一加 3T 智能手机简短评测

Name: OnePlus 3T
Brand: OnePlus

旗舰2.0。在不到六个月的时间里，一加推出了其高端智能手机一加3T（一加3的后继产品）。我们将找出哪些改进是有卓有成效的，以及是否值得升级设备。

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Kangfei Zheng ), Published 12/18/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 3T (3 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.4 GHz, Kryo

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 530

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, 10点触控, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Optic-AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 50.61 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Fingerprint, Hall, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Abmient light, eCompass, BeiDou

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.35 x 152.7 x 74.7

Battery

0 Wh, 3400 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 298, 1.12 µm, OIS, phase recognition autofocus (PDAF), f/2.0, UHD Video, RAW Support, Auto HDR)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Samsung 3P8SP, 1.0 µm, EIS, Fixed Focus, f/2.0, 1080p Video)

Additional features

Speakers: Mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual, Power adapter, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick-start guide, OxygenOS 3.5, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

158 g, Power Supply: 100 g

Price

439 Euro

Links

OnePlus homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Case

Connectivity

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +7%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s +3%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s +107%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +9%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	279 MBit/s +9%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Display


468 cd/m²	422 cd/m²	395 cd/m²
468 cd/m²	421 cd/m²	398 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	425 cd/m²	401 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 471 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 429.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23

	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
Screen		50%	31%	33%	19%	35%
Brightness middle	421	556 32%	445 6%	582 38%	419 0%	350 -17%
Brightness	430	519 21%	434 1%	563 31%	431 0%	351 -18%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	93 11%	91 8%	84 0%	98 17%
Black Level *		0.34	0.36	0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	1.3 82%	2.8 61%	4.4 38%	4.1 42%	2.04 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.3	2.6 83%	5.8 62%	7.4 52%	12 22%	3.25 79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	1.9 72%	3.7 46%	4.8 29%	3.3 51%	1.63 76%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.31 ^95%	2.2 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7866 ^83%	6818 ^95%	7164 ^91%	6175 ^105%	6550 ^99%	6391 ^102%
Contrast		1635	1236	1532
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		63.15		77.78	89.38	86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.71		99.44	100	99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

244 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

ColorChecker (Standard, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (Custom, target color space: sRGB)

Colorspace (Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Colorspace (Custom, target color space: sRGB)

Grayscale (Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Grayscale (Custom, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (Custom, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Performance

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points -11%
HTC 10	131866 Points -18%
Huawei P9	95743 Points -40%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points -20%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points +86%
Huawei P9	1755 Points -7%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points +32%
Huawei P9	4904 Points +16%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points +22%
HTC 10	27176 Points -12%
Huawei P9	19854 Points -36%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points +85%
HTC 10	30061 Points -13%
Huawei P9	21577 Points -37%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points -31%
HTC 10	20344 Points -9%
Huawei P9	15517 Points -31%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points +15%
HTC 10	3157 Points +23%
Huawei P9	1237 Points -52%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points +23%
HTC 10	4581 Points +38%
Huawei P9	1080 Points -67%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points +5%
HTC 10	1512 Points +4%
Huawei P9	2510 Points +73%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points
HTC 10	2495 Points +12%
Huawei P9	974 Points -56%
OnePlus 3	2571 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points
HTC 10	2889 Points +19%
Huawei P9	829 Points -66%
OnePlus 3	2864 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points
HTC 10	1688 Points -2%
Huawei P9	2503 Points +45%
OnePlus 3	1892 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points +17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	59 fps
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps -2%
HTC 10	43 fps -27%
Huawei P9	43 fps -27%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps -10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	91 fps
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps +21%
HTC 10	73 fps -20%
Huawei P9	40 fps -56%
OnePlus 3	89 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	45 fps
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps +30%
HTC 10	24 fps -47%
Huawei P9	19 fps -58%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps -40%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	46 fps
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps +32%
HTC 10	39 fps -15%
Huawei P9	18 fps -61%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps -13%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	32 fps
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps +86%
HTC 10	14 fps -56%
Huawei P9	11 fps -66%
OnePlus 3	30 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps -53%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	32 fps
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps +32%
HTC 10	24 fps -25%
Huawei P9	10 fps -69%
OnePlus 3	31 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps -12%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points
HTC 10	5809 Points +3%
Huawei P9	7058 Points +25%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -15%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points +35%
HTC 10	2193 Points -1%
Huawei P9	2025 Points -9%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points +95%
HTC 10	2806 Points -10%
Huawei P9	3930 Points +26%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +35%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points -36%
HTC 10	1772 Points -9%
Huawei P9	2627 Points +34%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points +15%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points +55%
HTC 10	5009 Points +13%
Huawei P9	1583 Points -64%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points -61%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	891 Points
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +72%
HTC 10	928 Points +4%
Huawei P9	1029 Points +15%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points +7%

Legend

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points +154%
HTC 10	8905 Points -9%
Huawei P9	11783 Points +20%
OnePlus 3	9155 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points +34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms *
Apple iPhone 7	1113 ms * +59%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -16%
Huawei P9	2923 ms * -8%
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * +6%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	135 Points
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points +50%
HTC 10	108 Points -20%
Huawei P9	128 Points -5%
OnePlus 3	122 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points +23%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points
Apple iPhone 7	165.9 Points +204%
HTC 10	52.1 Points -4%
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +26%
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points +36%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 3T	HTC 10	Huawei P9	OnePlus 3	Samsung Galaxy S7
AndroBench 3-5		-56%	-49%	-19%	-28%
Sequential Read 256KB	436.4	275.1 -37%	281.3 -36%	408.7 -6%	483.8 11%
Sequential Write 256KB	165.3	115.6 -30%	72.2 -56%	153.3 -7%	145.7 -12%
Random Read 4KB	123.6	29.92 -76%	39 -68%	137.6 11%	85.9 -31%
Random Write 4KB	74.4	15.89 -79%	47.45 -36%	18.23 -75%	16.01 -78%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		83.3	55		72.3
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		65.4	24.83		53.6

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	59 fps

... in comparison

Emissions

Max. Load

Idle


36.9 °C	33.7 °C	32.9 °C
39.4 °C	33.9 °C	32.5 °C
39.2 °C	34.2 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 35 °C


34.7 °C	35.8 °C	37.5 °C
34.7 °C	36 °C	36.7 °C
34.6 °C	36.2 °C	37.4 °C

Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency Comparison (Checkboxes select/deselectable!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Idle	0.61 / 1.77 / 1.81 Watt
Load	6.67 / 10.98 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		28%	0%	3%	15%	26%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.54 11%	0.68 -11%	0.77 -26%	0.57 7%	0.68 -11%
Idle Average *	1.77	1.51 15%	1.49 16%	2.36 -33%	1.24 30%	1.02 42%
Idle Maximum *	1.81	1.54 15%	1.91 -6%	2.37 -31%	1.36 25%	1.14 37%
Load Average *	6.67	3.75 44%	7.4 -11%	3.09 54%	5.92 11%	4.73 29%
Load Maximum *	10.98	5.01 54%	9.71 12%	5.35 51%	10.53 4%	7.16 35%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 42min

	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-9%	-19%	-9%	16%	4%
Reader / Idle	1423	1770 24%	1273 -11%	1514 6%	1338 -6%	1810 27%
H.264	810	722 -11%	648 -20%	568 -30%	847 5%	892 10%
WiFi v1.3	494	517 5%	413 -16%	569 15%	840 70%	456 -8%
Load	282	126 -55%	203 -28%	206 -27%	268 -5%	242 -14%

Pros

+ 高品质机身

+ 高端性能无需节流

+ 优秀相机

+ 快速存储

+ 高速WLAN

+ 双SIM卡

+ 通知拨杆

+ USB-C

+ 高达128GB的内部存储

+ 良好的语音质量与噪声抑制

+ 优秀的显示效果

+ 快速充电

+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- 只有LTE Cat. 6

- 取决于区域的不同频率

- 无法拓展存储

- 没有FM收音机

- 摄像头不如以前清晰

- 无红外感应

- 扬声器存在静电干扰

- 没有附送耳机

In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

一加3T是一加3名副其实的继承者。然而，由于之前机型已经是最好的高端安卓手机之一了，对制造商来说它并不算是个挑战。而一加3T的改动很小，这同样是问题所在。

成功的更新：一加3T仅仅是一加3的一个小升级，所以它和旧款一样是最好的高端智能手机之一。

如果您已经拥有一加3，则没有必要购买一加3T，而其他情况下可以选购。终于推出的128GB版本可能会给消费者不小的惊喜。在一加在线商店里，它仅比64GB版本贵40欧元（约42美元），由于缺少microSD卡读卡器，这显得很值得玩味。略快的系统芯片是个不错的改进，但实际上由于温度相似，它们的实际性能表现区别很小。

一加为新款3T配备了更大容量的电池，但是由于功耗更高，它的续航仍然和一加3差不多。我们不想夸大无线连接测试的结果，毕竟之前的型号在一开始也存在着同样的问题，这个问题在一个OxygenOS的更新中被修复。据称安卓7的更新将会在12月发布。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

OnePlus 3T - 2016-12-12 12/12/2016 v6 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 93%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

48 / 60 → 80%

Weight

92%

Battery

92%

Display

83%

Games Performance

64 / 63 → 100%

Application Performance

63 / 70 → 90%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

77%

Average

78%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 一加 3T 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero, 2016-12-18 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Case

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Display

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Performance

Emissions

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

Energy Management

Pros

Cons

Price comparison