荣耀 8 Pro 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparisons
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro |
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1803:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC U Play Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -19% | -34% | -20% | -6% | 30% | 29% | -59% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 541 | 547 1% | 361 -33% | 424 -22% | 445 -18% | 554 2% | 560 4% | 421 -22% | 485 -10% |
Brightness | 514 | 556 8% | 366 -29% | 432 -16% | 434 -16% | 552 7% | 562 9% | 430 -16% | 490 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 87 -4% | 90 -1% | 93 2% | 96 5% | 93 2% | 84 -8% | 92 1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.43 -43% | 0.25 17% | 0.36 -20% | |||||
Contrast | 1803 | 1272 -29% | 1696 -6% | 1236 -31% | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 4.8 -50% | 5.1 -59% | 5.7 -78% | 2.8 12% | 1.59 50% | 1.7 47% | 7.1 -122% | 2.1 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 8.8 -22% | 10 -39% | 10.8 -50% | 5.8 19% | 2.56 64% | 3.4 53% | 15.3 -113% | 5.5 24% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.5 -13% | 5.5 -38% | 4.1 -3% | 3.7 7% | 2.01 50% | 1.6 60% | 6.8 -70% | 2.6 35% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.39 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.31 95% | 2.01 109% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7120 91% | 7194 90% | 7388 88% | 7359 88% | 7164 91% | 6321 103% | 6435 101% | 7866 83% | 6843 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | 81.57 | 88.14 | ||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 | 99.87 | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC U Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC U Play | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
HTC U Play | |
HTC 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P10 | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC 10 | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC U Play |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HTC U Play | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P10 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
HTC 10 | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC U Play |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
Honor 8 Pro | |
Huawei P10 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
HTC 10 |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei P9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash | HTC U Play Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | -39% | -51% | -19% | -16% | 1% | -33% | -7% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 32.16 | 32.19 0% | 24.95 -22% | 23.6 -27% | 65.4 103% | 50.4 57% | 57.2 78% | 45.64 42% | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 54.2 | 54.2 0% | 62.5 15% | 36.8 -32% | 83.3 54% | 76.4 41% | 71.1 31% | 78.5 45% | |
Random Write 4KB | 151.6 | 152.3 0% | 51.2 -66% | 52.7 -65% | 15.89 -90% | 15.79 -90% | 15.27 -90% | 74.4 -51% | 74.9 -51% |
Random Read 4KB | 166.4 | 168.4 1% | 39.33 -76% | 32 -81% | 29.92 -82% | 86.7 -48% | 127.2 -24% | 123.6 -26% | 117.2 -30% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 187.1 | 189.8 1% | 140.4 -25% | 135.5 -28% | 115.6 -38% | 145.1 -22% | 194.2 4% | 165.3 -12% | 168.3 -10% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 738 | 738 0% | 284.3 -61% | 197.3 -73% | 275.1 -63% | 487.3 -34% | 788 7% | 436.4 -41% | 439.7 -40% |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 30 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.24 Watt |
Idle | 0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt |
Load |
6.58 / 10.12 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | HTC U Play 2500 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 35% | 23% | 15% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.98 | 0.83 15% | 0.87 11% | 0.92 6% | 0.68 31% | 0.63 36% | 0.68 31% | 0.61 38% | 0.66 33% |
Idle Average * | 2.27 | 2.1 7% | 1.2 47% | 1.84 19% | 1.49 34% | 1.1 52% | 1.13 50% | 1.77 22% | 1.01 56% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.36 | 2.18 8% | 1.27 46% | 2 15% | 1.91 19% | 1.56 34% | 1.16 51% | 1.81 23% | 1.09 54% |
Load Average * | 6.58 | 6.57 -0% | 4.69 29% | 4.3 35% | 7.4 -12% | 5.95 10% | 4.69 29% | 6.67 -1% | 3.97 40% |
Load Maximum * | 10.12 | 9.32 8% | 5.63 44% | 6.2 39% | 9.71 4% | 6.7 34% | 5.24 48% | 10.98 -8% | 8.34 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 8 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | HTC U Play 2500 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 26% | 16% | 14% | -6% | -7% | 26% | 16% | 14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1378 | 1538 12% | 1540 12% | 1446 5% | 1302 -6% | 1273 -8% | 1565 14% | 1423 3% | 1371 -1% |
H.264 | 675 | 947 40% | 582 -14% | 776 15% | 514 -24% | 648 -4% | 742 10% | 810 20% | 724 7% |
WiFi v1.3 | 573 | 758 32% | 966 69% | 530 -8% | 473 -17% | 413 -28% | 736 28% | 494 -14% | 407 -29% |
Load | 181 | 219 21% | 176 -3% | 263 45% | 223 23% | 203 12% | 275 52% | 282 56% | 320 77% |
Pros
Cons
荣耀8 Pro是一台品质上乘、性能出色的雅致高端智能手机。相比一些最新高端设备,尽管它搭配了6GB工作内存,但仍然在不少方面有所欠缺。
在荣耀8 Pro中,我们(仍)没有找到荣耀系列所闻名的高性价比。去年的一些高端智能手机(如三星 Galaxy S7 Edge)甚至在更低价位上提供了更优秀的整体表现,这也由于它们在上市的一年间有了大幅降价。
搭配蓝牙4.2而非5.0,相对“较弱”的显卡,无自动对焦的前置相机,和过时的USB 2.0接口,让荣耀8 Pro与目前最新旗舰机型有了明显差距。另外,它的电池不支持无线充电,机身也没有提供防沙防水等认证。它的机身边框较宽,因此机身/屏幕面积比较高,对于一台2017年的设备来说,它的机身利用效率较低。
整体上,荣耀8 Pro是一台非常成功且值得推荐的华为P10替代机型。不过我们认为,它很难与2017年的优秀旗舰机型相竞争。
除此之外,华为在硬件配置上的吝啬让我们十分遗憾——是否所有荣耀8 Pro用户都可以体验到高速UFS-2.1闪存的好处还尚未可知。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Honor 8 Pro
-
05/04/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich