华硕VivoBook S550CM CJ038H的Ultrabook测评

Since the new Asus VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H is very similar to the S56CM ultrabook model in casing, workmanship and input devices, the impressions, advantages and shortcomings can largely be transferred onto our test device.

Like the S56CM, this ultrabook also features aluminum components. The black, brushed aluminum display lid and the silver, precious metal base unit make a high-end and robust impression and provide a pleasantly cool feel. Minor drawbacks are the quickly accumulated and very visible fingerprints. The quality impressions in terms of stability and workmanship can also be adopted. The base unit of the VivoBook strikes with high rigidness and barely yields anywhere even when greater force is applied.

In contrast to the S56CM's display lid, which was not a reason for concern but proved to lack some stiffness, the lid of the S550CM-CJ038H is quite rigid.

We also noticed the tightly pulled display hinges that stand out a bit, though evidently, from its sister model. This prevents opening the laptop with only one hand because the base unit lifts, but they keep the display firmly and tightly in position. This is definitely an advantage in our opinion.

Overall, the VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H presents a decent workmanship and quality impression particularly in view of the price range.

由于新华硕VivoBook S550CM CJ038H是非常相似的S56CM的ultrabook外壳，做工和输入设备模型的印象，优点和缺点，可以在很大程度上被转移到我们的测试设备。

本Ultrabook的像S56CM，还设有铝组成。黑，拉丝铝显示屏盖和白银，贵金属的基本单元，使一个高端和稳健的印象，并提供了一个凉爽的感觉。小缺点是快速积累和非常明显的指纹。还可以采用质量的稳定性和工艺方面的印象。 VivoBook高刚性罢工的基本单位，几乎没有产生任何地方，甚至更大的力，应用时。

对比的S56CM的显示屏盖，这不是一个值得关注的理由，但事实证明，缺少一些刚性的盖子S550CM CJ038H是相当严格的。

我们也注意到死死拉住显示脱颖而出位的铰链，但显然，从它的姐妹机型。这可以防止只用一只手打开笔记本电脑，因为基本单位升降机，但他们保持牢固和紧密的显示位置。在我们看来，这是绝对的优势。

总体而言，在的VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H提出一个体面的做工和质量的印象，特别是在的价格区间。

The outdoor suitability of laptops is not an insignificant factor particularly in the ultrabook sector. However, the VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H does not fulfill any of the crucial parameters like high brightness, contrast and, when possible, a matte screen surface. Particularly the dimmed brightness of 162 cd/m² on battery and not least the highly reflective screen makes comfortable use of the ultrabook outdoors difficult.

室外适宜的笔记本电脑是不是一个微不足道的因素，尤其是在Ultrabook的部门。然而，对VivoBook S550CM CJ038H不履行任何的关键参数，如高亮度，对比度，并在可能的情况下，磨砂屏幕表面。特别是暗淡的亮度为162坎德拉/平方米的电池，而不是至少高反射率的屏幕，使舒适的使用ultrabook的户外困难。

Finally, we look at the viewing angles of the screen installed in the test device. Regrettably, the Samsung screen does not give a really convincing performance in this category either. The slightest change in viewing position quickly leads to color deviations up to inverting. As usual, this drawback is mainly noticed on the vertical plane while the image remains stable for a longer time horizontally.

最后，我们来看看在测试装置安装在屏幕的可视角度。遗憾的是，三星的屏幕没有一个真正令人信服的表现在这个类别。观看位置的丝毫变化迅速，导致颜色偏差反相。像往常一样，这个缺点主要注意到的垂直平面上，而水平方向较长的时间保持稳定的图像。

Tests based on a few up-to-date PC games confirmed this. Since we have performed a few games with Nvidia's GeForce GT 635M in the past, we will only look at 6 different PC games here. We refer to our extensive benchmark chart for detailed information about the gaming suitability of various GPUs.

The VivoBook S550CM's gaming performance is unsurprisingly on a par compared with the frequently mentioned S56CM. Acer's Aspire V3-571G featuring a stronger GT 640M can excel the Asus devices quite a bit (Skyrim +30%). When we take Sony's Vaio SV-T1511M1E/S for comparison, the VivoBook can leave the contender far behind in this case. The dedicated GPU in our test device provides a much higher performance than Intel's HD Graphics 4000 processor and surpasses the touch-ultrabook contender with a plus of 40% in Anno 2070.

It is again the energy-efficient ULV processor that is partly noticed as the bottleneck in processor-heavy games. Playable frame rates can nevertheless usually be achieved in medium up to high details with the native resolution of 1366x768 pixels depending on the game. This should be sufficient for casual gamers who do not want to waive on an ultrabook. However, there is not enough power for Full HD and maximum details. Nvidia's GPU Boost for increasing the GPU's core clock from 660 MHz up to 800 MHz during load was only noticed in the first few seconds after starting a game. The clock rate settled to its default 660 MHz after a short while.

基于几个最新PC游戏的测试证实了这一点。既然我们已经进行了几场比赛，与NVIDIA的GeForce GT 635M，在过去，我们只会看在6种不同的PC游戏。我们指游戏适合各种GPU的详细信息，我们广泛的基准图。

，VivoBook的S550CM的游戏性能是勿庸置疑相比，经常提到的S56CM的相提并论。宏碁的Aspire V3-571G具有更强的GT640M能练成华硕的设备颇有几分（天际+30％）。当我们把索尼的Vaio的SV-T1511M1E/ S为比较，VivoBook可以离开竞争者远远落后于这种情况。专用GPU在我们的测试设备提供了更高的性能比英特尔的HD4000图形处理器，，安诺2070加40％，并超越了触摸式的Ultrabook竞争者。

再次，它是高效节能的ULV处理器部分注意到作为处理器沉重的游戏中的瓶颈。可玩的帧速率通常仍然可以在介质中实现高细节的原始分辨率为1366×768像素，这取决于游戏。这应该是足够的休闲玩家，谁不想放弃的ultrabook。然而，有没有足够的力量全高清和最大的细节。 Nvidia的GPU Boost可提高GPU的核心时钟从660 MHz到800 MHz的加载过程中只注意到在一场比赛开始后的前几秒钟。片刻后，其默认的660 MHz的时钟速率落户。

The operating temperatures of Asus' VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H also range on a good level. Particularly the casing's temperatures were noticed positively, which almost imperceptibly warmed the chassis clad in cool aluminum during low load. This naturally changes a bit during high computing load. However, only the base unit's top warms up noticeably in a few areas but that will not at all be perceived as unpleasant. The test device's bottom of course heats up more but is still within a normal and good limit.

As usual here, we performed our multi-hour stress test for measuring the hardware's maximum temperatures. We loaded both the CPU and GPU to 99% using the programs Prime95 and Furmark. The cooling system made a good impression. The laptop convinced with low GPU temperatures that settled to a stable 80-81 °C. The CPU also remained within a good range with a maximum of 85 °C. However, the CPU achieved the latter by omitting Turbo Boost and a constantly fluctuating clock rate. It dropped from the otherwise stable 1.7 GHz to lower rates, only to immediately jump back to 1696 MHz. In return, the GPU maintained its default clock rate of 660 MHz (core) and 900 MHz (memory) over the entire period. Throttling should also not be an issue in routine load scenarios since a 3DMark cycle performed following the stress test finished with a similar score as in a cold state.

工作温度的华硕“的VivoBook S550CM CJ038H也范围在一个良好的水平。特别是外壳的温度正注意到，几乎在不知不觉中温暖穿在阴凉铝机箱，在低负荷。这自然改变了一下，在高运算负荷。然而，只有座机的温暖，明显在少数地区，但不会在所有被视为不愉快的。当然，本试验装置的底部加热多了起来，但仍然是在正常和良好的限制之内。

像往常一样，在这里，我们进行了多小时的压力测试测量硬件的最高气温。加载99％的CPU和GPU使用程序运行Prime95和Furmark对。冷却系统，取得了良好的印象。笔记本电脑相信与GPU温度低，落户到一个稳定的80-81°C。 CPU也保持在良好的范围之内的和最多85℃。然而，CPU达到了后者的通过省略Turbo Boost技术，不断波动的时钟速率。它从原本稳定的1.7 GHz的下降率较低，只有立即跳回至1696兆赫。作为回报，GPU保持其默认时钟频率为660兆赫（核心）和900兆赫（内存）的整个期间。节流应该也不会是一个问题，在常规负载情况下，因为3DMark周期的进行压力测试后，完成了一个类似的得分在寒冷的状态。

Ultrabook with a touchscreen - a feature that adds value or a superfluous accessory?

With the VivoBook S550CM-CJ038H, Asus launches a stylish and elegant ultrabook featuring a touchscreen on the market. It is the touchscreen that makes the biggest and almost sole difference to the S56CM reviewed a few months ago.

However, we would not say that the screen is an added value or a handy feature after almost a week of testing. The screen proves to be apt due to its fast response and good detection of multi-touch gestures and the Windows 8 tile interface is convenient. However, the more common laptop use with the classic Windows GUI is unfavorable. To always have to lean over the ultrabook, more frequent incorrect inputs due to (too) small icons and particularly the need to use a keyboard for certain actions prevent productive workflow. In our opinion, this does not really present an added value, especially since the laptop stands out with absolute and intuitive use via mouse and keyboard. This is unfortunately only true to a small extent for the touchpad that often interferes aggravatingly with frequent unintentional inputs. We would warmly recommend using an external mouse.

In our opinion, Asus should have invested in a higher quality screen. The brightness, contrast and color reproduction regrettably leave a lot of room for improvement making the screen the biggest weakness of the otherwise good ultrabook, despite its touch feature.

However, we quite liked the robust chassis of the S550CM because of the very tightly pulled hinges and the display's increased stability. Alongside the elegant design, slim build, potent equipment featuring a dedicated GPU and the decent emission values, it represents a good and attractive 15.6-inch ultrabook for a reasonable price.

Potential buyers who do not need the touch feature are well advised with the S56CM sister model. Acer's Aspire TimelineUltra M5-481TG offers a bit more graphics power. Users who want a touchscreen but do not need a gaming suitable graphics could look at Sony's Vaio SV-T1511M1E/S or at the Asus S200E, S400CA, U38DT models as an alternative.

带有触摸屏的Ultrabook - 一个功能，增加值或一个多余的附件？

随着的VivoBook S550CM CJ038H，华硕推出配备了触摸屏市场上时尚优雅的ultrabook。它是触摸屏，使审阅几个月前S56CM最大且几乎唯一的区别。

但是，我们不会说，它的屏幕是一个附加值或一个方便的功能，经过近一周的测试。屏幕被证明是容易的，由于它的快速响应和良好的多点触摸手势，Windows 8的瓷砖接口是方便检测。然而，比较常见的笔记本电脑经典的Windows图形用户界面的使用是不利的。要始终有俯身的ultrabook，更频繁的输入错误（太）由于小图标，特别是某些行动防止效率的工作流程需要使用键盘。在我们看来，这并不真正存在的附加值，特别是因为绝对和直观的使用，通过鼠标和键盘的笔记本电脑脱颖而出。不幸的是，只有真正的在小范围内的触摸板，经常干扰aggravatingly频繁无意输入。我们将热忱建议使用外接鼠标。

我们认为，华硕应该投资在质量更高的画面。令人遗憾的是亮度，对比度和色彩重现留下很多改善的空间，使得屏幕最大的弱点本来很好的ultrabook，尽管它的触摸功能。

然而，我们很喜欢的的S550CM，因为强劲的机箱非常死死拉住铰链和显示器的稳定性增加。除了优雅的设计，身材苗条，强效的设备，配备了专用的GPU和体面的排放值，它代表了一个良好的和有吸引力的15.6英寸Ultrabook的一个合理的价格。

不需要触摸功能的潜在买家建议与S56CM的姐妹机型。宏基的Aspire TimelineUltra：M5-481TG提供了更多的图形处理能力。谁想要一个触摸屏，但并不需要一个游戏适合图形可以看看索尼的Vaio的SV-T1511M1E / S或在华硕S200E，S400CA，U38DT的模式，作为替代的用户。