Notebookcheck Logo

华硕VivoTab TF810C Convertible 测评

不平衡. 使用真正的Windows8在平板电脑或笔记本电脑。似乎是没有国界的生产力:熟悉的Office包工程,频繁的作家一定会喜欢键盘和电池的使用时间是巨大的。所以为什么这个称号呢?
Tablet Windows
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W with keyboard dock:  Next to the VivoTab Smart and RT the crowning of convertible tablets?
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W with keyboard dock: Next to the VivoTab Smart and RT the crowning of convertible tablets?

For the original German review, see here.

IFA 2012 was the revival of convertibles. To this point subnotebooks with a classic swivel joint were niche products. For the most part these devices, like the convertible Lifebooks (e.g. Fujitsu T580, T900), Latitudes (Dell XT2) or ThinkPads (X220T) were attractive for the business user. There have been some Windows 7 consumer convertibles over the last couple of years, but the sales figures were never really high.

The most important consumer convertibles: Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t (N450), HP TouchSmart tm2 (Core 2 Duo), Dell Inspiron duo (N550), Gigabyte Booktop T1125N (Intel Core) and Asus Eee PC T91 MT (Z520). Reason for the small demand was the bad touch optimization of Windows 7 and a market that was heavily focused on notebooks. 

The massive growth of Android and iOS based tablets and their big performance jumps in a very short period got the attention of Intel and Microsoft. The big players did not want to lose against Android in the long term but sell their own processors for tablets and smartphones. Windows 8 was also optimized to become a touch-OS and Intel made ultra-mobile X86-Atom CPUs (Clover Trail) for tablets and smartphones (Windows Phone).

The VivoTab TF810C belongs to this "new" category. Atom Z2760 combined with real Windows 8 (no RT-version) and an attachable keyboard. Can the 11.6-inch device connect the typical Windows world and its proven applications with the mobile tablet world? Asus talks about transformed productivity and not only attaches a convenient keyboard but also a second battery. Do mobility and Windows productivity meet the requirements of the 900 Euros (~$1201) price tag?
对于
德国原装审查,在这里看到。

IFA2012是敞篷车的复兴。这点次笔记型电脑采用了经典的旋转接头利基产品。在大多数情况下这些设备,像可换股Lifebooks(例如富士通T580,T900),纬度(XT2戴尔)或ThinkPad笔记本电脑(X220T)是为商业用户的吸引力。在过去几年中,已经有一些Windows 7的消费者敞篷车,但从来没有真正高的销售数字。

最重要的消费敞篷车:联想IdeaPad S10-3T(N450),惠普TouchSmart TM2(酷睿2),:戴尔Inspiron朵(N550),技嘉Booktop T1125N(英特尔酷睿)和华硕Eee PC T91 MT(Z520)。需求小的原因是坏的触摸优化的Windows 7和主要侧重于笔记本市场。


基于Android和iOS平板电脑和大的性能在很短的期间内跳跃的迅猛增长得到了英特尔和微软的注意。大牌球星不想失去对Android的长远,但出售自己的处理器为平板电脑和智能手机。 Windows 8的优化,成为触摸操作系统和英特尔超移动X86-Atom处理器的平板电脑和智能手机的Windows Phone(三叶草小径)。


该的VivoTab TF810C属于这个“新”类别。 Atom Z2760的真正的Windows8(RT版本)和一个附加的键盘相结合。 11.6英寸的设备可以连接典型的Windows世界和其成熟的应用程序与移动平板世界?华硕谈到生产力转化,不仅重视方便的键盘,但第二块电池。做机动性和Windows生产力达到900欧元(〜$1201)明码标价的要求?

Case

Similar to HP and Acer, Asus decided to use the docking concept. But this is only one way to transform a tablet into a subnotebook. Flipping frame (Review Dell XPS 12 ConvertibleDell XPS 12), slider-mechanism (Sony Vaio Duo 11, Toshiba Satellite U920t), double-sided displays (Asus Taichi 21) and 360-degree hinges (Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga) are other solutions.

类似惠普和宏碁,华硕决定使用对接的概念。但是,这只是其中的方式来改造成亚笔记本片剂。翻转帧(戴尔XPS12),滑块机构(索尼VAIO DUO11,东芝Satellite U920t),双面显示器(华硕TAICHI21)和360度铰链(联想IdeaPad瑜珈)等解决方案。

Dell XPS 12
Dell XPS 12
Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga
Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11/13
Acer Iconia W510P
Acer Iconia W510P
Toshiba Satellite U920t
Toshiba Satellite U920t
Sony Vaio Duo 11
Sony Vaio Duo 11
Unlocking of the attached docking keyboard
Unlocking of the attached docking keyboard
is mechanically with a slider on the left side of the tablet.
is mechanically with a slider on the left side of the tablet.
Docking works faultlessly all the time.
Docking works faultlessly all the time.

Advantage of the docking system: If you do not need the keyboard - or in this case the longer runtime - you do not have to carry a bulky and heavy case. The first look is reserved for the massive metallic joint of the 11.6-inch device. Two bars inside keep the tablet in place and a velvet insert avoids unpleasant abrasions. Moving the joint is very difficult without the cover as lever-arm, it is exceptionally firm. Accordingly opening the cover with one hand is not possible.

The slider on the left tablet side releases the locking mechanism mechanically. The connection has a very good tensile strength, without unlocking the tablet cannot be released. The joint cannot avoid teetering of the cover; it is too loose in the socket.

The opening angle of the cover is limited to around 130 degrees and the heavy base unit (weight of the second battery) avoids tipping backwards. Touch inputs encounter a usable fixated surface but the wobbling within the joint is disturbing. The Samsung ATIV Smart PC and HP Envy X2 have the same problem. Especially problematic for Samsung users: The opening angle is smaller, the device can tip due to the unfavorable center of gravity (no battery weight underneath the keyboard) and the display falls back onto the keyboard by itself (no fixation point).

We really like the stability and build quality of both components. The glass has good pressure resistance, only at the border surfaces pressure creates small pressure marks. The brushed aluminum finish of the back side of the tablet is pleasantly cool and avoids slipping of the hands. The ripped plastic stripes at the same place have the same purpose.

The keyboard-dock leaves the same sturdy impression of the tablet body. It is made of brushed aluminum at the cover and rubberized plastic underneath. The base can only be slightly bent but not dented anywhere.

系统的对接优势:如果你没有需要键盘 - 在这种情况下,运行时间较长 - 你不必携带一个笨重的情况。先看看保留了大量的金属关节的11.6英寸的设备。两间酒吧内保持平板电脑的地方,避免不愉快的天鹅绒插入擦伤。无杠杆臂盖,移动的联合是非常困难的,这是非常坚定的。因此用一只手打开盖子是不可能的。

平板电脑的左侧上的滑块机械释放该锁定机构。连接具有很好的抗张强度,而不解锁平板电脑不能释放。关节无法避免摇摇欲坠的封面,在插座太松。

在盖的打开角度被限制到大约130度,并避免向后翻倒的重质基本单元(第二电池的重量)。触摸输入遇到可用的迷恋表面,但摆动关节内扰乱。三星ATIV智能PC和惠普Envy X2有同样的问题。特别是有问题的三星用户:开启角度较小,该设备可以翻倒由于不利的重心(没有键盘下方的电池重量)和显示回落到键盘本身(没有固定点)。

我们真的很喜欢的稳定性和建设质量的两个组成部分。玻璃具有良好的耐压性能,仅在边境表面压力创造小的压力标志。凉爽的平板的背面是拉丝铝完成,并避免滑倒手中。撕开塑料条纹在同一个地方有异曲同工之妙。

键盘底座留下的碑体相同的坚固的印象。它是由拉丝铝盖及橡胶塑料下方。碱可以稍微弯曲,但没有凹陷的任何地方。

Connectivity

The combination of tablet and keyboard dock enables a high number of ports beneath the keyboard. Asus integrates two standard USB 2.0 ports but waives the micro-USB port at the tablet. One USB 2.0 port can be used with an included adaptor for the docking port. Samsung does a better job at this point with standard and micro-USB at the tablet. 

Micro-SD cards (microSDHC and microSDXC) can be used to expand the memory. The Envy X2 offers more ports in total with a full size SD card reader and HDMI (standard) but drops the micro-HDMI port at the tablet. We think the HP solution is more practical because you do not need an adaptor and a display is connected at the office most of the time anyway. When our VivoTab is used as a laptop it is very hard to attach the HDMI cable. It would hang free and cause the device to tip over. Similar to our review unit the W510 and ATIV Smart PC only have the card reader and HDMI (in each case micro) at the tablet.

平板和键盘底座的组合可以在键盘下方的高数量的端口。华硕在平板集成了两个标准的USB2.0端口,但放弃的micro-USB端口。 1个USB 2.0端口,可用于与随附的转接器的对接端口。三星做一个更好的工作,在这一点上与标准的micro-USB平板。

可用于扩大内存的Micro-SD卡(microSDHC和microSDXC)。羡慕X2提供了更多的端口,一个全尺寸的SD卡读卡器和HDMI(标准),但总药片滴微型HDMI端口。我们认为,惠普解决方案更实用,因为你并不需要一个适配器和显示器连接在办公室的大部分时间反正。 VivoTab当用作一台笔记本电脑,这是非常难以连接的HDMI电缆。它会挂起,并导致设备翻倒。我们的审查单位类似W510和ATIV智能PC机的唯一读卡器和HDMI(在各情况下微)平板。

Tablet back: docking-port / power or USB 2.0 adaptor
Tablet back: docking-port / power or USB 2.0 adaptor
Right side: micro HDMI, volume (tablet), USB 2.0
Right side: micro HDMI, volume (tablet), USB 2.0
Back: no ports
Back: no ports
Front: power on button (tablet)
Front: power on button (tablet)
Left side: USB 2.0, power (dock), unlock, microSDHC-port, combined audio (tablet)
Left side: USB 2.0, power (dock), unlock, microSDHC-port, combined audio (tablet)

Communication

The WLAN module supports the draft-n standard and Bluetooth 4.0, which is pretty much standard repertoire for most Windows devices by now. Based on our rough evaluation the transmitting power is convenient: With a distance of three meters the reception is excellent (Windows: 5 bars), upstairs (10 m) and outside the house (15 m, 3 bars) still good to low (40 m, 1 bar). The transmitting power of the router (Fritz!Box 7270) is always reduced to 50%.

4G/UMTS is no option for the TF810C, Asus offers no according model. In return you get a GPS module for location. When you are on the road and use the internet connection of your smartphone via tethering certain applications can display your current position (Google Maps). Common navigation applications, even without internet connection, are also working. The sibling VivoTab Smart ME400C is also available with GPS but still lacks 4G capability. From the Atom competitors only the ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C is equipped with a UMTS. Acer should provide the Iconia W511 with 3G soon.

NFC (Near Field Communication) is a technology to connect external devices in a contactless way with the VivoTab. One example: Hold NFC capable headphones next to the tablet and they immediately start playing. A hardware installation is not necessary. A second contact results in a disconnect. Iconia W510 and Envy x2 11 also have NFC on board.

Accessories

The VivoTab is also available without the keyboard dock, the price is 800 Euros (~$1068) in this case. As accessory you get a stylus pen (Wacom, passive, without battery) with five replacement tips in a small box. In addition there is a USB 2.0 dongle for the docking port of the tablet and a cover that can also be used as a tablet stand. The keyboard dock does not fit into this cover.

Invisible are compass, position sensor and gyroscope (gyrostabilizer, detects the position of the tablet) and an ambient light sensor. The latter acts too exaggerated in our opinion and often reduces the brightness too much. Via function key it can be deactivated very quickly, at least at the dock. The listed sensors are standard for modern tablets.

Software

Here Asus restrains itself and does not waste much space of the very limited storage. Asus Web Storage, Asus@Vibe fun Center and a trial version of MS Office, which is all. From the 64 GB MMC storage 50 GB remains for Windows 8 and software after deduction of the recovery partition and the formatting loss. Windows needs 13 GB so around 37 GB remains for the user.

Maintenance

The VivoTab has no maintenance covers. They are not necessary because there is no fan (cleaning) and the memory is soldered. We cannot determine if the eMMC storage module is soldered, but it would be typical.

Warranty

The VivoTab has a standard warranty period of 24 months (pick-up & return service). For 60 to 70 Euros (~$80 to $93) the manufacturer sells a one year warranty extension from 2 to 3 years.

沟通

WLAN模块支持Draft-N的标准和蓝牙4.0,这是相当多的标准剧目现在对于大多数Windows设备。根据我们的粗略评估,发射功率为方便三米的距离接收优秀(Windows上:5条),楼上的(10米)外的房子(15米,3个酒吧)还是不错的,低(40米,1条)。总的发射功率的路由器(方框7270 Fritz!)被降低至50%。

4G/UMTS是没有选项TF810C,华硕没有提供相应的模型。作为回报,你会得到一个GPS模块的位置。当你的道路上,用你的智能手机的互联网连接通过圈养某些应用程序可以显示您当前的位置(谷歌地图)。常见的导航应用,即使没有互联网连接,也都是工作。同级VivoTab的智能ME400C也可与GPS,但仍然缺乏4G能力。从Atom的竞争对手只有ATIV智能PC XE500T1C的配备了一个UMTS。宏基ICONIA W511提供3G的到来。

NFC(近场通信)是一种技术,一种非接触式的方式连接外部设备与VivoTab。举个例子:保持平板NFC功能的耳机,他们立即开始播放。安装的硬件是没有必要的。第二个接触的结果脱节。 ICONIA W510和羡慕X2 11也有NFC板的。

饰品

的的VivoTab是不带键盘底座也可,在这种情况下,价格是800欧元(〜$ 1068)。作为附件,更换提示一个小盒子,你会得到一个手写笔(Wacom的,被动的,不带电池)。此外,还有一个USB 2.0的片剂的对接端口和一个盖,也可以用作片剂的台阶加密狗。键盘底座不适合此盖。

隐形罗盘,位置传感器和陀螺仪(陀螺稳定器,检测平板的位置)和环境光传感器。太夸张了,在我们看来,后者的作用往往降低了亮度太多。通过功能键可以停用速度非常快,至少在码头。上市传感器是现代片的标准。

软件

华硕自我约束,不会浪费太多的空间非常有限存储。华硕Web存储,华硕盛传娱乐中心和一个试用版的MS Office,这是所有。从64 GB MMC存储50 GB仍然为Windows 8和软件的恢复分区和格式化损失扣除。 Windows需要13 GB,37 GB左右留给用户。

保养

的VivoTab有没有维修盖。它们是没有必要的,因为没有风扇(清洗),内存被焊接。我们不能确定的eMMC存储模块是焊接的,但它会是典型的。



的的VivoTab有一个标准的保修期为24个月(回升及退换货服务)。对于60至70欧元(约$ 80至$ 93)制造商销售从2至3年的保修期延长一年。

Rear 8 MP 3624x2448
Rear 8 MP 3624x2448
Rear 8 MP 1280x920
Rear 8 MP 1280x920
Front 2 MP 1280x960
Front 2 MP 1280x960
Reference Canon EOS 1000D
Reference Canon EOS 1000D

Webcam

Camera wanted? 2.0 Megapixels (front) and 8.0 Megapixels (back) convert the VivoTab into a camera with a huge view-finder. What surprises us is the good quality of the 8 MP camera, which comes with a small flash. The autofocus (AF) works well. The main cameras of the ATIV Smart PC, Envy X2 11 and Iconia W510 (all 8 MP) are not that good. With the W510 pictures suffer from strong color noise and bad focusing even under daylight. ATIV and Envy are better (AF) but also distort the colors and create some noise.

摄像头



相机想要的吗? 200万像素(前)和8.0万像素(背)转换成相机VivoTab一个巨大的取景器。但令人惊讶的是800万像素的摄像头,配备了一个小闪光灯的优良品质。自动对焦(AF)效果很好。 ATIV智能PC,羡慕X211和ICONIA W510(8 MP)的主要相机并不好。随着W510的图片遭受强烈的色彩噪音和坏的重点,即使在日光下。 ATIV和羡慕(AF),但扭曲的颜色,并创造一些噪音。

Input Devices

Keyboard

Keys and touchpad are useful if you work in the Explorer or in text editing. The stylus pen is very accurate with marking and selecting tools but it is tedious to pick up the stylus again when you are working with the keyboard.

The base of the keyboard is very firm, the clear pressure point is good and the comparatively large key travel outshines most consumer notebook keyboards. All in all we get very good feedback during typing. If the keys had a conical curvature it would be perfect. The stroke is firm but not too hard and the produced noise is quiet even during heavy typing.

The clear layout of the 15 mm wide keys (desktop 19 mm) and the smaller but separate arrow keys are very convenient. Accurate typing is possible right away.

Touchpad

The palm rest with its comfortable size allows the use of a large touchpad. The area with a diagonal of 10.1 centimeters is a click pad with integrated buttons. They have a large, smooth travel with a soft stroke. However the clicking sound is a bit too loud. As usual it is a multi-touch pad.

 

Touchscreen

The 10 finger multi-touch display can be operated with the fingers or the stylus pen. The Wacom pen is made of plastic and cannot be stored inside the tablet. The pen has a better build than the stylus of the ATIV Smart PC, it has a catchy rubberized surface and is heavier. 10 millimeters before it touches the surface a dot indicates the position. That increases the operating speed, improves productivity and enables handwritten inputs.

键盘

按键和触摸板是有用的,如果你在资源管理器或文本编辑工作。手写笔是非常准确的标记和选择工具,但它是乏味再次拿起手写笔,当您正在使用的键盘。

该基地的键盘是非常坚定的,明确的压力点是好的和比较大的主要旅游一枝独秀大多数消费类笔记本键盘。所有的一切,我们在打字过程中得到很好的反馈。如果密钥有一个圆锥形的曲率,这将是完美。中风是坚定的,但不要太用力,产生的噪声是安静,即使在沉重的打字。

15毫米宽键(台式机为19毫米)和规模较小,但分开的箭头键的布局清晰,都非常方便。准确的打字可能。

触摸板

以其舒适的大小,允许使用一个宽大的触摸板掌托。面积对角线10.1厘米是一个集成按钮的触摸板。他们有一个大的,用柔软的行程顺利出行。但是点击的声音有点太大声。与往常一样,它是多触摸垫。



触摸屏

10指多点触摸显示屏,可以用手指或手写笔操作。 Wacom笔是由塑料制成,并且不能被存储在片剂内。笔有一个更好地打造的ATIV智能PC的手写笔,它有一个朗朗上口的橡胶表面和较重。 10毫米前表面接触点指示的位置。这增加了操作速度,提高了生产率,使手写输入。

Keyboard
Keyboard
Touchpad (click pad)
Touchpad (click pad)
Multi-touch S-IPS+
Multi-touch S-IPS+

Display

The 11.6-inch S-IPS+ display has a low resolution compared to other tablets. The HD resolution (1366x768 pixels) is worthy of criticism considering there are some HD+ (IdeaPad Yoga 11) or FHD convertibles in the same or similar form factor. Dell XPS 12, Sony Vaio Duo 11Asus Taichi 21 and Samsung Smart PC Pro offer Full HD. If we consider real Intel-Atom competitors the buyer has no alternative to the HD resolution. The Tegra 3 based VivoTab RT TF600 has the same resolution as well as the less expensive sibling VivoTab Smart (Windows 8).

The X-rite TFT calibration did not work because of a driver incompatibility (GMA driver does not support adjustable Gamma curves, so called video LUT's). The color space comparison to sRGB and Adobe RGB is therefore dropped. The contrast is determined with CalMAN software: 1,229: 1 is a value that is reached by almost no other tablet or notebook. Reason is the still rare S-IPS+ display. The contrast of the ATIV Smart PC could not be measured (video LUT's), the Iconia W510 reaches 780:1 and the Envy X2 11 985:1. In regard of the brightness (312 cd/m²) and brightness distribution (89%) the HP has a similarly good IPS panel. It is a bit better when it comes to color accuracy (see CalMAN screens) but falls behind with the viewing angles.

11.6英寸的S-IPS+显示器具有分辨率低,相比其他平板电脑。高清分辨率(1366x768像素),是值得批评,考虑到有一些HD +(IdeaPad瑜伽的11)或FHD敞篷的相同或相似的形式因素。戴尔XPS12,索尼VAIO DUO11,华硕TAICHI21和三星Smart PC Pro的全高清。如果我们认为真正的英特尔原子竞争对手买方有没有替代的高清分辨率。基于Tegra 3的VivoTab RT TF600具有相同的分辨率,以及更便宜的兄弟VivoTab智能(Windows 8中)。

X-RITE TFT校准没有工作,因为驱动程序不兼容的(GMA驱动程序不支持调节伽玛曲线,所谓的视频LUT)。相比,sRGB和Adobe RGB的色彩空间,因此下跌。对比确定与卡尔曼软件:1,229:1是一个值,达到几乎没有其他平板电脑或笔记本。原因是尚不多见的S-IPS+显示屏。 ATIV智能电脑的对比度无法测量(视频LUT)的Iconia W510达到780:1和羡慕X211985:1。至于亮度(312坎德拉/平方米)和亮度分布(89%)的HP有一个同样优秀的IPS面板。这是一个有点更好的,当它涉及到颜色精度(见的CalMAN屏幕),但落后的视角。

381
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 426 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 395.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 377 cd/m²
Contrast: 1229:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)

Depending on the brightness setting the Gamma value is between 1.8 at 10% brightness and the target value of 2.2 at maximum brightness. The color temperature also depends on the brightness setting and varies minimally between 6,400 and 6,500 Kelvin. It is very close to the ideal value of 6,500 Kelvin. Although the white point is almost exactly in the target area of the CIE 1931 norm color chart, all colors except cyan and red are far off the target values. Magenta and blue especially have a negative impact.

These colors also clearly deviate from the norm for the saturation. It would be good if the yellow DeltaE line would not exceed the value 5. The blue cast is very weak compared to TN panels of cheap notebooks. The distortions are visible to the human eye with a DeltaE of 3 or higher. Above that is the grayscale with an average 5.31. Compared to good desktop displays the results are bad. But, if we only consider the notebook displays we reviewed with this method so far, the VivoTab is similar to the Spectre XT or Zenbook Prime Touch.

根据设置的伽马值的亮度上是在10%的亮度,在最大亮度的目标值2.21.8之间。还取决于亮度设置色温6,400和6,500开尔文之间的变化最小。它是非常接近6500开尔文的理想值。虽然白点几乎是一模一样在CIE1931规范彩色图表的目标区域,青色和红色的颜色以外所有远方的目标值。红色和蓝色,尤其是有负面影响。

这些颜色也清楚地偏离从饱和规范。这将是很好的黄色的DeltaE线的将不能超过该值5。偏蓝是非常弱相比TN面板便宜的笔记本电脑。扭曲的DeltaE为3或更高的人的眼睛与可见。以上说的是5.31的平均灰度。良好的桌面相比,显示的结果是不好的。但是,如果我们只考虑笔记本电脑显示器用这种方法我们回顾到目前为止,VivoTab类似的幽灵XT或ZENBOOK总理触摸。

Color Management
Color Management
Saturation
Saturation
Grayscale
Grayscale

The brightness is automatically adjusted to the ambient light via sensor (next to the 2 MP webcam). Cloudy daylight was not enough to get the maximum brightness 418 cd/m² (center). Because of this the desktop on the following pictures seems slightly too dark, but there is no luminance reduction when using the battery. When the sensor is deactivated (function key), the brightness can be manually adjusted to 377 cd/m² (center). This is significantly more than most of the competition when plugged in. The best is the HP Envy X2 11 (battery/plugged in 324 cd/m²).

Due to the strong reflections of the touch surface, operating under daylight can be complicated. This criticism, which applies for almost all tablets, can be reduced with the high luminance.

亮度会自动调整,以通过环境光线传感器(200万像素的摄像头旁)。多云白天是不够的,以获得最大亮度418坎德拉/平方米(中心)。正因为如此,下面的图片上的桌面似乎稍微过暗,但在使用电池时,不存在亮度降低。当传感器被停用(功能键),亮度可以手动调节到377坎德拉/平方米(中心)。这是明显比大多数竞争插上电源时最好是惠普Envy X211(电池/插324坎德拉/平方米)。

由于触摸表面的强烈反射,在日光下操作可能很复杂。这种批评,它适用于几乎所有的平板电脑,可以减少与高亮度。

 

Side view, cloudy
Side view, cloudy
Flat view, cloudy
Flat view, cloudy
Side view, cloudy
Side view, cloudy

Viewing angles are one big strength of IPS panels, especially S-IPS+. The competitors offer wide viewing angles from the side (178 degrees), but they do not have these undistorted diagonal views. Vertically and horizontally users will notice almost no differences between the displays of the mentioned Atom convertibles. Ghost images or clear darkening of the screen do not occur.

可视角度是IPS面板的一大强度,特别是S-IPS +。竞争对手提供从侧面宽视角​​(178度),但他们没有这些失真对角线意见。垂直和水平的用户会发现几乎没有提到的原子敞篷显示器之间的差异。不发生重影或清晰的屏幕变黑。

 

Viewing angles Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
Viewing angles Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
Viewing angles HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
Viewing angles HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
Viewing angles Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C
Viewing angles Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C
Viewing angles Acer Iconia W510
Viewing angles Acer Iconia W510

Performance

The System-on-Chip (SoC) Atom Z2760 (Clover Trail) is Intel's first X86 chip with integrated graphics (GMA 3650) for tablets as well as smartphones (e. g. ZTE Grand X). Due to the 32nm process the chip is more efficient than Atom CPUs in netbooks (e.g. N2600) and can keep up with the Nvidia Tegra (ARM) when it comes to runtime and efficiency. See our efficiency comparison ARM against x86 for more information.

The Clover Trail is available for smartphones as Atom Z2000 and Z2580. For tablets or convertibles the Z2760 is the only processor currently available. As an alternative you can get the VivoTab with a Tegra 3 in the VivoTab RT Convertible (Windows 8 RT). Like all Atom convertibles our review unit is equipped with 64 GB eMMC flash storage and 2 GB LPDDR2 RAM (onboard).

系统级芯片(SoC)凌动Z2760(三叶草足迹)是英特尔的第一款X86芯片集成显卡(GMA3650),平板电脑以及智能手机(如中兴通讯大X)。由于32nm工艺的芯片比Atom上网本的CPU(例如N2600)更有效,并能保持与Nvidia的Tegra(ARM),当它涉及到运行和效率。有关更多信息,请参阅我们的效率比较ARM对X86。

三叶草径为Atom Z2000和Z2580的智能手机。片剂或敞篷Z2760是目前可用的唯一的处理器。作为替代,你可以用的Tegra3 VivoTab RT敞篷版(Windows8 RT版)的VivoTab。像所有的原子敞篷我们的审查单位配备64 GB eMMC的闪存存储和2 GB LPDDR2内存(板载)。

DPC Latenzen Idle OK
DPC Latenzen WLAN On/Off OK
Systeminfo GPUZ unvollständige Daten
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
System information Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W

Processor

CB R11.5 Multi 4x 1.8 GHz
CB R11.5 Multi 4x 1.8 GHz
CB R11.5 Solo 1x 1.8 GHz
CB R11.5 Solo 1x 1.8 GHz

The computing power of the Atom is not on the same level as ultrabooks or cheap notebooks. Even weak Celeron/Pentium processors are 80 to 113% faster at multi core tests.  For the comparison we use ultrabook convertibles. With an i5-3317U & Co these subnotebooks are up to 390% faster.

The computing power is similar to the 2012 Atom generation but with reduced energy consumption. The 2008 N270 (Diamond Ville; Eee PC 1002HA) is 50%, the 2012 N2600 (Cedarview; Aspire One D270) is 9% slower. The consumption under load (see stress test) was almost cut in half compared to netbooks from 2012. The tablet Atom can keep up with the currently fastest ARM chips, which is shown by the multi-platform benchmark Geekbench 2. The competitors from HP, Samsung and Acer are on the same level. 

原子的计算能力是不是超极本或便宜的笔记本电脑在同一水平上。即使是微弱的赛扬/奔腾处理器在多核测试速度提高80%至113%。为了比较,我们使用ultrabook的敞篷车。随着酷睿i5-3317U与合作,这些小型笔记本电脑快390%。

的计算能力是类似的2012原子生成的,而是以减少能源消耗。 2008 N270(钻石威乐的Eee PC1002HA)为50%,2012年的N2600(Cedarview的Aspire One D270)是慢了9%。根据负载(压力测试)消费几乎减少了一半,与上网本相比,从2012年开始。平板原子能跟上目前最快的ARM芯片,这是多平台基准测试软件Geekbench2所示。来自惠普,三星和宏碁的竞争对手都在同一水平上。

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1692 Points
Acer Aspire One D270-26Dbb
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, N2600, WDC Scorpio Blue WD3200BPVT-22JJ5T0
1548 Points -9%
HP Pavilion dm1-4200sg
Radeon HD 7310, E1-1200, Toshiba MK3276GSX
1654 Points -2%
HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1644 Points -3%
Acer Iconia W510
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1685 Points 0%
Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C-A02DE
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1700 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V5-531
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 967, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
3038 Points +80%
Acer Aspire V5-431-887B4G50Mauu
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 887, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVT
3597 Points +113%
Toshiba Satellite U920t-100
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Samsung MZMPC128HBFU
7343 Points +334%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Toshiba THNSNS128GMCP
7409 Points +338%
Dell XPS 12
HD Graphics 4000, 3667U, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZMPC256HBGJ-00000
8290 Points +390%
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
1404 Points
HTC One X
609 Points -57%
Apple iPad mini
750 Points -47%
Asus Transformer Pad TF300T
1440 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad A2109
1471 Points +5%
Google Nexus 7
1599 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 5
1648 Points +17%
Acer Iconia W510
1398 Points 0%
Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C-A02DE
1410 Points 0%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
602
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1692
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
423
Help

System Performance

PCMark 7 Scores
PCMark 7 Scores

The system performance of the VivoTab, displayed by PCMark 7, leaves a better impression. Now the Atom device is only 10 - 17% behind weaker Pentium or Celeron notebooks (low voltage): The reason for this is the flash storage, which outclasses all mechanical hard drives of compared devices by around 40%. The picture below shows the PCMark 7 System Storage Score. Systems with conventional hard drives cannot keep up and lose points. However, ultrabooks with real solid state drives are clearly ahead (+ 177 - 127%). The currently available netbook generation (Atom N2600Aspire One D270 or also AMD C-60, Aspire One 725) is 35 to 46% behind the VivoTab.

显示由的PCMark7上,的的VivoTab,的系统的性能的离开一个更好的的印象。现在的Atom设备是只有10个 - 的17背后的%较弱的的Pentium或的赛扬笔记本电脑的(低电压):这样做的原因是的flash的的存储,这大大优于所有的机械的的的硬盘驱动器的相比,的设备由的40%左右。在下面的的图片显示了的PCMark7系统寄存分数。与传统的的硬盘驱动器的的系统不能跟上,点和失去点。然而,与真正的的坚实的的状态驱动器的ultrabooks的是清楚地AHEAD(+177 - 127%)。当前可用的的上网本的一代评论(Atom N2600,的Aspire One D270,或,也包括Amd C-60,的Aspire One725)是35至第46,%背后的VivoTab。

3.2
Windows 8 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
3.4
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
4.7
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
3.6
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
3.2
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.8
PCMark 7 Score
1240 points
Help
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1240 Points
Acer Aspire One 725
Radeon HD 6290, C-60, Seagate Momentus 5400.6 ST9500325AS
805 Points -35%
Acer Aspire One D270-26Dbb
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, N2600, WDC Scorpio Blue WD3200BPVT-22JJ5T0
668 Points -46%
HP Pavilion dm1-4200sg
Radeon HD 7310, E1-1200, Toshiba MK3276GSX
878 Points -29%
Acer Iconia W510
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1248 Points +1%
HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1430 Points +15%
Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C-A02DE
SGX545, Z2760, 64 GB SSD
1263 Points +2%
Acer Aspire V5-531
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 967, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT020-9YG142
1362 Points +10%
Acer Aspire V5-431-887B4G50Mauu
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 887, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVT
1450 Points +17%
Toshiba Satellite U920t-100
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Samsung MZMPC128HBFU
4443 Points +258%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Toshiba THNSNS128GMCP
4803 Points +287%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Toshiba THNSNS128GMCP
4803 Points +287%
Dell XPS 12
HD Graphics 4000, 3667U, Samsung SSD 830 Series MZMPC256HBGJ-00000
4751 Points +283%
PCMark 7 - System Storage (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
2375 Points
Acer Aspire One 725
1434 Points -40%
HP Pavilion dm1-4200sg
1458 Points -39%
HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
2980 Points +25%
Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C-A02DE
2526 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V5-531
1406 Points -41%
Acer Aspire V5-431-887B4G50Mauu
1480 Points -38%
Toshiba Satellite U920t-100
5184 Points +118%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
5384 Points +127%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
5384 Points +127%
Dell XPS 12
5156 Points +117%

Storage Solution

Crystal Disk Mark 3.0: 79 MB/sec seq. read
Crystal Disk Mark 3.0: 79 MB/sec seq. read

Compared to latest SSD drives the performance of the eMMC chip is very low (see Vaio Duo 11 in the following diagram). HD-Tune and Crystal Disk Mark determine only 50 and 79 MB/sec for sequential reading, which is even less than the latest hard drives. The results for the 4K tests are better, here the eMMC is almost 100% faster compared to a typical hard drive with 5400 rpm.

相比最新的SSD硬盘的eMMC芯片的性能是非常低的(参见下图中的VAIO DUO11)。 HD-Tune和水晶硬盘马克决定只有50和79 MB /秒的顺序阅读,甚至低于最新的硬盘驱动器。 4K测试的结果都比较好,这里的eMMC是几乎100%的速度相比,一个典型的5400转硬盘。


CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Read 4k (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
7.05 MB/s
Acer Aspire V5-531
0.266 MB/s -96%
HP Pavilion dm1-4200sg
0.321 MB/s -95%
Acer Iconia W510
7.116 MB/s +1%
HP Envy x2 11-g000eg
9.628 MB/s +37%
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
19.64 MB/s +179%
64 GB SSD
Transfer Rate Minimum: 27.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 52.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 50.3 MB/s
Access Time: 0.6 ms
Burst Rate: 40 MB/s
CPU Usage: 5.7 %

Graphics

The PowerVR SGX545 (IGP) is at the bottom end when compared against integrated solutions from AMD and Intel. It can surpass the old GMA 950 and 3150 (Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit), but cannot deliver the performance of the already slow Intel GMA (Sandy Bridge). The more we look at ultrabooks and HD 4000 the bigger the difference. The HD4000 in the Toshiba U920t Convertible is almost three times faster and delivers ten times the fps in FIFA 13.

The PowerVR does not support DirectX-10, only version 9. If older test games start at all, there were often graphic errors, for example with FIFA 13 and World in Conflict. In the end the GPU is used for video acceleration when the necessary player and codec are provided.

对AMD和Intel的集成解决方案相比时的PowerVR SGX545(IGP)的底端。它可以超越旧的GMA950和3150(CINEBENCH R10底纹32位),但不能提供的性能已经缓慢的英特尔GMA(Sandy Bridge的)。我们来看看超极本和HD4000的差异越大。 HD4000东芝U920t换股近三倍的速度,提供了十倍FIFA13的fps。

PowerVR的不支持DirectX10,只有第9版。如果旧的测试游戏开始,往往是图形错误,例如FIFA13冲突世界。最终使用的GPU视频加速时提供必要的播放器和编解码器。

3DMark 2001SE Standard
3152 points
3DMark 03 Standard
1507 points
3DMark 05 Standard
613 points
Help
Fifa 13 - 1024x768 Low (sort by value)
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
10 fps
Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C-A02DE
9.7 fps -3%
Acer Aspire V5-431-887B4G50Mauu
43.8 fps +338%
Toshiba Satellite U920t-100
108.1 fps +981%
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Acer Aspire One 725
5.01 fps
HP Pavilion dm1-4200sg
5.11 fps
Acer Iconia W510
0 fps
Acer Aspire V5-531
6.38 fps
Acer Aspire V5-431-887B4G50Mauu
6.68 fps
Dell XPS 12
12.37 fps
Toshiba Satellite U920t-100
13.08 fps
Sony Vaio Duo 11 SV-D1121X9EB
15.84 fps
lowmed.highultra
Left 4 Dead (2008) 12
Fifa 13 (2012) 10

Emissions

Stress test Prime95 & Furmark - steady 1.8 GHz
Stress test Prime95 & Furmark - steady 1.8 GHz

Temperature

The VivoTab TF810C does not need a fan, it has the same passive silent cooling solution as similar equipped tablets. This is the case for all Atom based competitors. Ultrabook convertibles (e. g. Vaio Duo 11) need active cooling. The 2012 Atom generation (Cedarview) also needed active cooling (at least the manufacturers always used it). The energy consumption and the created heat of Cedarview were considerably higher.

The produced heat has to be dissipated by the case surfaces. Here, the aluminum cover is an advantage. The VivoTab remains cool, especially if you use little computing performance. During idle we measure a maximum surface temperature of only 25 °C at the front and back. The keyboard dock remains at ambient temperature, it only contains the battery.

During load (stress test Furmark + Prime95) the VivoTab TF810C has a steady CPU clock of 1.8 GHz. Turbo boost is not available. The GPU clocks could not be determined with any tool. We suspect unfinished drivers. The result of the mandatory 3DMark 05 run after the stress test was identical to the plugged in test. By the way, the computing performance remains identical when the battery is used, the CB R11.5 test results (32 bit) were the same.温度

VivoTab TF810C不需要风扇,它具有类似设备齐全片相同的被动静音散热解决方案。这是所有基于凌动的竞争对手的情况。 Ultrabook的可换股票据(如VAIO DUO11)需要主动冷却。 2012年凌代(Cedarview)也需要的主动冷却(至少制造商总是用它)。的能源消耗和创建的热Cedarview是相当高的。

产生的热量要消散的情况下表面。在这里,铝盖是一个优势。 VivoTab保持冷静,特别是如果你使用很少的计算性能。闲置期间,我们测量表面最高温度只有25°C的正面和背面。键盘底座保持在环境温度下,它仅包含电池。

在负载(压力测试的Furmark+ Prime95测试)VivoTab的TF810C的有一个稳定的1.8 GHz的CPU时钟。涡轮增压是不可用。 GPU时钟不能确定使用任何工具。我们怀疑未完成的驱动程序。强制的3DMark 05运行压力测试后的结果是相同的测试插入。顺便说一下,计算性能保持相同的电池的使用时,CB R11.5测试结果(32位)是相同的。

Max. Load
 36.8 °C39.1 °C31.1 °C 
 30.1 °C29.1 °C27.6 °C 
 29.1 °C30.1 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
30.2 °C42.6 °C39.7 °C
28.3 °C30.1 °C30.1 °C
28.4 °C29 °C29.1 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.6 °C | Room Temperature 23.7 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).

Speakers

Speakers (tablet)
Speakers (tablet)

The integrated speakers (back of the tablet, at the edge) deliver reasonable sound at adjusted or maximum volume. The volume is pretty high (no distortions). When you carry the tablet around both hands are exactly above the speakers, but the sound does not suffer in these situations because the fingers cannot cover 100% of them.

Low tones and bass are not very inspiring, they are just not present. The sound is more mid tone focused. We did not like the automatic volume adjustment of the sound driver, we could clearly determine adjustments. For headphones there is a standard 3.5 mm audio jack that was combined with the microphone. The tablet also has an integrated microphone, for example, voice commands can be used for web URLs or search words.

集成扬声器(数位板背面的边缘),提供合理调整或最大音量的声音。量是相当高的(无失真)。当你随身携带的平板电脑,左右双手的正上方的扬声器,但是声音并不吃亏,因为在这些情况下,手指不能覆盖100%。

不低的音调和低音是非常鼓舞人心的,他们只是不存在。声音是中等色调的重点。我们不喜欢的声音驱动程序自动音量调节,我们可以清楚地判断出调整。耳机是一个标准的3.5毫米音频插孔,麦克风结合。该平板还拥有一个集成的麦克风,语音命令,例如可以用于网页的网址或搜索词。

Energy Management

Power Consumption

The energy consumption is between 1.6 - 4.2 Watts at idle and 5.8 Watts under medium workloads (3DMark2006). The very low consumption is comparable to ARM tablets (Vivo Tab RT TF600) or the X86-competition (Iconia W510 1.7-6.9 Watts at idle). The Samsung ATIV Smart PC (1.6-4.0) is more frugal although its display brightness is nearly identical.

Under high load the voltmeter only indicates 8.4 Watts. The W510 (9.7 Watts) is more power hungry; the rest of the competition is on the same level. Interesting: The TF600 with Tegra 3 and Windows RT needs even more power, 9.1 and 11 Watts respectively (medium, high; similar brightness). Intel Core devices like the Vaio Duo 11 with i5-3317U need 5 - 11 Watts at idle and 34 Watts under load. In return the performance is significantly higher compared to our Intel-Atom system.

The 10 Watts power supply unit is sufficient for the consumption. During continuous load and utilization of the PSU the following charging times could be longer.

耗电量

能源消耗之间闲置的1.6 - 4.2瓦和5.8瓦中等负载下(3DMARK2006)。非常低的消费是与ARM片(VIVO标签RT TF600)或X86的竞争(的Iconia W5101.7-6.9瓦处于闲置状态)。三星ATIV智能PC(1.6-4.0)是更加节俭,但其显示亮度几乎是相同的。

在高负载下,电压表显示8.4瓦。 W510(9.7瓦)更耗电,其余的比赛是在同一水平上。有趣的Tegra3和Windows RT TF600需要更强大,9.1和11瓦(中,亮度高;相似)。英特尔酷睿酷睿i5-3317U需要5 - 11瓦在闲置和34瓦负载下的设备如VAIO DUO11。在返回的性能明显高于我们的英特尔凌动系统。

的10瓦电源单元是足够的消费。电源在连续负载和利用以下的充电时间可以较长。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.4 / 4.2 / 4.2 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 8.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 960

Battery Runtime

Just recently the Envy X2 11 with its dual batteries delivered massive runtimes of 7:07 and 11:55 up to 20:34 hours (load/WLAN/idle). These runtimes can be beaten by our review unit. 33 hours (tablet+dock) is the result for the Reader-test, the consumption was minimized by turning off all wireless connections and the lowest brightness. The runtime measurements became an ordeal because the limited energy settings of Windows 8 (there is just one energy profile!) caused the tablet to go into unintentional standby quite often. When we only used the tablet this could be avoided with the "Don't Sleep" tool, but it did not always work when the keyboard dock was attached. Due to these problems we did not get a correct result for the WLAN test even after several days of testing.

Based on our evaluation the most realistic runtime is determined by the "Movie 150 cd/m²" scenario. The tablet shows a low resolution AVI movie for almost 14 hours (830 minutes). With the docking station this value is increased to 18:20 hours (1,100 minutes). The worst scenario under load (only tablet, maximum brightness) is seven hours (425 minutes). The Reader-test (idle) without docking battery stops after 10:41 hours (641 minutes). The docking station is no charging station; the tablet cannot be recharged with the second battery.

There is one disadvantage with two batteries: the pretty weak 10 Watts PSU needs 6:10 hours (both batteries) and 4:07 hours (only tablet battery) for a complete charge (device is turned on). The 2-cell tablet battery has a capacity of 30 Wh (lithium-polymer, 3,950 mAH). The battery beneath the keyboard provides 25 Wh (two cells).

The competition, also with dual batteries, cannot keep up with these runtimes: Asus VivoTab RT TF600 (16:10 hours/10:18; idle/WLAN), Iconia W510 (19:09/13:35), Samsung XE500T1C (single battery, 14:43/7:14).

就在最近的Envy X211双电池交付了大量的运行时间为7:07和11:55至20:34小时(满载/ WLAN/空闲)。这些运行时可以通过我们的审查单位殴打。 33小时(平板+坞)是为读者测试的结果,消耗最小化,关闭所有无线连接和最低亮度。运行时的测量成为一个考验,因为有限的能量设置的Windows8(仅仅是一个能源配置!)平板电脑进入无意待机,经常造成。当我们只用平板电脑,这可能是可以避免的“不睡觉”的工具,但它并不总是工作时,键盘底座连接。由于这些问题,我们没有得到正确的结果的WLAN测试,即使经过数天的测试。

基于对我们的评价,最现实的运行是由“电影150坎德拉/平方米”的情景。平板显示低分辨率的AVI电影近14个小时(830分钟)。使用对接站,该值被增加至18:20小时(1100分钟)。最坏的情况下负载(片剂,最大亮度)是7个小时(425分钟)。读写测试(空闲)没有对接的电池停止后10:41小时(641分钟)。基座是没有充电站,平板电脑不能用第二块电池充电。

带两块电池有一个缺点:相当薄弱的10瓦PSU需要6:10小时(电池)和一个完整的充电4:07小时(仅平板电池)(装置已开启)。 2细胞平板电池容量为30瓦(3,950毫安时锂聚合物)。在键盘下方的电池提供25瓦​​(两个单元)。

这些运行的竞争,也有双电池,能不能跟上:华硕VivoTab RT TF600(16:10 hours/10:18;空闲/ WLAN)的Iconia W510(19:09/13:35),三星XE500T1C(单电池,14:43/7:14)。

Classic test, without dock: 424 min.
Classic test, without dock: 424 min.
Reader's test, docking-battery: 1983 min.
Reader's test, docking-battery: 1983 min.
Movie 150 cd/m², with dock: 1100 min.
Movie 150 cd/m², with dock: 1100 min.
Reader's test, without dock: 641 min.
Reader's test, without dock: 641 min.
Movie 150 cd/m², without dock: 830 min.
Movie 150 cd/m², without dock: 830 min.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 03min

Verdict

Asus complements its Windows RT VivoTab TF600 (Tegra 3) with a device for traditional Windows fans, the VivoTab TF810C-1B026W including keyboard dock. But you really have to be a big fan; the extra charge of 350 Euros (~$467) is immense. For this price you get the X86-platform with real Windows 8. It is only 32 bit but it can run all familiar applications (no limitation to Windows RT apps).

At least in theory, similar to the HP Envy x2 11-g000eg, Acer Iconia W510 and Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C, the performance suffers from the weak Atom processor. If you want to use the TF810C as a desktop replacement on the go (multi-tasking, run apps simultaneously, save lots of data, casual games) you will reach the performance limits very quickly. This is the reason for the title "unbalanced": The TF810C is more expensive than some Intel-Core ultrabooks but computing speed and overall performance are almost similar to netbooks (Atom N2600 early 2012).

But the VivoTab TF810C has its advantages too. 33 hours idle runtime is unrivaled compared to other Cedarview-Atom devices. We can only estimate the WLAN runtime with an additional test: around 17 hours. These runtimes can be achieved with the additional battery in the keyboard dock. Other benefits are the keyboard, which is convenient for frequent writers and the robust, high quality aluminum finish of the base unit and tablet.

The potential buyer might be surprised by the low HD resolution (1366x768 pixels), but Atom convertibles from the competition do not offer something better (Envy x2 11, Acer Iconia W510 and ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C). If you want a higher resolution in the same or at least similar form factor (Windows 8) you have to choose an Intel Core based convertible, for example the Sony Vaio Duo 11 or Dell XPS 12. The S-IPS+ panel does not need to hide from the competition, it is very bright during battery use, has a very high contrast and wide viewing angles (best in class). The three listed competitors also have good displays but are not that perfect.

Similar (low) performance, identically good panels with the same resolution: Which Atom convertible is the best? With prices of around 900 Euros (~$1201) the Envy x2 11 and our VivoTab TF810C are the most expensive, yet they offer the best runtimes with the additional battery inside the keyboard docks. Acer Iconia W510 (500 - 600 Euros, ~$667 - $801) and ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C (under 800 Euros, ~$1068, without UMTS) are considerably less expensive. However, Samsung waives the second battery and with Acer the customer has to live with worse build quality and inconvenient input devices. In return, Acer integrated an additional battery and offers long runtimes. Asus does not want to scare off the customers and sells a technically identical VivoTab Smart ME400C for around 500 Euros (~$667, without dock).

华硕补充其Windows RT VivoTab TF600 Tegra 3的设备与传统的Windows球迷,VivoTab TF810C 1B026W的,包括键盘底座。但你真的是一个大风扇的额外费用350欧元(约$ 467)是巨大的。对于这个价格,你得到了X86平台的,与真正的Windows 8。这是只有32位,但它可以运行所有熟悉的应用程序(Windows RT应用程序的限制)。

至少从理论上讲,类似惠普Envy X2 11 g000eg的,宏碁Iconia W510和三星ATIV智能电脑XE500T1C,性能会受到影响从弱的Atom处理器。如果您要使用TF810C,在旅途中作为台式机替代(多任务,同时运行的应用程序,节省大量的数据,休闲游戏),你将达到非常快的性能限制。这的标题是“不平衡”的原因是:TF810C更比一些英特尔核心超极昂贵,但计算速度和整体性能几乎是类似上网本(ATOM N2600 2012年初)。

但VivoTab的TF810C的也有它的优势。 33小时空闲运行是无与伦比的,相比其他Cedarview原子装置。我们只能估计一个额外的测试:约17小时的WLAN运行。这些运行时可以实现额外的电池在键盘底座。其他好处是键盘,这是,方便频繁作家和基本单元和平板电脑的强劲,高品质的铝合金表面。


低的HD分辨率(1366x768像素)的潜在买家可能会惊讶,但原子敞篷竞争不提供更好的东西(羡慕X2 11,宏碁Iconia W510和ATIV智能PC XE500T1C)。如果你想有一个更高的分辨率相同或至少相似的外形(Windows 8中),你必须选择一个基于英特尔酷睿敞篷车,例如索尼VAIO DUO 11或戴尔XPS 12。 S-IPS +面板不需要躲避竞争,它在电池使用过程中是非常光明的,具有非常高的对比度和宽视角(最佳的)。这三家上市的竞争对手也有不错的显示,但不是完美的。


类似的性能(低),相同的好的板具有相同的分辨率:原子可兑换是最好的吗?价格大约900欧元(〜$ 1201)羡慕X2 11 VivoTab TF810C“的是最昂贵的,但他们提供最好的运行时间与额外的电池里面的键盘底座。宏碁Iconia W510(500 - 600欧元〜$ 667 - $ 801)和ATIV智能电脑XE500T1C(800欧元〜$ 1068,没有UMTS)是相当便宜。然而,三星放弃第二个电池的,与宏基客户有生活更糟的建设质量和不方便输入设备。作为回报,宏碁集成了一个额外的电池,并提供长期的运行时间。华硕不希望吓跑客户和销售技术上相同的的VivoTab智能ME400C约500欧元(约$ 667,无底座)。

Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W with keyboard dock: more expensive than some notebooks but lower performance than a cheap notebook. If you are looking for laptop performance with Windows 8 you will be greatly disappointed with the Atom.
Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W with keyboard dock: more expensive than some notebooks but lower performance than a cheap notebook. If you are looking for laptop performance with Windows 8 you will be greatly disappointed with the Atom.
Please share our article, every link counts!
In Review: Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
In Review: Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W

Specifications

Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W
Processor
Intel Atom Z2760 2 x 1.8 GHz, Cloverview
Graphics adapter
PowerVR SGX545, Core: 533 MHz, RAM: 400 MHz, Intel GMA Cloverview, 9.14.3.1082
Memory
2048 MB 
, LPDDR2-800, On-board
Display
11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, 电容式,多点触摸, S-IPS+ LED, TruVivid,康宁FIT玻璃,耐指纹涂层, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB SSD, 64 GB 
Soundcard
HD Audio
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 麦克风/耳机, Card Reader: microSDHC,microSDXC, Sensors: 罗盘,陀螺仪,光传感器,位置传感器, docking port, USB 2.0 via adapter at docking port
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, NFC
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 294.2 x 188.8
Battery
55 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 30瓦时锂聚合物电池3950毫安标签,25瓦​​的额外电池的键盘底座, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 630 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 32 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 8 MP Rear, 2 MP Front
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, Stylus Pen, Tablet Stand/Cover, WebStorage, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.353 kg, Power Supply: 90 g
Price
949 Euro

 

Windows 8 is pretty smooth,
Windows 8 is pretty smooth,
Because of that the cover bounces pretty much when it is opened in notebook mode.
Because of that the cover bounces pretty much when it is opened in notebook mode.
The base unit or keyboard dock contains a second battery.
The base unit or keyboard dock contains a second battery.
Combined with the primary battery it provides gigantic runtimes of up to 33 hours at idle (!). The WLAN runtime is half of that.
Combined with the primary battery it provides gigantic runtimes of up to 33 hours at idle (!). The WLAN runtime is half of that.
and makes it suitable for daily use on the road.
and makes it suitable for daily use on the road.
The joint cannot avoid some bouncing but is otherwise a durable construction.
The joint cannot avoid some bouncing but is otherwise a durable construction.
The 8 MP  main camera surprises with very good focusing and a high color accuracy.
The 8 MP main camera surprises with very good focusing and a high color accuracy.
A sturdy chassis made of aluminum and plastic gives the VivoTab a high quality impression
A sturdy chassis made of aluminum and plastic gives the VivoTab a high quality impression
The keyboard dock does not fit into it.
The keyboard dock does not fit into it.
Unfortunately the handy 10 Watts PSU needs 6 hours for a complete recharge of both batteries.
Unfortunately the handy 10 Watts PSU needs 6 hours for a complete recharge of both batteries.
A special feature is the NFC sensor. Hold compatible NFC-headphones (example) next to it and it connects (without hardware installation).
A special feature is the NFC sensor. Hold compatible NFC-headphones (example) next to it and it connects (without hardware installation).
The keyboard made a good impression during typing and had good grip.
The keyboard made a good impression during typing and had good grip.
Combined with the viewing angle stability of the HD display we get a companion suitable for working.
Combined with the viewing angle stability of the HD display we get a companion suitable for working.
For more precise inputs we get a stylus pen.
For more precise inputs we get a stylus pen.
The tablet itself has no USB port (not even mini/micro USB).
The tablet itself has no USB port (not even mini/micro USB).
This adaptor can be attached if necessary.
This adaptor can be attached if necessary.
This leatherette case is a standard accessory.
This leatherette case is a standard accessory.
Now the device can be used as a subnotebook.
Now the device can be used as a subnotebook.
Like the 10.1-inch sibling the tablet can be attached to the keyboard dock.
Like the 10.1-inch sibling the tablet can be attached to the keyboard dock.
but multi-tasking or demanding applications
but multi-tasking or demanding applications
bring the device quickly to its knees.
bring the device quickly to its knees.
Luckily the display brightness remains the same with battery use. We measure 377 cd/m².
Luckily the display brightness remains the same with battery use. We measure 377 cd/m².
The touch-panel can reflect under certain circumstances and therefore limit the visibility.
The touch-panel can reflect under certain circumstances and therefore limit the visibility.
A brightness sensor adjusts the brightness to the environment.
A brightness sensor adjusts the brightness to the environment.
Sometimes it reduces the brightness too much, but it can easily be deactivated via function key.
Sometimes it reduces the brightness too much, but it can easily be deactivated via function key.
The locking mechanism is released with a slider on the side of the tablet.
The locking mechanism is released with a slider on the side of the tablet.
Unfortunately the connection between the joint and tablet is wobbly.
Unfortunately the connection between the joint and tablet is wobbly.
If you expect ultrabook performance for the 900 Euros (~$1201) you will be disappointed.
If you expect ultrabook performance for the 900 Euros (~$1201) you will be disappointed.
The weak point in the price-performance ratio is the Atom processor.
The weak point in the price-performance ratio is the Atom processor.
An Atom-processor for over 900 Euros (~$1201)?
An Atom-processor for over 900 Euros (~$1201)?
What is it? A high-end netbook?
What is it? A high-end netbook?
Definitely not, Asus does not consider the VivoTab as part of that extinct class.
Definitely not, Asus does not consider the VivoTab as part of that extinct class.
Quite the contrary, as a so called hybrid or convertible the Vivo Tab seems to have a bright future.
Quite the contrary, as a so called hybrid or convertible the Vivo Tab seems to have a bright future.
After the sibling with Windows RT (VivoTab RT TF600) and Tegra 3
After the sibling with Windows RT (VivoTab RT TF600) and Tegra 3
we now review the Intel hardware with real Windows 8.
we now review the Intel hardware with real Windows 8.
It can be used as a tablet stand.
It can be used as a tablet stand.

Similar Devices

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Snapdragon X SD X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.874 kg
华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Snapdragon X SD X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.874 kg

Links

Price Comparison

Pros

+
+ 键盘具有良好的反馈
+ Wacom的手写笔进行准确的输入
+ 通过扩展坞的标准USB端口
+ 极端基座的电池运行时间
+ 静音操作
+ 低热量的发展
+ 明亮的显示屏和高对比度
+ 在同类产品中的最佳视角
+ 附件:片剂站立/覆盖
+ 非常不错的800万像素摄像头,闪光灯

Cons

- Windows的性能低
- 最低GPU供电
- 响亮的触摸板
- 慢,小的闪存存储
- 两个电池的充电时间很长
- 轻微的TFT出血/压敏边界

Shortcut

What we like

Clean and high quality aluminum inlet of the keyboard. The docking inputs are convenient and the stylus refines working with the Windows desktop. The additional docking battery should be mandatory; its weight avoids tipping of the device in notebook mode. The 8 MP main camera with flash is a highlight and produces sharp images.

What we miss

A standard SD card reader and an HDMI port at the dock. The low performance leaves a bad impression; the VivoTab cannot be used as desktop replacement. The drivers of the PowerVR SGX 545 are suboptimal; we could not determine the specifications and the display calibration did not work.

What surprises us

The high price. For only 150 Euros (~$200) more you could, for instance, get a Satellite U920t-100, an Intel Core based convertible with ultrabook performance.

The Competition

Intel Atom based: HP Envy x2 11-g000eg, Acer Iconia W510Samsung ATIV Smart PC XE500T1C 

More power with  Intel Core processor: Dell XPS 12, Sony Vaio Duo 11Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13Asus Taichi 21; soon: Microsoft Surface with Windows 8 Pro.

我们喜欢


清洁和高品质的铝合金的键盘入口。对接输入方便,手写笔与Windows桌面细化工作。额外的对接电池应该是强制性的,它的重量避免引爆的设备在笔记本模式。 800万像素主摄像头,闪光灯是一大亮点,并产生清晰的图像。

我们错过了什么


一个标准的SD卡读卡器和一个HDMI端口在码头。低性能留下了不好的印象; VivoTab不能用于作为台式机替代品。的PowerVR SGX545的司机是不理想的,我们不能确定的规格和没有工作的显示校准。

但令人惊讶的


高昂的代价。只有150欧元(约$200),你可以,例如,卫星U920t-100,基于英特尔酷睿敞篷Ultrabook的性能。

竞争


基于英特尔凌动:惠普Envy X211 g000eg,宏碁Iconia W510,三星ATIV智能电脑XE500T1C

更多的权力与英特尔酷睿处理器:戴尔XPS12,索尼VAIO DUO11,联想IdeaPad瑜伽,华硕TAICHI2113;快:与Windows8 Pro的微软Surface。

Rating

Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W - 02/05/2013 v3 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
64%
Weight
93%
Battery
100%
Display
89%
Games Performance
16%
Application Performance
73%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Add Points
82%
Average
80%
87%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Asus VivoTab TF810C-1B026W TabletOnly - 02/03/2013 v3 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
40%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
45%
Weight
97%
Battery
97%
Display
89%
Games Performance
16%
Application Performance
73%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Add Points
80%
Average
75%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕VivoTab TF810C Convertible 测评
Sebastian Jentsch, 2013-05- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)