一加 3 智能手机简短评测
OnePlus 3 (3 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz
Memory
6 GB
, LPDDR4
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式，10点触控，Corning Gorilla Glass 4, 光学AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB
, 52.49 GB free
Weight
161 g, Power Supply: 100 g
Price
399 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 475 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 431 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | 31% | -6% | 15% | 6% | 5% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 419 | 451 8% | 554 32% | 784 87% | 445 6% | 582 39% | 297 -29% | 583 39% |
| Brightness | 431 | 446 3% | 552 28% | 774 80% | 434 1% | 563 31% | 297 -31% | 560 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 96 14% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.46 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 3.84 6% | 1.59 61% | 6.5 -59% | 2.8 32% | 4.4 -7% | 2.67 35% | 3.55 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12 | 2.56 79% | 11.7 2% | 5.8 52% | 7.4 38% | 3.98 67% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.97 -20% | 2.01 39% | 8 -142% | 3.7 -12% | 4.8 -45% | 2.81 15% | 3.88 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.01 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6550 99% | 7283 89% | 6321 103% | 8699 75% | 7164 91% | 6175 105% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 58.07 -35% | 82.12 -8% | 68.08 -24% | 77.78 -13% | 66.31 -26% | 59.05 -34% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 90.14 -10% | 99.98 0% | 97.46 -3% | 99.44 -1% | 99.79 0% | 92.8 -7% | |
| Contrast | 1503 | 1823 | 1236 | 1532 | 1267 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Lightmark | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | Basemark X 1.1
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 35 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.07 / 0.27 Watt |
| Idle |  0.57 / 1.24 / 1.36 Watt |
| Load |
5.92 / 10.53 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -4% | -13% | -19% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.63 -11% | 0.5 12% | 0.55 4% | 0.68 -19% | 0.87 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 1.24 | 1.1 11% | 1.9 -53% | 1.37 -10% | 1.49 -20% | 1.2 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.36 | 1.56 -15% | 2.2 -62% | 2.25 -65% | 1.91 -40% | 1.27 7% |
| Load Average * | 5.92 | 5.95 -1% | 3.2 46% | 6.24 -5% | 7.4 -25% | 4.69 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.53 | 6.7 36% | 6.4 39% | 9.12 13% | 9.71 8% | 5.63 47% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Honor 7 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -30% | -26% | 16% | -14% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1338 | 1393 4% | 888 -34% | 1273 -5% | 1663 24% | 1655 24% | 1446 8% |
| H.264 | 847 | 580 -32% | 553 -35% | 648 -23% | 914 8% | 714 -16% | 776 -8% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 840 | 356 -58% | 484 -42% | 413 -51% | 732 -13% | 513 -39% | 530 -37% |
| Load | 268 | 229 -15% | 241 -10% | 203 -24% | 392 46% | 197 -26% | 263 -2% |
Pros
+ 机身
+ 高性能无降频
+ 不错的相机
+ 快速存储设备
+ 高速无线网络
+ 双SIM卡
+ USB-C型接口
+ 通知开关键
+ 不错的屏幕
+ 充裕的内部存储空间
+ 不错的通话品质和降噪
+ 快速充电
Cons
- 仅支持LTE Cat. 6
- 无线网络制式支持取决于区域
- 不可扩展存储空间
- 不支持收音机
- 不支持红外传输
- 扬声器底噪高
- sRGB模式用处不大
一加3是一款成功的智能手机，它不仅有优秀的配置，同时设计美观且工艺优良。它搭配了高速的Snapdragon 820，慷慨的6 GB工作内存，指纹识别器，双SIM卡，期待已久的NFC支持以及不错的相机和快速充电功能——这一切只需不到400欧元（约2937人民币）。市场上几乎没有其他如此有野心的设备存在。甚至是在中国市场上，它也没有可以相提并论的竞争者，特别是在品质上。
目前它最强的竞争对手是中兴Axon 7。在一加机型的价位稳定后，Axon的优势将会越来越小。特别是这家企业最近改变了策略。另外一个值得参考的设备是LG G5，它的售价最近有了大幅降低。
找到400欧以下比它更优秀的智能手机是不可能完成的任务。
不过，一加3也并不完美，对于同类设备中的佼佼者三星也不会造成威胁。它的屏幕分辨率和色彩还原品质都没有达到很高的水平，同时S7搭配的相机比它也高了一个档次，特别是在暗光环境的表现。它的连接性和传感器配置都有所保留。LTE Cat.6在2015年初开始就成为了标准配置，已经随处可见。遗憾的是，它的存储空间无法扩展，扬声器表现也让人有些失望。
这些都更接近于吹毛求疵，虽然它可能无法凭借技术参数登上排行榜首，一加的这台设备依然是一台非常强大、值得选择的产品。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
OnePlus 3
- 07/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
