小米红米笔记本 14 2025 评测--配备 Raptor Lake 处理器和 32GB 内存，经济实惠的日常笔记本电脑
哑光 IPS 面板，120 赫兹。
红米本 14 采用了英特尔公司为 2025 年推出的全新 Raptor Lake Refresh CPU。除了高品质的铝合金外壳，还配备了高分辨率的 IPS 屏幕，可以轻松编辑图片。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论：红米本 14 性价比高，令人信服
事实证明，新款红米本 14 2025 是一款出色的全能型产品，在测试中没有任何重大弱点，考虑到价格，几乎没有什么可抱怨的。铝制外壳质量上乘，键盘手感舒适，intel 的 Raptor Lake Refresh 处理器提供了足够的性能，整体散热做得非常好，这也是为什么这款 14 英寸笔记本即使在高负载情况下也能保持非常安静的原因。
雾面 IPS 显示屏的高分辨率、120 Hz 频率和准确的色彩还原也给人留下了深刻印象。加上全 sRGB 覆盖范围，红米本 14 还能顺利用于图像编辑。不过，电池续航能力一般，这也是电池容量较低的原因。
其他薄弱环节包括缺少 Thunderbolt 或 USB 4.0 接口，实际上还安装了一个旧的 USB 2.0 接口。内存无法扩展，但有一个额外的 M.2 SSD 插槽。不过，在国内最大的问题是国际键盘布局，因为红米本 14 在欧洲没有正式销售，必须进口，这也使保修问题变得复杂。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.9%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 880€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
2. 78.1%  | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $769.00 List Price: 820 USD | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
3. 83.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $575.00 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 85.5%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 870€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
5. 82% v7 (old)  | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 720€ | 1.3 kg | 20.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS |
小米公司推出的红米笔记本 14 2025 是一款经济实惠的 14 英寸笔记本，配备了英特尔 Raptor Lake Refresh 处理器。我们的测试设备是配备 酷睿 5 220H 2.8K IPS 显示屏、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价约为 870 欧元（约合人民币 903 元）。
规格
外壳与连接
红米本 14 采用了稳定、高品质的铝合金一体成型机身。底座非常稳定，不会扭曲或凹陷。盖子的弹性稍差，我们也能在这里听到轻微的吱吱声，但这在日常使用中不成问题。铰链调节良好，几乎没有晃动，最大开启角度为 180 度。外壳下盖可以轻松取下，必要时可以更换 M.2-2242 固态硬盘、WLAN 模块和电池。此外，还有一个完整的 M.2-2280 插槽可用于固态硬盘。
虽然该机箱在价格方面超出预期，但在功能方面却不得不接受一些妥协。你找不到 Thunderbolt 4 或 USB 4.0，甚至只有一个老式的 USB 2.0 端口。英特尔 Wi-Fi 模块（AX203，2x2）支持蓝牙 5.2 和 Wi-Fi 6 标准，但频率仅为 80 MHz，因此传输速率被限制在 900 Mbps 左右。1080p 网络摄像头的拍照效果不是特别好，而且不支持 Windows Studio 特效。虽然不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，但至少可以使用实时字幕功能。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
我们无法找到任何有关小米红米本 14 2025 可持续发展的信息。不过，包装主要由纸板制成，因此可以回收利用。
输入设备 - 发光键盘
红米本 14 目前只提供国际键盘布局，但键盘本身非常舒适。键程相当长，为 1.5 毫米，而且反馈精确，便于书写长篇文字。两段式白色照明可在黑暗环境中提供帮助。ClickPad（12.5 x 8.2 厘米/~4.9 x 3.2 英寸）的塑料表面具有良好的滑动性能，我们在指针控制或手势操作方面没有遇到任何问题。我们还可以通过物理方式点击下部区域，但会发出较大的噪音。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹的 IPS
14 英寸 IPS 屏幕分辨率高达 2,880 x 1,800 像素（16:10），频率为 120 Hz，因此动作非常流畅。主观画质不错，但色彩和对比度当然无法与 OLED 面板相比。不过，PWM 闪烁或反光的问题并不存在，但磨砂表面确实会在明亮的表面产生极小的颗粒感。但你必须仔细观察。响应时间不错。
最大亮度为 437 cd/m²（平均 411 cd/m²），加上较低的黑电平（0.21 cd/m²），最大对比度非常高。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件测量了出厂配置文件，该配置文件已经非常精确。没有明显的偏色，所有偏差（灰度和色彩）都低于重要的 3 分值。这意味着无需进行后续校准，我们只能对显示器进行微小的改进（可在右侧免费下载配置文件）。因此，红米本 14 也适合用于编辑图像。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 437 cd/m²
Contrast: 2081:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 TL140ADXP21-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 LEN140WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER Work 14 Base B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -44% | 24% | -1% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72 | 39.6 -45% | 99.9 39% | 70.3 -2% | 72.4 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 57.5 -42% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 40.9 -44% | 97 33% | 72.1 -1% | 73.8 1% |
| Response Times | 6% | 95% | 11% | -82% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.7 ? | 27.1 ? 20% | 1.4 ? 96% | 32.7 ? 3% | 60 ? -78% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18.7 ? | 20.3 ? -9% | 1.2 ? 94% | 15.2 ? 19% | 34.7 ? -86% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | ||||
| Screen | -211% | 83% | -13% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 437 | 338 -23% | 391 -11% | 418 -4% | 402 -8% |
| Brightness | 412 | 330 -20% | 386 -6% | 408 -1% | 404 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 95 9% | 90 3% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.37 -76% | 0.02 90% | 0.3 -43% | 0.16 24% |
| Contrast | 2081 | 914 -56% | 19550 839% | 1393 -33% | 2513 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 8.03 -474% | 1.89 -35% | 1.6 -14% | 2.2 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 22.17 -824% | 4.43 -85% | 2.5 -4% | 4.2 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 2.22 -122% | 1.79 -79% | 1.1 -10% | 1.3 -30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 7.5 -317% | 1.3 28% | 2 -11% | 3 -67% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6392 102% | 5812 112% | 6411 101% | 6851 95% | 6801 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -83% /
-145% | 67% /
72% | -1% /
-7% | -34% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8592 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
只要避免阳光直射，红米本 14 在户外使用也不会有任何问题。IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性很好。
性能 - 猛禽湖刷新
2025 RedmiBook 14 只配备酷睿 5 220H，16 或 32 GB LPDDR5x-6400 内存。不提供专用 GPU。
测试条件
红米Book 14没有提供自己的能耗曲线。我们在最佳性能模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。
处理器 - Core 5 220H
核心 5 酷睿5 220H不属于英特尔新一代箭湖处理器（即 酷睿5 225H)，而是猛禽湖更新型号系列中的一款芯片。基本上，它是一款 酷睿 i5-13600H最高时钟频率提高了 100 MHz。在红米本 14 中，该处理器的短暂功耗可达 43 瓦，随后为 32 瓦。因此，CPU 性能足以应付许多日常任务。性能保持相对稳定，在电池模式下性能也没有降低。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 技术部分可用。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6403, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
系统性能
实际上，红米Book 14 是一款反应灵敏的设备，在合成基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。在测试过程中，系统稳定性没有出现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5393 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 108756, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 220H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了局限性。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
测试设备中安装了 YMTC 的 1 TB SSD（PC411），初始启动后仍有 909 GB 可用。紧凑型 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘（M.2-2242）的性能非常出色。我们无法在测试设备上对连续负载下的性能进行常见的 DiskSpeed 测试。更多固态硬盘基准测试结果请点击 这里.
* ... smaller is better
图形卡
Raptor Lake Refresh 处理器的 iGPU 是 Iris Xe Graphics G7使用的是 80 个 EU，在纯粹性能方面无法与当前的 iGPU 相媲美。这一点在游戏性能上也很明显，非常有限。不过，iGPU 完全可以胜任一般的日常任务，如流式传输视频（也是 4K）。在电池供电和长时间负载的情况下，性能也能保持稳定。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30078 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7215 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4991 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1791 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1201 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 1197 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (463 - 3047, n=51) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 121.9 | 105.7 | 25.9 | 11 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 107.8 | 65.8 | 70.2 | 65.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.8 | 25.4 | 17.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 0 game wont start | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 96 | 43 | 34 | 27 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 19 | 14.8 | 13.1 | 12.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 17.2 | 13.7 | 12 | 10.6 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
红米Book 14 的散热装置由两根热管和两个风扇组成，因此设备整体非常安静。即使在游戏或压力测试中，我们测得的最大噪音也只有 34 分贝（A），是迄今为止对比组中最安静的设备。没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 25.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.9 / 34.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) | ||
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -19% | -10% | -10% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 23.6 | 25.9 -10% | 24 -2% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 25.9 -10% | 25 -6% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23.6 | 27.6 -17% | 27 -14% | 23.8 -1% | 23.6 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 27.6 -7% | 29 -13% | 27.1 -5% | 24.8 4% |
| Load Average * | 31.9 | 43.4 -36% | 37 -16% | 34.9 -9% | 34.2 -7% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 34.4 | 43.7 -27% | 37 -8% | 43.7 -27% | |
| Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 43.8 -27% | 38 -10% | 43.7 -27% | 42.9 -25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式和执行简单任务时，机身依然非常凉爽。在高负载情况下，底部（中上部区域）会出现热点，我们测得的温度高达 45 °C（113 °F）。不过，由于其位置的关系，即使在这种极端情况下，该设备仍然可以放在大腿上。底座顶部的温度明显较低，最高温度为 38 °C（100.4 °F）。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.1 °C / -1.9 F).
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -12% | -9% | -13% | -0% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.6 | 41.2 -7% | 39 -1% | 43.7 -13% | 39.2 -2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 41.4 8% | 46 -2% | 49.4 -10% | 40.4 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 29.2 -20% | 28 -15% | 27.7 -14% | 25.3 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.6 | 31.2 -27% | 29 -18% | 28.6 -16% | 25.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器整体表现不错，特别是考虑到价格区间。声音再现得益于纯净的高音，只是低音相对较弱。
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Work 14 Base audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
我们的功耗测量结果并无意外，考虑到显示屏的高分辨率，功耗值并不低。相对较低的功率限制在负载情况下非常明显，因为我们测得的最大功率仅为 63 瓦，随后很快降至 50 瓦左右。因此，随机提供的 100 瓦电源装置（GaN，包括欧盟适配器）实际上过大了。待机模式和关机模式下的功率值也并不突出。
| Off / Standby | 0.39 / 0.53 Watt |
| Idle | 3.3 / 8.4 / 9.6 Watt |
| Load |
51.9 / 63.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Core 5 220H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, YMTC PC411-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Work 14 Base i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | 3% | -29% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.8 -15% | 5 -52% | 4.4 -33% | 3.7 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 8.4 | 8.6 -2% | 6 29% | 9.2 -10% | 6.8 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 8.8 8% | 10 -4% | 9.6 -0% | 7.2 25% |
| Load Average * | 51.9 | 60 -16% | 41 21% | 62.6 -21% | 31.8 39% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51 | 59.4 -16% | 42.5 17% | 71.5 -40% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 51 | 51.7 -1% | 71.9 -41% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 63.2 | 65 -3% | 58 8% | 101.7 -61% | 47.2 25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 31 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
电池寿命
测试设备使用 56 Wh 电池，在我们的电池测试中仅取得了平均成绩。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大亮度的 34%）的 WLAN 模式下，仅有不到 10 小时的时间，在全亮度下仅有不到 6.5 小时的时间（均为 60 Hz）。尤其是红米本 14 2024 的旧 Pro 版，由于采用了更大的 80 Wh 电池，在这方面优势明显。
开机时充满电需要 123 分钟，55 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025
- 02/27/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
