Sony Xperia XA1
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4" Exmor R手机传感器, ISO 3200, 23mm 广角, F2.0, 对比自动对焦, 录像@1080p/30fps
Price comparison
Average of 38 scores (from 81 reviews)
Reviews for the Sony Xperia XA1
独特的中端智能手机。 Xperia XA1 是索尼今年的中端智能手机。凭借着高像素的相机和奢华的设计,它的确有着成为大众机型的潜力。但它的处理器能够提供足够的性能嘛?续航能力又如何呢?我们将会在在测试中回答这些和其他的一些问题。
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Lenovo P2 has an amazing battery, a better screen and performance for £200, while the Moto G5 also has a better screen and comes in £50 cheaper.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A good budget buy with a superb camera sensor. It’s a shame the camera software is a little too enthusiastic.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A good budget buy with a superb camera sensor. It’s a shame the camera software is a little too enthusiastic.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
SONY XPERIA XA1, a mid-range device available with satisfactory features in very economical price. As we all know SONY is back in Pakistan with its new devices and the competition is very tough these days because already some companies are doing very well. The weak part of SONY XPERIA XA1 is its multi-touch support and battery else it has performed well in every section.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s no lie that Android OS underwent a complete metamorphosis compared to what it was a few years ago. With the mobile chip development allowing budget 8-core configurations we see extremely stable smartphones at a relatively low price. Mobile photography has also undergone development and Sony Xperia XA1 is an example. At a time when more and more companies are retreating from the high number of pixels at the expense of their size, Sony just adds a larger sensor – 1 / 2.3 “, and again has a 23 MP main camera. It did well in good light conditions and didn’t disappoint when we took the smartphone for a late night walk along the beautiful central street of Plovdiv.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/11/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xperia XA1 is a pretty neat upgrade to last year’s Xperia XA. Its camera has been given a serious shot in the arm, making it one of the best — if not most consistent — smartphone snappers at the price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Compared to last year’s offering, the Sony Xperia XA1 is definitely a significant step up. All the hardware the Japanese brand has put under hood definitely made a big impact on the device in terms of performance and the camera on this phone definitely gets a big ‘ol thumbs up. The problem here is that the competition in this segment is extremely tough and, at Php 14,99o, many may look to other brands that look better on paper at this price point. If you’re looking for a phone with a sweet camera at around the Php 15k price point though, you might want to have a look at the Sony Xperia XA1.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/03/2017
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Ultimately, the fact that this phone's value hinges on the camera experience makes it less valuable in my eyes, since its impressive specs don't provide a performance much above average.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If having the best possible smartphone camera for the money is a priority, then the XA1 is a no-brainer. You’ll have to put up with a slightly fiddly manual camera mode and deal with the HDR-hating Auto mode – plus, be wary of its slow launch times. But if you can look past all that, there’s no better phone for the money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That 23 megapixel rear camera is 24mm equivalent wide angle and uses an f/2.0 lens and (of course) a Sony Exmore sensor. Video resolution isn’t mentioned so I’d guess that it’s full HD. The front camera is an 8MP f/2.0 unit.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xperia XA1 is a fine upgrade over its XA predecessor, with a better camera, faster chipset, USB-C and more memory. Moreover, Sony's aging polycarbonate brick design is actually becoming fresh again in this day and age of glass or metal handsets with rounded corners.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sony’s Xperia XA1 is a significant improvement over last year’s Xperia XA and a strong rival to the likes of the Moto G5 and Lenovo P2. That gorgeous design has been further refined for an attractive and easy-to-handle device, while the upgraded performance and longer battery life make for a much more satisfying user experience. Only the lack of Full HD visuals and a fingerprint sensor are worth griping about.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That’s pretty much it for this unboxing and quick review for the Xperia XA1. Sony Philippines should be sending us a retail unit soon, so do check back for its full review. The Sony Xperia XA1 is priced at Php 14,990.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xperia XA1 is another of those Sony products that get a 1 suffix for the second generation, making it difficult to count the iterations as the years go by. But hey, who cares about last year?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
From what the Xperia XA1 offers, this phone is pretty good for users who are on a tight budget and love taking photos. This is because the camera has been greatly improved from its predecessor, while the 5x Clear Image Zoom is also a useful feature to have, not to mention the compact build hides fairly good battery life. Moreover, the PlayStation apps that are pre-installed inside are nice to have too especially if you're a PS gamer. It takes a bit of time to charge up though (two and a half hours, more or less).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We gave the original Xperia XA a 3/5 score, and the follow-up looks to be going along a similar path. It looks quite nice, has an interesting camera and there should be plenty of power, but that screen just isn’t up to scratch.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sony's Xperia XA1 and XA1 Ultra might not be flagship devices, but their edge-to-edge displays are great. So much so that we'd love to have seen them on both the Xperia XZs and the Xperia XZ Premium. Just imagine how fabulous a 4K HDR edge-to-edge display could be.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If last year’s rollout is any indication, only certain carriers will choose to take these two phones on. The Xperia ZX Premium and Xperia ZXs will get more attention from the Big 3, whereas flanker brands and regional providers are more likely to look at these mid-range devices.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In terms of release and pricing, Sony has announced that the XA1 will begin to go on sale on May 1, 2017 through retailers like Amazon, Best Buy, B&H, and much more, for the price of $299.99. That’s not too shabby when you think about it, but we’re curious to see where they place the XA1 Ultra later on in late spring. We’re hoping to see it under $500 at the very least, just because anything more than that, it’ll be competing against other giants in the premium space.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Source: Smart Web DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 84% display: 79%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 98% display: 70% mobility: 50%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 87% features: 71% display: 84% mobility: 81%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 83%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Android Style HD IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 65% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 64% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 68% features: 72% display: 72% mobility: 68% ergonomy: 86%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 60% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 65% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 65% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 65% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 90% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/26/2017
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 40% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 74% display: 80% mobility: 56%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Tinh Te VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 45%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
ARM Mali-T880 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P20 MT6757: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.