华硕 Zenbook NX500JK-DR018H 超极本简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LQ156D1JX02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 290.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 309 cd/m²
Contrast: 1188:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H 15.6 3840x2160 IPS Touch Glare | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2013-10 15.4 2880x1800 IPS Glare | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) 15.6 3200x1800 IPS Touch Glare | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70 (59424712) 15.6 3840x2160 IPS Glare | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T 15.6 3840x2160 IPS Touch Glare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.6 | 50.6 | 64.1 | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 96.1 | 76.3 | 92.3 | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 52.3 | 65.5 | ||
| Screen | 4% | -19% | -23% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 309 | 332 7% | 349 13% | 290 -6% | 255 -17% |
| Brightness | 290 | 302 4% | 322 11% | 257 -11% | 248 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 83 -3% | 83 -3% | 81 -6% | 88 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.3326 -28% | 0.21 19% | 0.512 -97% | 0.18 31% |
| Contrast | 1188 | 998 -16% | 1662 40% | 566 -52% | 1417 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.69 | 1.95 58% | 8.27 -76% | 3.72 21% | 2 57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.35 | 2.11 37% | 7.99 -139% | 3.11 7% | 1.61 52% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.34 94% | 3.42 64% | 2.48 89% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6400 102% | 6489 100% | 8117 80% | 6959 93% | 6462 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 83 | 60.6 -27% | 69.08 -17% | 48.16 -42% | 60 -28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.1 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
4% | -19% /
-19% | -23% /
-23% | 13% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | Apple MBP Retina 15 | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | HP Envy 15-k010ng | Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 8 | 16% | 7% | 20% | 26% | 5% | -6% | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2822 | 3386 20% | 3603 28% | 3099 10% | 3072 9% | ||
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3676 | 4305 17% | 3414 -7% | 4190 14% | |||
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3250 | 4318 33% | 3870 19% | 3769 16% | |||
| Storage Score | 5009 | 4938 -1% | 1959 -61% | ||||
| Home Score Accelerated | 2970 | 3245 9% | 3128 5% | ||||
| Creative Score Accelerated | 3307 | 4480 | |||||
| Work Score Accelerated | 3286 | 4012 22% | 3583 9% | ||||
| PCMark 7 | -2% | 6% | -18% | 4% | -7% | -46% | |
| Score | 5565 | 5842 5% | 5937 7% | 5010 -10% | 5879 6% | 5034 -10% | 2882 -48% |
| System Storage | 5608 | 7136 27% | 5562 -1% | 3141 -44% | 5209 -7% | 5296 -6% | 1536 -73% |
| Computation | 17559 | 10885 -38% | 19543 11% | 17704 1% | 20069 14% | 16779 -4% | 14339 -18% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
5% | 7% /
6% | 1% /
-8% | 15% /
15% | -1% /
0% | -26% /
-23% |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5565 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | 2970 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2822 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3676 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated | 3286 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3250 points | |
Help | ||
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | Apple MBP Retina 15 | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -31% | -38% | -29% | -35% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 431.3 | 46.64 -89% | 140.7 -67% | 173.5 -60% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 926 | 397.7 -57% | 309.5 -67% | 272.8 -71% | ||
| Score Total | 1152 | 1064 -8% | 1070 -7% | 784 -32% | 921 -20% | |
| 4K Read | 27.39 | 15.56 -43% | 23.83 -13% | 37.69 38% | 30.44 11% | |
| 4K Write | 61.5 | 27.86 -55% | 59.6 -3% | 81.7 33% | 67.7 10% | |
| Seq Read | 1093 | 731 -33% | 498.5 -54% | 504 -54% | 501 -54% | |
| Seq Write | 708 | 592 -16% | 404.9 -43% | 325.1 -54% | 252.3 -64% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -42% | -33% | -19% | -27% | ||
| Read Seq | 1095 | 699 -36% | 512 -53% | 514 -53% | 509 -54% | |
| Write Seq | 831 | 647 -22% | 412.9 -50% | 352.4 -58% | 264.1 -68% | |
| Read 4k | 30.38 | 15.48 -49% | 24.57 -19% | 32.23 6% | 32.95 8% | |
| Write 4k | 72.3 | 28.08 -61% | 66.1 -9% | 93.7 30% | 76.5 6% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-36% | -36% /
-36% | -24% /
-25% | -31% /
-32% |
Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
Sequential Read:
1095 MB/s
Sequential Write:
831 MB/s
512K Read:
633 MB/s
512K Write:
751 MB/s
4K Read:
30.38 MB/s
4K Write:
72.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
279.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
232.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4421 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42257 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12781 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3248 points | |
Help | ||
| Thief - 1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
| Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a8G1.12TWakk | |
| Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | |
| Apple MBP Retina 15 | |
| Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | |
| Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a8G1.12TWakk | |
| Dota 2 - 1920x1080 High / On, Render Quality: 100 % (sort by value) | |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | |
| Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a8G1.12TWakk | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | |
| Apple MBP Retina 15 | |
| Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | |
| Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a8G1.12TWakk | |
| Dishonored - 1920x1080 High / On, FOV: 75 AA:FX (sort by value) | |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishonored (2012) | 119 | 64 | ||
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 112 | 79.3 | 36.5 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 85 | 30.46 | ||
| Dota 2 (2013) | 50.3 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 39.1 | 32 () | 16.5 |
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | Apple MBP Retina 15 | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | HP Envy 15-k010ng | Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 4% | -7% | -2% | 0% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28 10% | 28 10% | 32.4 -5% | 29.6 5% | 29.7 4% | 33.8 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 28 10% | 28 10% | 33.4 -8% | 30.6 1% | 31 -0% | 33.8 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 28 10% | 29.8 4% | 33.4 -8% | 31.4 -1% | 31 -0% | 33.9 -9% |
| Load Average * | 39.7 | 35.8 10% | 42.1 -6% | 44.5 -12% | 44.4 -12% | 41.8 -5% | 41.9 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.8 | 45.8 -5% | 42.1 4% | 44.4 -1% | 44.6 -2% | 43 2% | 43.6 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 31 / 31 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.7 / 43.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance) | ||
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | Apple MBP Retina 15 | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | HP Envy 15-k010ng | Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -25% | -1% | -6% | 6% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.6 | 46 -3% | 48.4 -9% | 43.5 2% | 48 -8% | 44.2 1% | 48.5 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.7 | 42 4% | 64.6 -48% | 46 -5% | 47.6 -9% | 43 2% | 46.3 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.9 | 34 -10% | 35.6 -15% | 28 9% | 32.3 -5% | 28.2 9% | 29 6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.4 | 33 -9% | 39.2 -29% | 32.8 -8% | 30.8 -1% | 27.3 10% | 28.7 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
| Asus NX500JK-DR018H | Apple MBP Retina 15 | Dell XPS 15 (Late 2013) | Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro | HP Envy 15-k010ng | Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 6% | 7% | 8% | 42% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14.1 | 7.6 46% | 10.2 28% | 12.8 9% | 6.2 56% | 5.3 62% | 17.6 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 21.3 | 15.1 29% | 18.8 12% | 10.2 52% | 9.8 54% | 21.1 1% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.4 | 15.6 33% | 17.4 26% | 19 19% | 21.4 9% | 9.9 58% | 24 -3% |
| Load Average * | 77.7 | 80.4 -3% | 87.4 -12% | 66.7 14% | 85.5 -10% | 60.4 22% | 83.5 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 81.8 | 88.5 -8% | 115.2 -41% | 99.1 -21% | 136.9 -67% | 72.1 12% | 108.7 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
| Idle | 14.1 / 21.3 / 23.4 Watt |
| Load |
77.7 / 81.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 960 | |
我们对它已经期待已久了，现在华硕在假期前推出了这款产品。奢华型笔记本Zenbook NX500JK现在已经上市，我们也把它带入了测试实验室。现在让我们来看一看华硕给我们的这款产品的承诺吧。
轻薄，经典。它的25毫米机身十分坚固，机身材质也非常精致，而低调的外观也充满设计感。华硕得分。
华丽，生动而准确的色彩。它的sRGB色域覆盖率为92%。sRGB相当于约72%的NTSC色域，因此它应该超过了sRGB参考值。它覆盖了80%的AdobeRGB（1998）色域。如果你不太挑剔的话，NX500的色彩覆盖可以说相当广。华硕得分。
细节和完美的可视角度。如果你想要极致的4K分辨率的话，它有完美可视角度、高对比度和高亮度的组合。不过4K分辨率对游戏和应用意味着什么又是另一个争议了。华硕得分。
高品质视频通话。它的摄像头让我们非常失望，但麦克风表现却非常优秀。可以称作高品质的只有麦克风，摄像头的照片和视频质量几乎在日光下也没有实用性。在这点上华硕无法得分。
键盘背光与终极输入体验。我们测试过更差的输入设备，但NX50无法与ThinkPad系列键盘的输入体验与易用性相媲美。而透明背光也不适合于在日光下工作使用。背光下的按键字体十分难以看清，以至于我们不得不关闭背光。华硕没能得分。
完美音效。名为Sonic Master Premium的音响系统声音清晰，平衡，甚至还有不错的低音，听起来非常悦耳。华硕得分。
游戏级图形性能。采用GDDR5的GTX 850M显卡可以运行很多最新的游戏，甚至在全高清和最高细节设定下。但在4K分辨率下玩游戏几乎是个不可能的任务，至少对于现在和近几年的游戏来说。NX500可以胜过采用GT 750M的竞争对手（XPS 15, MBP 15 Retina），但它与同样配备GTX 850M的竞争对手比较则落于下风，由于它处理器和显卡的加速效果十分有限。不过，这只对于追需求性能的技术宅来说才成立。但仍然华硕没能得分。
体验真正强劲性能。三星的固态硬盘速度很快，可以胜过很多竞争对手的硬盘。遗憾的是，处理器没能跟上硬盘的速度，它在机身变热后加速性能就降至谷底，经常运行于标准的2.3GHz频率。这点上华硕无法得分，很多售价低很多的设备都可以完全发挥处理器的最大性能。
强大但冷酷。一个人的痛苦可能是另一个人的喜悦。它在温度控制上的谨慎控制限制了性能，却提供了出色的低噪音和清凉机身。华硕得分。
无止尽运行。它在无线上网测试中运行了仅6小时，相比主要竞争对手MBP Retina 15和XPS 15都短了许多。同时，再加上它的镜面屏幕和高重量机身（2.25千克）还有电源适配器（436克），让华硕没能得分。
Zenbook NX500JK在这个小评分单元中得到了10分钟的5分。如果追求完美的话，则必须与市场上最好的设备一拼高下。Zenbook在很多方面都能在竞争中脱颖而出。但是，这款Zenbook在很多承诺过的方面并不出色，如性能，人体工程学设计和便携性。顶级性能？华硕营销部门的用词可能有些夸张了。我们想要再说一次，并不是针对华硕：设计一台美观，轻薄，安静，持久，但无法在高设定下运行游戏的笔记本电脑并不是一件丢人的事。或者我们必须要责备消费者或者媒体，因为他们总是期待着新的性能记录吗？
现在我们还没有这个问题的答案。竞争对手Apple MBP Retina 15 (89%) 和戴尔 XPS 15 (88%)仍然是非常好的选择，看一看它们的得分就可以明白了。这款Zenbook NX500得到了86%，因此消费者仍然会在选择中有所犹豫。
如果你喜欢这款Zenbook，但只希望花费最高1000欧元的话（约7556人民币），我们推荐同厂商的N550JK（标准电压处理器，GTX 850M）。它的铝合金机身和硬件配置一样都与这款产品非常相似。除了全高清的屏幕，你还可以得到一个外接低音炮。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
