Xiaomi Black Shark
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/30fps
Price comparison
Average of 12 scores (from 20 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Black Shark
The Xiaomi Black Shark gaming phone offers a water-cooling system, a metal case in an industrial design, and an optional gamepad. Should gamers get misty-eyed about this phone or will only eccentrics import it from China? Find out in our review.
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For just over £400, the Black Shark is among the most powerful and well-equipped devices to date. It's got a relatively clean software experience, great battery life and a useful gaming mode to keep you focused on play. It's not the perfect phone though – even at this price point.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Black Shark may not be the best at much, but it is a stunning deal for the price. As a gaming machine it will leave most satisfied, and as a phone it competes with the best of the best.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On the basis of the previous model of black shark, the Black Shark Helo has made many improvements in appearance, lighting effect, external release, heat dissipation, etc., which also makes it a more balanced and excellent game phone. If you are a gamer, the Black Shark Helo is still a cost-effective option.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2018
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Black Shark gaming phone did provide an amazing gaming experience. The graphics were great and the company was able to include features that aids in better game-play. Although I’m sure that some people might complain how the controller is one-sided, it will still depend on the user’s preference. The device’s camera was also decent, admittedly better than some smartphones. What are your thoughts on the Black Shark Gaming Phone? Let me know in the comments.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 84% mobility: 90%
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2018
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 95% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% features: 95% display: 86% mobility: 95% ergonomy: 58%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
高通骁龙845 SoC中的集成显卡。据高通公司称,比旧款骁龙835中的Adreno 540快了30%,功耗降低30%。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 845:
适用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年初推出,采用台积电的10 nm LPP FinFET制造。 集成了高性能2.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核(Cortex-A75),和低功耗1.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核,从而提高效率。 此外,还提供X20 LTE调制解调器,交流WiFi和双通道32位1866 MHz LPDDR4x内存控制器。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.99":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.