Notebookcheck Logo

荣耀 5C 智能手机简短评测

这是我们的荣耀。 一块绚丽的屏幕和不错的相机搭配金属机身——售价仅不足200欧元(约1461人民币),荣耀5C给了我们很好的第一印象。请阅读我们的评测了解为什么这台5.2寸智能手机如此出色。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Honor 5C (5 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 650 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.46 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB (第二个SIM卡槽), NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器,近距传感器,指南针, WiFi Direct
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); 最高速度 150 GBit/s (下载), 50 GBit/s (上传); 辐射值: 1.12 W/kg (头部), 0.42 W/kg (身体), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 147.1 x 73.8
Battery
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, 自动对焦, LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄 @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
Additional features
Speakers: 扬声器位于底部, Keyboard: 触控, HiCare, Health, 通讯录, 指南针, 文件管理器, 24 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
156 g, Power Supply: 47 g
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g146.9 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 140 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g142.6 mm 71.8 mm 7.1 mm 120 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Networking
453%
326%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
49.8
303
508%
249
400%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
58.3
290
397%
205
252%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Honor 5C: Overview
GPS Honor 5C: Overview
GPS Honor 5C: Crossing
GPS Honor 5C: Crossing
GPS Honor 5C: Riverside
GPS Honor 5C: Riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
509
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 515 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 498.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1051:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG X Screen
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"
OnePlus X
Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5"
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
7%
-5%
6%
-18%
2%
13%
Brightness middle
515
375
-27%
392
-24%
289
-44%
312
-39%
505
-2%
535
4%
Brightness
498
376
-24%
376
-24%
291
-42%
314
-37%
468
-6%
521
5%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
90
-3%
96
3%
91
-2%
88
-5%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.49
0.32
35%
0.27
45%
0.74
-51%
0.43
12%
Contrast
1051
1172
12%
1452
38%
682
-35%
1244
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.2
6
3%
7.5
-21%
4.7
24%
6.28
-1%
4.1
34%
4.88
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.4
9.5
17%
13.1
-15%
7.3
36%
5.8
49%
8.66
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.4
4.5
39%
9.9
-34%
3
59%
8.24
-11%
4.9
34%
5.2
30%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.03 108%
2.12 104%
2.5 88%
2.26 97%
CCT
8664 75%
6975 93%
9704 67%
6291 103%
8145 80%
7116 91%
7766 84%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
53143 Points
OnePlus X
52463 Points -1%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -49%
LG X Screen
22955 Points -57%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points -5%
Honor 5X
37152 Points -30%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
906 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 Points -48%
LG X Screen
473 Points -48%
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points -3%
Honor 5X
698 Points -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
3914 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1425 Points -64%
LG X Screen
1436 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points -4%
Honor 5X
3047 Points -22%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
11755 Points
OnePlus X
15051 Points +28%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -63%
LG X Screen
4352 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points 0%
Honor 5X
7852 Points -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
11319 Points
OnePlus X
14541 Points +28%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points -66%
LG X Screen
3791 Points -67%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points 0%
Honor 5X
7764 Points -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
13588 Points
OnePlus X
17156 Points +26%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points -34%
LG X Screen
9033 Points -34%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points +1%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5C
563 Points
OnePlus X
710 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -91%
LG X Screen
53 Points -91%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points -2%
Honor 5X
129 Points -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
480 Points
OnePlus X
643 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -91%
LG X Screen
42 Points -91%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points -1%
Honor 5X
103 Points -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1418 Points
OnePlus X
1117 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -50%
LG X Screen
716 Points -50%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points -3%
Honor 5X
1089 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 5C
383 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
317 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1418 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 5C
367 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
303 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1440 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
20 fps
OnePlus X
23 fps +15%
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -51%
LG X Screen
9.6 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps -5%
Honor 5X
14 fps -30%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
19 fps
OnePlus X
21 fps +11%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -73%
LG X Screen
5.1 fps -73%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps 0%
Honor 5X
14 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5C
8.4 fps
OnePlus X
10 fps +19%
HTC Desire 530
4 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -55%
LG X Screen
4 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps 0%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps -30%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
7.9 fps
OnePlus X
8.6 fps +9%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -77%
LG X Screen
1.8 fps -77%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps -1%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
4.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
5120 Points
OnePlus X
4450 Points -13%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points -19%
LG X Screen
4031 Points -21%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points +4%
Honor 5X
3794 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1225 Points
OnePlus X
1252 Points +2%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -52%
LG X Screen
521 Points -57%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points -2%
Honor 5X
297 Points -76%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5C
2600 Points
OnePlus X
2225 Points -14%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points -59%
LG X Screen
1011 Points -61%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points -6%
Honor 5X
1378 Points -47%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1504 Points
OnePlus X
662 Points -56%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points -80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -57%
LG X Screen
491 Points -67%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points -11%
Honor 5X
787 Points -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
814 Points
OnePlus X
1975 Points +143%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points -62%
LG X Screen
302 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points 0%
Honor 5X
763 Points -6%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5C
707 Points
OnePlus X
843 Points +19%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points -22%
LG X Screen
491 Points -31%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points +8%
Honor 5X
9 Points -99%

Legend

 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Screen Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 5C
9111 ms *
OnePlus X
7264 ms * +20%
HTC Desire 530
17471 ms * -92%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * -43%
LG X Screen
12880 ms * -41%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
9397 ms * -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
4188 Points
OnePlus X
4810 Points +15%
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points -35%
LG X Screen
2650 Points -37%
Honor 5X
3595 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points +14%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5C
73 Points
OnePlus X
85 Points +16%
HTC Desire 530
34 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points -36%
Honor 5X
65 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points -8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
27.93 Points
OnePlus X
28 Points 0%
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points -40%
LG X Screen
15.67 Points -44%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points -22%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points +4%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
263 MB/s
OnePlus X
235.5 MB/s -10%
HTC Desire 530
127 MB/s -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s -44%
LG X Screen
131 MB/s -50%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s -45%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.5 MB/s +8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s -35%
HTC Desire 530
55.8 MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s -5%
LG X Screen
72 MB/s -5%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s +3%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s -39%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s -74%
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s -81%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s -66%
LG X Screen
10 MB/s -84%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s -72%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s -38%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s -9%
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s -26%
LG X Screen
8 MB/s -49%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s -36%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s -2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C
51.9 MB/s
HTC Desire 530
35.56 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.8 MB/s +54%
LG X Screen
75.3 MB/s +45%
Huawei P9 Lite
60.8 MB/s +17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s
HTC Desire 530
18.22 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s +93%
LG X Screen
46.95 MB/s +94%
Huawei P9 Lite
25.1 MB/s +4%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high26 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 38.4 °C38.1 °C40.9 °C 
 38.4 °C38.1 °C42.2 °C 
 37.3 °C37.6 °C40.2 °C 
Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 39 °C
33.8 °C34.6 °C35.9 °C
34.4 °C35.2 °C35.6 °C
34.4 °C35.1 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 2.07 / 2.15 Watt
Load midlight 3.46 / 5.18 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-37%
37%
32%
0%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
1.58
-78%
0.6
33%
0.61
31%
0.73
18%
0.87
2%
Idle Average *
2.07
2.59
-25%
0.91
56%
1.41
32%
2.09
-1%
2.08
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
2.66
-24%
1.12
48%
1.51
30%
2.11
2%
2.22
-3%
Load Average *
3.46
5.22
-51%
3.04
12%
2.56
26%
4.15
-20%
5.26
-52%
Load Maximum *
5.18
5.67
-9%
3.2
38%
3.1
40%
5.05
3%
6.34
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
16h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 36min
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
LG X Screen
2300 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
5%
23%
59%
2%
28%
Reader / Idle
997
976
-2%
1117
12%
968
-3%
1599
60%
1053
6%
1404
41%
H.264
602
457
-24%
514
-15%
658
9%
602
0%
568
-6%
WiFi v1.3
584
553
-5%
425
-27%
549
-6%
643
10%
643
10%
604
3%
Load
156
177
13%
250
60%
339
117%
402
158%
144
-8%
272
74%

Pros

+ 绚丽全高清屏幕
+ 性价比
+ 日光下拍摄效果不错
+ 最新的安卓系统
+ NGC
+ 高性能
+ 优秀的通话音质
+ 实用的电池续航
+ 双SIM卡

Cons

- 机身滑
- 不可更换电池
- 使用microSD卡则无法使用第二块SIM卡
- 不支持USB OTG
- 不支持App2SD
- 有限的无线网络制式支持
- 大量预装垃圾软件
- 暗光下相机效果差
- 相对较沉
In review: Honor 5C. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.
In review: Honor 5C. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

一加X曾经是高性价比中端手机中的佼佼者之一。荣耀5C也不甘落后:高品质的组件隐藏在第一眼看上去平平无奇的配置表之后,让我们这台测试机可以挑战更高价位的设备。

例一)相机:它拍摄的图片锐度适中,色彩还原准确,同时前置摄像头也十分适合自拍。尽管它没有提供对4K视频的支持,同时相机在暗光环境下表现也一般,在这个价位上它依然提供了很好的表现。

例二)屏幕:全高清,高亮度,IPS——在售价第一位是“1”时我们也不好意思要求更多了。当然,它的黑值略高,同时整体色彩偏蓝,不过在这个价位上依然属于可以接受。而高性能,不错的通话品质也是它的加分项。

荣耀5C可以成为一加X的强劲竞争对手。我们测试机的表现明显超过了同价位产品的表现,特别是在组件品质的方面。

需要经常旅行的用户可能会对它的网络制式支持感到失望。需要高速无线网络的用户可能也会不太满意。另外,它的电池无法更换。双SIM卡是个不错的功能,不过需要在第二张SIM卡和microSD卡之间做出抉择仍然让人感觉有些遗憾。

最后,在不足200欧元(约1467人民币)的价位上,荣耀5C的高性价比罕逢敌手,十分值得考虑购买。 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Honor 5C - 07/06/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
60 / 75 → 80%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
39 / 60 → 66%
Weight
92%
Battery
92%
Display
84%
Games Performance
25 / 63 → 40%
Application Performance
48 / 70 → 69%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
73%
Average
72%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 荣耀 5C 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2016-07-20 (Update: 2016-07-23)