雷蛇灵刃17 Pro笔记本电脑评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 299.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1032:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 4% | 40% | 6% | 38% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 60.6 | 62.9 4% | 64 6% | 88.9 47% | 63.6 5% | 86.4 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 89 | 87.8 -1% | 90.4 2% | 100 12% | 95.4 7% | 99.9 12% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.1 | 63.9 3% | 64.8 4% | 99.7 61% | 65.5 5% | 99.1 60% |
Response Times | -3% | -81% | -547% | -6% | -308% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.8 ? | 7.2 ? -6% | 15.6 ? -129% | 60.8 ? -794% | 7.6 ? -12% | 35.6 ? -424% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 9.6 ? -0% | 12.8 ? -33% | 38.4 ? -300% | 9.6 ? -0% | 28 ? -192% |
PWM Frequency | 204.9 ? | 25510 ? | ||||
Screen | 13% | -30% | -22% | 24% | -29% | |
Brightness middle | 299.3 | 288 -4% | 299.1 0% | 230 -23% | 355 19% | 357.9 20% |
Brightness | 294 | 287 -2% | 273 -7% | 207 -30% | 327 11% | 347 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 91 -3% | 81 -14% | 83 -12% | 85 -10% | 94 0% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.2 31% | 0.27 7% | 0.2 31% | 0.26 10% | 0.33 -14% |
Contrast | 1032 | 1440 40% | 1108 7% | 1150 11% | 1365 32% | 1085 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.55 | 2.33 9% | 5.07 -99% | 5.62 -120% | 1.54 40% | 6.57 -158% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.73 | 5.34 -13% | 10.55 -123% | 10.24 -116% | 3 37% | 9.86 -108% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.9 | 2.47 15% | 3.31 -14% | 0.77 73% | 6.74 -132% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 1.19 66% | 6.8 -94% | 4.54 -30% | 2.19 37% | 4.3 -23% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.6 85% |
CCT | 7101 92% | 6710 97% | 7805 83% | 6625 98% | 6893 94% | 6403 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 57 0% | 58.5 3% | 88 54% | 61 7% | 88.4 55% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.7 | 88 -1% | 89.9 1% | 100 13% | 95 7% | 100 13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
9% | -36% /
-30% | -176% /
-80% | 8% /
17% | -100% /
-52% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=10) | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4412 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5672 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5734 points | |
Help |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -40% | -26% | -10% | -19% | 7% | |
Seq Read | 1831 | 1315 -28% | 1835 0% | 1153 -37% | 2599 42% | 3005 64% |
Seq Write | 1744 | 927 -47% | 1121 -36% | 1328 -24% | 588 -66% | 2668 53% |
4K Read | 45.16 | 52.4 16% | 23.98 -47% | 35.05 -22% | 37.57 -17% | 40.89 -9% |
4K Write | 107.1 | 122.8 15% | 100 -7% | 96 -10% | 104.4 -3% | 94.4 -12% |
4K-64 Read | 1240 | 326.5 -74% | 687 -45% | 727 -41% | 1116 -10% | 1366 10% |
4K-64 Write | 1695 | 727 -57% | 776 -54% | 1212 -28% | 513 -70% | 1197 -29% |
Access Time Read * | 0.064 | 0.11 -72% | 0.047 27% | 0.063 2% | 0.051 20% | 0.055 14% |
Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.045 -22% | 0.053 -43% | 0.04 -8% | 0.036 3% | 0.039 -5% |
Score Read | 1468 | 510 -65% | 895 -39% | 878 -40% | 1414 -4% | 1708 16% |
Score Write | 1977 | 942 -52% | 988 -50% | 1441 -27% | 676 -66% | 1558 -21% |
Score Total | 4197 | 1715 -59% | 2306 -45% | 2784 -34% | 2715 -35% | 4123 -2% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2086 | 773 -63% | 1487 -29% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 425.5 | 493 16% | 608 43% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 555 | 647 17% | 1162 109% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 22693 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38597 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18887 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8460 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 307.6 | 282.2 | 252.3 | 177.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 287.9 | 237.3 | 152.2 | 87.4 |
Rocket League (2017) | 249 | 247.7 | 248.4 |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -3% | 4% | -7% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 28.2 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 28.2 -0% | 31.5 -12% | 30 -6% | 31 -10% |
Idle Average * | 28.2 | 32 -13% | 28.2 -0% | 31.6 -12% | 31 -10% | 32 -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 40 -30% | 31 -1% | 31.6 -3% | 33 -7% | 41 -33% |
Load Average * | 42 | 46 -10% | 50.8 -21% | 32.3 23% | 43 -2% | 47 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 51 -0% | 50.8 -0% | 43 16% | 55 -8% | 47 8% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 52 2% | 50.8 4% | 45.5 14% | 58 -9% | 48 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 30.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.65 / 1.3 Watt |
Idle | 16.2 / 20.4 / 26.1 Watt |
Load |
96.5 / 214.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | -47% | 13% | -8% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16.2 | 19 -17% | 31 -91% | 13 20% | 13.9 14% | 10 38% |
Idle Average * | 20.4 | 22 -8% | 36 -76% | 17 17% | 18.8 8% | 15 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 29 -11% | 44 -69% | 23 12% | 23.1 11% | 22 16% |
Load Average * | 96.5 | 102 -6% | 107 -11% | 90 7% | 112.3 -16% | 92 5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 182.9 | 190 -4% | 212 -16% | 147 20% | 231 -26% | 153 16% |
Load Maximum * | 214.3 | 231 -8% | 258 -20% | 215 -0% | 291.5 -36% | 216 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 16% | -32% | -17% | 11% | 5% | |
Reader / Idle | 295 | 372 26% | 543 84% | 253 -14% | 464 57% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 280 | 235 -16% | 296 6% | 190 -32% | 197 -30% | 316 13% | 294 5% |
Load | 86 | 67 -22% | 49 -43% | 81 -6% | 54 -37% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
Pros
Cons
从历史上看,Razer Blade Pro笔记本电脑一直具有新颖的功能,可以将自己与竞争对手区分开来。例如,Blade Pro 2015具有独特的屏幕,而Blade Pro 2017则具有机械键盘,触控板灯,THX认证和音量滚轮。 2019年的Blade Pro 17删减了所有这些奇特的功能,专注于基础,结果是一台Razer最出色的Blade笔记本电脑。一代一代的改进实际上是有形的,而不仅仅是边缘的;与上一代Blade Pro 2017 GTX 1080相比,它在的重量减轻22%,体积减小24%,屏幕亮度增加30%,能效提高14%,同时提供高达39%的图形性能提升,和轻松升级的RAM,储存。
我们认为有几个方面可以使Blade Pro 17更好。 MSI笔记本电脑上的SteelSeries键盘更坚固,更深的键程可以提高触感,而软绵绵的触控板肯定可以从MacBook Pro中获取一些灵感。高性能的风扇噪音比Blade Pro 2017更安静,但它仍然超过50 dB(A)。用于在平衡模式和高性能模式之间切换的宏键将比每次打开Synapse更快更容易。集成专用的低音炮可以提高音频质量,而无需THX认证。同时,AC适配器电缆太绷紧,可以做得更薄,更灵活,便于携带。不过这些缺点不足以阻止其成为类别领先的游戏笔记本电脑。
价格可能会成为阻止游戏玩家大肆挥霍。只需2500美元,用户就可以购买具有相同i7-9750H CPU和RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU的Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH,而同配置的Blade Pro 17售价则高达3200美元。更豪华的设计带来的溢价是否可以接受是您自己需要考量的问题。然而,对于我们来说,由于相对Blade Pro 2017的所有重大改进,现款现在比以往任何时候都更值得考虑。
Razer简化了Blade Pro系列,提升了整体游戏体验。如果你正在市场上选购一台17英寸的轻薄游戏笔记本电脑,请跳过臃肿的Blade Pro 2017并考虑更精简的Blade Pro 17.它会比一些竞争对手花费更多,但它感觉起来也更好。
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo