荣耀 6X 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 547 cd/m²
Contrast: 960:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.09
| Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 8% | 16% | 0% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 547 | 535 -2% | 575 5% | 348 -36% | 287 -48% | 518 -5% |
| Brightness | 540 | 521 -4% | 559 4% | 320 -41% | 289 -46% | 475 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 85 -10% | 91 -3% | 85 -10% | 91 -3% | 81 -14% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.43 25% | 0.39 32% | 0.23 60% | 0.61 -7% | |
| Contrast | 960 | 1244 30% | 1474 54% | 1513 58% | 849 -12% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 4.88 4% | 5.2 -2% | 3.5 31% | 2.9 43% | 6.8 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 8.66 5% | 10.3 -13% | 6.4 30% | 10.1 -11% | 11.4 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 5.2 16% | 7.2 -16% | 4 35% | 2.1 66% | 7 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.05 107% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6546 99% | 7766 84% | 7224 90% | 6527 100% | 6228 104% | 8151 80% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9s Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -45% | -29% | -25% | -13% | -9% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 283.4 | 144 -49% | 165.8 -41% | 210.2 -26% | 189.4 -33% | 240.4 -15% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 73.8 | 78 6% | 42 -43% | 68.6 -7% | 46.24 -37% | 68.6 -7% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.55 | 17 -57% | 38.7 -2% | 21.3 -46% | 22.33 -44% | 22.05 -44% |
| Random Write 4KB | 45.05 | 10 -78% | 8 -82% | 34.6 -23% | 10.11 -78% | 10.6 -76% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 52 | 53.1 2% | 39.6 -24% | 75.5 45% | 72.9 40% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.53 | 32.1 -7% | 25.6 -26% | 58.2 69% | 50.7 47% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 25 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 57 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 6X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.11 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.82 / 2 / 2.03 Watt |
| Load |
3.34 / 4.92 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 6X 3340 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -21% | -38% | -27% | 21% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.82 | 0.87 -6% | 1.44 -76% | 1.29 -57% | 0.67 18% | 0.72 12% |
| Idle Average * | 2 | 2.08 -4% | 2.47 -24% | 2.28 -14% | 1.71 14% | 1.5 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.03 | 2.22 -9% | 2.58 -27% | 2.52 -24% | 1.83 10% | 1.57 23% |
| Load Average * | 3.34 | 5.26 -57% | 4.55 -36% | 4.06 -22% | 2.37 29% | 3.48 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.92 | 6.34 -29% | 6.3 -28% | 5.91 -20% | 3.31 33% | 6.04 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 6X 3340 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -45% | -33% | -37% | 29% | -58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2250 | 1053 -53% | 1326 -41% | 1543 -31% | 2030 -10% | 775 -66% |
| H.264 | 885 | 602 -32% | 644 -27% | 587 -34% | 1220 38% | 460 -48% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 957 | 643 -33% | 604 -37% | 517 -46% | 1025 7% | 353 -63% |
| Load | 375 | 144 -62% | 283 -25% | 245 -35% | 681 82% | 170 -55% |
Pros
Cons
荣耀的5.5寸机型6X是一台十分全面的设备。它的官方建议零售价为249欧元（约1848人民币），作为一台性能优秀的高品质中端机型，它在不少方面都相比前代机型5X有所改进，它的优秀配置具备很强的竞争力。
首先需要提到的是它的变焦双镜头相机——这个功能通常只有更贵的设备才会提供。全高清屏幕，LTE Cat.6，NFC，双SIM卡支持和32GB存储空间（可用空间22.9GB）也都为它赢得了加分。由于搭配了大容量电池，荣耀6X可以轻松实现两天的续航时间。
荣耀6X在低售价的基础上提供了接近高端设备的配置。
不过，较低的售价也意味着它难免会有其取舍。荣耀6X仅支持2.4GHz无线网络，同时传输速率也只是中规中矩。另外尽管它搭配了八核处理器和3GB内存，最新的游戏在高设定下仍然无法保持流畅运行。它的单声道扬声器效果也十分一般，通话音质也偶尔会有些模糊。
最后需要提到的是，尽管不算是一个缺点，但它在我们测试时仍然搭载安卓6.0。不过，根据生产商提供的信息它将会在未来几周内升级到安卓7.0。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Honor 6X
- 03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
