荣耀 6X 智能手机简短评测

Name: Honor 6X
Brand: Honor

优秀实惠。 荣耀6X价位不高，但它不论是在配置还是性能上都对售价更高的机型造成了不小的威胁。它甚至搭配了双镜头相机。我们将会通过深入评测看看这台来自华为副牌荣耀的安卓设备究竟表现如何。

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/18/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 6X (6 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 655 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

Memory

3 GB

, LPDDR3

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, abgerundetes 2,5D-Glas, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 22.9 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD卡最高支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔感应器，近距感应器，指南针，重力感应器, micro-USB 2.0, USB OTG, WiFi Direct, GLONASS, BeiDou

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 四频 (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS 三频 (900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz), 下载／上传最高 300/50 MBit/s, nano-SIM, 头部电磁辐射值 1.23 W/kg, 身体电磁辐射值 1.16 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 150.9 x 76.2

Battery

3340 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix LED 闪光灯, 相变感应自动对焦, 视频拍摄最高 1920x1080 像素 30 帧／秒, 传感器模组: 索尼 IMX386
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 视频拍摄最高 1280x720 像素 30 帧／秒

Additional features

Speakers: 位于底部的单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 数据线，电源适配器，快速开始说明, EMUI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

162 g, Power Supply: 35 g

Price

249 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s +88%
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.9 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	43.1 MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s +87%
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.6 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	42.9 MBit/s -21%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


551 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	539 cd/m²
556 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	545 cd/m²
533 cd/m²	520 cd/m²	523 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

abgerundetes 2,5D-Glas tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 556 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 540.1 cd/m² Minimum: 7.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 547 cd/m²
Contrast: 960:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.09

	Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		8%	8%	16%	0%	-15%
Brightness middle	547	535 -2%	575 5%	348 -36%	287 -48%	518 -5%
Brightness	540	521 -4%	559 4%	320 -41%	289 -46%	475 -12%
Brightness Distribution	94	85 -10%	91 -3%	85 -10%	91 -3%	81 -14%
Black Level *	0.57	0.43 25%	0.39 32%	0.23 60%		0.61 -7%
Contrast	960	1244 30%	1474 54%	1513 58%		849 -12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	4.88 4%	5.2 -2%	3.5 31%	2.9 43%	6.8 -33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.1	8.66 5%	10.3 -13%	6.4 30%	10.1 -11%	11.4 -25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.2	5.2 16%	7.2 -16%	4 35%	2.1 66%	7 -13%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.26 ^97%	2.4 ^92%	2.3 ^96%	2.05 ^107%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6546 ^99%	7766 ^84%	7224 ^90%	6527 ^100%	6228 ^104%	8151 ^80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	56764 Points
Honor 5X	37152 Points -35%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	56798 Points 0%
HTC One A9s	51330 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	45234 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points -15%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	788 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017	780 Points -1%
HTC One A9s	711 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	680 Points -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	3341 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017	3240 Points -3%
HTC One A9s	2936 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	3277 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	11775 Points
Honor 6X	11775 Points 0%
Honor 5X	7852 Points -33%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11611 Points -1%
HTC One A9s	10766 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	8505 Points -28%
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	11353 Points
Honor 6X	11353 Points 0%
Honor 5X	7764 Points -32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11147 Points -2%
HTC One A9s	10453 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	7746 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	13535 Points
Honor 6X	13535 Points 0%
Honor 5X	8174 Points -40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	13590 Points 0%
HTC One A9s	12025 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	12949 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 6X	550 Points
Honor 5X	129 Points -77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	606 Points +10%
HTC One A9s	603 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	475 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	468 Points
Honor 5X	103 Points -78%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	516 Points +10%
HTC One A9s	524 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	394 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	1433 Points
Honor 5X	1089 Points -24%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1547 Points +8%
HTC One A9s	1269 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	1687 Points +18%
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 6X	385 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017	389 Points +1%
HTC One A9s	425 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	299 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XA	422 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	318 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017	321 Points +1%
HTC One A9s	359 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	242 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XA	306 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	1440 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1532 Points +6%
HTC One A9s	1175 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	1681 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA	1236 Points -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X	19 fps
Honor 5X	14 fps -26%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	19 fps 0%
HTC One A9s	27 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	19 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps +47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X	18 fps
Honor 5X	14 fps -22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	18 fps 0%
HTC One A9s	18 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	12 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 6X	8.5 fps
Honor 5X	5.9 fps -31%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8.5 fps 0%
HTC One A9s	14 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	9.4 fps +11%
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps +76%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X	4.6 fps
Honor 5X	5.4 fps +17%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	7.9 fps +72%
HTC One A9s	7.2 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	4.9 fps +7%
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps +57%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X	4.9 fps
Huawei P8 lite 2017	5 fps +2%
HTC One A9s	11 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	7.2 fps +47%
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps +124%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X	2.5 fps
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4.6 fps +84%
HTC One A9s	2.6 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	3.2 fps +28%
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps +92%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	4383 Points
Honor 5X	3794 Points -13%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4419 Points +1%
HTC One A9s	3350 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	3691 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points +7%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6X	1300 Points
Honor 5X	297 Points -77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	435 Points -67%
HTC One A9s	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	973 Points -25%
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points -20%
System (sort by value)
Honor 6X	2721 Points
Honor 5X	1378 Points -49%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	2694 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	2127 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points -16%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 6X	1779 Points
Honor 5X	787 Points -56%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1658 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	1319 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X	819 Points
Honor 5X	763 Points -7%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	826 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	512 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points -18%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 6X	720 Points
Honor 5X	9 Points -99%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	624 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points 0%

Legend

Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	4199 Points
Honor 5X	3595 Points -14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4630 Points +10%
HTC One A9s	4395 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	3905 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points -4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 6X	9373 ms *
Honor 5X	12510 ms * -33%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8768 ms * +6%
HTC One A9s	9346 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	9671 ms * -3%
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms * -3%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6X	73 Points
Honor 5X	65 Points -11%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	62 Points -15%
HTC One A9s	69 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	66 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XA	72 Points -1%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X	26.46 Points
Honor 5X	21.92 Points -17%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	29.5 Points +11%
HTC One A9s	27.48 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016	24.12 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points +4%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		-45%	-29%	-25%	-13%	-9%
Sequential Read 256KB	283.4	144 -49%	165.8 -41%	210.2 -26%	189.4 -33%	240.4 -15%
Sequential Write 256KB	73.8	78 6%	42 -43%	68.6 -7%	46.24 -37%	68.6 -7%
Random Read 4KB	39.55	17 -57%	38.7 -2%	21.3 -46%	22.33 -44%	22.05 -44%
Random Write 4KB	45.05	10 -78%	8 -82%	34.6 -23%	10.11 -78%	10.6 -76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	52		53.1 2%	39.6 -24%	75.5 45%	72.9 40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	34.53		32.1 -7%	25.6 -26%	58.2 69%	50.7 47%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	25 fps
	very low	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	57 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


35.9 °C	34.8 °C	37.1 °C
35.2 °C	35.1 °C	37.5 °C
34.1 °C	33.7 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 35.5 °C


31.7 °C	32.2 °C	32.5 °C
31.7 °C	31.7 °C	32.4 °C
32.1 °C	31.5 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 32 °C

Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 5X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	0.82 / 2 / 2.03 Watt
Load	3.34 / 4.92 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Honor 5X 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh	HTC One A9s 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh
Power Consumption		-21%	-38%	-27%	21%	7%
Idle Minimum *	0.82	0.87 -6%	1.44 -76%	1.29 -57%	0.67 18%	0.72 12%
Idle Average *	2	2.08 -4%	2.47 -24%	2.28 -14%	1.71 14%	1.5 25%
Idle Maximum *	2.03	2.22 -9%	2.58 -27%	2.52 -24%	1.83 10%	1.57 23%
Load Average *	3.34	5.26 -57%	4.55 -36%	4.06 -22%	2.37 29%	3.48 -4%
Load Maximum *	4.92	6.34 -29%	6.3 -28%	5.91 -20%	3.31 33%	6.04 -23%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		37h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 15min

	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Honor 5X 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh	HTC One A9s 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-45%	-33%	-37%	29%	-58%
Reader / Idle	2250	1053 -53%	1326 -41%	1543 -31%	2030 -10%	775 -66%
H.264	885	602 -32%	644 -27%	587 -34%	1220 38%	460 -48%
WiFi v1.3	957	643 -33%	604 -37%	517 -46%	1025 7%	353 -63%
Load	375	144 -62%	283 -25%	245 -35%	681 82%	170 -55%

Pros

+ 价格实惠

+ 高品质机身

+ 支持LTE Cat.6和NFC

+ 双SIM卡

+ 指纹感应器

+ 双镜头相机提供了优秀的拍摄效果

+ 明亮的全高清屏幕

+ 高系统性能

+ 负载下无降频问题

+ 长电池续航

Cons

- 不支持App2SD

- 不支持5GHz无线网络

- 第二块SIM卡与SD卡共用插槽

- 游戏运行流畅度时好时坏

- 一般的单声道扬声器

In review: Honor 6X. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

荣耀的5.5寸机型6X是一台十分全面的设备。它的官方建议零售价为249欧元（约1848人民币），作为一台性能优秀的高品质中端机型，它在不少方面都相比前代机型5X有所改进，它的优秀配置具备很强的竞争力。

首先需要提到的是它的变焦双镜头相机——这个功能通常只有更贵的设备才会提供。全高清屏幕，LTE Cat.6，NFC，双SIM卡支持和32GB存储空间（可用空间22.9GB）也都为它赢得了加分。由于搭配了大容量电池，荣耀6X可以轻松实现两天的续航时间。

荣耀6X在低售价的基础上提供了接近高端设备的配置。

不过，较低的售价也意味着它难免会有其取舍。荣耀6X仅支持2.4GHz无线网络，同时传输速率也只是中规中矩。另外尽管它搭配了八核处理器和3GB内存，最新的游戏在高设定下仍然无法保持流畅运行。它的单声道扬声器效果也十分一般，通话音质也偶尔会有些模糊。

最后需要提到的是，尽管不算是一个缺点，但它在我们测试时仍然搭载安卓6.0。不过，根据生产商提供的信息它将会在未来几周内升级到安卓7.0。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Honor 6X - 2017-03-06 03/06/2017 v6 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

72 / 75 → 95%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

42 / 60 → 70%

Weight

91%

Battery

97%

Display

84%

Games Performance

19 / 63 → 30%

Application Performance

47 / 70 → 67%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 73%

Camera

73%

Average

73%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 荣耀 6X 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero, 2017-03-18 (Update: 2017-03-18)