Vivo X51 5G
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26 mm, 1/2.8", 0.8 µm)
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 57 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo X51 5G
Vivo launches the X51 5G in Europe, which is nominally the X50 Pro already known from Asia. Besides software modifications and an optimized camera, the review reveals further positive improvements and enriches the market with an exciting alternative.
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
The Vivo X51 5G turned in a generally disappointing performance in terms of autonomy, providing fewer hours of active use than its competitors in this review and across the database as a whole. That said, it did quite well in our gaming use case; further, it did better in terms of daytime efficiency, although its high power consumption at night is a bit concerning. Its charging performance was above average, and gamers will be pleased with its 21-second speed for achieving a 1% power boost — one of the very best times among all tested devices.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN
In short, the X51 5G promises a lot and mostly delivers, it’s just the price tag that weighs it down somewhat and restrains me from recommending it as a must-buy. This is unfortunate because Vivo almost had a winning formula with the X51 5G that offers something different from its fellow BKK stablemates only to be undone by its RRP of £749/€799 and the looming presence of the more powerful OnePlus 8T and Google’s £599 Pixel 5.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
The Vivo X51 5G can produce satisfying selfies when used with an awareness of its limitations. With the phone fairly close to the subject, it captures detailed, nicely exposed photos with pleasant color and wide dynamic range. However, selfie-stick users will be disappointed to find themselves in soft focus, as the focus distance and narrow depth of field makes for a relatively tight sweet spot in terms of sharpness. Video performance is let down by poor stabilization and narrow dynamic range, so serious vloggers will likely be better served by other options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/04/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
Although positioned towards the top end of the mid-range price bracket, the inclusion of a quad camera makes the Vivo’s X51 5G a good value proposition. Its photography performance is more than competent, too, with no major weaknesses identified in our tests. Dual tele-lenses makes it a good option for portraits at 50 mm and longer-range zoom shots, too. Pleasant skin tones and wide depth of field also make it easy to recommend for those shooting lots of people pictures, but serious portrait photographers would appreciate better bokeh simulation.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN
The Vivo X51 5G is worth investigating if you're after a phone that gives you premium-level specs, performance and camera quality without costing you a huge amount of money. It's still relatively expensive, but this is a phone that has plenty listed in the positives column.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Vivo X51 holds up well overall, even against some devices that are more expensive. The screen displays appropriate brightness under most conditions, though it could be a little brighter indoors and outdoors in the shade. The color rendering is fairly accurate across many uses, even with the blue light filter on. Its biggest drawbacks are for video; HDR10 content is much too dark, which has a big impact on the viewing experience. It also showed weaknesses in the touch attribute, where a lack of smoothness impaired the experiences of browsing and gaming.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Beautiful to look at, the X51 has a fantastic camera arrangement and is a joy to hold and use. It marks highly for everything, but the price is quite high when compared to the competition.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 64% display: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As Vivo's first push into wider markets, we think the X51 - which was called the X50 Pro at its eastern launch - is a bit of a revelation. It delivers an impressive gimbal stabilisation system, a decent overall camera setup, and solid build. The battery isn't class-leading, but at this price and with these features - plus the software has been improved for this launch - it looks like a future success for Vivo. Well, if the name wasn't so uninspired.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Is the Vivo X51 a good phone? Most certainly, with a solid camera, beautiful display, and phenomenal design. But at this price the X51 doesn't feel competitive. It's a great phone, but it's bad value.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Vivo loves to push advanced features out there before the competition. The Vivo X51 5G is a vehicle for its ‘gimbal’ camera, which offers superb low-light performance and super-stable video. It’s a great advancement, but the price may seem a little high for a phone with a mid-tier CPU, even if it is a great one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Vivo X51 5G is a device packed with high-end features. The quad camera setup is made even more impressive by the built-in gimbal, while the addition of a 90Hz refresh rate and 5G makes this phone feel modern and future proof. The biggest downside here is the £749 price tag, elevating the phone beyond more recognisable household names, such as OnePlus and the Google Pixel. That said, it's difficult to complain of a lack of features with the Vivo X51 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Is the Vivo X51 a good phone? Most certainly, with a solid camera, beautiful display, and phenomenal design. But at this price the X51 doesn't feel competitive. It's a great phone, but it's bad value.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2021
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 59% performance: 79% mobility: 81% workmanship: 83%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/22/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Basic Tutorials DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit Germany DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stadt-bremerhaven DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2020
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 88% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/14/2020
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 79% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 86%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 65% performance: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2020
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/03/2020
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 88% mobility: 75% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 60% features: 75% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 77%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 89% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% mobility: 100%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2020
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/29/2020
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 765G:
具有8个CPU Kryo 475内核的快速中端ARM SoC(一个主频为2.4 GHz的高速ARM Cortex-A76主核,一个主频为2.2 GHz的A76中核和六个主频为1.8 GHz的ARM Cortex-A55小核)。作为首批SoC之一,它还集成了5G调制解调器(Snapdragon X52下行和上传速度高达3.7 / 1.6 Mbps,支持mmWave和Sub-6)。该处理器在采用三星高效的7纳米EUV工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.56":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.