红米10X 5G智能手机评测:比肩三星S20 Ultra?
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2400x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
78.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2 | 152 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 | |
79.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
79.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
75.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2020 | Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.55" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 24% | 19% | -30% | -27% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 608 | 610 0% | 554 -9% | 442 -27% | 594 -2% | 523 -14% |
Brightness | 608 | 579 -5% | 559 -8% | 419 -31% | 613 1% | 482 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 92 -4% | 92 -4% | 90 -6% | 89 -7% | 86 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.46 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 1.8 55% | 2 50% | 6.1 -53% | 6.1 -53% | 6.22 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.65 | 3 74% | 7.7 34% | 9.7 17% | 10.6 9% | 10.56 9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.5 24% | 1.6 52% | 5.9 -79% | 7 -112% | 8 -142% |
Gamma | 2.291 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.226 99% |
CCT | 7023 93% | 6864 95% | 6589 99% | 7631 85% | 7370 88% | 8856 73% |
Contrast | 1649 | 1195 | 1137 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 227.3 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A41 | Realme 6 Pro | Oppo A91 | Nokia 5.3 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -41% | -44% | -31% | -43% | -45% | -29% | 80% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 999 | 498.1 -50% | 299.9 -70% | 513 -49% | 505 -49% | 299.5 -70% | 760 ? -24% | 1889 ? 89% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 479.5 | 171.1 -64% | 211.1 -56% | 203.3 -58% | 185.3 -61% | 243.2 -49% | 297 ? -38% | 1473 ? 207% |
Random Read 4KB | 239.4 | 122.6 -49% | 84 -65% | 158.7 -34% | 145.6 -39% | 109.1 -54% | 152.9 ? -36% | 278 ? 16% |
Random Write 4KB | 289.6 | 112.9 -61% | 72.5 -75% | 154 -47% | 28.55 -90% | 45.2 -84% | 131.6 ? -55% | 312 ? 8% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.5 ? | 76.7 ? -9% | 83 ? -2% | 86.4 ? 2% | 77.2 ? -9% | 77.3 ? -9% | 76 ? -10% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.5 ? | 54.9 ? -15% | 67 ? 4% | 63.4 ? -2% | 60.3 ? -7% | 60.7 ? -6% | 59.6 ? -8% |
PUBG mobile
Dead Trigger 2
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.3 Watt |
Idle | 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watt |
Load |
5.1 / 8.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | 33% | 13% | 32% | 0% | 10% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.75 53% | 0.96 40% | 0.92 42% | 0.82 49% | 1.6 ? -0% | 0.883 ? 45% | |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 2.19 -15% | 1.57 17% | 1.79 6% | 1.73 9% | 1.9 ? -0% | 1.467 ? 23% | |
Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.24 -7% | 1.61 23% | 1.88 10% | 1.75 17% | 2.1 ? -0% | 1.621 ? 23% | |
Load Average * | 5.1 | 3.88 24% | 2.93 43% | 5.41 -6% | 2.33 54% | 5.1 ? -0% | 6.58 ? -29% | |
Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 5.97 33% | 4.97 44% | 7.59 15% | 5.97 33% | 8.9 ? -0% | 9.91 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 804 | 1175 46% | 650 -19% | 1031 28% | 605 -25% | 876 9% |
Pros
Cons
总结——一台优秀的红米手机:
由于采用了联发科Dimensity 820,Redmi 10X的5G版本是一款价格较低的中端智能手机。 Redmi智能手机的起步价目前为200欧元(约233美元),具有相对较高的性能,快速的存储和快速的WLAN。 此外,还配有优秀的屏下指纹,并且是同类价格中可能是最快的指纹传感器之一。
Redmi 10X是一款出色的200欧元(〜233美元)智能手机。
不幸的是,Redmi 10X 5G不太可能找到进入欧洲的正式途径,从而迫使您接受进口和中文版MiUI的限制。
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich