荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Name: Honor 8 Pro
Brand: Honor

开拓新领地。 华为的最新旗舰机型荣耀8 Pro又树立了新的标准。在接下来的详细测试中，我们将会考量这台设备在各个方面的表现，并与其他高端机型进行对比。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 05/13/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 8 Pro (8 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

Memory

6 GB

Display

5.70 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, LCD, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 52.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 读卡器最大支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔感应器，红外感应器，近距感应器，环境光感应器，指南针，重力感应器，陀螺仪，状态指示灯, USB OTG, Miracast, 状态指示灯

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz LTE (FDD): 频段 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 LTE (TDD): 频段 38, 40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.97 x 157 x 77.5

Battery

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix + 1200万像素, 自动对焦, 搭配LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 77度广角镜头

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，USB数据线，VR头戴, Emotion UI 5.1 (兼容安卓7.0), 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

184 g, Power Supply: 52 g

Price

549 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	656 MBit/s +182%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (154^min) MBit/s +47%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +44%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s +34%
HTC U Play Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	260 MBit/s +12%
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	233 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	368 MBit/s +56%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308 (48.8^min) MBit/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +19%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s +9%
HTC U Play Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s +6%
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	236 MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Honor 8 Pro

LG G6

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Honor 8 Pro

LG G6

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Honor 8 Pro

LG G6

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D


502 cd/m²	523 cd/m²	502 cd/m²
503 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	530 cd/m²
495 cd/m²	517 cd/m²	512 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 541 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1803:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27

	Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1"	Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	HTC U Play Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		-19%	-34%	-20%	-6%	30%	29%	-59%	13%
Brightness middle	541	547 1%	361 -33%	424 -22%	445 -18%	554 2%	560 4%	421 -22%	485 -10%
Brightness	514	556 8%	366 -29%	432 -16%	434 -16%	552 7%	562 9%	430 -16%	490 -5%
Brightness Distribution	91	86 -5%	87 -4%	90 -1%	93 2%	96 5%	93 2%	84 -8%	92 1%
Black Level *	0.3	0.43 -43%		0.25 17%	0.36 -20%
Contrast	1803	1272 -29%		1696 -6%	1236 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	4.8 -50%	5.1 -59%	5.7 -78%	2.8 12%	1.59 50%	1.7 47%	7.1 -122%	2.1 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.2	8.8 -22%	10 -39%	10.8 -50%	5.8 19%	2.56 64%	3.4 53%	15.3 -113%	5.5 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4	4.5 -13%	5.5 -38%	4.1 -3%	3.7 7%	2.01 50%	1.6 60%	6.8 -70%	2.6 35%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.39 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.31 ^95%	2.01 ^109%	2.13 ^103%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7120 ^91%	7194 ^90%	7388 ^88%	7359 ^88%	7164 ^91%	6321 ^103%	6435 ^101%	7866 ^83%	6843 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)						82.12	81.57		88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						99.98	99.87		100

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 30.8 ms rise
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	146044 Points
Huawei P10	140084 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Plus	98413 Points -33%
HTC U Play	51628 Points -65%
HTC 10	131866 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points +13%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points -12%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	1935 Points
HTC U Play	775 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1952 Points
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10	6036 Points
HTC U Play	2825 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6375 Points
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	6245 Points
Huawei P10	6521 Points +4%
HTC 10	4021 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1853 Points
Huawei P10	1899 Points +2%
HTC 10	1654 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points +9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	25766 Points
Huawei P10	27692 Points +7%
Huawei P9 Plus	19936 Points -23%
HTC U Play	11275 Points -56%
HTC 10	27176 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	29282 Points +14%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points +20%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	32243 Points
Huawei P10	35964 Points +12%
Huawei P9 Plus	21807 Points -32%
HTC U Play	11713 Points -64%
HTC 10	30061 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	33077 Points +3%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	15129 Points
Huawei P10	15341 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Plus	15331 Points +1%
HTC U Play	9970 Points -34%
HTC 10	20344 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	20892 Points +38%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +48%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1865 Points
Huawei P10	2649 Points +42%
Huawei P9 Plus	1188 Points -36%
HTC U Play	657 Points -65%
HTC 10	3157 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3958 Points +112%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1856 Points
Huawei P10	2816 Points +52%
Huawei P9 Plus	1042 Points -44%
HTC U Play	565 Points -70%
HTC 10	4581 Points +147%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4786 Points +158%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points +78%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1896 Points
Huawei P10	2193 Points +16%
Huawei P9 Plus	2336 Points +23%
HTC U Play	1516 Points -20%
HTC 10	1512 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2465 Points +30%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1832 Points
Huawei P10	2274 Points +24%
Huawei P9 Plus	952 Points -48%
HTC U Play	421 Points -77%
HTC 10	2495 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3188 Points +74%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points +21%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1746 Points
Huawei P10	2409 Points +38%
Huawei P9 Plus	807 Points -54%
HTC U Play	349 Points -80%
HTC 10	2889 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3479 Points +99%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	2216 Points
Huawei P10	1902 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Plus	2547 Points +15%
HTC U Play	1498 Points -32%
HTC 10	1688 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2466 Points +11%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	59 fps
Huawei P10	55 fps -7%
Huawei P9 Plus	43 fps -27%
HTC U Play	18 fps -69%
HTC 10	43 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps -2%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps 0%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	43 fps
Huawei P10	69 fps +60%
Huawei P9 Plus	41 fps -5%
HTC U Play	18 fps -58%
HTC 10	73 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps +142%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps +112%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +79%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	20 fps
Huawei P10	32 fps +60%
Huawei P9 Plus	19 fps -5%
HTC U Play	7 fps -65%
HTC 10	24 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps +90%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps +125%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps +30%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	29 fps
Huawei P10	30 fps +3%
Huawei P9 Plus	18 fps -38%
HTC U Play	7.1 fps -76%
HTC 10	39 fps +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps +72%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps +59%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +41%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	13 fps
Huawei P10	25 fps +92%
Huawei P9 Plus	11 fps -15%
HTC U Play	4.8 fps -63%
HTC 10	14 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps +77%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +146%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps +15%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	21 fps
Huawei P10	24 fps +14%
Huawei P9 Plus	10 fps -52%
HTC U Play	4.8 fps -77%
HTC 10	24 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps +100%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +52%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +29%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	15 fps
Huawei P10	15 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.2 fps -59%
HTC U Play	2.5 fps -83%
HTC 10	18 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps +67%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps +33%
Lenovo Moto Z	16 fps +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	11 fps
Huawei P10	16 fps +45%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.8 fps -38%
HTC U Play	2.5 fps -77%
HTC 10	10 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps +18%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps +82%
Lenovo Moto Z	9.8 fps -11%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	7356 Points
Huawei P10	7341 Points 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	7159 Points -3%
HTC U Play	3356 Points -54%
HTC 10	5809 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points -21%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	2985 Points
Huawei P10	2621 Points -12%
Huawei P9 Plus	2019 Points -32%
HTC U Play	344 Points -88%
HTC 10	2193 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points +11%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -21%
System (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	4029 Points
Huawei P10	3830 Points -5%
Huawei P9 Plus	3932 Points -2%
HTC U Play	2173 Points -46%
HTC 10	2806 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points +32%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -16%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	4277 Points
Huawei P10	2778 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Plus	2667 Points -38%
HTC U Play	996 Points -77%
HTC 10	1772 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points -27%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points -54%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	4070 Points
Huawei P10	4115 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Plus	1512 Points -63%
HTC U Play	666 Points -84%
HTC 10	5009 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points +51%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +6%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 8 Pro	1131 Points
Huawei P10	1077 Points -5%
Huawei P9 Plus	1049 Points -7%
HTC U Play	10 Points -99%
HTC 10	928 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points +3%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -21%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -15%

Legend

Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

HTC U Play Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	14050 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +32%
Huawei P9 Plus	12058 Points +20%
Huawei P10	10236 Points +2%
Honor 8 Pro	10016 Points
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -2%
HTC 10	8905 Points -11%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points -22%
HTC U Play	3163 Points -68%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HTC U Play	9982 ms * -216%
Honor 8 Pro	3157 ms *
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * -0%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -0%
Huawei P10	3129 ms * +1%
Huawei P9 Plus	2792 ms * +12%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2237 ms * +29%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +29%
Huawei P9 Plus	70 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	62.2 Points +7%
Honor 8 Pro	58.1 Points
Huawei P10	57.9 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points -6%
HTC 10	52.1 Points -10%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points -18%
HTC U Play	22.32 Points -62%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	154 Points +9%
Honor 8 Pro	141 Points
Huawei P10	136 Points -4%
OnePlus 3T	135 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Plus	130 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points -21%
HTC 10	108 Points -23%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Huawei P9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash	HTC U Play Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		0%	-39%	-51%	-19%	-16%	1%	-33%	-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	32.16	32.19 0%	24.95 -22%	23.6 -27%	65.4 103%	50.4 57%	57.2 78%		45.64 42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	54.2	54.2 0%	62.5 15%	36.8 -32%	83.3 54%	76.4 41%	71.1 31%		78.5 45%
Random Write 4KB	151.6	152.3 0%	51.2 -66%	52.7 -65%	15.89 -90%	15.79 -90%	15.27 -90%	74.4 -51%	74.9 -51%
Random Read 4KB	166.4	168.4 1%	39.33 -76%	32 -81%	29.92 -82%	86.7 -48%	127.2 -24%	123.6 -26%	117.2 -30%
Sequential Write 256KB	187.1	189.8 1%	140.4 -25%	135.5 -28%	115.6 -38%	145.1 -22%	194.2 4%	165.3 -12%	168.3 -10%
Sequential Read 256KB	738	738 0%	284.3 -61%	197.3 -73%	275.1 -63%	487.3 -34%	788 7%	436.4 -41%	439.7 -40%

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	30 fps

... in comparison

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


43 °C	41.6 °C	39.9 °C
41.9 °C	39.8 °C	44.8 °C
40.6 °C	40.2 °C	42 °C

Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 41.5 °C


37.5 °C	39.2 °C	40.9 °C
37.6 °C	38 °C	41.2 °C
37.4 °C	39 °C	39.7 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Honor 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Idle	0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt
Load	6.58 / 10.12 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	HTC U Play 2500 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Power Consumption		8%	35%	23%	15%	33%	42%	15%	40%
Idle Minimum *	0.98	0.83 15%	0.87 11%	0.92 6%	0.68 31%	0.63 36%	0.68 31%	0.61 38%	0.66 33%
Idle Average *	2.27	2.1 7%	1.2 47%	1.84 19%	1.49 34%	1.1 52%	1.13 50%	1.77 22%	1.01 56%
Idle Maximum *	2.36	2.18 8%	1.27 46%	2 15%	1.91 19%	1.56 34%	1.16 51%	1.81 23%	1.09 54%
Load Average *	6.58	6.57 -0%	4.69 29%	4.3 35%	7.4 -12%	5.95 10%	4.69 29%	6.67 -1%	3.97 40%
Load Maximum *	10.12	9.32 8%	5.63 44%	6.2 39%	9.71 4%	6.7 34%	5.24 48%	10.98 -8%	8.34 18%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 01min

	Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	HTC U Play 2500 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		26%	16%	14%	-6%	-7%	26%	16%	14%
Reader / Idle	1378	1538 12%	1540 12%	1446 5%	1302 -6%	1273 -8%	1565 14%	1423 3%	1371 -1%
H.264	675	947 40%	582 -14%	776 15%	514 -24%	648 -4%	742 10%	810 20%	724 7%
WiFi v1.3	573	758 32%	966 69%	530 -8%	473 -17%	413 -28%	736 28%	494 -14%	407 -29%
Load	181	219 21%	176 -3%	263 45%	223 23%	203 12%	275 52%	282 56%	320 77%

Pros

+ 明亮，高对比度的IPS屏幕

+ QHD分辨率

+ 高性能

+ 6GB内存

+ 高速64GB UFS-2.1闪存

+ 双SIM卡

+ 屏幕色彩准确

+ 优秀的双相机系统...

Cons

- ...不过表现并不顶尖

- 发热量高

- 不支持蓝牙5.0

- 无线模组速度较慢

- 仅USB 2.0接口

- 一般的GPS模组

In the test: Honor 8 Pro. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

荣耀8 Pro是一台品质上乘、性能出色的雅致高端智能手机。相比一些最新高端设备，尽管它搭配了6GB工作内存，但仍然在不少方面有所欠缺。

在荣耀8 Pro中，我们（仍）没有找到荣耀系列所闻名的高性价比。去年的一些高端智能手机（如三星 Galaxy S7 Edge）甚至在更低价位上提供了更优秀的整体表现，这也由于它们在上市的一年间有了大幅降价。

搭配蓝牙4.2而非5.0，相对“较弱”的显卡，无自动对焦的前置相机，和过时的USB 2.0接口，让荣耀8 Pro与目前最新旗舰机型有了明显差距。另外，它的电池不支持无线充电，机身也没有提供防沙防水等认证。它的机身边框较宽，因此机身／屏幕面积比较高，对于一台2017年的设备来说，它的机身利用效率较低。

整体上，荣耀8 Pro是一台非常成功且值得推荐的华为P10替代机型。不过我们认为，它很难与2017年的优秀旗舰机型相竞争。

除此之外，华为在硬件配置上的吝啬让我们十分遗憾——是否所有荣耀8 Pro用户都可以体验到高速UFS-2.1闪存的好处还尚未可知。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Honor 8 Pro - 05/04/2017 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

49 / 60 → 81%

Weight

89%

Battery

92%

Display

87%

Games Performance

55 / 63 → 87%

Application Performance

69 / 70 → 98%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

74%

Average

78%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2017-05-13 (Update: 2017-05-13)

荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Size Comparisons

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Honor 8 Pro audio analysis

Huawei P10 audio analysis

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison