荣耀 5C 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|
Networking | 453% | 326% | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | 49.8 | 303 508% | 249 400% |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | 58.3 | 290 397% | 205 252% |
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1051:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG X Screen IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | OnePlus X Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 7% | -5% | 6% | -18% | 2% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 515 | 375 -27% | 392 -24% | 289 -44% | 312 -39% | 505 -2% | 535 4% |
Brightness | 498 | 376 -24% | 376 -24% | 291 -42% | 314 -37% | 468 -6% | 521 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 90 -3% | 96 3% | 91 -2% | 88 -5% | 85 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.32 35% | 0.27 45% | 0.74 -51% | 0.43 12% | ||
Contrast | 1051 | 1172 12% | 1452 38% | 682 -35% | 1244 18% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 6 3% | 7.5 -21% | 4.7 24% | 6.28 -1% | 4.1 34% | 4.88 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.4 | 9.5 17% | 13.1 -15% | 7.3 36% | 5.8 49% | 8.66 24% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 4.5 39% | 9.9 -34% | 3 59% | 8.24 -11% | 4.9 34% | 5.2 30% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.03 108% | 2.12 104% | 2.5 88% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 8664 75% | 6975 93% | 9704 67% | 6291 103% | 8145 80% | 7116 91% | 7766 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5X |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
OnePlus X | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Honor 5X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Honor 5C | |
HTC Desire 530 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG X Screen | |
Huawei P9 Lite |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 26 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 30 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.27 Watt |
Idle | 0.89 / 2.07 / 2.15 Watt |
Load |
3.46 / 5.18 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Honor 5C 3000 mAh | HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh | OnePlus X mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -37% | 37% | 32% | 0% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.89 | 1.58 -78% | 0.6 33% | 0.61 31% | 0.73 18% | 0.87 2% |
Idle Average * | 2.07 | 2.59 -25% | 0.91 56% | 1.41 32% | 2.09 -1% | 2.08 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.15 | 2.66 -24% | 1.12 48% | 1.51 30% | 2.11 2% | 2.22 -3% |
Load Average * | 3.46 | 5.22 -51% | 3.04 12% | 2.56 26% | 4.15 -20% | 5.26 -52% |
Load Maximum * | 5.18 | 5.67 -9% | 3.2 38% | 3.1 40% | 5.05 3% | 6.34 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 5C 3000 mAh | LG X Screen 2300 mAh | HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh | OnePlus X mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 2% | 5% | 23% | 59% | 2% | 28% | |
Reader / Idle | 997 | 976 -2% | 1117 12% | 968 -3% | 1599 60% | 1053 6% | 1404 41% |
H.264 | 602 | 457 -24% | 514 -15% | 658 9% | 602 0% | 568 -6% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 584 | 553 -5% | 425 -27% | 549 -6% | 643 10% | 643 10% | 604 3% |
Load | 156 | 177 13% | 250 60% | 339 117% | 402 158% | 144 -8% | 272 74% |
Pros
Cons
一加X曾经是高性价比中端手机中的佼佼者之一。荣耀5C也不甘落后:高品质的组件隐藏在第一眼看上去平平无奇的配置表之后,让我们这台测试机可以挑战更高价位的设备。
例一)相机:它拍摄的图片锐度适中,色彩还原准确,同时前置摄像头也十分适合自拍。尽管它没有提供对4K视频的支持,同时相机在暗光环境下表现也一般,在这个价位上它依然提供了很好的表现。
例二)屏幕:全高清,高亮度,IPS——在售价第一位是“1”时我们也不好意思要求更多了。当然,它的黑值略高,同时整体色彩偏蓝,不过在这个价位上依然属于可以接受。而高性能,不错的通话品质也是它的加分项。
荣耀5C可以成为一加X的强劲竞争对手。我们测试机的表现明显超过了同价位产品的表现,特别是在组件品质的方面。
需要经常旅行的用户可能会对它的网络制式支持感到失望。需要高速无线网络的用户可能也会不太满意。另外,它的电池无法更换。双SIM卡是个不错的功能,不过需要在第二张SIM卡和microSD卡之间做出抉择仍然让人感觉有些遗憾。
最后,在不足200欧元(约1467人民币)的价位上,荣耀5C的高性价比罕逢敌手,十分值得考虑购买。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Honor 5C
-
07/06/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer