小米9T（国内红米K20）智能手机评测：有着惊人续航的中端机

Name: Xiaomi Mi 9T
Brand: Xiaomi

第三台小米9。

在Mi 9和Mi 9 SE之后推出Mi 9T，这是一款将Mi 9系列推向不同方向的设备。 9T继承了Mi 9的许多功能，但有弹出式自拍相机，4,000 mAh电池和3.5 mm耳机插孔的区别。请继续阅读以了解9T如何与其他Mi 9型号相抗衡。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 09/15/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 9T (Mi 9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, 10-point multitouch, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, 103.8% NTSC colour space coverage, glossy: yes, HDR

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 52.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，电子罗盘，陀螺仪，接近传感器, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, aptX, aptX HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE/FDD: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28. LTE/TDD: Bands 38, 40. SAR values: Body – 1.511 W/kg, Head - 1.341 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 156.7 x 74.3

Battery

4000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX586，f / 1.75,1 / 2“，0.8μm.16Mix广角摄像头：f / 2.2,13 mm，1 / 3.0”，1.0μm。 12 MP长焦相机：f / 2.2,54 mm，1 / 3.6“，1.0μm，2倍光学变焦。照片最高可达4K，视频最高可达8,000 x 6,000。
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f /2.0, 0.9μm，HDR，高达1080p @ 960 FPS慢动作，4K @ 60 FPS

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 模块化电源，USB Type-C到A，保护盖，SIM工具，快速入门指南，保修卡, MIUI 10, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

191 g, Power Supply: 40 g

Price

380 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	293 (161^min - 346^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s -14%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	333 (297^min - 343^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -44%

Xiaomi Mi 9T; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (297-343)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (161-346)

GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


579 cd/m²	581 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
586 cd/m²	589 cd/m²	594 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	588 cd/m²	601 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 601 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 588.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 589 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"
Screen		-3%	21%	-10%	-105%	-23%	-66%
Brightness middle	589	583 -1%	593 1%	451 -23%	537 -9%	644 9%	547 -7%
Brightness	589	577 -2%	587 0%	430 -27%	525 -11%	628 7%	525 -11%
Brightness Distribution	96	97 1%	94 -2%	90 -6%	85 -11%	91 -5%	93 -3%
Black Level *				0.55	0.58		0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.6 36%	0.9 64%	1.4 44%	6.41 -156%	2.64 -6%	4.6 -84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.9	3.9 20%	2 59%	4.4 10%	10.86 -122%	9.23 -88%	12.1 -147%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	2.7 -69%	1.5 6%	2.5 -56%	6.7 -319%	2.5 -56%	3.9 -144%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.099 ^105%	2.024 ^109%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6544 ^99%	6267 ^104%	6548 ^99%	6422 ^101%	8310 ^78%	6649 ^98%	7158 ^91%
Contrast				820	926		1519

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

245.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points -26%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points -39%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2436 - 2527, n=2)	2482 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +117%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6826 - 6871, n=2)	6849 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +119%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7795 - 7881, n=2)	7838 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +54%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points -8%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8626 - 9075, n=4)	8909 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points -9%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7177 - 7913, n=4)	7599 Points +1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (35557 - 40105, n=4)	38270 Points +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points -64%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (46605 - 52736, n=4)	50758 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points -30%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (19389 - 21898, n=4)	20581 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -35%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2950 - 3547, n=4)	3277 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -38%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points -60%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +213%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2999 - 3604, n=4)	3316 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2792 - 3362, n=4)	3151 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -33%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3002 - 3644, n=4)	3359 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +235%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -35%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points -53%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +210%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3101 - 3741, n=4)	3448 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +494%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -24%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2702 - 3339, n=4)	3091 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points -63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2192 - 2469, n=4)	2379 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +216%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2008 - 2299, n=4)	2212 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3210 - 3331, n=4)	3246 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -6%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2214 - 2619, n=4)	2437 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +231%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2085 - 2465, n=4)	2291 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +430%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2827 - 3349, n=4)	3144 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points -100%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points +139%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1851 - 2302, n=4)	2119 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points +199%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1731 - 2180, n=4)	1997 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2445 - 2862, n=4)	2700 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (55 - 59, n=4)	57.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps -4%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (67 - 84, n=4)	78 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +264%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps -53%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (31 - 37, n=4)	34.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +122%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (34 - 42, n=4)	38.8 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +335%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (22 - 27, n=4)	24.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +174%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps -4%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (24 - 30, n=4)	27.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +334%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12 - 15, n=4)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +268%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps -6%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (14 - 17, n=4)	16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +341%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (13 - 16, n=4)	15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +230%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (15 - 18, n=4)	16.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +399%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps -2%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +158%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8.3 - 10, n=4)	9.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +302%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (5.4 - 6.8, n=4)	6.25 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +425%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (8.4^min - 36.6^max) fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13.03 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	15.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (7.68^min - 27.7^max) fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	11.59 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	13.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (8.05^min - 26.52^max) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14.51 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +121%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	16.9 fps 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	210836 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (202586 - 210836, n=2)	206711 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1656 Score -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score +148%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	2000 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +191%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2972 - 3539, n=4)	3242 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +89%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points -53%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6426 - 6760, n=4)	6569 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +50%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -36%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points -79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3435 - 4646, n=4)	4007 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3175 - 3875, n=4)	3616 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +375%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points +7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1099 - 1366, n=4)	1171 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +42%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	603 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	517 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	504 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	603 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +284%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +155%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	47.13 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (36.6 - 50.1, n=4)	43.5 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points -66%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +193%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	46.46 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (32.8 - 46.5, n=4)	39.9 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min -29%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min -32%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +73%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	86 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (60 - 86, n=4)	73 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	17501 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12771 - 17501, n=4)	15757 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points -41%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points -52%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points -72%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms * -300%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * -86%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms * -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3436, n=4)	2950 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	2564 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +27%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +39%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 9T	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Huawei P30 Lite	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Samsung Galaxy A50	Sony Xperia 10	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-29%	-25%	-24%	-40%	55%	-8%	318%
Sequential Read 256KB	492.7	492.5 0%	293.2 -40%	283.6 -42%	507 3%	273.8 -44%	666 35%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) 4%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 273%
Sequential Write 256KB	179.2	190.1 6%	158.6 -11%	208.7 16%	192.1 7%	232.9 30%	388.3 117%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) -2%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 695%
Random Read 4KB	128.6	115.8 -10%	71.6 -44%	76.6 -40%	98.9 -23%	53.1 -59%	149.4 16%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) -9%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 115%
Random Write 4KB	107.8	21.86 -80%	87.3 -19%	73.1 -32%	18.2 -83%	14.39 -87%	165.3 53%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -25%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 187%

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.6.3a: Ø28.8 (27-31)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.8 (23-61)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Shadow Fight 3; 1.18.5: Ø58.5 (1-61)

Max. Load

Idle


35.4 °C	34.8 °C	31.3 °C
34.9 °C	34.3 °C	31.4 °C
33.7 °C	33.6 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 33.4 °C


30 °C	32.1 °C	34.7 °C
29.6 °C	30.8 °C	34.4 °C
29.1 °C	31.4 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 31.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 9T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	0.54 / 0.95 / 1.08 Watt
Load	2.7 / 5.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	-91%	-82%	-67%	-57%	-37%	-33%	-78%
Idle Minimum *	0.54	0.53 2%	0.91 -69%	1.1 -104%	0.8 -48%	0.72 -33%	0.67 -24%	0.643 ?(0.54 - 0.8, n=4) -19%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -66%
Idle Average *	0.95	1.18 -24%	2.41 -154%	1.7 -79%	1.5 -58%	2.16 -127%	1.26 -33%	1.235 ?(0.95 - 1.49, n=4) -30%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -53%
Idle Maximum *	1.08	1.2 -11%	2.43 -125%	2.1 -94%	1.7 -57%	2.17 -101%	1.29 -19%	1.448 ?(1.08 - 1.8, n=4) -34%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -50%
Load Average *	2.7	3.04 -13%	4.57 -69%	5.1 -89%	5.9 -119%	3.32 -23%	3.71 -37%	4.28 ?(2.7 - 5, n=4) -59%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -139%
Load Maximum *	5.4	4.83 11%	7.57 -40%	7.9 -46%	8.3 -54%	5.34 1%	9.3 -72%	6.65 ?(5.4 - 7.11, n=4) -23%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -81%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		35h 38min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 18min

	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-33%	-39%	-28%	-19%	-39%	-28%
Reader / Idle	2138	1374 -36%	1248 -42%		1587 -26%	1006 -53%	1650 -23%
H.264	1208	853 -29%	685 -43%	809 -33%	869 -28%	620 -49%	1008 -17%
WiFi v1.3	991	510 -49%	515 -48%	715 -28%	701 -29%	541 -45%	546 -45%
Load	258	218 -16%	198 -23%	196 -24%	275 7%	233 -10%	194 -25%

Pros

+ 外观设计

+ 无槽屏幕

+ 3.5毫米耳机接口

+ 良好的Wi-Fi性能

+ 精确的GPS

+ 双SIM卡

+ Widevine DRM L1

+ 令人印象深刻的照片

+ 快速指纹传感器

+ 快速面部识别

+ 充满活力的AMOLED显示屏

+ 高速中端SoC

+ 电池寿命长

+ 快速充电电池

Cons

- 没有防水或防尘认证

- 没有microSD卡插槽

- Type-C端口采用较慢的2.0标准

- 高SAR值

- 低沉的低光投射

- PWM

- 没有无线充电

- 相对昂贵

The Xiaomi Mi 9T smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Austria and TradingShenzhen.

小米肯定会将新款智能手机迅速推向市场。 Mi 9T遵循Mi 9和Mi 9 SE，其命名方案可能使这三种设备难以区分。然而，Mi 9T不仅仅是一个重新设计的Mi 9。

小米Mi 9T具有出色的电池寿命，弹出式自拍摄像头，出色的显示效果和强劲的性能。总体而言，9T提供的性能超过了大多数中端智能手机，但没有比Mi 9便宜多少。

首先，Mi 9T采用了无刘海显示屏，采用了电动弹出式前置摄像头，以克服Mi 9和Mi 9 SE的缺口。 Mi 9T还拥有比其他型号大得多的电池，这使得该设备具有出色的续航，耳机插孔也是Mi 9和Mi 9 SE所缺乏的。

凭借其高通骁龙730 SoC，9T提供了比Mi 9 SE更多的性能，但它无法与Mi 9中的855相匹配。9T具有与Mi 9相同的尺寸显示，即0.46英寸大于Mi 9 SE中的那个。这三款设备都配备了6 GB的RAM。

Mi 9T的一个关键点是它的价格。 64 GB型号比Mi 9便宜69欧元（约77美元），Mi 9具有更好的相机和更强大的SoC。然后是Mi 9T Pro，也作为红米K20 Pro出售，它还配备了骁龙855.简而言之，Mi 9T同时也是一款出色的中端智能手机，而且对于小米来说是一个艰难的卖点，主要是因为其余的Mi 9系列。

Xiaomi Mi 9T - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 64%

Weight

89%

Battery