东芝 WT8-B-102 平板电脑简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 278.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 152 cd/m²
Contrast: 776:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.58 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
46.68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.72
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Miix 2 10 | |
| Toshiba Encore WT8-A-102 | |
| Toshiba Satellite NB10t-A-101 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Miix 2 10 | |
| Toshiba Encore WT8-A-102 | |
| Toshiba Satellite NB10t-A-101 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2168 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 7 | |
| Score (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Asus VivoTab Note 8 (M80TA) | |
| Toshiba Encore WT8-A-102 | |
| HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-122P-61454G50NSS | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 2 | |
| System Storage (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Toshiba Encore WT8-A-102 | |
| HP Pavilion 11-n070eg x360 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-122P-61454G50NSS | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 2 | |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | |
| Read Seq (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Write Seq (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Read 4k (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Write 4k (sort by value) | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| Toshiba WT8-B-102 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 1296 points | |
Help | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 1.7 Watt |
| Idle |  1 / 2.3 / 2.3 Watt |
| Load |
7.7 / 9.4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
尽管Z3735G处理器的技术参数看起来相对于前作没有太大的变化，2014年的新版东芝Encore 2 WT8告诉了我们基于这款芯片组的Windows 8平板很难在性能上落后于前代产品。我们发现在Turbo Boost加速上的区别实际上对处理器性能有影响，而一些省去的显示芯片单元（主要是视频处理单元）和仅仅1GB的内存会影响多任务处理的性能。考虑到Encore 2 WT8（在截稿时）并没有比其他性能更好的Windows 8平板售价更低，我们很难推荐这款产品。
东芝Encore 2 WT8的主要竞争对手是联想Miix 2 8，我们正好有机会在测试中直接对比这两款产品。联想Miix 2在外观和手感上十分相似，也有相似的电池容量和接口配备。不过它在性能表现上由于采用了2GB内存而占优，至少你不需要担心它的虚拟内存占用问题。Miix 2 8的扬声器相比之下不如WT8的效果更好。另外一个竞争者，戴尔Venue 8 Pro有更好的屏幕和电池续航时间。
东芝设计了一台简洁、轻薄的Windows 8平板，快速的闪存、明亮的屏幕和优质的扬声器则为它提供了流畅和舒适的Windows 使用体验，这些对于一些用户来说可能已经足够了，不过它仍需降低WT8的售价以加强它的竞争力，如果它的售价可以低于150美元（约913人民币）则可以算是一款合理的Windows RT风格平板电脑。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
