Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, Videos @1080p/30fps
Price comparison
Average of 12 scores (from 31 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi 14C
小米红米 14C 有醒目的外观和低调的外观,这取决于你的品味。不过,它始终配备了非常快的屏幕、NFC 和指纹传感器,这在廉价智能手机中并不多见。在我们的测试中,我们将了解处理器功率是否足以满足日常使用。
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

Okay, it’s conclusion time folks! To sum up, the Redmi 14C is a very decent offering in the budget midrange segment with a premium-looking design and enough power for your day-to-day usage. The cameras are equally decent too. Likewise, HyperOS is feature-rich albeit the app recommendations and some infused ads can be a turn-off. But you can easily disable those and get a cleaner UI experience. Meanwhile, the battery life is good and the in-box 33W charger is commendable, despite the phone only supporting 18W. Overall, there is nothing much to complain about here, but, if I have to nitpick one, I would have definitely loved a hole-punch cutout display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2024
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 85% performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: Manila Shaker

Overall, the Redmi 14C is a solid budget-friendly smartphone. With its various RAM and storage options, good battery life, and decent camera features, it meets the needs of casual users seeking reliable performance at an affordable price. While it may not excel in every area, it offers good value in the budget smartphone market. So, would I recommend the Redmi 14C? Based on its features and performance, I would recommend it for users seeking an affordable smartphone. However, if you prioritize advanced camera performance, a brighter display, or a unique design, you might want to consider other options. Overall, it offers great value for its price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2024
Source: Unbox

With a starting price of Php 5k, the Redmi 14C ticks all the essentials one is looking for in a budget phone in 2024. Xiaomi has been improving its offerings on the budget segment, but we wish that they start using UFS storage instead of eMMC for better app loading times.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2024
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2024
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2024
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Smart World

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2024
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/28/2024
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mister Gadget

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2024
Source: Evo smart

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/02/2024
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2024
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/10/2024
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 70% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2024
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 100% display: 30% mobility: 70%
Source: Nerd-mobile

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/30/2024
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 40% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Unite4buy

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2024
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2024
Rating: price: 60% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/17/2024
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/05/2024
Source: Cell Phones

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2024
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2024
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/25/2024
Source: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2024
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2024
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/04/2024
Source: Viettelstore

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/30/2024
Source: Selular

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/16/2024
Source: Selular

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/06/2024
Source: Mobile-com JP

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2024
Rating: performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: SMHN

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2024
Source: Mobile-com JP

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/22/2024
Comment
ARM Mali-G52 MP2:
具有2个集群的中端集成图形卡。ARM声称G52系列比G51系列在同一工艺节点上快30%,效率高15%。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio G81 Ultra: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.88":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.