雷蛇灵刃15基础版笔记本电脑评测:10代英特尔升级
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 15.75 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
83 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 21 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 366.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Samsung SDCA029, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -22% | -24% | 0% | -24% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 69.9 -30% | 66.9 -33% | 65.6 -34% | 99.9 0% | 65.3 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.1 -1% | 98.1 -2% | 92.2 -8% | 100 0% | 95.1 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.4 | 71.1 -27% | 68.5 -30% | 66.9 -31% | 98.2 1% | 65.9 -32% |
Response Times | -300% | 13081% | -214% | 17% | 13057% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.7 ? | 11.2 ? -315% | 12.8 ? -374% | 7 ? -159% | 2.2 ? 19% | 16.4 ? -507% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.6 ? | 10 ? -285% | 10.4 ? -300% | 9.6 ? -269% | 1.8 ? 31% | 8.8 ? -238% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 23810 ? 39917% | 60 ? 1% | 23810 ? 39917% | ||
Screen | 8% | 4% | -6% | 20% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 366.7 | 339.4 -7% | 293 -20% | 323.6 -12% | 385 5% | 324.2 -12% |
Brightness | 371 | 331 -11% | 270 -27% | 315 -15% | 390 5% | 304 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 91 0% | 93 2% | 90 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.38 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 1.58 70% | 1.69 68% | 3.31 36% | 2.46 53% | 5.01 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.92 | 3.8 52% | 3.37 57% | 5.74 28% | 4.01 49% | 12.7 -60% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.3 -15% | 2.3 -15% | 2.9 -45% | 1.39 30% | 7.9 -295% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6514 100% | 6952 93% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6395 102% | 8455 77% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.6 | 64.8 -25% | 63 -27% | 59.7 -31% | 98 13% | 60.8 -30% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.4 -1% | 98.5 -1% | 91.8 -8% | 100 0% | 95.5 -4% |
Contrast | 1414 | 1010 | 1116 | 853 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.47 | 1.24 | 2.73 | 2.6 | 1.64 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -104% /
-46% | 4354% /
2801% | -81% /
-42% | 12% /
15% | 4327% /
2763% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.5 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506UI | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (2017 - 3133, n=55) | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (416 - 486, n=55) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506UI | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (342 - 495, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4580 - 5090, n=21) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28512 - 35174, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1117 - 1251, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4859 - 6262, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (7.1 - 10.7, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (54.5 - 64.7, n=9) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.608 - 0.695, n=14) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3696 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4705 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5244 points | |
Help |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 18% | 21% | -27% | -15% | 6% | |
Seq Read | 2021 | 1832 -9% | 1086 -46% | 1239 -39% | 1200 -41% | 1925 -5% |
Seq Write | 2090 | 1864 -11% | 1901 -9% | 920 -56% | 836 -60% | 2371 13% |
4K Read | 47.71 | 52.1 9% | 51 7% | 45.74 -4% | 65.8 38% | 37.2 -22% |
4K Write | 101.1 | 108.3 7% | 117.3 16% | 95.7 -5% | 103.8 3% | 108.9 8% |
4K-64 Read | 856 | 1159 35% | 1503 76% | 322 -62% | 789 -8% | 1177 38% |
4K-64 Write | 1041 | 1807 74% | 1721 65% | 722 -31% | 929 -11% | 1135 9% |
Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.05 4% | 0.059 -13% | 0.073 -40% | 0.103 -98% | 0.065 -25% |
Access Time Write * | 0.111 | 0.034 69% | 0.1 10% | 0.047 58% | 0.045 59% | 0.108 3% |
Score Read | 1105 | 1394 26% | 1662 50% | 492 -55% | 975 -12% | 1407 27% |
Score Write | 1351 | 2102 56% | 2029 50% | 910 -33% | 1117 -17% | 1481 10% |
Score Total | 3037 | 4221 39% | 4588 51% | 1654 -46% | 2594 -15% | 3633 20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2474 | 2083 -16% | 2155 -13% | 1236 -50% | 2073 -16% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 679 | 496.5 -27% | 715 5% | 703 4% | 576 -15% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1037 | 977 -6% | 1506 45% | 812 -22% | 1426 38% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -11% | -9% | -41% | -2% | 4% | |
Write 4K | 118.7 | 137.2 16% | 132.5 12% | 93.9 -21% | 127.4 7% | 108.8 -8% |
Read 4K | 52.4 | 46.82 -11% | 45.03 -14% | 46.29 -12% | 147.5 181% | 45.41 -13% |
Write Seq | 2247 | 1221 -46% | 1987 -12% | 974 -57% | 485.9 -78% | 2467 10% |
Read Seq | 2234 | 1217 -46% | 1434 -36% | 1425 -36% | 1352 -39% | 2456 10% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 515 | 527 2% | 467.5 -9% | 259.4 -50% | 476.5 -7% | 532 3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 584 | 614 5% | 536 -8% | 296.5 -49% | 531 -9% | 590 1% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2235 | 1986 -11% | 2003 -10% | 977 -56% | 1061 -53% | 2801 25% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3171 | 3234 2% | 3306 4% | 1666 -47% | 2552 -20% | 3172 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
7% | 6% /
10% | -34% /
-32% | -9% /
-9% | 5% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31) | |
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (9107 - 17603, n=30) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18964 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26823 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15800 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6527 points | |
Help |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (62 - 98, n=12) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Asus TUF FX705GM |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (177.7 - 356, n=18) | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (144.9 - 254, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (86.5 - 151.4, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus TUF FX705GM |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 289.6 | 203.3 | 118.8 | 61.9 | 43.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 143 | 132 | 124 | 116 | 90.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 94.1 | 88.5 | 79.5 | 51.4 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 129 | 100 | 94 | 85 | 30 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 135.6 | 103.2 | 74.4 | 57.3 | 21.5 |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 7% | -8% | -13% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 28.5 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28.7 -1% | 30 -6% | 28.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 29.8 -5% | 34 -20% | 28.5 -0% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 32.4 -14% | 36 -27% | 28.5 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.7 | 30.9 3% | 29 9% | 38 -20% | 41 -29% | 49 -55% |
Load Average * | 47.7 | 39.5 17% | 33.5 30% | 38.2 20% | 48 -1% | 49 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.5 | 48 -1% | 45 5% | 56.6 -19% | 48 -1% | 49 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 59.4 -20% | 45.2 9% | 56.6 -14% | 54 -9% | 55 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 31.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47.7 / 49.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.7 °C / -19.3 F).
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.55 / 0.86 Watt |
Idle | 11.1 / 13.7 / 33.4 Watt |
Load |
104.4 / 203.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 4% | -26% | -62% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.1 | 14.9 -34% | 12.5 -13% | 18 -62% | 19 -71% | 10 10% |
Idle Average * | 13.7 | 17.5 -28% | 15.3 -12% | 21 -53% | 40.5 -196% | 13 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 29.5 12% | 20.7 38% | 38 -14% | 52 -56% | 20 40% |
Load Average * | 104.4 | 94.8 9% | 90.2 14% | 113 -8% | 132.3 -27% | 100 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 159.9 | 146.1 9% | 162 -1% | 149 7% | 183.3 -15% | 159 1% |
Load Maximum * | 203.8 | 210.9 -3% | 209.3 -3% | 256 -26% | 217.2 -7% | 196 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 71% | 63% | -25% | 51% | 38% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 413 71% | 393 63% | 181 -25% | 364 51% | 332 38% |
Reader / Idle | 614 | 953 | 518 | 554 | ||
Load | 94 | 102 | 166 | 44 |
Pros
Cons
过去,英特尔有一个“tick-tock”处理器产品周期,其中“tick”将代表主要架构的重新设计,并进行重大性能更新,而“tock”产品将是“tick”的“打磨”版本。类似情况适用于2020 Razer Blade 15,因为新的第10代Core i7-10750H CPU和GeForce RTX Super Max-Q GPU分别是第9代Core i7-9750H和GeForce RTX Max-Q的相对较小的更新。机身上下都有一些调整,但是仍然是我们都熟悉的样子。与去年的型号相比,任何游戏性能优势都在个位数百分比内。
如果您打算购买Blade 15,那么可以考虑2019年的型号,尤其是现在它们更便宜。跳过2020年基础系列,您真的不会错过任何值得的东西。希望明年的机型能带来更多切实的升级,例如更安静的风扇和Ampere GPU。
对本已出色的2019系列的改进。有一些新的改进可以很好地解决问题,但是它们几乎都是次要的,没什么可写的。
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo