惠普 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Brand: HP

实惠而迟缓。 尽管搭配了固态硬盘，但6瓦的赛扬处理器仍然带来了较差的Windows 10使用体验。运行安静和长电池续航是它低能耗配置的主要优势。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Laptop / Notebook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (250 G6 Series)

Processor

Intel Celeron N3060 2 x 1.6 - 2.5 GHz, Braswell

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) - 1024 MB VRAM, Core: 360 MHz, RAM: 800 MHz, DDR3, 20.19.15.4474

Memory

4 GB

, DDR3, PC3-12800, 11-11-11-28, 单通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, glossy: no

Storage

Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, 128 GB

Soundcard

Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cherry Trail / Braswell SoC - HD Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD 读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2 w/ WiDi

Optical drive

hp DVDRW DU8A6SH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.3 x 384.3 x 254.5

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, DTS Audio Control, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.96 kg

Price

300 USD

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Asus F540SA-XX087T Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7	121 MB/s +433%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	22.7 MB/s 0%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	22.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7	211 MB/s +693%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD	27.5 MB/s +3%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	26.6 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	531 MBit/s +219%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	166.7 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	550 MBit/s +121%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	248.4 MBit/s


214.2 cd/m²	198.1 cd/m²	182.2 cd/m²
206.4 cd/m²	199.8 cd/m²	181.5 cd/m²
213.2 cd/m²	205.6 cd/m²	187.9 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD0504 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 214.2 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 198.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 199.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 281:1 (Black: 0.712 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
53.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.69

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD ChiMei N156BGE-E32, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Asus F540SA-XX087T Chi Mei N156BGE-E42, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES ChiMei, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA AU Optronics AUO38ED, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		15%	13%	13%	23%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	35.43	40.71 15%	40.21 13%	40.17 13%	43.63 23%	36.51 3%
sRGB Coverage	53.3	61.1 15%	60.1 13%	60 13%	65.1 22%	55 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	36.6	42.07 15%	41.56 14%	41.54 13%	45.1 23%	37.72 3%
Response Times		-16%	33%	42%	9%	15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.4 ?(14.8, 27.6)	52 ?(28, 24) -23%	28 ?(13, 15) 34%	20 ?(10, 10) 53%	42 ?(22, 20) 1%	40 ?(20, 20) 6%
Response Time Black / White *	28.8 ?(10.8, 18)	31 ?(14, 17) -8%	20 ?(10, 10) 31%	20 ?(12, 8) 31%	24 ?(8, 16) 17%	22 ?(6, 16) 24%
PWM Frequency		1000	200 ?(90)	200 ?(90)	806 ?(90)
Screen		20%	29%	39%	22%	18%
Brightness middle	199.8	211 6%	245 23%	215 8%	220 10%	219 10%
Brightness	199	200 1%	230 16%	200 1%	203 2%	222 12%
Brightness Distribution	85	83 -2%	84 -1%	87 2%	83 -2%	85 0%
Black Level *	0.712	0.43 40%	0.46 35%	0.26 63%	0.49 31%	0.39 45%
Contrast	281	491 75%	533 90%	827 194%	449 60%	562 100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	13.24	10.53 20%	8.34 37%	13.07 1%	8.95 32%	12.67 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	21.52	17.79 17%	12.31 43%	16.06 25%	15.89 26%	20.99 2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.33	11.85 11%	9.48 29%	4.34 67%	10.59 21%	13.82 -4%
Gamma	1.69 ^130%	2.25 ^98%	2.38 ^92%	2.48 ^89%	2.51 ^88%	2.63 ^84%
CCT	15879 ^41%	13758 ^47%	10624 ^61%	7212 ^90%	12049 ^54%	15633 ^42%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	33.8	39 15%	38 12%	38 12%	41 21%	35 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	53.4	61 14%	57 7%	60 12%	65 22%	55 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 14%	25% / 26%	31% / 34%	18% / 21%	12% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points +214%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points +192%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	96 Points +159%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +138%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	87 Points +135%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel Pentium N3540	40 Points +8%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	37 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	33 Points -11%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	28 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points +324%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	261 Points +284%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points +278%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	228 Points +235%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +203%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel Pentium N3540	151 Points +122%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points +38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	68 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	61 Points -10%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points +212%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	1.13 Points +176%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points +139%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.41 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points +227%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	2.48 Points +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points +164%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.86 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	9080 Points +302%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points +284%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	7614 Points +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	6994 Points +210%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel Pentium N3540	4454 Points +97%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	2256 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	1978 Points -12%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel Atom Z3735F	822 Points -64%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points +240%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	3712 Points +205%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U	3505 Points +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	3286 Points +170%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel Atom Z3735F	1829 Points +50%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel Pentium N3540	1340 Points +10%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1216 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	1019 Points -16%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1361 s *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	788 s * +42%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1566 s *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	898 s * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2510

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

2256

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1216

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

0.86 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

10.12 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.41 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

37 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

13.08 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

68 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3317 Points +100%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3237 Points +95%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	2834 Points +71%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	2674 Points +61%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1661 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1598 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1419 Points -15%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1413 Points -15%
Medion Akoya S2218 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1027 Points -38%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4343 Points +197%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	4249 Points +190%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3468 Points +137%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1464 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1426 Points -3%
Asus F540SA-XX087T HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1269 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1224 Points -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3735 Points +110%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3605 Points +103%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	2804 Points +58%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1779 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1624 Points -9%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1265 Points -29%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1661 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		1779 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		1464 points
Help

	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	Asus F540SA-XX087T Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-83%	-84%	-85%	-82%	141%
Read Seq	484.4	104.7 -78%	103.5 -79%	98.3 -80%	101 -79%	509 5%
Write Seq	139.2	95.7 -31%	91.1 -35%	89.8 -35%	99.6 -28%	322.1 131%
Read 512	338.1	33 -90%	33.74 -90%	20.79 -94%	38.12 -89%	321.2 -5%
Write 512	134.7	38.3 -72%	38.77 -71%	34.84 -74%	42.22 -69%	289.4 115%
Read 4k	17.21	0.375 -98%	0.374 -98%	0.335 -98%	0.522 -97%	20.99 22%
Write 4k	31.52	0.782 -98%	0.649 -98%	0.619 -98%	1.29 -96%	88 179%
Read 4k QD32	94.6	0.675 -99%	0.818 -99%	0.789 -99%	1.116 -99%	141.3 49%
Write 4k QD32	31.08	0.769 -98%	0.648 -98%	0.641 -98%	1.287 -96%	228.5 635%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP

Sequential Read: 484.4 MB/s

Sequential Write: 139.2 MB/s

512K Read: 338.1 MB/s

512K Write: 134.7 MB/s

4K Read: 17.21 MB/s

4K Write: 31.52 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 94.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 31.08 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U	2335 Points +511%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1834 Points +380%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1257 Points +229%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1162 Points +204%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	384 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	382 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540	200 Points -48%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F	181 Points -53%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U	1774 Points +329%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1525 Points +268%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1196 Points +189%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	915 Points +121%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	424 Points +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	414 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540	239 Points -42%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F	207 Points -50%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U	8813 Points +362%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	6314 Points +231%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	5592 Points +193%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	2117 Points +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	1907 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540	1290 Points -32%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F	1190 Points -38%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	14334 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	12233 Points
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U	5530 Points +310%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	5123 Points +279%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	4643 Points +244%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	1497 Points +11%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540	1378 Points +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	1350 Points
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F	1140 Points -16%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	3086 Points +362%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	2913 Points +336%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U	2401 Points +259%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540	1815 Points +172%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F	994 Points +49%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	740 Points +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	668 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	8087 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		422 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		18104 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		1350 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	35.6 fps +97%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01 HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP	33.1 fps +83%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L	27.7 fps +53%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB	24 fps +33%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256	22.2 fps +23%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	18.1 fps
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	16 fps -12%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR	14.24 fps -21%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	18.8 fps +96%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01 HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP	17.6 fps +83%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB	12.9 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L	12.7 fps +32%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256	11.4 fps +19%
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	10.01 fps +4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	9.6 fps
Dell Latitude 11 3150 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR	7.08 fps -26%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	18.1	9.6
Overwatch (2016)	15.1	9.7

Noise Level

Idle		/ / dB(A)
Load		/ dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)

	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	Asus F540SA-XX087T HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Noise
off / environment *	31.2	31.2	31.2	31.2	31.6
Idle Minimum *	31.5	33.5	31.7	33.2	34.5
Idle Average *	31.9	33.5	31.7	33.2	34.5
Idle Maximum *	31.9	33.5	31.7	34.6	34.5
Load Average *	34.2	33.5	37.2	45	39
Load Maximum *	36.8	33.5	35.3	45.2	38.3

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


34.6 °C	35 °C	25.2 °C
32.8 °C	38 °C	25.2 °C
33.4 °C	31.4 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 31.3 °C


25.4 °C	31.4 °C	37.2 °C
25.4 °C	42.8 °C	38.7 °C
25.8 °C	29.8 °C	32.6 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-5.7 °C / -10.2 F).

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 0.51 Watt
Idle	3.9 / 6.4 / 6.5 Watt
Load	11.1 / 13.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Asus F540SA-XX087T N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES 5200U, Radeon R5 M330, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-102%	-28%	-29%	-91%	-44%
Idle Minimum *	3.9	5.8 -49%	4.8 -23%	3.8 3%	4 -3%	3.6 8%
Idle Average *	6.4	12.6 -97%	7.5 -17%	6.9 -8%	6.5 -2%	6 6%
Idle Maximum *	6.5	12.8 -97%	9.2 -42%	7.14 -10%	7 -8%	6.4 2%
Load Average *	11.1	27.6 -149%	16 -44%	20 -80%	36 -224%	26 -134%
Load Maximum *	13.8	30 -117%	15.4 -12%	20.7 -50%	43.6 -216%	28.1 -104%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 45min

	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh	Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh	Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh	Asus F540SA-XX087T N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES 5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		-16%	-45%	-12%	-22%	-24%
Reader / Idle	716				667 -7%	634 -11%
WiFi v1.3	376	315 -16%	207 -45%	329 -12%	342 -9%	347 -8%
Load	225				115 -49%	109 -52%

Pros

+ 无处理器降频；低发热量

+ 长电池续航；低功耗

+ 可更换锂电池

+ 可升级硬盘和内存

+ HDMI和VGA接口

+ 价格实惠

+ 安静

Cons

- 键盘按键噪音较大；无键盘背光

- 色域覆盖较窄，可视角度有限

- 系统性能低

- 屏幕上盖不够坚固

- 塑料材质较为廉价

- 屏幕亮度低

- 不易于维护更新

- 无USB-C接口

较老的主流笔记本电脑通常都搭配了高速处理器和迟缓的机械硬盘，硬盘在这个情况下就成了系统性能瓶颈。我们在测试的这台设备搭配了很弱的赛扬N3060处理器和高速固态硬盘，完全相反的故事带来的结果是：它只适合文字处理，上网浏览和视频播放等负载较低的用途，与凌动处理器上网本的能力相近。

它的优势包括了安静的运行，低售价和长电池续航。它的机身品质中规中矩，我们更推荐选择搭配酷睿i系列处理器和全高清屏幕的250 G5机型。如果用户对屏幕品质的要求较高，应该尽早进行色彩校准。配置相近的前代250 G4机型性能表现并没有落后很多，性价比相对更高。

如果用户可以避免搭配赛扬N3060的入门机型的话，惠普250 G5对于一般用途来说还是一款值得推荐的设备。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT - 10/30/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

73 / 98 → 75%

Keyboard

71%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

46 / 80 → 57%

Weight

63 / 20-67 → 91%

Battery

88%

Display

70%

Games Performance

33 / 68 → 49%

Application Performance

47 / 92 → 51%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

53%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Add Points

-1%

Average

62%

76%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2020-06- 8)