雷蛇手机二代评测

Name: Razer Phone 2
Brand: Razer

游戏开始。

雷蛇正在准备迎接第二轮的竞争。继第一款命名为“雷蛇手机”的游戏手机之后，他们带来了惊喜-雷蛇手机二代。不要被其暗淡的名字所迷惑，雷蛇手机2并不无聊。让我们来看看这款全新的游戏手机都做到了什么，以及它的弱点。

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 12/19/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Console Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Phone 2 (Phone Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385), Octa-Core, 64 Bit

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

5.72 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, 10点触控, 120 Hz刷新率, IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz屏幕, 康宁大猩猩5代玻璃, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm耳机接口，24-bit USB-C DAC耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器，加速传感器, 距离传感器, 指南针, 晴雨表，陀螺仪，步数传感器

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850/900/1,800/1,900, WCDMA: 1/2/3/4/5/8, FDD-LTE: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/26/28/29/30/32/66/71, CAT18, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 158.5 x 78.99

Battery

15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 1200万像素 (12 MP, f/1.75, OIS)+长焦镜头(12 MP, f/2.6), 4K video
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, 模块化充电器, USB Type-C线, 24-bit USB-C DAC, SIM卡工具, 快速入门说明书, Nova-Launcher, ChromaKit, Dolby Atmos, Razer Cortex, 游戏加速器，主题商店, 12 Months Warranty, IP67，高通快充4.0+，无线充电，LTE CAT18, SAR值(head): 0.508 W/kg, SAR值(body): 1.493 W/kg

Weight

219 g, Power Supply: 94 g

Price

6000 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Phone 2017 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 MBit/s +70%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +55%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	388 (234^min - 484^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117 MBit/s -70%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, SD 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	96.7 (50^min - 106^max) MBit/s -75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Phone 2017 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	665 MBit/s +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s +3%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	604 (420^min - 626^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 MBit/s -81%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, SD 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	103 (86^min - 109^max) MBit/s -83%

Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (568-626)

Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102.6 (86-109)

Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø390 (269-484)

Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø95.2 (50-106)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


557 cd/m²	555 cd/m²	554 cd/m²
585 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	578 cd/m²
574 cd/m²	588 cd/m²	601 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 601 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 576.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1935:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.388

	Razer Phone 2 IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Razer Phone 2017 IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.7"	Asus ROG Phone AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		-5%	-31%	31%	-34%
Brightness middle	600	436 -27%	597 0%	656 9%	549 -8%
Brightness	577	417 -28%	637 10%	659 14%	541 -6%
Brightness Distribution	92	92 0%	83 -10%	88 -4%	95 3%
Black Level *	0.31	0.16 48%			0.42 -35%
Contrast	1935	2725 41%			1307 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.43	3.88 -13%	5.12 -49%	1.7 50%	6.08 -77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.36	7.96 -25%	10.9 -71%	2.8 56%	10.69 -68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.4	5.8 -32%	7.3 -66%	1.7 61%	6.6 -50%
Gamma	2.388 ^92%	2.45 ^90%	2.203 ^100%	1.998 ^110%	2.305 ^95%
CCT	6069 ^107%	7657 ^85%	7371 ^88%	6487 ^100%	8399 ^77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2451 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	2409 Points
Razer Phone 2017	1942 Points -19%
Asus ROG Phone	2500 Points +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4774 Points +98%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2437 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	2272 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)	2416 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5555 Points +131%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	9018 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6742 Points -25%
Asus ROG Phone	9231 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	11244 Points +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8453 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3	7934 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)	8705 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15472 Points +72%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	13896 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7931 Points -43%
Asus ROG Phone	14489 Points +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark	13620 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3	13194 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)	13578 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=60, last 2 years)	12476 Points -10%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	10006 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7968 Points -20%
Asus ROG Phone	9707 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3	11474 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)	10123 Points +1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	8701 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7046 Points -19%
Asus ROG Phone	9430 Points +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8309 Points -5%
Sony Xperia XZ3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)	8368 Points -4%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	62783 Points
Razer Phone 2017	42278 Points -33%
Asus ROG Phone	64029 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	77599 Points +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60543 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3	65330 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)	61139 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	80333 Points
Razer Phone 2017	58360 Points -27%
Asus ROG Phone	80283 Points 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	159735 Points +99%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82423 Points +3%
Sony Xperia XZ3	83927 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)	80548 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	35578 Points
Razer Phone 2017	21521 Points -40%
Asus ROG Phone	37475 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	27717 Points -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31384 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XZ3	36794 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)	33322 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	6285 Points
Razer Phone 2017	5030 Points -20%
Asus ROG Phone	6454 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	5205 Points -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark	6324 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	6300 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)	5811 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	8006 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6127 Points -23%
Asus ROG Phone	8243 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	7055 Points -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8312 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3	8014 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)	7763 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	3587 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3092 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone	3668 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2713 Points -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3443 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3	3603 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)	3115 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	6425 Points
Razer Phone 2017	5269 Points -18%
Asus ROG Phone	6568 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	6667 Points +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark	6482 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	6517 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)	5761 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	8389 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6475 Points -23%
Asus ROG Phone	8345 Points -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	10374 Points +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8451 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	8369 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)	7671 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	3532 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3189 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone	3763 Points +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2961 Points -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3570 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	3672 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)	3094 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	4660 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3810 Points -18%
Asus ROG Phone	4730 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3544 Points -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark	4668 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3	4700 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)	4388 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)	3075 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	5113 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4049 Points -21%
Asus ROG Phone	5174 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3726 Points -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5220 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3	5092 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)	4919 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)	3259 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	3557 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3157 Points -11%
Asus ROG Phone	3637 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3027 Points -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3408 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3	3703 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)	3217 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)	3280 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	5094 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4101 Points -19%
Asus ROG Phone	4757 Points -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4121 Points -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5078 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3	5184 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)	4607 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)	7934 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	5825 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4490 Points -23%
Asus ROG Phone	5673 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4828 Points -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5770 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	5810 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)	5439 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)	11805 Points +103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	3540 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3148 Points -11%
Asus ROG Phone	3040 Points -14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2723 Points -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3577 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	3764 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)	3088 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)	4663 Points +32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	89 fps
Razer Phone 2017	79 fps -11%
Asus ROG Phone	89 fps 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XZ3	60 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)	62.1 fps -30%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	152 fps
Razer Phone 2017	117 fps -23%
Asus ROG Phone	150 fps -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	226 fps +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark	151 fps -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	152 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)	142.5 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	289 fps +90%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	56 fps
Razer Phone 2017	40 fps -29%
Asus ROG Phone	75 fps +34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	59 fps +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark	59 fps +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3	50 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)	54.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +36%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	83 fps
Razer Phone 2017	43 fps -48%
Asus ROG Phone	83 fps 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	107 fps +29%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82 fps -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	83 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)	73.1 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	170.1 fps +105%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	37 fps
Razer Phone 2017	22 fps -41%
Asus ROG Phone	54 fps +46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	58.9 fps +59%
Xiaomi Black Shark	53 fps +43%
Sony Xperia XZ3	31 fps -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)	45.3 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.6 fps +80%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	61 fps
Razer Phone 2017	21 fps -66%
Asus ROG Phone	60 fps -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	69.3 fps +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3	57 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)	53.9 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120.8 fps +98%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	22 fps
Razer Phone 2017	15 fps -32%
Asus ROG Phone	31 fps +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	31 fps +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31 fps +41%
Sony Xperia XZ3	19 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)	27.7 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.7 fps +121%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	35 fps
Razer Phone 2017	25 fps -29%
Asus ROG Phone	35 fps 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	40 fps +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark	35 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3	35 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)	33.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +108%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	23 fps
Asus ROG Phone	34 fps +48%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	47 fps +104%
Sony Xperia XZ3	21 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)	29.1 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.6 fps +124%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone	37 fps
Apple iPhone Xs Max	36.8 fps
Sony Xperia XZ3	37 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)	35.2 fps
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	82.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	15 fps
Asus ROG Phone	21 fps +40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	32.1 fps +114%
Sony Xperia XZ3	14 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)	18.6 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.5 fps +157%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	14 fps
Asus ROG Phone	14 fps 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	16.3 fps +16%
Sony Xperia XZ3	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)	15.6 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	33.2 fps +137%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	285952 Points
Razer Phone 2017	208972 Points -27%
Asus ROG Phone	299878 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	302955 Points +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark	290397 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3	292268 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)	277434 Points -3%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	232418 Points
Asus ROG Phone	242953 Points +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark	230642 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	226853 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)	225534 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	4200 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3651 Points -13%
Asus ROG Phone	4693 Points +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4895 Points +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3489 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3	3804 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)	4111 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +52%
System (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	8120 Points
Razer Phone 2017	5660 Points -30%
Asus ROG Phone	8613 Points +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	11675 Points +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark	7105 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XZ3	8135 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)	7644 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +26%
Memory (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	3906 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4085 Points +5%
Asus ROG Phone	5296 Points +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	1815 Points -54%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2871 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3	2317 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)	3649 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +75%
Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	8001 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6273 Points -22%
Asus ROG Phone	7957 Points -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	15659 Points +96%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5846 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3	7989 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)	7797 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +117%
Web (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2	1226 Points
Razer Phone 2017	1225 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone	1336 Points +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	1731 Points +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark	1243 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3	1390 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)	1344 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +28%

Legend

Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	273 Points +207%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	90.9 Points +2%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	88.9 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)	80.3 Points -10%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	63.3 Points -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +153%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37721 Points +121%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	18275 Points +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	17067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)	15153 Points -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	13663 Points -20%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	12600 Points -26%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	3476 ms * -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)	2905 ms * -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	2287 ms * -0%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	2283 ms *
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	2154 ms * +6%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +74%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +61%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +55%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	103 Points +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	96 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)	90.2 Points -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	90 Points -6%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	347 Points +32%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	266 Points +1%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	263 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	246 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)	246 Points -6%

* ... smaller is better

	Razer Phone 2	Razer Phone 2017	Sony Xperia XZ3	Xiaomi Black Shark	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-8%	-19%	95%	39%	530%
Sequential Read 256KB	733	732 0%	681 -7%	742 1%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) -5%	1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 155%
Sequential Write 256KB	194.8	202.5 4%	196.1 1%	199.6 2%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) 15%	1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 645%
Random Read 4KB	124.3	142.5 15%	135.7 9%	127.2 2%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) 10%	279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 124%
Random Write 4KB	23.99	14.3 -40%	22.22 -7%	114.1 376%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) 253%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 1196%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.4 -8%	34.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -61%		68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33) -21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	52.5 -16%	30.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -51%		52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33) -16%

Battle Bay
	Settings	Value
	half resolution	60 fps
	full resolution	109 fps

Real Racing 3
	Settings	Value
	high	101 fps
	low	60 fps

Max. Load

Idle


39.7 °C	39.4 °C	39.8 °C
39.4 °C	39.4 °C	40.7 °C
38.7 °C	38.9 °C	39.6 °C

Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 39.5 °C


37.6 °C	38.8 °C	40.8 °C
38.3 °C	38.4 °C	38.9 °C
38.3 °C	38.6 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 38.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Phone 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 1.5 / 2.6 Watt
Load	7.2 / 12.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-2%	21%	11%	6%	4%	4%
Idle Minimum *	0.6	0.83 -38%	0.6 -0%	1 -67%	0.8 -33%	0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26) -44%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -48%
Idle Average *	1.5	2.11 -41%	1.4 7%	1.4 7%	1.5 -0%	1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26) -15%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	2.24 14%	1.7 35%	1.7 35%	2.3 12%	2.07 ?(0.87 - 3.5, n=26) 20%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 38%
Load Average *	7.2	4.94 31%	3.8 47%	4.6 36%	4.8 33%	4.87 ?(3.56 - 7.41, n=26) 32%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) 9%
Load Maximum *	12.3	9.08 26%	10.6 14%	6.7 46%	10.1 18%	9.27 ?(6.2 - 12.3, n=26) 25%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) 19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		27h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 26min

	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		44%	-5%	9%	17%
Reader / Idle	1630		1110 -32%	1305 -20%	1753 8%
H.264	742		800 8%	801 8%	747 1%
WiFi v1.3	531	762 44%	533 0%	742 40%	711 34%
Load	206		216 5%	223 8%	253 23%

Pros

+ 120Hz屏幕

+ 强劲的处理器和散热

+ 8 GB的内存

+ 可拓展储存

+ 独特的RGB标志

+ 双SIM选项

+ 内置高品质DAC

+ 带OIS的相机

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 无线充电

+ QC快充

Cons

- 重

- 内置存储空间小

- 正面额头下巴略大

- 续航堪忧

如果您正在寻找一台特别的手机，雷蛇手机2将非常适合您，这不仅仅是因为那块信仰标志。华硕ROG手机是一台类似的产品，不过只有90赫兹的屏幕。因此，120 Hz屏幕是雷蛇手机独有的-这是智能手机市场上的一个充满异国情调的竞争者，它依赖游戏开发者来支持这一独特功能，并支持它们，现在支持120 Hz的游戏数量正在以极快的速度增长，这可能使得雷蛇手机成为每个手机游戏玩家都会渴望的游戏智能手机。

高通骁龙845和8 GB内存速度快，功能强大，但它们也不是雷蛇手机2独有的，也不比三星和华为自己的高性能芯片快得多。不过三星和华为的旗舰比雷蛇手机2更贵。它唯一真正的缺点是缺乏续航-如果电池续航对你很重要，你可能需要三思。

小米黑鲨是一台便宜的替代品。在我们的测试中，它几乎和Razer Phone 2一样好，但价格只有一半左右。如果你仍然喜欢雷蛇，你可能也会去考虑去年的老型号。不过它缺乏新款先进的冷却系统，无线充电，IP67认证和Chroma RGB标志。

我们强烈建议您先亲自看一下手机，并确保它的方形边缘形状适合您的手和耳朵。以及它是否达到了自己宣称的强劲性能。

Razer Phone 2 - 11/28/2018 v6 ^(old)
Inge Schwabe

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

89 / 75 → 100%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

53 / 60 → 88%