Notebookcheck Logo

小米11 Lite 5G NE智能手机评论。最畅销的产品得到微调

真的是新的吗?

小米为其11系列中受欢迎的Lite机型提供了一个小的升级。继续阅读,看看更新的SoC和新的颜色版本是否真的能证明更高的购买价格,以及这种升级是否值得。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米不仅用新版(NE)机型使目前11系列的精简版机型适应了最新的命名惯例,并从其名称中删除了 "Mi",而且还为其提供了更新的SoC和新的颜色变体。这款纤薄的手机也变得更轻了,除此之外,它还保留了其前辈的优点,即小米11 Lite 5G.

小米11 Lite 5G NE的建议售价为370欧元(约417美元)。作为回报,这款智能手机配备了6GB的内存和128GB的内部存储。升级到8GB内存需要额外支付30欧元(约34美元)。256GB版本目前没有在德国正式销售,但它可以从一些零售商那里买到,这些零售商通常收取407欧元(约459美元)至420欧元(约473美元)。

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, 10 multitouch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.24 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.81 x 160.53 x 75.73
Battery
4250 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.79, 26 mm, 1/1.97", 0.7 µm) 8 MP (ultra wide, f/2.2, 119˚, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) 5 MP (macro, f/2.4, 50 mm, 1/5.0", 1.12 µm); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24, 27 mm, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: on-screen, 33-watt charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, silicon case, headphone adapter (USB Type-C to 3.5 mm audio jack), documentation, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), NavIC (L5); body SAR: 0.954 W/kg, head SAR: 0.594 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
158 g, Power Supply: 109 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
Sony Xperia 10 III
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

充其量,小米11 Lite 5G NE可以通过颜色在视觉上与它的前辈区分开来。泡泡糖蓝、薄荷绿、桃花粉、雪花白和松露黑,这些选择不仅丰富,而且相当多彩。此外,NE的重量少了一克。

小米规定的机身高度为6.81毫米,而我们测量的是7.1毫米。摄像头从外壳突出1.8毫米,但总的来说,11 Lite给人留下了非常纤细的印象。做工似乎也是高质量的。虽然前代产品仍然使用康宁大猩猩6号玻璃,但NE型号现在使用较旧的5号版本。哑光玻璃背面在视觉上非常有吸引力,而且能很好地掩盖指纹。缝隙尺寸很贴合,也很均匀。只有显示屏周围的黑色塑料边框使高质量的外观稍稍减弱。

IP53认证,至少表明该智能手机是防溅的,可能仍然存在,但它不再出现在官方规格表中。SIM卡插槽并不完全与框架平齐,因为它略微凹陷。它可以容纳两张nano SIM卡或一张microSD卡,而不是第二张SIM卡。

Size comparison

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 158 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g154 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 169 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 小米11 Lite NE带有microSD和USB 2.0功能

小米11 Lite 5G NE有一个支持OTG的USB 2.0端口,因此可以连接存储设备和其他外围设备。

没有通知LED,但这一点可以通过一个永远在线的显示屏来弥补。此外,一个用于控制家庭多媒体产品、空调等的红外发射器,以及蓝牙5.2和NFC都在机上。

唯一缺少的是一个无线电接收器和一个音频插孔。不过,耳机可以通过USB连接,小米还提供了相应的适配器。

顶部:麦克风,红外辐射器
顶部:麦克风,红外辐射器
左侧
左侧
右边。音量摇杆,电源/指纹
右边。音量摇杆,电源/指纹
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、读卡器
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、读卡器

微型SD卡读卡器

microSD插槽支持最大尺寸为1024GB的存储卡,并与exFAT文件系统兼容。然而,结合我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60参考卡,其复制速度相当缓慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s +254%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.73 MB/s +128%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s +22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.81 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.4 (26-46.9)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.8-37.8)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.3 (16.9-80.9)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (50.1-75.6)

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12.5的新版本

小米11 Lite 5G NE运行Android 11和MIUI 12.5。在测试时,安全更新处于2021年11月1日的水平,因此是相当最新的。更新到Android 12和MIUI 13被认为是肯定的。小米甚至通过其印度推特渠道承诺三年内的主要更新和四年内的安全更新。然而,目前还不清楚这是否也将适用于欧洲的机型。

小米在智能手机上预装了相当多的第三方应用程序。虽然这有点烦人,但它们可以被卸载。此外,在系统中偶尔会显示广告,特别是在文件管理器中,有时在安装应用程序后也会显示广告。

通信和GNSS - 强大的定位能力

通信功能几乎没有变化,尽管与前代产品相比,小米为移动网络增加了一些额外的频段。在测试中,接收质量是正常的。

通过Wi-Fi 6,11 Lite 5G NE支持现代Wi-Fi标准,与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器结合,提供相当好的数据传输率;它比 小米11 Lite虽然,但这种差异在日常使用中不会被注意到。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s +5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s -18%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
504 (479min - 524max) MBit/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s +14%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 III
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (513min - 573max) MBit/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s -45%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø754 (339-805)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (833-900)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (779-895)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (847-921)
GPS测试。支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统
GPS测试:室内
在室内
GPS测试。室外
户外活动

小米11 Lite 5G NE的定位功能堪称典范,它甚至支持大多数卫星网络的双频和三频模式。卫星定位也相应地快速而精确。

虽然小米手机在我们的试驾中追踪路线相对准确,但它不得不承认败给了 Garmin Venu 2手表.尽管如此,也没有预期的导航限制。

GNSS试骑。湖泊
GNSS试骑。湖泊
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结

电话和通话质量

小米11 Lite 5G NE在拿在耳边时提供良好的通话质量。它可靠地消除了较安静的背景噪音,但在繁忙的街道上,其噪音抑制达到了极限。虽然噪音仍然勉强可闻,但用户的声音被压制,听起来有点空洞,而且在传输过程中也会出现中断。

扬声器回响明显,但当智能手机在附近时,它仍然可以在安静的环境中使用。在离手机仅一米多的距离,已经很难理解用户的意思。

小米11 Lite 5G NE有一个混合SIM卡解决方案;它支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,还可以管理SIP账户。

摄像头--小米11 Lite 5G NE中良好的三合一解决方案

用小米11 Lite 5G NE拍摄的自拍照
用小米11 Lite 5G NE拍摄的自拍照

与上一代相比,没有明显的变化。 前辈在相机方面没有明显的变化。前置镜头可拍摄2000万像素的自拍,并能以1080p的速度录制视频(最高60FPS)。照片相当吸引人,智能手机在人像模式下有良好的虚化效果。只是对主体的过渡并不总是完全平滑的。

背面的主摄像头使用64MP的三星GW3传感器。白天的照片显示出良好的细节和生动的色彩,但人工智能喜欢在校正方面做得有点过头,以至于湖泊场景中的光雾根本不存在。小米在低光性能方面有所改进,现在的自动对焦效果更好。超广角镜头显示了大量的后期锐化,但在画面边缘只有少数畸变。我们希望看到变焦时有更好的图像稳定功能。数字变焦的质量(最大6倍)在2倍或3倍放大率之前仍然令人满意,但超过这个范围,照片很快就变得模糊不清,结果不是很吸引人。该机还配备了一个额外的微距镜头,视频以30 FPS的超高清速度记录。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,小米11 Lite 5G NE的主摄像头显示出良好的图像清晰度,一直到周边地区,没有过度。在色彩再现方面,情况有所不同。特别是绿色调和深色皮肤显示得太亮了。这也适用于浅蓝色和丁香色。白平衡有点偏暖,但灰阶在大多数情况下也过于明亮。

ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: 13.15 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 24.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 - 纤细的手机,厚实的盒子

小米11 Lite 5G NE的盒子里包含33瓦的充电器
小米11 Lite 5G NE的盒子里包含33瓦的充电器

小米11 Lite 5G NE仍然有一个相对慷慨的包装。除了智能手机,盒子里还有一个兼容的硅壳,一个模块化的33瓦充电器(USB-A),一条USB线(Type-A到Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,甚至还有一个音频插孔适配器。

小米不提供可选配件,但可以通过第三方供应商获得。这款智能手机只提供12个月的保修,但 零售商的保修仍然不受影响。

输入设备和操作--小米智能手机上的流畅导航

不同于 前身,小米11 Lite 5G NE配备了康宁大猩猩5号玻璃,而且还配备了工厂贴的保护膜。屏幕快速而精确,这主要是因为240赫兹的高采样率,但保护膜为手指提供了稍高的滑行阻力。该系统浏览起来快速而流畅,尤其是在启用90赫兹模式时。

指纹扫描仪已被集成到电源按钮上,用于生物识别安全,它提供了良好的识别率和令人满意的解锁速度。另外,还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别;这种方法更快,但安全性较低。此外,双击唤醒显示屏或单手模式等功能也已实现。

显示 - 昏暗,但回报更准确

子像素结构
子像素结构

相比之下 前代产品相比,规格表上没有根本变化。,规格表上没有根本变化,但AMOLED面板的最大亮度略低,亮区和暗区的均匀分布(APL50)导致峰值亮度为825cd/m²。这仍然足以实现体面的HDR再现;小米11 Lite 5G NE在这方面支持HLG、HDR10、HDR10+和DolbyVision。只想手动调节亮度的用户,最高只能达到490cd/m²。

刷新率可以设置为60或90赫兹,而且没有自适应调整。也没有直流调光模式。另一方面,我们可以在测试中观察到OLED的闪烁,从最低显示亮度水平开始;闪烁相当均匀,只在337.8和373.1赫兹之间轻微波动。该面板只在可调亮度的53%以上以恒定的90赫兹运行。

789
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
792
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
796
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 812 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 799.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Sony Xperia 10 III
OLED, 2520x1080, 6"
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7"
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Screen
-110%
-17%
-215%
-123%
-72%
Brightness middle
797
863
8%
536
-33%
562
-29%
594
-25%
736
-8%
Brightness
800
860
8%
540
-32%
535
-33%
594
-26%
751
-6%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
97
0%
90
-7%
99
2%
96
-1%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
3.2
-256%
1.1
-22%
3.99
-343%
2.74
-204%
2.18
-142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
5.2
-160%
1.9
5%
9.74
-387%
6
-200%
5.69
-185%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
3.9
-255%
1.3
-18%
6.5
-491%
4.2
-282%
2.1
-91%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.27 97%
2.174 101%
2.278 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6397 102%
7299 89%
6494 100%
6882 94%
7322 89%
6563 99%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz ≤ 53 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 53 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

如果选择正确的设置,色彩再现几乎是完美的。我们通过选择带有标准白平衡的 "原色 "色彩方案来实现这里的测量值。然而,在这种情况下,智能手机只使用较小的sRGB色彩空间。在使用工厂设置时,显示效果更冷,饱和度更高。

灰度(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式。原始颜色,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

小米11 Lite 5G NE的显示屏在户外始终保持清晰,但即使在阴天也会出现相当强烈的反射。

正如预期的那样,该面板的视角稳定性非常好。显示内容只有在非常平坦的视角下才会变得有点热。我们几乎无法检测到通常在许多OLED面板中发现的闪耀效果。

户外活动
户外活动
小米11 Lite 5G NE的视角稳定性
小米11 Lite 5G NE的视角稳定性

性能 - 小米11 Lite 5G NE的SoC降级

小米11 Lite 5G NE搭载的是 骁龙778G 5G,可以利用集成的阿德诺642L图形单元。小米11 Lite配备了一个 骁龙780G,这在纸面上实际上是两个月的时间,但仍然运行得更快。这既是由于更高的时钟速率,也是由于其更现代的结构宽度。

因此,在所有领域的基准测试中,老款智能手机的速度略快,特别是在3DMark图形测试中,它可以显示出明显的优势。只有在个别物理测试中,SD780G略微落后,但在总评中仍然领先于SD778G。这在日常使用中并不十分明显,但我们本以为新版设备的SoC会更强大。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
590 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points +24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=11)
781 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +26%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1716 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points -3%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=11)
2882 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +11%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2281 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
921 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points +48%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2216 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2548, n=11)
2329 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 16883, n=43, last 2 years)
6769 Points +197%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2207 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points +27%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
965 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points +61%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2359 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=10)
2254 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 13578, n=37, last 2 years)
6909 Points +213%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8273 Points -23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=10)
11553 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12941 Points +20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6389 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3215 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6352 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6326 - 6409, n=7)
6367 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7238 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points +19%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3204 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7241 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7138 - 7276, n=7)
7221 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4529 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3254 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4442 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=7)
4498 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6458 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3122 Points -52%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6559 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=7)
6584 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7608 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3315 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7496 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=7)
7489 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4224 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2593 Points -39%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4563 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=7)
4892 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5036 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2178 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4967 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5096, n=9)
5032 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5213 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points +17%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1992 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5140 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5134 - 5218, n=9)
5186 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4501 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3236 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4444 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4723, n=9)
4539 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5236 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2308 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5355 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=9)
5337 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5651 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2120 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5591 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=9)
5550 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4166 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3344 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4664 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=9)
4710 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4299 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2023 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4250 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=9)
4278 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)
2841 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5338 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1878 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5263 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=9)
5315 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)
3085 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2557 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2775 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2539 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=9)
2578 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)
2706 Points +6%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2505 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points -67%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2464 - 2505, n=10)
2483 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2822 Points +13%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2500 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
826 Points -67%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=10)
2466 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7517 Points +201%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
695 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
252 Points -64%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (686 - 695, n=10)
691 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2043 Points +194%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
688 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
247 Points -64%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (681 - 690, n=10)
686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2040 Points +197%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
89 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
54 fps -39%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps +1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
108 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=11)
93 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
133 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps +15%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
72 fps -46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps +68%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps +34%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=11)
132.7 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +110%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
69 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
30 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps +29%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
69 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=11)
65.9 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +9%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
79 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
36 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps +66%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=11)
77.8 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +108%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps +12%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
21 fps -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=11)
49.5 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +28%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
57 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps +61%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 58, n=11)
56.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +104%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps +21%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
12 fps -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps +62%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=11)
28.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +64%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps +21%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +73%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 34, n=11)
33.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +113%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps +27%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps -61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps +48%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=11)
31.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
39 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps +28%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
16 fps -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +46%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=11)
35.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +104%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps +30%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8 fps -60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps +55%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=11)
19.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +86%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
14 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps +29%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps -59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps +57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=11)
13.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +126%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
344070 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points +33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
438254 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 540593, n=11)
501252 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=107, last 2 years)
797430 Points +57%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
40708 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
139024 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=6)
138766 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 7865, n=2, last 2 years)
4454 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3092 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4349 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4079 - 5002, n=11)
4549 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +30%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6586 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points -15%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9089 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=11)
9736 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points -3%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points +25%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3176 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points +36%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4269 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=11)
4968 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3334 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6783 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6594 - 6783, n=11)
6686 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +149%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1311 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1359 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1155 - 1534, n=11)
1336 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +1%
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
678 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (621 - 734, n=5)
663 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)
879 Points +30%
Productivity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
706 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (660 - 754, n=5)
691 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 - 1504, n=158, last 2 years)
908 Points +29%
Creativity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
607 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (549 - 677, n=5)
601 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 - 1740, n=158, last 2 years)
845 Points +39%
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
839 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (701 - 875, n=5)
794 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 - 1552, n=158, last 2 years)
924 Points +10%

小米11 Lite 5G NE在浏览器基准测试中表现良好,只得承认败给了更强大的 摩托G100.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.3 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.2 Points +6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.8 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=11)
75.1 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.8 Points -17%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
45.36 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.9 Points +4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
155.3 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (102.6 - 155.3, n=7)
132.5 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.1 Points -24%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
82.5 Points -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
133.6 runs/min +117%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min +15%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=9)
56.2 runs/min -9%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.2 runs/min -13%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min -18%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
41.2 runs/min -33%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points +30%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=10)
107 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
74 Points -35%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points +7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=11)
27285 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points -16%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 III
16866 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91)
2506 ms * -89%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * -37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms * -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802 ms * -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=11)
1620 ms * -22%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589 ms * -20%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * -20%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms *

* ... smaller is better

小米在其智能手机中使用快速的UFS 2.2存储,这为快速的系统速度打下了良好的基础。然而,其他竞争对手可以获得更快的存储,而诺德2尤其是在对比领域中,简直是拔得头筹。

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSony Xperia 10 IIIMotorola Moto G100OnePlus Nord 2 5GSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
-13%
38%
55%
-10%
-12%
78%
Sequential Read 256KB
944
949
1%
840
-11%
1730
83%
1827
94%
951
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
679
710
5%
400.8
-41%
717
6%
1256
85%
486.5
-28%
Random Read 4KB
208.7
207.9
0%
172.3
-17%
253.6
22%
223.7
7%
168.2
-19%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
178.8
206.9
16%
210.7
18%
252.9
41%
239
34%
192.5
8%

游戏--良好的中档游戏手机

ǞǞǞ阿德诺642L在小米11 Lite 5G NE中提供了良好的游戏性能,即使在较高的图形设置下,它也足以处理大多数游戏,但它也有其局限性。例如,在PUBG中不能选择超高清设置。然而,我们用GameBench确定的帧率确定的帧率处于良好的、最重要的、稳定的水平。然而,我们无法从小米手机中挤出超过60FPS的帧率。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
死亡扳机2
死亡扳机2
游戏涡轮
游戏涡轮
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.9: Ø60.5 (60-61)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.7.0: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.7.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放--新版的双扬声器

温度

小米11 Lite 5G NE的表面温度始终保持无害,即使在连续负载的情况下,也只有部分达到30℃以上(约86°F)。

不像 小米11 Lite 5G,新版成功地保持了芯片组的性能稳定,即使在压力测试中。然而,我们无法再次执行GFXBench测试。

Max. Load
 33.4 °C32 °C29.8 °C 
 33.4 °C32 °C29.6 °C 
 31 °C30.1 °C29.2 °C 
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 31.2 °C
29 °C31.7 °C33.1 °C
28 °C29.9 °C32.7 °C
27.2 °C29.5 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 33.1 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.8 (14.8-15)

发言人

小米11 Lite 5G NE有两个扬声器,可以提供体面的声音输出,但在中等音量下缺乏精度,听起来有点闷。

另外,音频可以通过USB-C端口传输,为此,小米还包括一个音频插孔适配器。蓝牙5.2可用于无线连接,它提供了非常广泛的编解码支持,包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC V1-V4。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.841.5252433.13116.127.74027.629.35032.331.76323.431.98022311002233.91252133.616017.94520013.348.525015.257.131513.260.640011.56350012.268.663012.368.780013.371.2100014.573.3125012.277160011.277.2200011.778.2250012.178.6315012.777.8400013.676.5500013.182.7630013.679.9800013.172.71000013.6691250013.660.31600013.553SPL2589.3N0.677.9median 13.3median 71.2Delta1.310.250.744.741.338.73130.635.634.4383730.125.830.831.123.523.520.331.820.34416.249.915.954.513.959.713.662.213.564.519.365.916.566.613.968.3147313.277.113.27714.271.31670.617.265.317.96618.567.819.169.319.865.319.355.720.159.228.883.61.154median 16.5median 65.337.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NESamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机,4250毫安时

能源消耗

小米11 Lite 5G NE的功耗在最大显示亮度的空闲使用中略有升高,但在标准亮度(150 cd/m²)下,它比基于相同SoC的Galaxy A52s等更有效。

使用附带的33瓦电源适配器,4250毫安时的电池可以在一个多小时(64分钟)内完全充电。仅仅45分钟后就能达到90%的标准。然而,不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.97 / 1.99 Watt
Load midlight 3.23 / 7.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 III
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
41%
-25%
-15%
-4%
-21%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.83
-6%
0.44
44%
0.9
-15%
0.8
-3%
1.2
-54%
1.106 ?(0.78 - 2.5, n=10)
-42%
Idle Average *
1.97
1.92
3%
0.65
67%
1.5
24%
1.2
39%
1.4
29%
2.07 ?(1.13 - 5, n=10)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
1.99
1.97
1%
0.69
65%
2.1
-6%
1.6
20%
1.7
15%
2.32 ?(1.44 - 5.6, n=10)
-17%
Load Average *
3.23
3.84
-19%
2.99
7%
6.7
-107%
5.7
-76%
3.6
-11%
4.17 ?(3.23 - 7.8, n=10)
-29%
Load Maximum *
7.08
8.6
-21%
5.42
23%
8.5
-20%
10.9
-54%
6.9
3%
7.81 ?(6.29 - 14, n=10)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.65 (1.007-8.03)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø4.18 (1.199-9.15)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.68 (3.47-4.19)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.28 (3.75-4.64)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.169 (1.054-1.294)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.422 (1.21-1.736)

电池寿命

小米11 Lite 5G NE在调整了显示亮度(150cd/m²)的真实世界Wi-Fi测试和视频测试中都落后于它的前辈,但作为回报,它在最小和最大运行时间方面设法提高了一点。

由于它拥有最小的电池,评测样本在我们的比较领域中排在最后,但它总体上仍然提供了良好的电池寿命。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 28min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 96)
11h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 53min
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 III
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
44%
40%
16%
10%
Reader / Idle
1648
1509
-8%
2272
38%
2846
73%
1926
17%
1897
15%
H.264
1215
1248
3%
1411
16%
1285
6%
1126
-7%
1109
-9%
WiFi v1.3
705
734
4%
809
15%
1049
49%
958
36%
721
2%
Load
233
223
-4%
479
106%
302
30%
272
17%
309
33%

Pros

+ 纤细轻巧的设计
+ 明亮的90 Hz AMOLED显示屏
+ 准确的色彩再现
+ 良好的定位能力
+ Wi-Fi 6和5G

Cons

- 新版没有什么新功能
- 没有无线充电
- 仍然只配备了大猩猩玻璃5
- 较弱的SoC

评语--精简版接受轻度处理

在审查中。小米11 Lite 5G NE.测试设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。
在审查中。小米11 Lite 5G NE.测试设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。

小米11 Lite 5G NE是一款强大的中档智能手机,提供良好的功能组合。它拥有一个明亮和色彩准确的OLED显示屏,一个快速的处理器,充足的存储空间,也可扩展,良好的电池寿命,以及广泛的GNSS支持下的准确定位。三摄像头的设置得到了明显的改善,它提供了体面的图像质量。

小米11 Lite 5G NE确实是一款不错的中端智能手机,但由于它所经历的修改有限,我们不得不问自己是否真的有必要。

直接将其与仍然相对较新的小米11 Lite 5G前辈相比是有点苦涩的,因为后者有更现代的SoC,更强大的保护玻璃,而且在此期间,它只是变得更便宜了。因此,如果你不是绝对需要一种新的颜色,我们不建议购买新版。此外,小米12系列可能将在下个月推出,其中肯定也包括一个新的Lite型号。

寻求更多性能的用户应该考虑 摩托G100.另一方面,在Galaxy A52s提供了一个120赫兹的显示屏和一个防水外壳。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,你可以在亚马逊上找到小米11 Lite 5G NE售价约425美元,取决于颜色。如果你在英国,你可以直接从制造商那里得到它https://www.mi.com/uk/buy/product/xiaomi-11-lite-5g-ne?gid=4214100065目前的折扣价为309.00英镑(优惠90英镑,总计约412美元),包括一对免费的红米Buds 3 Pro。

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
92%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 83%
Application Performance
78 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
65%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米11 Lite 5G NE智能手机评论。最畅销的产品得到微调
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-12-23 (Update: 2024-08-15)