Xiaomi Mi 6
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 34 scores (from 50 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Mi 6
内行建议。 正在寻找一台强劲的高端智能手机的用户,可以考虑一下小米Mi6。售价约400欧元(约450美元)的这款小米旗舰机型提供了丰富的功能,遗憾的是没有支持LTE-20频段。从我们的测试结果来看,第六代的Mi机型在一个方面很难与其他高端机型对抗。
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi6 is really an insider tip among high-end smartphones. It offers top-notch performance and a really great camera, which does not look like an S8 but still outshines many of its competitors. That also applies to the front camera. The design is really nice, even if it attracts fingerprints, but it is very stable and high quality built and should be able to withstand a lot.Currently, only the microphone is negative. It's great to talk on the phone and you can barely tell the difference to other devices, but when recording videos, it seems a bit tinny and ups and downs could definitely be better. That's a pity since the Xiaomi Mi5s actually had a good microphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% workmanship: 82%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 6 is without a doubt a flagship class phone on a budget, but there’s still significant ground to cover before it can truly be an excellent device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
And that’s a good example of the sacrifice you’ll have to make with the Mi 6. It comes in at a price that no other flagship can beat, but you are going to have to make some big sacrifices. If you don’t mind them, snap one up while you can!
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi mi6 is the best smartphone according to its features. This is the mini DSLR with perfect camera results and if you know how to use the proffesional camera then this is the best device for you. One thing which Xiaomi mi6 lacks is audio jack and we know all high-end devices are not coming with audio jacks now.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s no secret that I wasn’t a big fan of last year’s Xiaomi Mi 5. I didn’t like how it performed, I didn’t like its camera and for the most part, I was quite annoyed that we got what felt like scraps instead of the proper flagship we hyped it up to be.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So even though we’d comfortably call it a pretty good device, its drawbacks are still something well worth considering: the lack of a headphone jack, the heavily customized MIUI, and the subpar screen are all potential dealbreakers that shouldn’t be dismissed easily.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s fast, well designed and has a lovely screen – but there are some issues that arise along the way. The lack of a headphone jack is annoying, but I have more long-term concerns about build quality and the lack of certain LTE bands.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 6 is a flagship phone with some outstanding areas and some weak spots. Considering the low price point, the phone still competes well with the best out there. Naturally, if you have $700+ to spend on something like the Galaxy S8 you’ll be getting a better overall package, but the Mi 6 brings great hardware down to a sub-$450 price point, and for some people that’s all you need.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Xiaomi’s Mi 6 could do some real damage if the company sold it more places. Too bad for us.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Simply put, the Mi 6 offers incredible value for its price. The phone has a stunning metal-and-glass design, along with build quality rivaling the best that Samsung and LG have to offer. It has powerful internals that outmatch flagships twice its price, and 6GB of RAM along with 128GB storage should be more than enough for most customers. The dual cameras add a new dimension, and the uptick in battery life is a welcome addition.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2017
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the price it's hard to argue with the Xiaomi Mi 6. The latest Snapdragon chipset makes it more powerful than you can conceivably need, the camera offering is solid, battery life excellent, design and build quality absolutely tip-top while the smaller-than-average package will appeal to those who think Android flagships are quite literally getting too big for their boots. The usual caveats apply when buying a device that's not fully vendor-optimised for the UK market, but for less than £400 something's got to give.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 98% display: 82% mobility: 57% workmanship: 100%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Masters DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 97% price: 90% performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Hartware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% features: 65% display: 91% mobility: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/10/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 93%
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/25/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2017
Source: Android Style HD IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/26/2017
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% display: 70% mobility: 87% workmanship: 82%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2017
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Rating: performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% display: 88% mobility: 70%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: TechZ VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/31/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 540:
高通骁龙835系统芯片中集成的图形卡。与Adreno 530相比,体系结构得到了优化,但由于采用了新的10纳米工艺,因此具有更高的时钟频率。在2017年初,安卓系统下的智能手机中最快的显卡芯片之一。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 835: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.15":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.