小米黑鲨4智能手机评测--144赫兹显示屏的移动游戏
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Rating Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 SD 870, Adreno 650 | 210 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 07 / 2020 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 222 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 88 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Asus ROG Phone 5 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 239 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" | 2448x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 259 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.92" | 2460x1080 |
外壳、设备和操作 - 受限的游戏设计
小米黑鲨4的几个版本可在网上购买。
- 6GB内存/128GB数据存储，起价429欧元（约507美元）。
- 8GB内存/128GB数据存储489欧元起（约合人民币578元
- 12GB内存/256GB数据存储，起价579欧元（约合人民币684元）。
此外，还有一款黑鲨4 Pro，配备了 骁龙888，但在中欧几乎买不到。
外壳有两种颜色，但只有镜面黑在中欧真正可用或负担得起。这款智能手机提供了一个相对克制的设计，如果你比较一下，比如说 联想Legion Phone Duel 2作为比较。尽管如此，还是有一些特殊的功能。背面的表面会折射光线，使其以 "X "的形状反射。相机模块位于一个六边形的边框中。黑鲨4的重量为210克（约7.4盎司），对于一款游戏手机来说，它的重量令人欣喜。
然而，你必须做的是没有LED效果。相反，有两个机械触发器，通过右边的十字侧的滑块扩展。当设备被打开时，当触发器第一次被激活时，会听到一种声音，就像你在给手枪装子弹一样。你是觉得这很武断还是很酷，取决于你。
在Wi-Fi方面，由于支持Wi-Fi 6，黑鲨4的水平不错，与其他游戏手机不相上下。当然，也支持5G接收。
预装了软件Android 11，小米在上面添加了自己的游戏界面JoyUI。游戏和玩家的特殊设置可以在所谓的Shark Space中进行管理。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
| Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
照相机 - 船上有广角相机
背面有三个相机镜头，尽管只有两个可以用于实际拍照。一个4800万像素的主摄像头，以及一个800万像素的广角镜头。还有500万像素的景深摄像头，这只是为了支持。
4800万像素的照片可以用主摄像头记录，但只在特殊模式下。通常情况下，1200万像素的图片被创建，这意味着4个像素被合并成一个，以增加光的产量。在正常照明条件下，该相机拍摄的照片还不错，但细节往往可以更准确一些。广角镜头的拍摄效果乍一看也还不错，但仔细看时往往不再有细节。
这款智能手机在弱光和高对比度下表现良好。然而，在只有一勒克斯的亮度下，图像变得有些像素化，但色彩和图像内容总体上仍然可以被识别。
如果需要，主摄像头还可以录制4K和60帧的视频。这里的图片质量也很好。曝光变化相当快，没有大的可见梯度，自动对焦通常能可靠地工作。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera flowerMain camera environmentMain camera Low LightWide angle
显示屏 - 黑鲨4的144赫兹AMOLED显示屏
小米的游戏手机中安装了一个相当明亮的AMOLED屏幕，分辨率为1080p。屏幕上均匀的亮度分布很好，但色彩准确度相当平庸。因此，寻找专业应用显示屏的用户将不得不用合适的软件重新校准显示屏，或者到其他地方寻找。
当然，刷新率对游戏玩家尤其重要。它的最高频率为144赫兹。然而，这无论如何也不能用于所有的移动游戏。我们用《PUBG移动版》进行了测试，最高只达到了60赫兹，尽管至少90赫兹是绝对可能的。这里不仅是游戏设计者的责任，手机制造商也必须调整某些东西。然而，制造商通常会以高电池使用率为由避免高帧率。
在亮度低于100%的情况下，可以看到相当强烈的OLED闪烁，但这也是这种屏幕类型的常见现象。在购买之前，你应该试一试在低亮度下是否感觉受到干扰。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 676 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.959
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Asus ROG Phone 5 AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8" | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 AMOLED, 2460x1080, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 8% | 129% | 92% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11 ? | 9 ? 18% | 2.4 ? 78% | 8 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6 ? | 8 ? -33% | 2.4 ? 60% | 6 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 162.3 | 227.3 40% | 568 ? 250% | 568 250% |
| Screen | 14% | 39% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 676 | 619 -8% | 789 17% | 463 -32% |
| Brightness | 669 | 616 -8% | 795 19% | 466 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 90 -8% | 98 0% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.77 | 3.74 35% | 1.4 76% | 3.24 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.81 | 7.94 19% | 3 69% | 5.75 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.7 54% | 1.7 54% | 4.4 -19% |
| Gamma | 1.959 112% | 2.188 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.201 100% |
| CCT | 6584 99% | 6662 98% | 6596 99% | 7273 89% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
12% | 84% /
69% | 47% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 162.3 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 162.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 162.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--快速，但不是顶级的
在性能方面，骁龙870被用作SoC，所以它在性能方面不是绝对的顶级联盟，但它仍然是一个强大的处理器。因此，审查样本优于其前辈 黑鲨3在某些方面的性能上高出10%左右。在实践中你应该很难注意到这种差异。图形性能也略高，在游戏中多出几帧当然是受欢迎的。
由于采用了UFS 3.1内存，内存速度相当快，在我们的基准测试中证明是可靠和快速的。
暖气是高性能智能手机的通常水平，在日常条件下应该几乎不会引起任何问题。
在我们的测量中，立体声扬声器明显显示出更多的低中音，甚至还有一点低音。这款智能手机在日常使用中以良好的声音脱颖而出，这并不完全令人信服，但仍然比这个价格范围内的许多其他智能手机听起来更好。
电池运行时间必须受到一些限制。4,500毫安时的电池比该价格范围内的其他智能手机略小；5000毫安时现在是标准配置。因此，该设备在我们的WLAN测试中达到了11:50小时。这是一个很好的结果，但你仍然可以在其他地方得到更多。该智能手机可以用高达120瓦的功率充电。可用的充电器不提供这个功率，但只有67瓦，并设法在一个多小时内为设备充电。几分钟后，你已经有足够的电量使用几个小时。
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | Asus ROG Phone 5 | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | 6% | 3% | -7% | 31% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1663 | 1692 2% | 1779 7% | 1999 20% | 1602 ? -4% | 1887 ? 13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 760 | 680 -11% | 795 5% | 754 -1% | 748 ? -2% | 1471 ? 94% |
| Random Read 4KB | 283.1 | 238.3 -16% | 291.4 3% | 262.6 -7% | 243 ? -14% | 278 ? -2% |
| Random Write 4KB | 259.9 | 227.8 -12% | 278 7% | 261.5 1% | 244 ? -6% | 311 ? 20% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Xiaomi Black Shark 4 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 5 6000 mAh | Lenovo Legion Phone Duel 2 5500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 710 | 703 -1% | 754 6% | 907 28% | 991 ? 40% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 带有NFC的良好游戏手机
小米黑鲨4又是一款可靠的游戏手机，而且还拥有机械触发器的好东西。与其他采用触摸解决方案的游戏智能手机相比，这些按钮的工作更加可靠。这款手机的设计相对克制，不像其他游戏手机那样提供LED照明效果。
相机可以提供良好的照片，扬声器甚至可以传达一点低音的感觉，而且智能手机相对较轻。电池运行时间可以更长，但对于日常使用来说是足够的。
最后，你还得到了NFC，但你仍然要做的是没有无线充电和IP认证。
小米通过黑鲨4成功地进一步发展了其游戏智能手机，并以相对谨慎的设计提供了一个良好的游戏手机。
总的来说，黑鲨4与前代产品相比是一次成功的进化。对于那些想省钱的人来说，这是一款不错的游戏手机，但如果你真的想要目前最高的游戏能力，你应该，比如说，去购买 华硕ROG手机5或 联想Legion Phone Duel 2.
价格和可用性
这款游戏智能手机在亚马逊上的售价为679.99美元。配备12GB内存/256GB大容量存储。那里也有更多存储空间的版本。在黑鲨的网站https://eu.blackshark.com/products/blackshark4你目前只能以599欧元（约708美元）的价格买到12GB/256GB的版本。
Xiaomi Black Shark 4
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
