Wiko U Feel Series
Processor: Mediatek MT6735, Qualcomm Snapdragon 430Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720, Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.00 inch
Weight: 0.145kg, 0.15kg
Price: 0, 229 euro
Average of 50 scores (from 72 reviews)
Wiko U Feel
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko U FeelProcessor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Price: 229 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
挥动手指产生不同。 U Feel是一台来自法国厂商Wiko的新主流智能手机。两个亮点则在于它的设计和指纹识别器,指纹识别器可以根据手指的动作来产生不同的操作。通过我们的评测可以看到这台手机的能力。
Foreign Reviews
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The U Feel Fab has been a very enjoyable smartphone to use during the review period, on surface you might view it as another huge screen smartphone made affordable but otherwise, this seem to be a smartphone that Wiko has really taken seriously, the phone is fast and reliable, comes with great battery life and most surprisingly, a rather capable camera which I will definitely like to use in road trips. At RM799, this might be a little overpriced for what it offers on paper, while the certainty of future software updates is still unknown, you might just want to look past all of that if you want a phone with a huge screen that offers a great battery life and camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The U Feel Fab has been a very enjoyable smartphone to use during the review period, on surface you might view it as another huge screen smartphone made affordable but otherwise, this seem to be a smartphone that Wiko has really taken seriously, the phone is fast and reliable, comes with great battery life and most surprisingly, a rather capable camera which I will definitely like to use in road trips. At RM799, this might be a little overpriced for what it offers on paper, while the certainty of future software updates is still unknown, you might just want to look past all of that if you want a phone with a huge screen that offers a great battery life and camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 94% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 94% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 87% features: 92% display: 91% mobility: 98%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 87% features: 92% display: 91% mobility: 98%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/27/2016
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/27/2016
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 75% performance: 75% mobility: 55% workmanship: 75%
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 75% performance: 75% mobility: 55% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 79% mobility: 80% workmanship: 79%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 79% mobility: 80% workmanship: 79%
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/11/2016
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/11/2016
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Wiko U Feel Prime
Specifications
Notebook: Wiko U Feel PrimeProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.15kg
Links: Wiko homepage U Feel Prime (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
便宜,值。 Wiko带来了一台全高清双卡并带有指纹识别功能的5英寸智能手机,并且价格不到300欧元(约合316美元)。我们的测试报告将会告诉你这台设备仅是廉价或亦富有竞争力。
Foreign Reviews
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 59%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 59%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Geektopia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Geektopia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/23/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/23/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/29/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/29/2016
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PCM NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PCM NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 85% display: 75% mobility: 55% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 85% display: 75% mobility: 55% workmanship: 75%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Comment
Wiko:
ARM Mali-T720:
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Mediatek:
MT6735:
64位四核的系统芯片(4个ARM Cortex-A53核心),主频最高1.5 GHz,面向低价平板电脑和智能手机。
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
430:
中低端八核ARM Cortex-A53处理器,主频最高1.4 GHz,集成Adreno 505显卡和DDR3L-1600内存控制器以及一个X6 LTE 模组
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
75.31%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.