荣耀 5X 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 535 cd/m²
Contrast: 1244:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26
Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -32% | 20% | -4% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 535 | 312 -42% | 467 -13% | 418 -22% | 349 -35% |
Brightness | 521 | 314 -40% | 460 -12% | 407 -22% | 353 -32% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 95 12% | 95 12% | 93 9% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.3 30% | 0.49 -14% | ||
Contrast | 1244 | 1557 25% | 853 -31% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.88 | 6.28 -29% | 3.28 33% | 3.92 20% | 5.22 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.66 | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 8.24 -58% | 1.89 64% | 3.81 27% | 3.96 24% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.12 104% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 7766 84% | 8145 80% | 6734 97% | 7361 88% | 7308 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
System (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Memory (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Graphics (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Web (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Honor 5X | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
* ... smaller is better
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 21 fps | ||
very low | 35 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 32 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.3 Watt |
Idle | 0.87 / 2.08 / 2.22 Watt |
Load |
5.26 / 6.34 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 24% | 38% | 27% | -58% | |
Reader / Idle | 1053 | 968 -8% | 1292 23% | 1364 30% | |
H.264 | 602 | 514 -15% | 657 9% | 677 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 549 -15% | 495 -23% | 526 -18% | 267 -58% |
Load | 144 | 339 135% | 350 143% | 264 83% |
Pros
Cons
华为设计了一款十分不错的设备。它经典的机身中搭载了高性能的组件,售价却毫不夸张。它的软件系统也新颖兼顾实用,相机可以拍摄不错的照片,同时有24个月的保修。
荣耀5X售价如此低当然也难以避免有不少缺点:通话质量差,扬声器一般,GPS信号不稳定。不过它的优质机身和明亮屏幕可以弥补这些缺憾。
荣耀5X的另外一个弱点是负载下的电池续航,让我们对它有些动摇。另一方面,这款智能手机的很多地方都让我们十分着迷:首先当然是售价。另外,如果消费者愿意多划出一些预算,避免荣耀5X的弱点的话也可以选择去年的机型,它的性能甚至更高。
对售价敏感的用户可以参考荣耀5X,它在这个价位上提供了很多独特的功能(屏幕尺寸,性能,机身品质)。可以接受更高价位机型的用户可以找到更多值得考虑的设备。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Honor 5X
- 03/07/2016 v5 (old)
Florian Wimmer