Notebookcheck Logo

小米黑鲨4智能手机评测--144赫兹显示屏的移动游戏

赌博的特长者?

小米黑鲨4的设计并不像其他游戏手机那样奢侈,而且相对便宜。然而,它有很多东西可以提供,包括144赫兹显示屏、5G和机械肩键。阅读我们的评论,了解这款游戏手机是否值得购买。
5G Android ARM Gaming Smartphone
小米黑鲨4
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 (Black Shark Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, 720 Hz sampling rate, MEMC, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.4 x 163.8 x 76.4
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Cam 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Cam 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth of field (Cam 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, bumper, USB cable, SIM tool, charger, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.29 W/kg (head), 1.6 W/kg (body); shoulder buttons (mechanical), fanless
Weight
210 g
Price
429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Rating Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
86.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
SD 870, Adreno 650
210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
07 / 2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
SD 865, Adreno 650
222 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2021
Asus ROG Phone 5
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
239 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
259 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.92"2460x1080

外壳、设备和操作 - 受限的游戏设计

小米黑鲨4的几个版本可在网上购买。

  • 6GB内存/128GB数据存储,起价429欧元(约507美元)。
  • 8GB内存/128GB数据存储489欧元起(约合人民币578元
  • 12GB内存/256GB数据存储,起价579欧元(约合人民币684元)。

此外,还有一款黑鲨4 Pro,配备了 骁龙888,但在中欧几乎买不到。

外壳有两种颜色,但只有镜面黑在中欧真正可用或负担得起。这款智能手机提供了一个相对克制的设计,如果你比较一下,比如说 联想Legion Phone Duel 2作为比较。尽管如此,还是有一些特殊的功能。背面的表面会折射光线,使其以 "X "的形状反射。相机模块位于一个六边形的边框中。黑鲨4的重量为210克(约7.4盎司),对于一款游戏手机来说,它的重量令人欣喜。

然而,你必须做的是没有LED效果。相反,有两个机械触发器,通过右边的十字侧的滑块扩展。当设备被打开时,当触发器第一次被激活时,会听到一种声音,就像你在给手枪装子弹一样。你是觉得这很武断还是很酷,取决于你。

在Wi-Fi方面,由于支持Wi-Fi 6,黑鲨4的水平不错,与其他游戏手机不相上下。当然,也支持5G接收。

预装了软件Android 11,小米在上面添加了自己的游戏界面JoyUI。游戏和玩家的特殊设置可以在所谓的Shark Space中进行管理。

小米黑鲨4
小米黑鲨4
小米黑鲨4
小米黑鲨4
小米黑鲨4
小米黑鲨4

Size comparison

176 mm 78.5 mm 9.9 mm 259 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 239 g168.7 mm 77.3 mm 10.4 mm 222 g163.8 mm 76.4 mm 10.4 mm 210 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
1238 (643min - 1325max) MBit/s +89%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
923 (783min - 956max) MBit/s +41%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (620min - 697max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
656 (613min - 676max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
811 (771min - 835max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
789 (660min - 853max) MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Wi-Fi 6E
788 (735min - 867max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
679 (601min - 733max) MBit/s -16%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø811 (771-835)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø656 (613-676)

照相机 - 船上有广角相机

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

背面有三个相机镜头,尽管只有两个可以用于实际拍照。一个4800万像素的主摄像头,以及一个800万像素的广角镜头。还有500万像素的景深摄像头,这只是为了支持。

4800万像素的照片可以用主摄像头记录,但只在特殊模式下。通常情况下,1200万像素的图片被创建,这意味着4个像素被合并成一个,以增加光的产量。在正常照明条件下,该相机拍摄的照片还不错,但细节往往可以更准确一些。广角镜头的拍摄效果乍一看也还不错,但仔细看时往往不再有细节。

这款智能手机在弱光和高对比度下表现良好。然而,在只有一勒克斯的亮度下,图像变得有些像素化,但色彩和图像内容总体上仍然可以被识别。

如果需要,主摄像头还可以录制4K和60帧的视频。这里的图片质量也很好。曝光变化相当快,没有大的可见梯度,自动对焦通常能可靠地工作。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera flowerMain camera environmentMain camera Low LightWide angle
ColorChecker
15.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 4: 10.67 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 18.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 4: 9.49 ∆E min: 3.62 - max: 22.96 ∆E

显示屏 - 黑鲨4的144赫兹AMOLED显示屏

子像素图像
子像素图像

小米的游戏手机中安装了一个相当明亮的AMOLED屏幕,分辨率为1080p。屏幕上均匀的亮度分布很好,但色彩准确度相当平庸。因此,寻找专业应用显示屏的用户将不得不用合适的软件重新校准显示屏,或者到其他地方寻找。

当然,刷新率对游戏玩家尤其重要。它的最高频率为144赫兹。然而,这无论如何也不能用于所有的移动游戏。我们用《PUBG移动版》进行了测试,最高只达到了60赫兹,尽管至少90赫兹是绝对可能的。这里不仅是游戏设计者的责任,手机制造商也必须调整某些东西。然而,制造商通常会以高电池使用率为由避免高帧率。

在亮度低于100%的情况下,可以看到相当强烈的OLED闪烁,但这也是这种屏幕类型的常见现象。在购买之前,你应该试一试在低亮度下是否感觉受到干扰。

664
cd/m²
665
cd/m²
666
cd/m²
674
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
666
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 676 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 669.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 676 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.959
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Asus ROG Phone 5
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.9"
Response Times
8%
129%
92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
11 ?(5, 6)
9 ?(5, 4)
18%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
78%
8 ?(5, 3)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
6 ?(3, 3)
8 ?(5, 3)
-33%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
60%
6 ?(3, 3)
-0%
PWM Frequency
162.3
227.3
40%
568 ?(22)
250%
568
250%
Screen
14%
39%
1%
Brightness middle
676
619
-8%
789
17%
463
-32%
Brightness
669
616
-8%
795
19%
466
-30%
Brightness Distribution
98
90
-8%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.77
3.74
35%
1.4
76%
3.24
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.81
7.94
19%
3
69%
5.75
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
1.7
54%
1.7
54%
4.4
-19%
Gamma
1.959 112%
2.188 101%
2.27 97%
2.201 100%
CCT
6584 99%
6662 98%
6596 99%
7273 89%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 12%
84% / 69%
47% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 162.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 162.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 162.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间

性能、排放和电池寿命--快速,但不是顶级的

在性能方面,骁龙870被用作SoC,所以它在性能方面不是绝对的顶级联盟,但它仍然是一个强大的处理器。因此,审查样本优于其前辈 黑鲨3在某些方面的性能上高出10%左右。在实践中你应该很难注意到这种差异。图形性能也略高,在游戏中多出几帧当然是受欢迎的。

由于采用了UFS 3.1内存,内存速度相当快,在我们的基准测试中证明是可靠和快速的。

暖气是高性能智能手机的通常水平,在日常条件下应该几乎不会引起任何问题。

在我们的测量中,立体声扬声器明显显示出更多的低中音,甚至还有一点低音。这款智能手机在日常使用中以良好的声音脱颖而出,这并不完全令人信服,但仍然比这个价格范围内的许多其他智能手机听起来更好。

电池运行时间必须受到一些限制。4,500毫安时的电池比该价格范围内的其他智能手机略小;5000毫安时现在是标准配置。因此,该设备在我们的WLAN测试中达到了11:50小时。这是一个很好的结果,但你仍然可以在其他地方得到更多。该智能手机可以用高达120瓦的功率充电。可用的充电器不提供这个功率,但只有67瓦,并设法在一个多小时内为设备充电。几分钟后,你已经有足够的电量使用几个小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1002 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
924 Points -8%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1132 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (943 - 1046, n=16)
989 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points -1%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3394 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3449 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3717 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3702 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (2725 - 4455, n=16)
3245 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points -3%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
16054 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16391 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (9827 - 16054, n=15)
12937 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12941 Points -19%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
14315 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9822 Points -31%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15027 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13586 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (10060 - 14315, n=5)
11688 Points -18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
11064 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10090 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10273 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11302 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (7970 - 11064, n=8)
9496 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
14968 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12843 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15263 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16586 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (11974 - 14968, n=8)
13527 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5784 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5765 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4791 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5344 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (3318 - 5784, n=8)
4719 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8975 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8105 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9620 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9839 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (6960 - 8975, n=9)
8089 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
10646 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9157 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12616 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
12914 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (8593 - 10646, n=9)
10088 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
5793 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5780 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5254 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5366 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (3296 - 5793, n=9)
4879 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points -21%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4351 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5722 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5887 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (4166 - 4374, n=16)
4264 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2822 Points -35%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4352 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5703 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5876 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (4152 - 4352, n=16)
4247 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7517 Points +73%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1234 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1511 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (1203 - 1254, n=15)
1232 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2043 Points +66%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1246 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1501 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (1195 - 1246, n=15)
1226 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2040 Points +64%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
53 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps -15%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
66 fps +25%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
60 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (22 - 54, n=16)
45.2 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps -7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
61 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps -15%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
80 fps +31%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
71 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (50 - 62, n=16)
58.2 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +30%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
34 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps -12%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
40 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (17 - 34, n=16)
28.8 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +9%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
23 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps -13%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
32 fps +39%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
27 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (18 - 23, n=16)
21.8 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +37%
Xiaomi Black Shark 4Xiaomi Black Shark 3Asus ROG Phone 5Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
6%
3%
-6%
29%
Sequential Read 256KB
1663
1692
2%
1779
7%
1999
20%
Sequential Write 256KB
760
680
-11%
795
5%
754
-1%
Random Read 4KB
283.1
238.3
-16%
291.4
3%
262.6
-7%
Random Write 4KB
259.9
227.8
-12%
278
7%
261.5
1%

温度

Max. Load
 42 °C41.7 °C37.9 °C 
 40.8 °C41.8 °C37.9 °C 
 41.8 °C41.7 °C37.9 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
35.6 °C37.3 °C41.5 °C
35.3 °C37.9 °C41.4 °C
35.3 °C38.1 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.736.22536.138.23126.929.44032.435.25034.332.1632725.88018.922.510018.434.512517.842.516015.146.620014.548.725012.349.931511.353.44009.758.550011.565.463014.571.180015.173.2100015.371.9125012.472.8160011.868.5200010.966.6250011.266.6315015.271.3400017.774.150002069.2630018.664.6800017.163.81000018.163.31250018.353.21600021.845.3SPL28.282N0.952.1median 15.1median 64.6Delta3.210.136.840.639.940.531.935.638.938.743.740.329.83425.924.726.325.724.92721.634.91940.918.94618.152.616.660.216.263.514.967.61568.615.668.414.968.914.970.915.669.414.668.314.273.214.170.314.467.314.659.714.961.315.261.915.462.715.75468.76666.36470.627.580.822.418.319.715.825.3146.9median 15.6median 62.7median 43median 39.9median 48median 14.2median 63.8411.323.324.122.613.316.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 4Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Xiaomi Black Shark 4
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 5
6000 mAh
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2
5500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
710
703
-1%
754
6%
907
28%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 50min

Pros

+ 性价比高
+ 144赫兹显示
+ 体面的摄像头
+ 5G和快速无线网络
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 没有IP认证
- 没有无线充电
- 运行时间可以更好

结论 - 带有NFC的良好游戏手机

在审查中。小米黑鲨4。
在审查中。小米黑鲨4。

小米黑鲨4又是一款可靠的游戏手机,而且还拥有机械触发器的好东西。与其他采用触摸解决方案的游戏智能手机相比,这些按钮的工作更加可靠。这款手机的设计相对克制,不像其他游戏手机那样提供LED照明效果。

相机可以提供良好的照片,扬声器甚至可以传达一点低音的感觉,而且智能手机相对较轻。电池运行时间可以更长,但对于日常使用来说是足够的。

最后,你还得到了NFC,但你仍然要做的是没有无线充电和IP认证。

小米通过黑鲨4成功地进一步发展了其游戏智能手机,并以相对谨慎的设计提供了一个良好的游戏手机。

总的来说,黑鲨4与前代产品相比是一次成功的进化。对于那些想省钱的人来说,这是一款不错的游戏手机,但如果你真的想要目前最高的游戏能力,你应该,比如说,去购买 华硕ROG手机5联想Legion Phone Duel 2.

价格和可用性

这款游戏智能手机在亚马逊上的售价为679.99美元。配备12GB内存/256GB大容量存储。那里也有更多存储空间的版本。在黑鲨的网站https://eu.blackshark.com/products/blackshark4你目前只能以599欧元(约708美元)的价格买到12GB/256GB的版本。

Xiaomi Black Shark 4 - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
92 / 75 → 100%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 66%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
71%
Average
83%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米黑鲨4智能手机评测--144赫兹显示屏的移动游戏
Florian Schmitt, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)