Notebookcheck Logo

红米10X 5G智能手机评测：比肩三星S20 Ultra?

千元级双5G支持。

Redmi 10X是一款经济实惠的中端智能手机，具有漂亮的AMOLED面板和快速的联发科Dimensity 820处理器。 光学屏下指纹传感器的可靠速度令我们感到非常惊讶，该传感器在这个价格范围内非常出色，其响应速度丝毫不比三星Galaxy S20智能手机中的超声波解决方案慢。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Redmi 10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 820 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.57 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, 屏幕键盘, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频端口, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 接近传感器，加速度传感器，陀螺仪，电子罗盘, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: n1 / n3 / n41 / n78 / n79; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 CDMA EVDO: BC0; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 CDMA 1X: BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.99 x 164.2 x 75.8
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1.6 um (4 in 1), FOV 79 °) + 8 MP (telephoto, OIS) + 8 MP (wide-angle, FOV 119 °) + 5 MP (macro)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, 22.5 W充电器，USB电缆，保护套, MiUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
208 g, Power Supply: 89 g
Price
220 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5		208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
82.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.8 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2		152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.10"2400x1080
79.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79.8 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3		172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
75.7 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610		185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone

Size Comparison

❌
165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.99 mm 208 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (642min - 704max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s -49%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s -52%
Realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s -58%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (25min - 258max) MBit/s -76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (495min - 650max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s -42%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s -54%
Realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s -54%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (20min - 215max) MBit/s -77%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (495-650)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (642-704)
Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Main camera
Main camera
2x zoom
2x zoom
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 13.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
32 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 31.4 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 47.92 ∆E
598
cd/m²		601
cd/m²		605
cd/m²
599
cd/m²		608
cd/m²		611
cd/m²
608
cd/m²		620
cd/m²		622
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 608 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.6"
Screen
24%
19%
-30%
-27%
-39%
Brightness middle
608
610
0%
554
-9%
442
-27%
594
-2%
523
-14%
Brightness
608
579
-5%
559
-8%
419
-31%
613
1%
482
-21%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
92
-4%
90
-6%
89
-7%
86
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.99
1.8
55%
2
50%
6.1
-53%
6.1
-53%
6.22
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.65
3
74%
7.7
34%
9.7
17%
10.6
9%
10.56
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.5
24%
1.6
52%
5.9
-79%
7
-112%
8
-142%
Gamma
2.291 96%
2.31 95%
2.11 104%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.226 99%
CCT
7023 93%
6864 95%
6589 99%
7631 85%
7370 88%
8856 73%
Contrast
1649
1195
1137

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8419 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
652 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points -45%
Realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points -13%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points -51%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points -57%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
742 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
  (n=1)
652 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=160, last 2 years)
1097 Points +68%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2678 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points -54%
Realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points -34%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points -47%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points -50%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2856 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
  (n=1)
2678 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=160, last 2 years)
3704 Points +38%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2456 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points +95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
  (n=1)
2456 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (457 - 23362, n=47, last 2 years)
9924 Points +304%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3009 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
  (n=1)
3009 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 19169, n=47, last 2 years)
8590 Points +185%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
138.3 Points +208%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.9 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 (n=1)
45 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
44.97 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.64 Points -27%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A41Realme 6 ProOppo A91Nokia 5.3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-44%
-31%
-43%
-45%
-29%
96%
Sequential Read 256KB
999
498.1
-50%
299.9
-70%
513
-49%
505
-49%
299.5
-70%
760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113)
-24%
2050 ?(270 - 4384, n=188, last 2 years)
105%
Sequential Write 256KB
479.5
171.1
-64%
211.1
-56%
203.3
-58%
185.3
-61%
243.2
-49%
297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113)
-38%
1663 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=188, last 2 years)
247%
Random Read 4KB
239.4
122.6
-49%
84
-65%
158.7
-34%
145.6
-39%
109.1
-54%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-36%
286 ?(47.6 - 504, n=188, last 2 years)
19%
Random Write 4KB
289.6
112.9
-61%
72.5
-75%
154
-47%
28.55
-90%
45.2
-84%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-55%
328 ?(9.4 - 964, n=188, last 2 years)
13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
-8%
PUBG mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G; HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Dead Trigger 2
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: Ø60.3 (59-61)
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Max. Load
 43.5 °C41.3 °C37.4 °C 
 42.6 °C41 °C37.4 °C 
 41.3 °C39.7 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
32.8 °C39.2 °C40.7 °C
33.7 °C39.2 °C40 °C
34.2 °C39 °C39.5 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.538.52536.236.63127.326.44033.536.35033.434.56323.524.68022.619.81002223.112520.824.416017.936.920013.341.425012.24531512.249.940012.455.150013.459.863013.464.980017.666.5100016.670.6125014.369.1160012.569.720001367.7250013.864.4315014.857.2400016.661.6500017.367.5630018.271.980001975.31000019.668.31250019.655.51600020.352.3SPL57.366.228.380.5N11.119.5146.9median 16.6median 61.6median 14.6median 63.7Delta3.711.513.716.834.829.419.626.323.92524.324.730.533.418.726.820.422.518.621.417.517.419.532.919.239.416.448.315.254.314.25714.760.413.862.514.66714.168.613.568.414.473.113.976.513.878.413.873.714.772.414.275.414.473.714.974.61563.415.152.315.350.126.585.50.859.7median 14.7median 63.40.912.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 10X 5GSamsung Galaxy A41
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 5.1 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
4520 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh		Realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Oppo A91
4025 mAh		Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
33%
13%
32%
0%
8%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.75
53%
0.96
40%
0.92
42%
0.82
49%
1.6 ?(n=1)
-0%
0.871 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=161, last 2 years)
46%
Idle Average *
1.9
2.19
-15%
1.57
17%
1.79
6%
1.73
9%
1.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
1.405 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.24
-7%
1.61
23%
1.88
10%
1.75
17%
2.1 ?(n=1)
-0%
1.553 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
26%
Load Average *
5.1
3.88
24%
2.93
43%
5.41
-6%
2.33
54%
5.1 ?(n=1)
-0%
7.05 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
-38%
Load Maximum *
8.9
5.97
33%
4.97
44%
7.59
15%
5.97
33%
8.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
10.6 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 24min
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
4520 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh		Realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Oppo A91
4025 mAh		Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
804
1175
46%
650
-19%
1031
28%
605
-25%
876
9%

Pros

+ 快速指纹读取器
+ 明亮的OLED面板
+ 快速SoC
+ 快速WLAN
+ 做工
+ 续航时间长
+ 快速的UFS存储

Cons

- 进口限制
- 轻微降频
- 只有60 Hz的面板

总结——一台优秀的红米手机：

Testing the Redmi 10X 5G. Test unit provided by tradingshenzhen.
Testing the Redmi 10X 5G. Test unit provided by tradingshenzhen.

由于采用了联发科Dimensity 820，Redmi 10X的5G版本是一款价格较低的中端智能手机。 Redmi智能手机的起步价目前为200欧元（约233美元），具有相对较高的性能，快速的存储和快速的WLAN。 此外，还配有优秀的屏下指纹，并且是同类价格中可能是最快的指纹传感器之一。

Redmi 10X是一款出色的200欧元（〜233美元）智能手机。

不幸的是，Redmi 10X 5G不太可能找到进入欧洲的正式途径，从而迫使您接受进口和中文版MiUI的限制。

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
44 / 64 → 69%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 74%
Camera
69%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 红米10X 5G智能手机评测：比肩三星S20 Ultra?
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-02- 2 (Update: 2021-02- 2)