Notebookcheck Logo

小米11 Lite 4G智能手机评测。小米11系列中最便宜的产品

预算版。

小米将其顶级智能手机聚集在小米11系列中,也为它们收取相当多的费用。在价格方面,小米11 Lite 4G的情况正好相反。这款6.55英寸的中端智能手机起价为300欧元(约354美元),因此显然是小米11系列中最便宜的代表。然而,正如我们的评论所显示的那样,其功能和性能都很好。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

在推出小米11小米11 Ultra顶级机型后,小米又推出了中端小米11 Lite 5G随着小米11 Lite 4G的推出,现在第二款Lite机型进入了竞争,它甚至比5G机型更便宜,在功能和性能方面已经相当实惠。

小米11 Lite 4G也采用了与小米11顶级机型相同的设计语言。然而,与5G版本相比,功能略少,如骁龙732G,而不是骁龙780G例如,以及只有Wi-Fi 5而不是Wi-Fi 6。除此以外,虽然小米11 Lite 5G的距离整体上非常短。

6.55英寸的小米11 Lite的得分是2400x1080分辨率的AMOLED面板,运行频率高达90赫兹,支持HDR10。此外,还有高达8GB的LPDDR4X内存和128GB的UFS 2.2存储,64MP的三摄像头设置,以及4250毫安时的电池。

我们的评论显示,在竞争激烈的中端市场上,该设备如何能保持自己的这些硬件组件,以及它与小米11 Lite 5G的对比情况。

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Mi 11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Full HD , HDR10, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: via USB Type-C to 3.5 mm headphone adapter, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, linear motor, IR blaster, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (bands 2/3/5/8), 3G (bands 1/2/3/4/5), 4G (bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/32/38/40/41/66), Head SAR 0.599 W/kg, Body SAR 0.948 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.81 x 160.53 x 75.73
Battery
4250 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 64 MP primary camera (f/1.79); 8 MP ultra wide-angle camera (f/2.2, 119˚); 5 MP telemacro camera (f/2.4), video up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix MP (f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 33-watt charger, USB Type-C cable, USB Type-C to 3.5 mm headphone adapter, SIM tool, soft case, user guide, warranty card, MIUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
157 g, Power Supply: 86 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
SD 732G, Adreno 618
157 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
78.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
SD 720G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
84 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080

外壳 - 非常薄,非常轻,有光泽的外观

小米11 Lite 4G仅有6.81毫米(不含摄像头凸起的测量值),纤细而高质量的外壳不仅非常薄,而且非常轻,只有157克,甚至比小米11 Lite 5G 轻了2克。在对比设备中,只有谷歌Pixel 4a,重量更轻,但它也小了不少,只有5.8英寸。

除了一些小细节,机箱与小米11 Lite 5G的机箱没有区别。小米提供波巴黑、泡泡糖蓝和桃粉色的小米11 Lite 4G,而5G版本则有薄荷绿、柑橘黄和松露黑。两个版本都有玻璃背面。后者在小米11 Lite 5G上是哑光的,而在小米11 Lite 4G上是反射的。高光泽度的表面看起来很时尚,但它也几乎神奇地吸引了指纹。

小米11 Lite 4G的正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护(5G版本为大猩猩6号玻璃)。这两款智能手机都有IP53等级,可以保护它们免受灰尘和溅水的影响。

Size comparison

163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 157 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g144 mm 69.4 mm 8.2 mm 143 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性--8GB内存变体难得一见

小米提供三种存储版本的小米11 Lite 4G。然而,目前只有其中两个在其网络商店有售。配备6GB LPDDR4X内存和64GB UFS 2.2存储空间的版本价格为300欧元(约354美元),而配备128GB内存的版本价格为350欧元(约413美元)。

我们的审查样本是第三个版本,有8GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 2.2存储空间(产品编号M2101K9AG),在小米商店或德国价格比较门户网站上还没有。在测试时,目前还不清楚小米是否以及何时会正式宣布欧洲市场的8GB版本。然而,除了额外的2GB内存外,其余配置与6GB版本相同。

其功能包括集成在电源按钮中的指纹传感器,具有USB 2.0速度的OTG功能的USB-C端口,双卡,以及红外辐射器。SIM卡槽不再是两张SIM卡,而是可以容纳一张SIM卡和一张高达512GB的microSD卡。AMOLED面板有一个始终开启的设置,但在MIUI 12中显示时间被限制在10秒。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边。带指纹扫描器的电源键,音量摇杆
右边。带指纹扫描器的电源键,音量摇杆
顶部:红外辐射器
顶部:红外辐射器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

我们用东芝Exceria Pro M501参考存储卡测试microSD读卡器的速度。顺序数据传输处于良好水平,但复制性能相当弱,只有13.8MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.85 MB/s +195%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s +165%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s +31%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.83 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40 (30.3-51)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.9 (34.8-52.4)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.5 (35-92.3)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø86.8 (31.3-92.5)

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12用于小米11 Lite 4G

小米11 Lite 4G配备了Android 11和其内部用户界面MIUI 12。在测试时(6月底),Android 安全补丁仍处于4月1日的水平,因此已不太符合最新情况。然而,由于小米每三个月为其目前的智能手机提供一次安全更新,因此可以预计在7月份会有一次更新。

MIUI是一个组织良好的系统界面,但它在安装应用程序后显示广告,即所谓的MSA(MIUI系统广告)。随着时间的推移,它们会变得很烦人,但可以通过内置设置很容易地停用它们。网上有许多指南,如这个 ,例如。

小米手机支持DRM Widevine L1,因此也能以高清方式传输内容。

通信和GNSS - NFC、蓝牙5.1和Wi-Fi 5

小米11 Lite 4G的无线通信功能包括欧盟地区所有重要频率的4G,NFC,蓝牙5.1,以及Wi-Fi 5。虽然它在Wi-Fi上提供非常稳定的传输速率,但由于缺乏MIMO技术,它的速度并不特别快。

连接到我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12,这款智能手机在接收数据时只能达到332Mb/s,发送数据时甚至只能达到283Mb/s。配备了Wi-Fi 6和多用户MIMO,小米11 Lite 5G管理的数据吞吐量是Wi-Fi的两倍以上。5G版本还配备了比小米11 Lite 4G更先进的蓝牙版本(蓝牙5.2与5.1)。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s +215%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s +136%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s +119%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (277min - 288max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (141min - 293max) MBit/s 0%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s +163%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s +101%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s +89%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 (320min - 341max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
310 (271min - 334max) MBit/s -7%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s -17%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (320-341)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (277-288)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

小米11 Lite 4G使用GPS和GLONASS卫星导航系统(每种情况下都是L1),以及伽利略(E1)和北斗(B1)确定其位置。在测试中,该设备能快速处理这个问题,在室内和室外的精确度都达到了3米。

这款智能手机在短途骑车时表现相当好,并带着Garmin Edge 500进行了比较。虽然它的表现并不像专业的导航设备那样精确,而且它经常把我们定位在离路线几米远的地方,特别是在密集的城市地区,但总体上的精确度足以满足日常使用。

GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

电话和通话质量 - 带有VoLTE和VoWiFi的双SIM卡

在测试中,小米11 Lite 4G以良好的通话质量令人信服。用户可以很好地理解对方,无论智能手机是放在耳边还是以免提模式使用。

支持Wi-Fi通话和VoLTE。

照相机--成熟的三相机设置可以拍摄出好的照片

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

小米11 Lite 4G的前置摄像头分辨率为16MP,比小米11 Lite 5G 少了4MP。尽管如此,在较小的版本中,图片质量也不错。软件在标准的人像设置中自动模糊背景,同时还添加了柔化效果,这确保了在良好的环境光线下几乎所有的时间都有令人愉悦的自拍。视频通话是可能的,最大分辨率为1080p,每秒60帧。

背面的方形相机模块由三个镜头和一个LED闪光灯组成。它的核心是6400万像素的摄像头,周围有一个银色的环,它提供的日光照片以生动的色彩和良好的清晰度而得分。

尽管相机规格相同,但4G和5G版本的小米11 Lite可能使用不同的传感器。这方面的一个迹象是白平衡,在小米11 Lite 4G中,你不一定要使用AI模式,这与5G兄弟姐妹机型不同。在默认设置下,小米11 Lite 4G的主摄像头已经可以很好地捕捉颜色和灰度,因此,拍摄的对象看起来不会过度饱和或冲淡。

在环境光线不佳的情况下,主摄像头仍能从拍摄对象身上提取许多细节,但照片整体上并不能给人留下深刻印象。然而,小米11 Lite 5G的表现明显更差,这也是不同相机传感器的另一个迹象。这两款手机都没有电子图像稳定功能,也没有长焦镜头,这就是为什么在变焦时特别需要稳定的手。

主摄像头录制的视频最高可达4K,每秒30帧。119˚的超广角相机,位于主镜头右侧的相机模块中,也可以处理最高1080p,30FPS的视频。由于分辨率只有800万像素,用超广角摄像头拍摄的照片照明效果很好,但它们没有提供太多的细节,边缘模糊,在晚上几乎没有用处。

第三个摄像头是一个500万像素的长焦摄像头,只要稍加练习,就可以用来拍摄体面的特写。与许多经济型智能手机不同,小米11 Lite 4G提供了三个成熟的摄像头,而不是两个摄像头加一个权宜之计,如深度传感器或低分辨率的微距摄像头。

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在受控的照明条件下,我们可以看到,主摄像头再现的颜色基本上是真实的。然而,在黑暗中(在1勒克斯下的色彩图表),这种精确性就没有了,只能看到测试图表的朦胧图像。

ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G: 7.32 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 13.49 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
74.8 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G: 44.37 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 74.79 ∆E

配件和保修 - 33瓦的电源适配器,一年保修

小米为其智能手机配备了一个33瓦的电源适配器,一条USB线(Type-A转C),一个透明保护套,一个SIM卡工具,以及一个Type-C转3.5毫米的耳机适配器。盒子里还包括一份用户手册和保修卡。小米没有为其智能手机提供任何特殊配件。

小米11 Lite 4G有12个月的保修期。

输入设备和处理 - 小米手机,触摸采样率为240赫兹

小米11 Lite 4G的AMOLED面板的触摸采样率为240赫兹,刷新率高达90赫兹(可选择60赫兹)。这使得智能手机可以非常流畅地操作。

指纹传感器并不像小米11 Lite 5G ,而是集成在电源按钮上,位于显示屏下方。当屏幕关闭时,它也能工作,并能快速、可靠地解锁小米11 Lite 4G。第二种生物识别认证方法也是如此,即使用前置摄像头的面部识别。然而,由于它是基于二维方法,它不太安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示器 - 明亮的AMOLED面板,超过800 cd/m²

子像素网格
子像素网格
在53%及以上的亮度水平下,PWM闪烁的频率恒定为90Hz。
在53%及以上的亮度水平下,PWM闪烁的频率恒定为90Hz。

小米11 Lite 4G的HDR10兼容的AMOLED面板的分辨率为2400x1080像素,导致402PPI的高像素密度。6.55英寸显示屏支持60或90赫兹的刷新率,标称亮度高达800尼特。

小米11 Lite 4G在测试中如约而至,在纯白背景下,平均亮度达到808.9 cd/m²,超过了制造商的规格。如果我们用均匀分布的亮区和暗区(APL50)重复测量,我们甚至可以达到842 cd/m²。相比之下,当亮度传感器被禁用时,亮度下降到462 cd/m²。在最低亮度水平下,我们仍然测量到2.88 cd/m²。根据HDR10认证,该显示器覆盖了99.7%的DCI-P3色彩空间。

AMOLED面板使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制。当面板亮度设置为53%或更低时,它在344.8至373.1赫兹的相当高频率范围内运行。在更高的亮度水平下,我们测量的PWM频率恒定为90赫兹。

804
cd/m²
816
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
815
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
813
cd/m²
800
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 816 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 808.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 815 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8"
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy A52
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen
15%
-59%
-27%
-43%
-1%
Brightness middle
815
705
-13%
606
-26%
694
-15%
863
6%
584
-28%
Brightness
809
707
-13%
606
-25%
696
-14%
860
6%
583
-28%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
98
0%
98
0%
93
-5%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
3.6
-177%
2
-54%
3.2
-146%
1.17
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
1.9
39%
6.2
-100%
6.7
-116%
5.2
-68%
2.95
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
1.3
50%
3.3
-27%
1.7
35%
3.9
-50%
1.7
35%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
2.1 105%
2.33 94%
2.231 99%
CCT
6544 99%
6576 99%
6704 97%
6440 101%
7299 89%
6341 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz ≤ 53 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 53 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

有三种颜色方案可供选择:"自动"、"饱和 "和 "原色"。AMOLED面板在第三种方案中提供了最好的图像质量。如果你切换到 "原色",颜色和灰度就会在理想范围内再现(DeltaE<3)。色温和伽玛值在这里也几乎是教科书式的。

色彩准确性("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩准确性("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于AMOLED面板的高亮度,小米11 Lite 4G可以在户外很好地使用。即使在阳光直射下,屏幕上的内容仍然相当清晰。

作为AMOLED面板的典型,当你从侧面看屏幕时,图像会略微偏向绿色或蓝色的色调。然而,这并不影响可读性。

在阳光直射下的户外使用
在阳光直射下的户外使用
视角
视角

性能--4G版的小米11 Lite,SoC较慢

小米11 Lite 4G和小米11 Lite 5G,大多只是在细节上有区别。然而,处理器是一个相当大的因素。虽然5G版本由骁龙780G ,但小米11 Lite 4G使用慢得多的骁龙732GAdreno 618图形芯片。

因此,在合成基准测试和浏览器测试中,小米11 Lite 4G无法与它的5G兄弟姐妹相比,而且它还被小米10 Lite 5G 勉强击败,后者配备的是骁龙765G。然而,这种性能差异在日常使用中几乎不明显,因为小米11 Lite 4G加载应用程序和网站的速度很快,而且在流畅地显示内容方面似乎没有任何问题。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
565 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
545 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (563 - 567, n=3)
565 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points +81%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1792 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points -8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1622 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1728 - 1792, n=3)
1769 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points +90%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1030 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1030 Points 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1176 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points +172%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1030 - 1182, n=3)
1101 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 21892, n=44, last 2 years)
7478 Points +626%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1211 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1226 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points +132%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1211 - 1293, n=3)
1265 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=38, last 2 years)
7575 Points +526%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
8793 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9241 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8793 - 8799, n=2)
8796 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +48%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
8064 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points +8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7184 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
8411 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10689 Points +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8064 - 8688, n=3)
8284 Points +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3919 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points -10%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1797 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points +78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3784 - 4021, n=3)
3908 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
4112 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1681 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3853 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points +109%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3917 - 4232, n=3)
4087 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3365 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2368 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3190 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3382, n=3)
3374 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3939 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points -7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1819 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3783 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3887 - 3939, n=3)
3915 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
4256 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1737 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4005 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points +97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4038 - 4256, n=3)
4127 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +363%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points +7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2182 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3167 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3125 - 3425, n=3)
3307 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2760 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1151 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2577 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points +85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2713 - 2783, n=3)
2752 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)
3075 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
998 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2450 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points +132%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2559 - 2694, n=3)
2625 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)
3259 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3386 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points -4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2474 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3149 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3372 - 3436, n=3)
3398 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)
3280 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2935 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1152 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2727 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2865 - 2938, n=3)
2913 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)
7934 Points +170%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2825 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points -13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1015 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2620 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points +118%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2735 - 2832, n=3)
2797 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)
11805 Points +318%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3400 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2177 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3184 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3311 - 3438, n=3)
3383 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)
4663 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2594 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points -13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1113 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2437 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2506 - 2610, n=3)
2570 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=70, last 2 years)
2836 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2534 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points -15%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
968 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2373 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points +128%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2427 - 2562, n=3)
2508 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=70, last 2 years)
3089 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2828 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points -4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2349 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2693 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2773 - 2828, n=3)
2809 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=70, last 2 years)
2696 Points -5%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1116 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points +186%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (835 - 1143, n=3)
1031 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)
2859 Points +156%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1112 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1044 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points +189%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (720 - 1124, n=3)
985 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 21065, n=181, last 2 years)
7682 Points +591%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
337 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
318 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points +157%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (278 - 337, n=2)
308 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)
2114 Points +527%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
331 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
313 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (258 - 331, n=2)
295 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2107 Points +537%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
81 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps -27%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
70 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (60 - 81, n=3)
74 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
86.8 fps +7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
91 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps -8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
77 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps +68%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (91 - 91, n=3)
91 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)
289 fps +218%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
43 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
37 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps +84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (34 - 43, n=3)
39 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
76.3 fps +77%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
45 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps -9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39 fps -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (45 - 45, n=3)
45 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)
170.1 fps +278%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
32 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps +78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (28 - 32, n=3)
29.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)
66.6 fps +108%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
33 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps -9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
31 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps +97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (33 - 33, n=3)
33 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)
120.8 fps +266%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps +94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (17 - 18, n=3)
17.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)
48.7 fps +171%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps +111%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (19 - 19, n=3)
19 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)
72.8 fps +283%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps +121%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.6 fps +172%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
20 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -10%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps +150%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (20 - 21, n=3)
20.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
82.4 fps +312%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
12 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps -8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps +117%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (11 - 12, n=3)
11.3 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.5 fps +221%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.4 fps
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.1 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps +143%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (7.4 - 7.5, n=3)
7.43 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
33.2 fps +349%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
352487 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198053 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
343854 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (345356 - 352487, n=3)
350034 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points +130%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
288309 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points -7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
185542 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
288306 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
468196 Points +62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (279048 - 292450, n=3)
286602 Points -1%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
5019 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points +215%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
21348 Points +325%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4958 - 35458, n=3)
15145 Points +202%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3617 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3287 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3617, n=3)
3486 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points +76%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
6752 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
5783 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (5972 - 6752, n=3)
6422 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points +51%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
4353 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points +4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3845 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4041 - 4353, n=3)
4146 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points +57%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
4157 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points -8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3830 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points +73%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3960 - 4157, n=3)
4068 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points +317%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1401 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points -8%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1371 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1228 - 1401, n=3)
1341 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points +12%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +128%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.8 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
54.4 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Chrome 91.0.4472.120)
53.4 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (49.5 - 53.4, n=3)
51.8 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.2 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.8 Points -10%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.19 Points -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
94.7 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.6 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Chrome 91.0.4472.120)
92.4 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (89.8 - 92.4, n=3)
90.9 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.7 Points -5%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.84 Points -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +237%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min +71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min +22%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (41.4 - 43.9, n=3)
42.8 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Chrome 91.0.4472.120)
41.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
37.9 runs/min -8%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min -36%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +104%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
78 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Chrome 91.0.4472.120)
73 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (71 - 73, n=3)
72 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points -3%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Chrome 91.0.4472.120)
17817 Points
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
17734 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17293 - 17817, n=3)
17503 Points -2%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4322 ms *
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2950 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2673 - 2832, n=2)
2753 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
2532 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms *

* ... smaller is better

尽管小米11 Lite 4G和小米11 Lite 5G使用相同的闪存类型(UFS 2.2),但测试设备的数据吞吐量明显落后。性能较慢的原因可能是骁龙732G 中的存储控制器,它根本不允许更高的速度。

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4GGoogle Pixel 4aOppo A74Samsung Galaxy A52Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
10%
-3%
-3%
88%
47%
53%
235%
Sequential Read 256KB
481.8
502
4%
515
7%
511
6%
949
97%
980
103%
Sequential Write 256KB
269
246.8
-8%
255.3
-5%
267.1
-1%
710
164%
476.9
77%
Random Read 4KB
145
162.9
12%
139.4
-4%
135.5
-7%
207.9
43%
156.4
8%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
32%
Random Write 4KB
141.6
187.4
32%
126.4
-11%
127.3
-10%
206.9
46%
138.5
-2%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
31%

游戏--运行流畅,但很少超过30FPS

凭借Snapdragon 732G立体声扬声器,小米11提供了一个体面的游戏包。这款智能手机可以流畅地运行最近的游戏,如《PUBG Mobile》和《Armajet》,而且在这两种情况下还能保持每秒30帧的速度。实际上,在Armajet中,小米11 Lite 4G可以充分利用其90赫兹的显示屏,这也是因为该游戏对图形的要求并不高。但即使是帧率设置 "无限制 "也不允许超过30 FPS。

我们用Gamebench工具确定帧率。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG移动版:高清/高图形设置下的30 FPS
PUBG移动版:高清/高图形设置下的30 FPS
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G; Armajet; 1.60.5: Ø30.2 (29-32)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G; PUBG Mobile; 1.4.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)

排放 - 负荷下只有轻微的节流现象

温度

在使用过程中,小米11 Lite 4G的触感一直很好。最大的热源,即骁龙732G ,位于摄像头模块的右侧,这意味着它位于智能手机的右上角,因此处于一个很少被触摸的区域。如果你触摸它,也不是什么大问题,因为小米手机的表面几乎不会比温热的温度高,最高温度为37.6℃(约100°F)。

然而,内部节流现象仍会发生。正如GFXBench的电池测试显示,在运行T-Rex和曼哈顿两个测试场景的第30次时,帧率在很长一段时间内保持相当稳定,但之后突然急剧下降。尽管如此,性能损失仍然在相对狭窄的范围内。因此,在日常使用中,你不应该注意到任何节流现象。

GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (1111min - 1116max) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 (337min - 335max) %
Max. Load
 37.6 °C36.2 °C33.2 °C 
 37.4 °C36 °C32.9 °C 
 36.2 °C33.7 °C31.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 35 °C
31.9 °C35.6 °C36.7 °C
31.5 °C34.6 °C37.5 °C
30.4 °C35.2 °C37 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

发言人

小米11 Lite 4G的立体声扬声器可以提供体面的音频,但由于缺乏低音调,听起来相当单薄。如果用户只是偶尔在智能手机上播放音乐或视频,那么这对扬声器仍然可以提供相当好的服务。

用户将不得不放弃小米11 Lite上的3.5毫米插孔,但可以使用附带的适配器将音频设备连接到USB-C端口。耳机和外部扬声器也可以通过蓝牙5.1无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203030.62526.727.63125.623.94026.123.85036.432.86329.224.8802521.410017.823.212518.333.516018.648.820017.448.225014.255.831515.959.140012.861.65001466.463013.370.280012.273100012.374.8125011.974.8160012.874.5200012.776.5250012.176.3315012.977.2400013.276.3500013.477.4630013.671.3800013.463.51000013.970125001465.51600014.254SPL25.286.7N0.768.1median 13.4median 70Delta1.29.833.136.22826.324.123.525.325.53626.12425.520.627.414.530.410.333.613.646.311.748.411.456.412.46110.16311.766.711.569.710.172.810.376.410.978.112.476.810.777.311.98012.780.113.180.213.179.513.672.814.365.913.665.614.163.314.654.724.589.20.575.1median 12.4median 69.71.610.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 71分钟内充满电

能源消耗

小米11 Lite 4G在功耗方面没有显示出任何不正常的情况,它的平均功耗略低于小米11 Lite 5G

该智能手机使用一个33瓦的电源适配器进行充电。在测试中,只需要大约半小时,就可以将4250毫安时的电池从0%充到50%。小米11 Lite 4G在1:11小时后充满电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.81 / 2 / 2.02 Watt
Load midlight 3.97 / 6.27 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
4250 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
36%
15%
13%
-6%
-33%
-9%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.49
40%
0.62
23%
0.88
-9%
0.83
-2%
1.5
-85%
0.93 ?(0.81 - 1.05, n=3)
-15%
Idle Average *
2
0.96
52%
1.59
20%
1.8
10%
1.92
4%
2.2
-10%
2.09 ?(1.8 - 2.47, n=3)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
2.02
1
50%
1.63
19%
1.84
9%
1.97
2%
2.9
-44%
Load Average *
3.97
3.11
22%
4.05
-2%
2.65
33%
3.84
3%
4.4
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.27
5.23
17%
5.2
17%
4.86
22%
8.6
-37%
7.2
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench, GFXBench, and in idle usage (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.238 (1.17-2.06)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.4 (1.577-4.3)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.75 (1.013-7.17)

电池寿命

小米11 Lite 4G在我们的Wi-Fi测试中持续了11:32小时,我们在显示屏亮度调整到150cd/m²的情况下进行测试。当连续循环播放H.264视频时,在相同条件下,它可以持续17:22小时。两者都很好,但不是突出的速度。尽管如此,在日常使用中,小米智能手机应该很容易在远离电源插座的情况下存活一整天,即使在密集的操作过程中。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
46h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 24min
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
4250 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
15%
1%
-9%
23%
Reader / Idle
2785
2270
-18%
2386
-14%
2093
-25%
1509
-46%
1683
-40%
H.264
1042
1045
0%
1179
13%
1027
-1%
1248
20%
1403
35%
WiFi v1.3
692
669
-3%
982
42%
836
21%
734
6%
884
28%
Load
264
225
-15%
314
19%
289
9%
223
-16%
448
70%

Pros

+ 明亮的90赫兹OLED
+ 纤细、轻便的设计
+ 高质量的做工
+ 良好的三摄像头设置
+ 33瓦的快速充电

Cons

- 比5G版本慢
- 没有成熟的永远在线显示屏
- 只有混合双卡

对小米11 Lite 4G的评判

在审查中。小米11 Lite 4G。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。
在审查中。小米11 Lite 4G。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。

小米11 Lite 4G以其时尚的设计和非常轻薄的外壳从许多其他中档智能手机中脱颖而出。名称中的 "Lite "后缀清楚地表明,买家不应该期待顶级的性能和功能,但考虑到价格,两者都很充足。

小米11 Lite 4G是一款非常轻薄且装备精良的中档智能手机,特别是由于其时尚的设计,应该会吸引很多买家。

小米11 Lite 4G与价格略高但外观几乎相同的小米11 Lite 5G版本有很多共同之处,包括明亮的90赫兹AMOLED面板和HDR10支持。相机性能甚至在整体上略胜一筹,尤其是在低光照照片中。然而,小米11 Lite 4G配备的是稍慢的骁龙732GSoC。此外,它配备了蓝牙5.1而不是5.2,自拍相机的分辨率为1600万像素而不是2000万像素。

尽管小米11 Lite 4G的处理器稍弱,但在日常使用中速度非常快。而且,与5G版本相比,能够忍受其余妥协的用户,实际上也一样可以使用小米11 Lite 4G,但他们会节省一些钱。然而,小米再次与自己竞争,就像与Poco F3 ,例如,它处于相同的价格范围,但有一个更快的SoC,Snapdragon 870也有一个120 Hz的AMOLED面板。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,你可以在新蛋网找到小米11 Lite 4G,配备8GB的内存。售价344.99美元。另外,128GB存储空间和6GB内存的版本在亚马逊上有售。售价约为339美元。

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
92%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
32 / 64 → 50%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 83%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
64%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米11 Lite 4G智能手机评测。小米11系列中最便宜的产品
Manuel Masiero, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)