小米红米6A智能手机评测
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8320, Core: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320
Memory
2048 MB
, 2GB or 3GB
Display
5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 16GB or 32GB, 25 GB free
Weight
145 g, Power Supply: 55 g
Price
729 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| LG K11 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: 1554:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS100 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Nokia 3.1 IPS, 1440x720, 5.2" | LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | -47% | -9% | -66% | |
| Brightness middle | 404 | 503 25% | 442 9% | 506 25% | 394 -2% |
| Brightness | 400 | 499 25% | 446 12% | 490 23% | 385 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 84 2% | 86 5% | 93 13% | 93 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.73 -181% | 0.35 -35% | 0.24 8% | 0.66 -154% |
| Contrast | 1554 | 689 -56% | 1263 -19% | 2108 36% | 597 -62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 5.44 -27% | 8.03 -88% | 6.4 -50% | 8.2 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.97 | 10.01 -0% | 15.81 -59% | 11.1 -11% | 21.5 -116% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 6.8 -94% | 10.4 -197% | 7.5 -114% | 7.5 -114% |
| Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.451 90% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% | 2.6 85% |
| CCT | 6899 94% | 6590 99% | 10070 65% | 8643 75% | 7581 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6194 - 7019, n=2) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (19 - 21, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (13 - 14, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (12 - 12, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6.3 - 6.6, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7.5 - 8.5, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4 - 4.3, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Gigaset GS100 | |
| Nokia 3.1 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67) | |
| Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A | Xiaomi Redmi 5A | Gigaset GS100 | Nokia 3.1 | LG K11 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | -49% | -21% | -20% | -17% | 701% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 277.5 | 293.8 6% | 97.2 -65% | 281.5 1% | 253 -9% | 242 ? -13% | 1882 ? 578% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 131.7 | 49.86 -62% | 24 -82% | 35.26 -73% | 48.32 -63% | 100.5 ? -24% | 1467 ? 1014% |
| Random Read 4KB | 33.94 | 42.32 25% | 17.6 -48% | 48.62 43% | 45.8 35% | 43.2 ? 27% | 278 ? 719% |
| Random Write 4KB | 52.2 | 9.28 -82% | 6.2 -88% | 9.2 -82% | 13.16 -75% | 22.4 ? -57% | 310 ? 494% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.8 ? | 84.9 ? 3% | 79.5 ? -4% | 77.2 ? -7% | 82.8 ? 0% | 71.8 ? -13% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.7 ? | 62.6 ? -5% | 61 ? -7% | 59.8 ? -9% | 61.1 ? -7% | 52.9 ? -19% |
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt |
| Load |
3.4 / 4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -54% | -8% | -14% | -4% | -54% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 1.2 -71% | 1.3 -86% | 0.68 3% | 0.57 19% | 0.68 ? 3% | 0.882 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.5 -25% | 2.1 -75% | 1.33 -11% | 1.48 -23% | 1.675 ? -40% | 1.448 ? -21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 2.9 -45% | 1.37 31% | 1.54 23% | 2.09 ? -5% | 1.603 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 3.4 | 2.9 15% | 4.4 -29% | 4.02 -18% | 4.56 -34% | 2.94 ? 14% | 6.57 ? -93% |
| Load Maximum * | 4 | 4.8 -20% | 5.3 -33% | 5.89 -47% | 6.16 -54% | 3.75 ? 6% | 9.92 ? -148% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 761 | 1009 33% | 532 -30% | 562 -26% | 741 -3% |
Pros
+ 系统性能优秀
+ 价格低廉
+ 外壳坚固
+ 双SIM和SD卡可同时使用
Cons
- 没有NFC
- 严格的联网要求
总结-及其优秀的性价比：
通过红米6A，小米给我们带来了一台红米5A应该成为的手机。6A的性能得到了显着的提升，因此简单的应用程序，浏览器任务和操作系统可以顺利地运行。相机仅仅适用于简单的快照。寻找价格合理的备用机的用户也可以拥有双卡双待和SD卡槽。
“只有小米才能提供给用户红米6A这样一台配置不错且价格实惠的智能手机。“
虽然你几乎不需要降低对系统性能的期待，但Redmi 6A还是缺少一些硬件设备。例如，由于价格低廉，所以缺少的指纹传感器和NFC。买家也应该了解小米严格的在线连接要求，因为如果没有MIUI帐户，您将无法对设置进行一些特定调整。
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
- 11/16/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
