惠普14s with Ryzen in review:廉价的笔记本电脑让人看到了潜力
作为一个主流平台，惠普14s配备了制造商所有可以想象的变体的硬件。无论是英特尔还是AMD芯片，大的和小的硬盘，最小的或慷慨的工作内存配置。因此，从280欧元（约333美元，不含Windows系统）到近850欧元（约1010美元，英特尔高端），每个人都有自己的选择。
我们的测试模型处于较低的中场，价格为530欧元（约630美元，不含Windows），但理论上可以通过Ryzen 5000 SoC跟上英特尔的高端产品。你可以在评论中找到我们不推荐该机型的原因。
HP 14s-fq1357ng (14s-fq Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U 6 x 2.1 - 4 GHz, 26 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 - 512 MB VRAM, RAM: 1333 MHz, DDR4, Adrenalin 20.40.32
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4-3200 (2x 8GB, 2 Slots)
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO403D, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Storage
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, 512 GB
, 340 GB free
Weight
1.46 kg, Power Supply: 271 g
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | HP 14s-dq1431ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
外壳和功能。可升级的子笔记本
由于底座上有薄薄的铝板，塑料底盘看起来很悦目，但这对稳定性没有帮助。轻巧的底盘只具有相当的抗扭性，铰链上的运动会使结构的邻近区域变形。键盘的弯曲度很大，底座可以在有限的范围内从下面弯曲。显示屏上的压力导致了亮度的变化（在黑色图像中可以识别）。
该机型可以升级，有两个内存插槽，一个M.2 2280插槽用于SSD，一个M.2 2230用于WiFi芯片。由于测试结果不佳，我们会先抛出后者。SD卡读卡器也很慢，但幸运的是你并不经常需要它。弹出机制的缺失很令人讨厌。SD卡被简单地卡在插槽中，我们不得不用指尖在只伸出4毫米的卡上挣扎。
至少1.4公斤（约3.1磅）的重量是可敬的，联想的竞争对手更重更厚。端口在右边，而且距离很近，这可能会给USB加密狗带来问题，例如用于以太网。Type-C USB不能用于充电，也不适合作为DisplayPort输出--至少它拒绝与我们的Type-C转HDMI线一起工作。
连接设备
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (54.8 - 339, n=21) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (86 - 348, n=21) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø295 (271-305)
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1391 (1295-1594)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1190 (1067-1275)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (405-842)
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø631 (615-642)
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (152-308)
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1380 (1117-1459)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1329 (674-1509)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø856 (441-906)
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (431-696)
20.9 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
26 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
21 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
输入设备。惠普笔记本电脑被证明是弱点
该输入法因其屈服的子结构而受到影响。在打字时，按键会屈服，导致打字时有一种海绵状的感觉，没有什么乐趣。平滑的按键有清晰的行程，而且很安静。没有照明，而且字迹可以更强，符合我们的口味。很少需要的F键被设计成Fn辅助键。
宽大的点击板对边缘很敏感，只比掌托略低，有一个清晰的压力点。然而，行程很小。事实证明，穿透力很强的点击噪音是令人讨厌的。
显示屏：不是一个最佳的笔记本显示屏
友达显示器配备了1920 x 1080像素，抗反射能力较弱，这意味着存在某种丝滑的光泽，这在阳光下也是令人讨厌的。平均223cd/m²的亮度对此无能为力。
对比度为978:1，这个数值几乎是英特尔姐妹产品的两倍，尽管根据命名法，它是相同的AUO面板类型。原因是黑值略低（0.22而不是0.16），英特尔姐妹的亮度更高。AMD Vari Bright没有激活，该设备没有像通常的AMD笔记本电脑那样与相应的Radeon软件一起工作。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO403D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 242 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 223 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 220 cd/m²
Contrast: 978:1 (Black: 0.225 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
| HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE NVM140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14s-dq1431ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 69% | 5% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.11 | 37.47 -2% | 64.8 70% | 40.3 6% | 38.42 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57 | 56 -2% | 96.3 69% | 59.5 4% | 57.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.37 | 38.71 -2% | 66.1 68% | 41.7 6% | 39.71 1% |
| Response Times | -2% | 27% | 17% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 41 ? -0% | 31.2 ? 24% | 35.2 ? 14% | 41 ? -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 28 ? -4% | 19.2 ? 29% | 21.6 ? 20% | 25 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 29800 | ||||
| Screen | -7% | 20% | -3% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 220 | 357 62% | 341 55% | 341 55% | 305 39% |
| Brightness | 223 | 315 41% | 313 40% | 327 47% | 264 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 82 -4% | 87 2% | 90 6% | 81 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.225 | 0.455 -102% | 0.27 -20% | 0.26 -16% | 0.16 29% |
| Contrast | 978 | 785 -20% | 1263 29% | 1312 34% | 1906 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.16 | 3.98 4% | 1.76 58% | 5.1 -23% | 5.44 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.43 | 6.92 7% | 4.85 35% | 17.6 -137% | 20.42 -175% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 3.33 -42% | 3.3 -40% | 2.1 11% | 3.23 -37% |
| Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.47 89% | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6389 102% | 6138 106% | 7233 90% | 6755 96% | 7035 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 66 | 37 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 89 | 58 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 4.4 | 4.72 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-5% | 39% /
32% | 6% /
2% | -1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
色彩也没有给14s带来提升；sRGB只覆盖了57%。如果你想在这个价格范围内寻找一个真正好的显示器，你最好选择 Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7它能覆盖96%的sRGB，而且亮度更高。至少灰度再现得相当好（没有明显的偏蓝），而且在降低亮度时没有PWM。
性能。AMD的笔记本处理器没有达到最高水平
Ryzen 5 5500U5700U和3500U是市场上可能的AMD配置，Athlon的变种也可能提供（在德国没有）。英特尔的姐妹们从赛扬N4500开始，到酷睿i3-1115G4，最后到i7-1165G7。AMD机型大多提供16GB内存，英特尔则提供8GB。
处理器
Ryzen 5 5500U ，涡轮增压高达4GHz，基础时钟为2.1GHz。六个Zen核心在芯片中工作，并增加了一个最高频率为1800 MHz的Radeon RX Vega图形单元。APU的图形和处理器部分都会根据散热条件改变其时钟。如果SoC上的温度过高，它就会节制时钟，直到废热沉降到一定限度以下。这在惠普14s中刚刚超过60度。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø996 (940.2-1110.59)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1156 (1134.46-1251.72)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø870 (762.33-887.51)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1207 (1162.45-1245.1)
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø373 (322.23-600.93)
芯片 Ryzen 5 5500U不能永久地运行其4000MHz的Turbo，而只是几秒钟。在R15中，时钟在4秒后已经回到2500兆赫，然后稳定在3000兆赫以下。因此，在前七次运行中，分数悠然下降，但随后让步了一些，保持在950分的水平。A 联想ThinkPad E14 G3采用了相同的SoC，表明在长期使用中可以达到1160分。我们的 Ryzen 5 5500U在启动时（-11%）和加载时（-19%）比较弱。2100MHz的基础时钟没有被削弱。
Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1149 - 1183, n=18) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6030 - 8565, n=19) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (449 - 461, n=19) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (2223 - 3316, n=20) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (170 - 179, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (995 - 1412, n=20) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (358 - 490, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4174 - 4378, n=19) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (29585 - 36896, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1070 - 1126, n=20) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4063 - 5917, n=20) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6.7 - 9.74, n=20) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (60 - 80.7, n=17) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (0.607 - 0.67, n=19) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark在所有学科中都低于平均水平，但是-5到-15%不应该被高估。该系统在任何时候都能顺利工作，20个浏览器标签和几个程序并没有立即使惠普14s陷入困境。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4626 - 5301, n=13) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8390 - 9789, n=13) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6262 - 7958, n=13) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4513 - 5540, n=13) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4809 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延迟
在使用LatencyMon的测试中，惠普14s显示中断时间增加，ACPI和网络驱动造成的延迟最高。因此，我们的测试配置不适合实时应用或类似的应用，但这可能随着未来的更新而改变。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
这里安装的容量为512GB的PCIe固态硬盘美光2210（M.2 2280）在存储基准中实现了低于平均水平的写入和读取率。与WDC、三星和SK Hynix的竞争对手在这里更快。然而，采用英特尔Optane内存的姐妹产品惠普14s-dq1431ng（英特尔）却很容易被打败。
| HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH | Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 57% | 89% | 37% | 20% | 17% | 92% | |
| Write 4K | 94.8 | 93.3 -2% | 223.7 136% | 83.3 -12% | 142.8 51% | 153.1 ? 61% | 147.8 ? 56% |
| Read 4K | 48.93 | 38.87 -21% | 51.2 5% | 46.84 -4% | 167.4 242% | 64.6 ? 32% | 63 ? 29% |
| Write Seq | 1059 | 2834 168% | 2579 144% | 2195 107% | 232.1 -78% | 1125 ? 6% | 2580 ? 144% |
| Read Seq | 1620 | 2452 51% | 2553 58% | 2112 30% | 1128 -30% | 1808 ? 12% | 2852 ? 76% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 400 | 386.6 -3% | 671 68% | 439.7 10% | 438 10% | 367 ? -8% | 408 ? 2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 377.2 | 495.5 31% | 761 102% | 391.1 4% | 491.2 30% | 507 ? 34% | 464 ? 23% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1136 | 2981 162% | 2721 140% | 2484 119% | 622 -45% | 1138 ? 0% | 3976 ? 250% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2073 | 3566 72% | 3358 62% | 2995 44% | 1566 -24% | 1997 ? -4% | 5231 ? 152% |
| AS SSD | 58% | 79% | 46% | -49% | -3% | 66% | |
| Seq Read | 1784 | 2645 48% | 3021 69% | 2596 46% | 677 -62% | 1885 ? 6% | 4057 ? 127% |
| Seq Write | 742 | 2627 254% | 2341 215% | 1460 97% | 194.7 -74% | 998 ? 35% | 2631 ? 255% |
| 4K Read | 58.3 | 55.2 -5% | 47.9 -18% | 48.62 -17% | 58.1 0% | 62.2 ? 7% | 58.5 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 141.9 | 119.4 -16% | 186.7 32% | 113.4 -20% | 124.1 -13% | 162 ? 14% | 176 ? 24% |
| 4K-64 Read | 582 | 1308 125% | 1472 153% | 1419 144% | 219.6 -62% | 585 ? 1% | 908 ? 56% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1047 | 1816 73% | 1829 75% | 1840 76% | 638 -39% | 863 ? -18% | 1867 ? 78% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.057 -10% | 0.06 -15% | 0.049 6% | 0.109 -110% | 0.07329 ? -41% | 0.05717 ? -10% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.031 33% | 0.021 54% | 0.032 30% | 0.065 -41% | 0.04957 ? -8% | 0.07341 ? -60% |
| Score Read | 819 | 1628 99% | 1822 122% | 1727 111% | 345 -58% | 836 ? 2% | 1372 ? 68% |
| Score Write | 1263 | 2198 74% | 2249 78% | 2099 66% | 782 -38% | 1125 ? -11% | 2309 ? 83% |
| Score Total | 2469 | 4667 89% | 4973 101% | 4658 89% | 1305 -47% | 2366 ? -4% | 4325 ? 75% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1067 | 1476 38% | 1168 9% | 1191 ? 12% | 2380 ? 123% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 597 | 538 -10% | 590 -1% | 477 ? -20% | 778 ? 30% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1019 | 1185 16% | 1148 13% | 857 ? -16% | 1716 ? 68% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 58% /
58% | 84% /
83% | 42% /
43% | -15% /
-20% | 7% /
4% | 79% /
75% |
* ... smaller is better
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2073 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1136 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
377.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
400 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1620 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1059 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
48.93 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
94.8 MB/s
Continuous power reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
图形卡
由于集成了Radeon RX Vega 7 SoC显卡，惠普14s有其局限性；这款14英寸的产品并非为游戏而设计。我们的游戏表立即显示了这一点。那里的游戏是3-5年前的，最多只能在中等设置下玩。如果你认真考虑目前的游戏，你应该寻找一个替代品
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (3353 - 6249, n=58) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1772 - 4037, n=62) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (496 - 1249, n=57) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5982 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3073 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1203 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
如果你用Ultra设置推动图形，你会遇到热限制，正如我们用Witcher 3 Ultra的测试所显示的那样。FPS保持在25分钟，然后与CPU和GPU时钟一起下降到10-11。在这里，GPU时钟从1800降到1200MHz，CPU时钟从3500降到1500MHz。这一切都发生在保持SoC的温度低于60摄氏度（140华氏度）。这对低废热很有好处，但却泄露了Radeon Vega RX的性能，然后低于平均值。
在测试中，中等程度的硬件密集型游戏和3DMarks并没有受到影响。与竞争对手相比，惠普14s的性能并不差，在某些情况下甚至领先于其他Vega RX 7s。带有iGPU Iris Xe的英特尔竞争产品大多被打败，即使有强大的Core i7 (Honor Magicbook 14i7).
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD: Ø10.7 (9-13)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø13.5 (11-16)
R5 5500U, Vega 7 Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N: Ø13.9 (12-15)
The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (63.8 - 178.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (43.1 - 140.7, n=35) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| 1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (54 - 167.5, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (25.1 - 81.3, n=27) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (63.4 - 172.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (38 - 123, n=33) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| 1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (49 - 156, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (26.3 - 82.7, n=28) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.8 - 95.3, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (11.3 - 32.2, n=36) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (23.3 - 58.2, n=58) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14.8 - 112.6, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (25.1 - 62.1, n=58) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 111.6, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (17.1 - 41.1, n=40) | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 59.9, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8.9 - 20.3, n=40) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25.9 - 144.7, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (24.7 - 53.4, n=56) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (24.2 - 116.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (19.3 - 40.3, n=56) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (17.4 - 35.7, n=56) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (65.6 - 229, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (34.8 - 95.3, n=41) | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 96.5, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (13.4 - 36.1, n=41) | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (19.4 - 80.9, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (11.5 - 30.1, n=41) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 82 | 74 | 22 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 52 | 29 | 14.7 | 10 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.7 | 84.5 | 47.2 | 43.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 34.8 | 16.9 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.8 | 29.7 | 26.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 76.6 | 30.5 | 25.3 |
Emissions & Energy: Cool HP Notebook
噪声排放
整体噪音水平很低。风扇在怠速模式下始终保持关闭状态。在负载情况下，它们突然启动；在这里，缓慢上升的速度会更令人愉快。风扇在负载时只知道一个速度，不管是压力测试还是通过高负载。 Witcher 3 Ultra。我们在这两种情况下都测得41分贝（A）。竞争对手在这方面的差别不大。对于目前英特尔和AMD芯片组的性能等级来说，风扇不需要连续工作是很常见的。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26 / 26 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41 / 41 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) | ||
温度
压力测试显示了冷却系统如何处理高的永久负载。一旦SoC上的温度超过81度（约178华氏度）--大约1:30分钟后就是这种情况--时钟就会逐渐从2500降到1600MHz。封装功率也从最初的25瓦减少到15瓦。
因此，惠普14s偏向于低表面温度。在芯片上永久只有刚过60度（约140华氏度），这意味着我们在底部测得的最高温度为45度（约113华氏度），而平均30度（约86华氏度）则要低得多。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
演讲者
扬声器位于键盘上方的穿孔板下，即使设备躺在床单上，也能确保声音的一致性。声音非常强调中音，几乎没有低频。竞争对手也不能做得更好，比如 Honor Magicbook 14显示。双麦克风的质量较差；录音时伴有适度的噪音。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP 14s-fq1357ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
Ryzen 5很节俭，这一点在空闲功耗为4至7瓦的情况下再次得到了体现。在永久负载期间，它增加到28至42瓦，而短时负载阶段可能更高。无论哪种方式，65瓦的电源都是合适的额定功率。能源消耗 Witcher 3能耗显示了冷却系统对R5-5500U的性能有多大的影响。 5500U拦截。当我们的惠普14s节制时钟以控制废热和噪音时，一台 联想IdeaPad 5 14ALC05继续有增无减，保持在已经较高的水平。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.19 / 0.45 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 6.3 / 7 Watt |
| Load |
27.7 / 42 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø27.7 (26.7-31.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø46.6 (45.1-48.9)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø42.2 (39.9-44.5)
HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø42.5 (41.3-45)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø52.8 (51.1-53.7)
电池寿命
我们通过Wi-Fi测试确定了与实践有关的运行时间。浏览器在8:27小时后关闭，对于41Wh的小电池来说，这是一个令人印象深刻的表现。然而，拥有56-57瓦特的竞争产品持续时间长达30%。如果你正在寻找一个更长的电池寿命，你应该检查一下 联想IdeaPad 5 14ALC05更加仔细。
| HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7, 41 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56.5 Wh | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | HP 14s-dq1431ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 41 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | 14% | 34% | -34% | 43% | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 507 | 649 28% | 580 14% | 680 34% | 334 -34% | 726 ? 43% |
| 1920x1080 Witcher 3 ultra 150cd | 89 | |||||
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| Reader / Idle | 675 | 1181 75% | 723 7% | 1750 ? 159% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 52% /
52% | 14% /
14% | 34% /
34% | -14% /
-14% | 101% /
101% |
Pros
+ 相对于重量而言，运行时间较长
+ 低废热
+ 良好的iGPU游戏性能
Cons
- 响亮的点击板
- 灵活的键盘底座
- 相当坚固的底盘
- 可以升级，但很难升级
- 缓慢的SD卡读卡器
- 缓慢的WLAN
- CPU性能低于平均水平
结论：惠普的14英寸机有太多的弱点
惠普14s迎合了对价格敏感的低预算客户，以及对价格和性能敏感的主流买家。廉价到中等价格的AMD和英特尔配置被用在一个庄重但不幸的也低于平均水平的稳定机箱中。我们的测试设备硬件包括Ryzen 5 5500U，16GB内存，512GB SSD和IPS全高清，这是一个非常有吸引力的性价比。
然而，如果考虑到不太稳定的机箱、受影响的输入设备、薄弱的显示屏、难以维护、缓慢的WLAN和很少的端口，我们对惠普14s没有太多可推荐的地方。
当然，这款 Ryzen 5500U在这里做得很好，将英特尔的竞争对手收入囊中。然而，该芯片在选择性和永久性负载下的表现低于平均水平。在这里，具有相同SoC的型号从Ryzen 5中获得更多的性能，见 联想ThinkPad E14 G3和 联想IdeaPad 5 14ALC05.
如果你正在寻找运行时间和一个非常好的性价比，你应该看一下 联想IdeaPad 5 14ALC05更加仔细。
价格和可用性
测试配置HP 14s-fq1357ng在发布本测试时没有提供，该设备是由德国惠普公司提供给我们的。相同的惠普14s-fq1158ng（不含Windows系统）目前的价格为533欧元（约635美元），在笔记本billiger.
HP 14s-fq1357ng
- 08/31/2021 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Price comparison
