惠普 15-ay116ng Notebook Review

Name: HP 15-ay116ng
Brand: HP

惊喜。 惠普15-ay116ng售价500欧元（约3692人民币），对于一台简单办公笔记本电脑来说并不算低。不过这台设备也带来了很多：一颗Kaby Lake处理器，一块全高清屏幕和一块固态硬盘。除此之外还有非常优秀的电池续航时间和低运行噪音。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 12/06/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 15-ay116ng (15 dw000 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4542

Memory

4 GB

, DDR4-2134, 单通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB

, 190 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC282 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HP DVDRW GUD1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.3 x 384.3 x 254.6

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office (试用版), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.04 kg, Power Supply: 295 g

Price

599 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP 15-ay116ng HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Dell Latitude 15-3570 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414	155.7 MB/s +601%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA	23.7 MB/s +7%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	22.7 MB/s +2%
Dell Latitude 15-3570	22.24 MB/s 0%
HP 15-ay116ng	22.2 MB/s
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE	15.35 MB/s -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414	234 MB/s +757%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE	27.7 MB/s +1%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	27.5 MB/s +1%
HP 15-ay116ng	27.3 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570	24.15 MB/s -12%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)	125 MBit/s +172%
HP 15-ay116ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)	46 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	274 MBit/s +417%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)	89 MBit/s +68%
HP 15-ay116ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)	53 MBit/s


229 cd/m²	235 cd/m²	230 cd/m²
231 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	222 cd/m²
243 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	240 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 249 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 233.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 241 cd/m²
Contrast: 566:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP 15-ay116ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15-3570 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Display		-2%	9%	0%	9%
Display P3 Coverage	37.34	36.51 -2%	40.71 9%	37.24 0%	40.61 9%
sRGB Coverage	56.2	55 -2%	61.1 9%	56 0%	61.1 9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	38.58	37.72 -2%	42.07 9%	38.48 0%	41.96 9%
Response Times		2%	-33%	-31%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(20, 20, Plateau)	40 ?(20, 20) -0%	52 ?(28, 24) -30%	58 ?(27, 31) -45%	37 ?(13, 24) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)	22 ?(6, 16) 4%	31 ?(14, 17) -35%	27 ?(10, 17) -17%	37 ?(20, 17) -61%
PWM Frequency			1000
Screen		-4%	-0%	-7%	-11%
Brightness middle	249	219 -12%	211 -15%	204 -18%	202 -19%
Brightness	234	222 -5%	200 -15%	198 -15%	211 -10%
Brightness Distribution	89	85 -4%	83 -7%	85 -4%	88 -1%
Black Level *	0.44	0.39 11%	0.43 2%	0.48 -9%	0.62 -41%
Contrast	566	562 -1%	491 -13%	425 -25%	326 -42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	11.71	12.67 -8%	10.53 10%	11.62 1%	12.35 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.51	20.99 -8%	17.79 9%	19.97 -2%	19.9 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.13	13.82 -5%	11.85 10%	12.3 6%	13.46 -3%
Gamma	2.57 ^86%	2.63 ^84%	2.25 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	15273 ^43%	15633 ^42%	13758 ^47%	13244 ^49%	15217 ^43%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36	35 -3%	39 8%	36 0%	39 8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	56	55 -2%	61 9%	56 0%	61 9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / -3%	-8% / -3%	-13% / -9%	-10% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7753

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11342

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4991

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

30.18 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.67 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.44 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.93 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

325 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

122 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	122 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -5%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -5%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	87 Points -29%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	82 Points -33%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	74 Points -39%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	52 Points -57%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	325 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points -11%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -11%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	261 Points -20%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	208 Points -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	195 Points -40%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	174 Points -46%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	11342 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	9080 Points -20%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	6927 Points -39%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	6385 Points -44%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	4428 Points -61%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	4991 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	3505 Points -30%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	3133 Points -37%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2325 Points -53%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	1642 Points -67%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	2907 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	2228 Points -23%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	1944 Points -33%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	1928 Points -34%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6488 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	5144 Points -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	4550 Points -30%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	4075 Points -37%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3672 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6825 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	221.5 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	160.6 Points -27%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	151.9 Points -31%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	132.7 Points -40%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	109.9 Points -50%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	71.2 Points -68%

Octane V2 - Total Score
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	32838 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	19299 Points -41%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	15801 Points -52%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	14188 Points -57%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	2390 ms * -106%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2267 ms * -96%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel Core i3-5005U	1832 ms * -58%
HP 15-ay116ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1159 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		4977 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3315 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4338 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4587 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3337 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3317 Points 0%
HP 15-ay116ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	3315 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	2980 Points -10%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	2834 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP 15-ay116ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	4587 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4477 Points -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4343 Points -5%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	3923 Points -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP

Sequential Read: 501 MB/s

Sequential Write: 483.9 MB/s

512K Read: 413.8 MB/s

512K Write: 294.9 MB/s

4K Read: 34.91 MB/s

4K Write: 95.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 370.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 243.6 MB/s

	HP 15-ay116ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-21%	-92%	-92%	-56%
Read Seq	501	509 2%	104.7 -79%	102.5 -80%	453.2 -10%
Write Seq	483.9	322.1 -33%	95.7 -80%	90.7 -81%	137.7 -72%
Read 512	413.8	321.2 -22%	33 -92%	32.58 -92%	308.5 -25%
Write 512	294.9	289.4 -2%	38.3 -87%	35.65 -88%	134.1 -55%
Read 4k	34.91	20.99 -40%	0.375 -99%	0.426 -99%	19.06 -45%
Write 4k	95.7	88 -8%	0.782 -99%	0.64 -99%	21.31 -78%
Read 4k QD32	370.9	141.3 -62%	0.675 -100%	0.987 -100%	93.5 -75%
Write 4k QD32	243.6	228.5 -6%	0.769 -100%	0.645 -100%	23.3 -90%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		8012 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1511 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		49743 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5542 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		744 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	2210 Points +59%
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U	2151 Points +54%
HP 15-ay116ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1394 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1273 Points -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1257 Points -10%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1162 Points -17%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U	968 Points -31%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP 15-ay116ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6876 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6314 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	6127 Points -11%
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U	6125 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5909 Points -14%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U	5097 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ProBook 470 G3 AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U	1212 Points +51%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	1205 Points +50%
HP 15-ay116ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	802 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U	578 Points -28%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	67.6	33.9	19.5	9.6
BioShock Infinite (2013)	45.3	25.3	20.9	6.5
Battlefield 4 (2013)	31.1	24.9	16.4	5

Noise Level

Idle		31.3 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A)
DVD		38.4 / dB(A)
Load		35.6 / 36.15 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

	HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520
Noise		-8%	-1%	-1%	2%
off / environment *	30.5	31.6 -4%	31.2 -2%	31.2 -2%	31 -2%
Idle Minimum *	31.3	34.5 -10%	31.5 -1%	32.5 -4%	31 1%
Idle Average *	31.3	34.5 -10%	31.9 -2%	32.5 -4%	31 1%
Idle Maximum *	31.3	34.5 -10%	31.9 -2%	32.7 -4%	31 1%
Load Average *	35.6	39 -10%	34.2 4%	34.2 4%	34.2 4%
Load Maximum *	36.15	38.3 -6%	36.8 -2%	34.6 4%	34.3 5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


32.5 °C	33.8 °C	23.6 °C
31.2 °C	33 °C	23.5 °C
29 °C	31.9 °C	24.4 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


22.9 °C	33.8 °C	36.6 °C
23.3 °C	31 °C	36.4 °C
22.5 °C	32.8 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 29.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).

	HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520
Heat		7%	-14%	-5%	-27%
Maximum Upper Side *	33.8	31.1 8%	33.2 2%	34.6 -2%	36.1 -7%
Maximum Bottom *	36.6	31.8 13%	37.3 -2%	35.6 3%	47 -28%
Idle Upper Side *	23.6	22.9 3%	28.7 -22%	26.7 -13%	31.7 -34%
Idle Bottom *	23.8	22.6 5%	32 -34%	26 -9%	32.9 -38%

* ... smaller is better

HP 15-ay116ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.34 / 0.35 Watt
Idle	3.2 / 6.3 / 7.4 Watt
Load	24 / 29 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520
Power Consumption		0%	-54%	-20%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	3.2	3.6 -13%	5.8 -81%	5.5 -72%	4.9 -53%
Idle Average *	6.3	6 5%	12.6 -100%	7.6 -21%	7.2 -14%
Idle Maximum *	7.4	6.4 14%	12.8 -73%	8.5 -15%	7.5 -1%
Load Average *	24	26 -8%	27.6 -15%	24.5 -2%	25.4 -6%
Load Maximum *	29	28.1 3%	30 -3%	25.4 12%	28 3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		14h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		6h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 27min

	HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh	Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-24%	-28%	43%
Reader / Idle	869	634 -27%			1024 18%
H.264	430	313 -27%
WiFi v1.3	412	347 -16%	315 -24%	295 -28%	542 32%
Load	87	109 25%			157 80%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕

+ 全高清屏幕

+ 高速固态硬盘

+ 优秀电池续航

Cons

- 仅高速以太网卡

- 仅一年质保

- 不支持USB-C

- 无维护底盖

- 不支持无线AC标准

- 无线网络模组数据传输率低

In review: HP 15-ay116ng. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

惠普的这台15.6寸笔记本电脑给我们带来了十分优秀的整体印象。由于搭配了Kaby Lake处理器，它可以适合大部分常见用途的需要——不管是现在还是数年之后。用户也可以更换固态硬盘，不过这需要打开机身才可以实现。它搭配的硬盘可以满足日常使用的需要。同时它也提供了十分优秀的电池续航。磨砂屏幕具备全高清分辨率，不过亮度较低且对比度十分不足。另外它的可视角度也不太稳定。不过，考虑到价位，这块屏幕也不算是无法接受。

15-ay116ng是惠普为产品线增加的一台全功能型办公笔记本电脑，它提供了十分优秀的性价比。

这台笔记本电脑的价签为500欧元（约3592人民币）。大部分的成本都用在了处理器，屏幕和固态硬盘上。这意味着其他部分它都节省了预算：这台笔记本电脑只有一年的质保，就算是在实惠型设备中，两年质保也是近年来的标准。另外，它仅搭配了高速以太网接口。如果千兆以太网对你来说不可或缺的话，就需要另外看看别的设备了。这台设备的无线网卡也不支持高速AC标准。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP 15-ay116ng - 11/25/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

76 / 98 → 77%

Keyboard

75%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

38 / 80 → 47%

Weight

63 / 20-67 → 91%