S9 Plus, and never once felt something as missing from my mobile experience. The rear fingerprint scanner performed flawlessly and my frustration with the offset fingerprint scanner from last year's models is gone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 97%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is a perfect smartphone for the camera lovers as it has big 6.2 inches’ screen with mindblowing camera results. Although the virtual reality is little overvalued because it is not as extraordinary as it should be plus the prices are very high in range. Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus has a similar design like Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus but with improved biometric scores.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 40% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
More evolution than revolution, but that’s still enough to make the S9+ the best big Android phone you can buy today.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Still, a bigger battery means more of a charge, and since the S8+ was able to outlast the S8 by 25 minutes in our battery test, we expect that the S9+ will top the S9 once we finish testing that second phone. If you want a longer-lasting phone, the S9+ is the better bet.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It seems like every year we declare Samsung’s flagships the best ever in their class. It’s becoming repetitive, but it doesn’t make it any less true – the Korean chaebol’s newest flagships are the best to come out so far this year and their best ever. Obviously 2018 has barely started and there’s yet another flagship announcement in the horizon, but Samsung has a good chance of retaining that title until the end of the year – that’s if the Note 9 fails to impress, which is unlikely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2018
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is in a pretty interesting position. Many would consider it to be a very small upgrade from the Galaxy S8, and so brushes it off as Samsung playing it safe. The thing here is, the Galaxy S8 and S8+ were two of the best smartphones released in 2017, redefining the industry with the Infinity Display and the world’s first 10nm processors in the Exynos 8895 and Snapdragon 845.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2018
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Galaxy S9+ may not look that much different than the Galaxy S8+, much of the improvements were made under the hood. Don’t fix something that ain’t broken, right? It’s got a slightly more compact in an almost identical design, a more practical placement of the fingerprint scanner and an inclusion of stereo speakers are all nice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2018
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is, hands down, the best Android phone available to buy at the moment if you're looking for the top-end flagship.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude our Samsung Galaxy S9+ review, I think it’s important to point out why this phone exists. Samsung really wants to offer the full package. The best all rounder. A phone that excels in everything, and that’s also delightful to use. In that respect, I think the company has succeeded. The whole concept of the camera re-imagined is not necessarily accurate, but it’s not like if the photos were bad. They’re mostly awesome.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% display: 98% mobility: 87% workmanship: 91%
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung’s improvements to its latest flagship work as promised, but don’t feel like features that you’d miss by not upgrading. Still, thanks to blazing performance, solid cameras and long battery life, the Galaxy S9+ continues to uphold the S series’ reputation for excellence.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Yahoo EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You’ll know the feature is active because a red light will illuminate above the phone’s display. I actually dislike seeing the light, since part of the fun of Apple’s FaceID is that it feels almost like magic when the phone would unlock with no indication of the techno-wizardry taking place behind the scenes.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Hot Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Ultimately, when you boil it all down, though it's still a pricey option, the new Samsung Galaxy S9+ is simply one of the best Android phones money can buy right now. It's arguably one of the best designed large format Android phones too, with gorgeous, sleek styling. And though battery life so far (we're still re-testing) hasn't dropped in quite where we expected, it's still pretty solid there too. The Galaxy S9+ is also currently the fastest Android handset on the market, with the best camera we've ever tested, as well as easily the best display of any smartphone we've seen to date. This new Galaxy S device also brings some innovative new features to the mix as well, like Super Slow-Mo, which is just plain fun. Regardless, that's a lot of "bests" Samsung has going on here and that, in our opinion adds up to an Editor's Choice device. Samsung nailed it with the new Samsung Galaxy S9+. Fantastic phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When I first picked up the Galaxy S9+ I was certain it would be the better phone of the two new Samsungs. Now I’m not so sure. Dual cameras aside, there’s barely any difference between the two phones and I just find the standard S9 easier to hold. To me at least, that’s a bigger deal than being able to zoom in a little bit more than normal on your photos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Best Products EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ will be two of the best smartphones you can buy in 2018. Each of them offers great design, class-leading hardware, and a feature-packed software experience.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and S9+ are subtle upgrades to last year’s S8 line. The most significant improvements are found in the fingerprint scanner position, the new intelligent face scan feature, the AR Emoji 3D avatars, and the camera, but only for the S9+, which gets the secondary zoom camera of the Note 8. In any case, if you’re a current Galaxy S8 user, we’d say an upgrade to the S9 would be completely unnecessary, but that’s expected. For owners of older devices, like the S7 or S6, the Galaxy S9 will feel like a major step forward.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's also worth noting that the S9+ supports Samsung's quick charging. And unlike with the iPhone X, the quick charger comes in the box. After 15 minutes, the S9+ was already at 19 percent, and it reached 38-percent capacity after 30 minutes. At 60 minutes, the S9+ got to 75 percent.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The S9 is available in 'Lilac Purple' and 'Titanium Gray.' The Galaxy S9 is priced at $960 CAD and the Galaxy S9+ costs $1,100. This review was done primarily using a S9+ pre-production model. If our experience with the retail version of the smartphone changes, this review will be updated.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 Plus is, technically, the best phone Samsung offers. It takes everything the Samsung Galaxy S9 delivers and then throws in some extra RAM and a 6.2-inch version of that drop-dead gorgeous Super AMOLED 18.5:9 display that continues to wow us. You need to be a screen-space aficionado or someone with big hands to fully justify its purchase, though.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It was rather pleasantly surprising to see Samsung announce the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus at nearly the same price as the S8 and S8 Plus, much less than the iPhone X. The $720 and $840 pricing for the S9 and S9 Plus, respectively, is reasonable for the high level specifications and functionality included in these two new phones.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Two days before Mobile World Congress 2018 officially kicked off, I was already in Spain, being secreted to a closed-door preview of the Samsung Galaxy S9 at some back alley gallery in Barcelona, camera in one hand, non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in another. Not that there was any real need, considering the S9 has probably been one of the most-leaked smartphones yet. And yes, almost everything you've read about the device to date, is true. Of course, now that my NDA has expired, I can share actual first impressions of the Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+, so let's get down to details.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/04/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To look at the Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a familiar phone. On the exterior not much has changed, but inside, there's more power, more advanced features and functions and the promise of a camera designed to out-perform all others.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is a smartphone without any real weaknesses in the camera department. In both still and video modes, it performs well across the board, delivering consistently good photo and video image quality in all light and shooting situations, thus earning itself our highest DxOMark Mobile score to date. Add one of the best smartphone zooms and a capable bokeh simulation mode to the mix, and the Galaxy S9 Plus is difficult to ignore for any photo-minded smartphone user. With the Galaxy S9 Plus, Samsung is setting the pace for 2018. We’ll see if the competition can follow suit.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As familiar as the Galaxy S9+ feels the first time you pick it up, it’s hard to knock anything about Samsung’s new flagship. The changes feel so well thought out.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Just a quick personal observation. Samsung is finally learning to play the crowd with the Galaxy S9. Instead of just throwing new features, they're making sure things work better, and play better with each other. I really liked that small little tidbit about the Lilac Purple color not being some random afterthought and instead is in the spirit of Pantone's Color of the Year. For Samsung fans, the S9 is familiar and builds upon the features of last year's S8. It's not revolutionary, but it feels more usable, more accessible, and more fun.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Like we said earlier, potentially the most significant upgrades the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ bring are in the camera department - super-slow mo recording at 960fps, dual aperture capability on the rear camera sensor, which is capable of shooting at f/2.4 when there’s plenty of light, but can switch to f/1.5 when the phone detects low-light conditions. This is supplemented by a secondary 12-megapixel sensor on the Galaxy S9+ for a dual rear camera setup. Needless to say, the time we spent with the Galaxy S9 duo on Sunday wasn’t enough to make any definite comments on their camera capability, and we look forward to testing them out in detail soon.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 Plus is, technically, the best phone Samsung offers. It takes everything the Samsung Galaxy S9 delivers and then throws in some extra RAM and a 6.2-inch version of that drop-dead gorgeous Super AMOLED 18.5:9 display that continues to wow us. You need to be a screen-space aficionado or someone with big hands to fully justify its purchase, though.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Small Business Computing EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's latest flagship smartphones, the Galaxy S9 and S9+ were unveiled Sunday, Feb. 25 at the Mobile World Congress tradeshow in Barcelona. Those hoping for a radical departure from last year's Galaxy S8 and S8+ will find an evolution instead.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9+ is certainly more attractive overall compared to the regular model and will no doubt be one of the best phones this year. That said, there’s not a huge amount different compared to last year.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You won't find a bigger and better Android phone than the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus, thanks to its oversized 6.2-inch curved screen and low-light-defeating dual-lens camera. Sure, it looks exactly like last year's S8 Plus, but it does fix the fingerprint sensor location (it's now center-aligned on the back) and speakers (now stereo). The new AR Emoji mode is overrated, though, and its higher price is tough to justify. This is for people who want the biggest screen and the best camera on one phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As a slightly stepped version of the Galaxy S9, the S9 Plus is ready for its moment in the light.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both the 5.8-inch Galaxy S9 and the 6.2-inch Galaxy S9+ are formidable phones, offering similar processing power, design savvy and camera capabilities. But there are distinct differences between the two devices that make a different one the better choice depending on what you want out of a smartphone.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, that was our first encounter with the Galaxy S9 pair. Looks can be deceiving and that's exactly the case here. While the S9 and S9+ may look like their S8 counterparts, the duo is more powerful, features a brand-new camera experience, and allows for immersive sound through its loudspeaker system. There is a lot more to explore, of course, and we can't wait for those review units to arrive.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Of course, what will be a significantly expensive price tag and that added overall size means the S9+ isn’t for everyone. So it’s just as well the Galaxy S9 is also set up to be a stonkingly good smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With all of the new stuff on the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus, it’s not surprising that the new phones will carry steep pricing. The Galaxy S9 will be priced at Php 45,990. The Galaxy S9 Plus is priced at Php 52,990 for the 64GB model, Php 55,990 for the 128GB model and a whopping Php 60,990 for the 256GB variant.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus will launch in three colors in the U.S. — Midnight Black, Lilac Purple and Coral Blue. The fourth color — Titanium Gray — isn’t coming to the U.S. It’s not entirely certain how much they will cost, but pre-orders launch on March 2, ahead of its March 16 release. Samsung is also offering its first-ever global pre-order offer called Trade Up and Save, allowing you to get up to $350 off the cost of the Galaxy S9 when you trade in last year’s flagship from any manufacturer. Trade Up and Save offers tiers so those with a Galaxy S7 or two-year-old flagship from another OEM will receive a little less.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Business News Daily EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The S9 and S9+ have some other minor feature updates as well, like an integration with Samsung's smarter things app, which is used to connect all the smart devices in your home, and the ability to split two apps across a screen horizontally. The enhanced camera is the major feature change on this device, so if you're a business owner who relies heavily on your mobile phone for photos or video, this is the device for you. There are some good feature improvements overall, and the draw of the Galaxy S9 and S9+ is that they can offer usability and support to busy workers.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As mentioned earlier on the outside the Galaxy S9 series doesn’t look too much different from its predecessor but the hardware behind it brings some welcome changes and innovation in features such as the audio and camera grab your attention.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy S9 and S9+'s will be available in 'Titanium Grey' and 'Lilac Purple,' at launch in Canada, though it's possible other colours could launch at a later date. The Galaxy S9 is priced at $960 CAD and the Galaxy S9+ costs $1,100 CAD. Both devices are set to be available for pre-order on February 25th, with a March 16th release date.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2020
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 93% features: 99% display: 95% mobility: 86%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Handy ohne Vertrag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: price: 80% performance: 90% features: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 89% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/01/2018
Source: IT-Markt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: Tech.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 98% mobility: 80% workmanship: 94%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2018
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 83% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2018
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Game IT ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2019
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Source: Game IT ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2018
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 98%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 80% features: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2018
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 85% performance: 95% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/31/2018
Rating: price: 64% features: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 64% display: 95% mobility: 59% workmanship: 91%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/05/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 60% features: 95% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% price: 75% features: 98% display: 97% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 63% display: 95% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 80% display: 96% mobility: 80% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 95%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 95% display: 100% mobility: 75% workmanship: 100%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 97%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Mobile Review RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2018
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/16/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/09/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: Jagat Review ID→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Dinside NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 60% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2018
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP18:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Exynos 9810: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.20":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.