惠普 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Brand: HP

更新换代。 更强的处理性能，终究配备的全高清屏幕和高速存储设备使得惠普的新笔记本成为了办公多面手。但除了这些新特性外，它仍然有着一些和前代一样的缺点。

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 11/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (250 G6 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake, 双核 (TDP 15 W)

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 1000 MHz, RAM: 1067 MHz, 20.19.15.4390

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2134 / PC4-17000

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO38ED, TN, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB

, M.2 接口

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 复合音频接口, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

hp DVDRW DU8A6SH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 384 x 255

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 4 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: VGA 640 x 480

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.104 kg, Power Supply: 279 g

Price

600 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP 250 G4 T6P08ES HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Dell Latitude 15-3570 DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD-card slot, 1x USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington lock

Left: power-in, VGA-out, Ethernet port, HDMI-out, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, audio combo

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570	155.7 MB/s +557%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA	23.7 MB/s
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	22.7 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	27.5 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	234 MBit/s +87%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	165 MBit/s +32%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)	125 MBit/s
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	91.6 MBit/s -27%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	274 MBit/s +208%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	143 MBit/s +61%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	99.9 MBit/s +12%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)	89 MBit/s
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	79 MBit/s -11%


228 cd/m²	227 cd/m²	217 cd/m²
223 cd/m²	219 cd/m²	207 cd/m²
243 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	209 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics AUO38ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 243 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 221.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 222 cd/m²
Contrast: 562:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.82 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.51% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD ChiMei N156BGE-E32, , 1366x768, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE LG LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		12%	11%	7%
Display P3 Coverage	36.51	40.71 12%	40.61 11%	39 7%
sRGB Coverage	55	61.1 11%	61.1 11%	58.3 6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	37.72	42.07 12%	41.96 11%	40.33 7%
Response Times		-36%	-31%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(20, 20)	52 ?(28, 24) -30%	37 ?(13, 24) 7%	39.2 ?(18.8, 20.4) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	22 ?(6, 16)	31 ?(14, 17) -41%	37 ?(20, 17) -68%	28 ?(12.4, 15.6) -27%
PWM Frequency		1000
Screen		3%	-8%	23%
Brightness middle	219	211 -4%	202 -8%	262 20%
Brightness	222	200 -10%	211 -5%	250 13%
Brightness Distribution	85	83 -2%	88 4%	92 8%
Black Level *	0.39	0.43 -10%	0.62 -59%	0.29 26%
Contrast	562	491 -13%	326 -42%	903 61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	12.67	10.53 17%	12.35 3%	8.49 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.99	17.79 15%	19.9 5%	17.99 14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.82	11.85 14%	13.46 3%	8.11 41%
Gamma	2.63 ^84%	2.25 ^98%	2.44 ^90%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	15633 ^42%	13758 ^47%	15217 ^43%	6300 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	35	39 11%	39 11%	37.07 6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	55	61 11%	61 11%	57.94 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-7% / -0%	-9% / -7%	6% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points 0%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	87 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	261 Points -9%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

116 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

288 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

36.66 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3337 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3317 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	2886 Points -13%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	2834 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4477 Points +3%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4343 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	3861 Points -11%

PCMark 7 Score		4213 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3317 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3605 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4343 points
Help

... in comparison

	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-90%	-42%	-89%
Read Seq	509	104.7 -79%	453.2 -11%	113.6 -78%
Write Seq	322.1	95.7 -70%	137.7 -57%	111.7 -65%
Read 512	321.2	33 -90%	308.5 -4%	39.65 -88%
Write 512	289.4	38.3 -87%	134.1 -54%	55.3 -81%
Read 4k	20.99	0.375 -98%	19.06 -9%	0.488 -98%
Write 4k	88	0.782 -99%	21.31 -76%	1.022 -99%
Read 4k QD32	141.3	0.675 -100%	93.5 -34%	1.367 -99%
Write 4k QD32	228.5	0.769 -100%	23.3 -90%	1.036 -100%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G

Sequential Read: 509 MB/s

Sequential Write: 322.1 MB/s

512K Read: 321.2 MB/s

512K Write: 289.4 MB/s

4K Read: 20.99 MB/s

4K Write: 88 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 141.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 228.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	1518 Points +21%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1347 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1273 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1257 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1225 Points -3%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1162 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6963 Points +10%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6314 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6126 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5909 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	4897 Points -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	874 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	652 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1393 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45395 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5123 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	43.2 fps +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA	42.6 fps
Dell Latitude 15-3570	36.5 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE	35.9 (20.77^min - 69.81^max) fps -16%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	30 fps -30%

Legend

HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G

Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP

Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0

Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050

Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U, AMD Radeon R5 M330, Toshiba MQ01ABD100

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.6			5.5
Battlefield 4 (2013)	30.6	22	14.5	4.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	65.7	34.1	19.7	9.3

Noise Level

Idle		34.5 / 34.5 / 34.5 dB(A)
DVD		37.3 / dB(A)
Load		39 / 38.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


21.9 °C	22.7 °C	20.2 °C
21.5 °C	22.9 °C	20.1 °C
21.6 °C	21.1 °C	22.1 °C

Maximum: 22.9 °C
Average: 21.6 °C


21.2 °C	22.4 °C	22.6 °C
20.6 °C	22 °C	22.1 °C
20.5 °C	21.1 °C	22.2 °C

Maximum: 22.6 °C
Average: 21.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).

HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.46 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 6 / 6.4 Watt
Load	26 / 28.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-57%	-14%	-26%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	5.8 -61%	4.9 -36%	5 -39%
Idle Average *	6	12.6 -110%	7.2 -20%	7.9 -32%
Idle Maximum *	6.4	12.8 -100%	7.5 -17%	8.6 -34%
Load Average *	26	27.6 -6%	25.4 2%	27.5 -6%
Load Maximum *	28.1	30 -7%	28 -0%	33.7 -20%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 34min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 49min

	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		-9%	54%	4%
Reader / Idle	634		1024 62%	698 10%
H.264	313			277 -12%
WiFi v1.3	347	315 -9%	542 56%	406 17%
Load	109		157 44%	109 0%

Pros

+ 雾面屏

+ 系统性能

+ 全高清屏幕

+ 温度

Cons

- 屏幕偏蓝

- 风扇持续工作

- 风扇噪音

- 较难维护

- 出厂无双通道内存

In review: HP 250 G5. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

惠普带来了一台低价位的用于处理日常办公任务的多面手，特别是在大学使用或者作为入门级商务本。多亏了众多可供选择的产品，你可以在各价位上找到合适你的产品。消费者在这个价位上应该期待些什么？它的外壳设计简单而且几乎全由塑料构成。但至少，厂商尝试着使它拥有高端的外观，使它看起来像铝制外壳。输入设备对于一般的办公工作来说是足够了而且达到了这个价位的标准线。我们期待在下一代上能够有更长的键程和不那么软的输入体验。附带，触摸板上的按键应该更安静一些。

本代新增了最新的全高清屏幕。但不幸的是，它明显偏蓝而且亮度不足。我们认为惠普 250 G5的性能表现是值得称赞的。所搭载的固态硬盘和Core i5处理器使得工作变得十分愉快。只有一点是不幸的，自行升级有些困难。另一个优点是它较低的工作温度，但风扇控制应该得到改善。