Notebookcheck Logo

小米9 SE智能手机评测

小屏旗舰？

Mi 9 SE超越了Mi 8 SE，是Mi 9的中端衍生型号。SE比其旗舰同名产品更精简，更紧凑，但它仍然让我们感到惊喜。 请继续阅读，了解它到底给我们留下了什么样的印象，以及Mi 9 SE是否有任何缺点。
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Mi 9 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 360
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memory
6 GB 
Display
5.97 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Capacitive multitouch touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，指南针，陀螺仪，霍尔传感器，接近传感器, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, infrared transmitter
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G: B1, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40. 3G: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.45 x 147.5 x 70.5
Battery
3070 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MPix，Sony IMX586，f / 1.75,1 / 2“，0.8μm.16Mix广角摄像头：f / 2.2,13 mm，1 / 3.0”，1.0μm。 12 MP长焦相机：f / 2.2,54 mm，1 / 3.6“，1.0μm，2倍光学变焦。照片最高可达4K，视频最高可达8,000 x 6,000。
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f /2.0,0.9μm，HDR，高达1080p @ 960 FPS慢动作，4K @ 60 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 模块化电源，USB Type-C到A型电缆，保护盖，SIM工具，快速入门指南，保修卡，MIUI 10,12个月保修，无风扇, MIUI 10, 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine: L1 (EU), L3 (China), fanless
Weight
155 g, Power Supply: 42 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Size Comparison

❌
159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (598min - 665max) MBit/s +132%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (430min - 578max) MBit/s +91%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s +15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (138min - 294max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (229min - 303max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (250min - 285max) MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (128min - 283max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (549min - 725max) MBit/s +118%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (630min - 704max) MBit/s +117%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 341max) MBit/s +7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (314min - 341max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (214min - 346max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (278min - 302max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s -10%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (214-346)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø279 (229-303)
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Wide-angle photo
Wide-angle photo
Default camera app filters
Default camera app filters
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app settings
Default camera app settings
Default camera app modes
Default camera app modes
Video mode
Video mode
Video settings
Video settings
Manual mode
Manual mode
Video modes
Video modes

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
581
cd/m²		574
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
585
cd/m²		583
cd/m²		577
cd/m²
586
cd/m²		577
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 586 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 577.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 583 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"		Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"		Xiaomi Poco F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"		Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"		Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen
10%
-77%
-53%
-30%
-109%
23%
Brightness middle
583
570
-2%
547
-6%
489
-16%
644
10%
537
-8%
593
2%
Brightness
577
565
-2%
525
-9%
486
-16%
628
9%
525
-9%
587
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
85
-12%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.34
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
4.6
-188%
3.8
-138%
2.64
-65%
6.41
-301%
0.9
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
3.6
8%
12.1
-210%
7.1
-82%
9.23
-137%
10.86
-178%
2
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
1.2
56%
3.9
-44%
4.4
-63%
2.5
7%
6.7
-148%
1.5
44%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.024 109%
2.099 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6267 104%
6504 100%
7158 91%
7213 90%
6649 98%
8310 78%
6548 99%
Contrast
1519
1438
926

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU 1.1 | AnTuTu v7 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
1875 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +193%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
5975 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +152%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points -48%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
7282 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +65%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points -41%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (8346 - 11143, n=2)
9745 Points +17%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (6832 - 8276, n=2)
7554 Points +11%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points -44%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (27117 - 29316, n=2)
28217 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points -64%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points -59%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (37657 - 43514, n=2)
40586 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points +155%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (13686 - 13698, n=2)
13692 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points -54%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points +174%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2073 - 2978, n=2)
2526 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points -57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points +317%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points +403%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1980 - 3100, n=2)
2540 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +139%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2480 - 2619, n=2)
2550 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points -52%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points +236%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2217 - 2828, n=2)
2523 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points -56%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points -39%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points +380%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2146 - 3248, n=2)
2697 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +818%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1946 - 2506, n=2)
2226 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points -64%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points -61%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2048 - 2073, n=2)
2061 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points -68%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points -64%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points +140%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1928 - 1980, n=2)
1954 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2480 - 2617, n=2)
2549 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points -67%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points -60%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points +167%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2108 - 2217, n=2)
2163 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points -71%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points -63%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points +230%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2146 - 2147, n=2)
2147 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +438%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1982 - 2506, n=2)
2244 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1923 - 1988, n=2)
1956 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points +200%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1885 - 1907, n=2)
1896 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2069 - 2338, n=2)
2204 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points +16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps -57%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (58 - 58, n=2)
58 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (74 - 74, n=2)
74 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +278%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps -67%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (33 - 33, n=2)
33 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +129%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps -64%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps +178%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (36 - 36, n=2)
36 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +359%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps -67%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps +125%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (23 - 24, n=2)
23.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +174%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps -63%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (26 - 26, n=2)
26 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +351%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (13 - 13, n=2)
13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +268%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps -65%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps +180%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (15 - 15, n=2)
15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +371%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps -69%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (14 - 14, n=2)
14 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +254%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps -69%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +399%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps -70%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps -78%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (9 - 9.1, n=2)
9.05 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +311%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps -71%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (5.8 - 5.9, n=2)
5.85 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +452%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (8.4min - 36.6max) fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21.26 (11.26min - 61.24max) fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
14.2 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (7.68min - 27.7max) fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
15.8 (10.44min - 44.6max) fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
12.8 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (8.05min - 26.52max) fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24.51 (11.54min - 48.55max) fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
14.2 fps 0%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
179353 Points 0%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4731 Score +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1656 Score -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
1966 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score +196%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points -53%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2630 - 2906, n=2)
2768 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +117%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (5198 - 5932, n=2)
5565 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +71%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points -67%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (2969 - 3026, n=2)
2998 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +128%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points -61%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points -59%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (3031 - 3453, n=2)
3242 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +390%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  (1004 - 1172, n=2)
1088 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +33%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
517 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
504 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
517 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)
2316 Points +348%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +224%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.2 Points +54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.21 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 ()
37.2 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.25 Points -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +263%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min +75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 ()
37.5 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min -12%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +107%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (47 - 72, n=2)
59.5 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +174%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points +81%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (10328 - 13562, n=2)
11945 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points -38%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10257 ms * -252%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * -64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4123 ms * -42%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2912 - 4383, n=2)
3648 ms * -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2912 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
2714 ms * +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873 ms * +36%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9 SESamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Sony Xperia 10Xiaomi Poco F1Samsung Galaxy A50Motorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-27%
-2%
-7%
42%
206%
99%
594%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.5
295.8
-40%
273.8
-44%
705
43%
507
3%
283.6
-42%
666
35%
530 ?(286 - 948, n=37)
8%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
273%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.1
104.9
-45%
232.9
23%
155.6
-18%
192.1
1%
208.7
10%
388.3
104%
212 ?(103.4 - 466, n=37)
12%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
650%
Random Read 4KB
115.8
84
-27%
53.1
-54%
101
-13%
98.9
-15%
76.6
-34%
149.4
29%
130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37)
13%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
139%
Random Write 4KB
21.86
15.45
-29%
14.39
-34%
17.81
-19%
18.2
-17%
73.1
234%
165.3
656%
101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37)
363%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
1314%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.2 ?(28.6 - 70.2, n=20)
PUBG Compare
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Asphalt Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø29.3 (27-31)
Dead Trigger 2
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø59.8 (54-61)
Max. Load
 35.1 °C33.6 °C32 °C 
 35.6 °C34.8 °C31.8 °C 
 34.3 °C31.6 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
30.9 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
30 °C32.1 °C34.2 °C
30.2 °C32.1 °C33.9 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 32 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.5392531.931.53122.324.84021.721.95029.228.46326.724.98020.324.410020.526.51252325.316015.64520017.849.125016.359.131515.461.540015.963.550015.864.263013.367.980014.165.9100014.171.412501469.7160013.567.8200013.469250013.972.3315014.271.7400013.967.1500014.672.9630014.267.7800014.766.3100001568.21250014.955.41600015.338SPL26.481.5N0.852.7median 14.7median 66.3Delta0.9839.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.78.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 SEXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.53 / 1.18 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.04 / 4.83 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-44%
-57%
-57%
-72%
-31%
-4%
-68%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.71
-34%
0.72
-36%
0.65
-23%
0.8
-51%
1.1
-108%
0.67
-26%
0.54 ?(0.53 - 0.55, n=2)
-2%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-69%
Idle Average *
1.18
1.36
-15%
2.16
-83%
1.97
-67%
1.5
-27%
1.7
-44%
1.26
-7%
1.285 ?(1.18 - 1.39, n=2)
-9%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.47
-23%
2.17
-81%
2.01
-68%
1.7
-42%
2.1
-75%
1.29
-8%
1.32 ?(1.2 - 1.44, n=2)
-10%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-35%
Load Average *
3.04
5.13
-69%
3.32
-9%
4.29
-41%
5.9
-94%
5.1
-68%
3.71
-22%
3.01 ?(2.97 - 3.04, n=2)
1%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-112%
Load Maximum *
4.83
7.89
-63%
5.34
-11%
9.05
-87%
8.3
-72%
7.9
-64%
9.3
-93%
4.88 ?(4.83 - 4.92, n=2)
-1%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-103%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
-10%
30%
20%
8%
9%
Reader / Idle
1374
1467
7%
1006
-27%
2088
52%
1587
16%
1650
20%
H.264
853
836
-2%
620
-27%
936
10%
869
2%
809
-5%
1008
18%
WiFi v1.3
510
605
19%
541
6%
808
58%
701
37%
715
40%
546
7%
Load
218
273
25%
233
7%
220
1%
275
26%
196
-10%
194
-11%

Pros

+ 设计时尚
+ 做工优良
+ 优秀的相机
+ 可圈可点的单声道扬声器
+ 稳固的系统性能
+ 不错的OLED面板

Cons

- 没有IP防尘防水
- 没有无线充电
- 存储不可拓展
- 没有microSD卡插槽
- LTE支持范围小
- 没有OIS
小米9 SE智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
小米9 SE智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

凭借Mi 9 SE，小米成功地创造了一款紧凑且具有吸引力的中端智能手机。SE继承了Mi 9的一些旗舰功能，同时降低了成本。小米为该设备配备了高对比度OLED面板，优秀的相机和不错的单声道扬声器以及精美的机身。

无论您购买哪种型号，电池容量和LTE覆盖率都非常差。此外，缺少microSD卡插槽，IP认证，通知LED或耳机插孔似乎都使Mi 9 SE错失了占领更大的中端智能手机市场的机会。

如果您正在寻找一款价格低廉的水桶机，那么小米Mi 9 SE可能是您的最佳选择。

在撰写本文时，Mi 9 SE的零售价仅为2199元，这使其物超所值。然而，我们已经看到它在网上有一些优惠。但无论是官方还是第三方价格，Mi 9 SE仍然是一款出色的中端智能手机。

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - 05/06/2019 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
43 / 60 → 72%
Weight
92%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
58 / 63 → 92%
Application Performance
67 / 70 → 95%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
77%
Average
79%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米9 SE智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07- 8 (Update: 2019-07- 8)