Notebookcheck Logo

AGM A8 智能手机简短评测

实惠型户外智能手机。 最近越来越多的智能手机都提供了防尘防水功能,可以适合户外徒步或工地使用的需要,户外型的智能手机可以面对泥土沙尘或岩石都无所畏惧。这台售价较低的机型AGM A8来自中国:在美国这款户外智能手机价位约150美元。
Android Smartphone
AGM A8
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 306, Core: 450 MHz
Memory
3 GB 
, 闪存
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最高支持 32 GB, 1 SmartCard, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器,地磁感应器, WiFi Direct, OTG
Networking
802.11a/b/g (a/b/g/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM:850/900/1800/1900 MHz, WCDMA: 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, LTE:800/1800/2100/2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 159 x 93
Battery
4050 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦,面部识别,笑容识别
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 固定焦距
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 谷歌键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB数据线,电源适配器,迷你螺丝刀, 户外应用, 12 Months Warranty, USB 2.0, 电磁辐射值: 0.579 W/kg (头部), fanless, ruggedized
Weight
247 g, Power Supply: 68 g
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The AGM A8 is a dual-sim smartphone
The AGM A8 is a dual-sim smartphone
All ports are hidden behind thick rubber flaps
It is IP68 dust and water resistant
The AGM A8 features a 5 inch display
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s +454%
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 MBit/s +179%
AGM A8
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18.4 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s +275%
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.9 MBit/s +71%
AGM A8
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.9 MBit/s
GPS AGM A8
GPS AGM A8
GPS AGM A8
GPS AGM A8
GPS AGM A8
GPS AGM A8
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
onscreen keyboard in portrait mode
onscreen keyboard in portrait mode
onscreen keyboard in portrait mode
onscreen keyboard in portrait mode
onscreen keyboard in landscape mode
onscreen keyboard in landscape mode
337
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 356 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 342.8 cd/m² Minimum: 8.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 1695:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.5
AGM A8
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Archos 50 Saphir
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Nomu S30
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7"
Screen
-158%
-74%
21%
-3%
Brightness middle
356
545
53%
423
19%
566
59%
646
81%
Brightness
343
527
54%
421
23%
564
64%
611
78%
Brightness Distribution
93
87
-6%
93
0%
94
1%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
0.58
-176%
0.26
-24%
0.23
-10%
Contrast
1695
940
-45%
1627
-4%
2809
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.7
12.5
-238%
7.8
-111%
2.7
27%
4.5
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.3
24.4
-194%
14.5
-75%
5.4
35%
8.3
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
15.4
-711%
9.8
-416%
3.1
-63%
6
-216%
Gamma
2.5 88%
1.87 118%
2.32 95%
2.15 102%
2.27 97%
CCT
6412 101%
12705 51%
9828 66%
6335 103%
7996 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
AGM A8
26753 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
38747 Points +45%
Nomu S30
50904 Points +90%
LG G6
151751 Points +467%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
22218 Points -17%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
AGM A8
4372 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
6839 Points +56%
Nomu S30
10763 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
3093 Points -29%
LG G6
29276 Points +570%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
4298 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
AGM A8
3808 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
6138 Points +61%
Nomu S30
10373 Points +172%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2591 Points -32%
LG G6
32128 Points +744%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3836 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
AGM A8
9082 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
11393 Points +25%
Nomu S30
12394 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
9613 Points +6%
LG G6
22335 Points +146%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
7429 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
AGM A8
54 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
266 Points +393%
Nomu S30
592 Points +996%
LG G6
3282 Points +5978%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
53 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
AGM A8
43 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
220 Points +412%
Nomu S30
522 Points +1114%
LG G6
4121 Points +9484%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
AGM A8
739 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
973 Points +32%
Nomu S30
1114 Points +51%
LG G6
1961 Points +165%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
558 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Archos 50 Saphir
175 Points
Nomu S30
416 Points
LG G6
2669 Points
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Archos 50 Saphir
142 Points
Nomu S30
351 Points
LG G6
2980 Points
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Archos 50 Saphir
985 Points
Nomu S30
1182 Points
LG G6
1955 Points
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
AGM A8
9.5 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
19 fps +100%
Nomu S30
17 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.1 fps +59%
LG G6
46 fps +384%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
9.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
AGM A8
2.8 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
11 fps +293%
Nomu S30
17 fps +507%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
5.4 fps +93%
LG G6
75 fps +2579%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
5.2 fps +86%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
AGM A8
4 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
8.6 fps +115%
Nomu S30
7.1 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2.3 fps -42%
LG G6
27 fps +575%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3.8 fps -5%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
AGM A8
1.8 fps
Archos 50 Saphir
4 fps +122%
Nomu S30
7.1 fps +294%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
0.8 fps -56%
LG G6
38 fps +2011%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1.8 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Archos 50 Saphir
6.1 fps
Nomu S30
4.7 fps
LG G6
16 fps
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Archos 50 Saphir
2.6 fps
Nomu S30
2.5 fps
LG G6
29 fps
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
AGM A8
2920 Points
Nomu S30
3175 Points +9%
LG G6
5703 Points +95%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
AGM A8
622 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
591 Points -5%
Nomu S30
964 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
443 Points -29%
LG G6
2496 Points +301%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points -15%
System (sort by value)
AGM A8
1161 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
1284 Points +11%
Nomu S30
2216 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
1103 Points -5%
LG G6
3646 Points +214%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
887 Points -24%
Memory (sort by value)
AGM A8
757 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
402 Points -47%
Nomu S30
942 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
366 Points -52%
LG G6
1930 Points +155%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points -31%
Graphics (sort by value)
AGM A8
306 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
383 Points +25%
Nomu S30
670 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
129 Points -58%
LG G6
5138 Points +1579%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
308 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
AGM A8
557 Points
Archos 50 Saphir
619 Points +11%
Nomu S30
618 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
744 Points +34%
LG G6
1073 Points +93%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
533 Points -4%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
AGM A8
1383 Points
LG G6
4369 Points +216%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
AGM A8
515 Points
LG G6
1831 Points +256%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
AGM A8
140.7 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
140.9 MB/s 0%
Nomu S30
242 MB/s +72%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
113.5 MB/s -19%
LG G6
428.7 MB/s +205%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
143 MB/s +2%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
AGM A8
69.5 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
12.21 MB/s -82%
Nomu S30
194.9 MB/s +180%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
25.6 MB/s -63%
LG G6
122.8 MB/s +77%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42.4 MB/s -39%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
AGM A8
11.44 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
14.48 MB/s +27%
Nomu S30
27.99 MB/s +145%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.8 MB/s +38%
LG G6
95.2 MB/s +732%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
19.7 MB/s +72%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
AGM A8
3.73 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
4.79 MB/s +28%
Nomu S30
8.84 MB/s +137%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
4 MB/s +7%
LG G6
16.58 MB/s +345%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
6.9 MB/s +85%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
AGM A8
22.01 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
28.55 MB/s +30%
Nomu S30
36.94 MB/s +68%
LG G6
77.6 MB/s +253%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
17.7 MB/s -20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
AGM A8
20.46 MB/s
Archos 50 Saphir
18.3 MB/s -11%
Nomu S30
21.52 MB/s +5%
LG G6
53.3 MB/s +161%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.4 MB/s -30%

Legend

 
AGM A8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Saphir Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nomu S30 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 Marvell Armada PXA1908, Vivante GC7000UL, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 29.4 °C29.8 °C31.4 °C 
 29.9 °C29.9 °C34.8 °C 
 29.8 °C29.4 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 30.5 °C
25.7 °C27.7 °C27.5 °C
27.2 °C28.1 °C27.8 °C
27.3 °C28.1 °C27.9 °C
Maximum: 28.1 °C
Average: 27.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.72525.440.13125.336.64032.927.55033.629.76331.633.28028.429.41002727.412520.825.1160222320021.32725020.839.231521.247.840019.454.350019.562.563017.772.280017.975.3100017.876.7125017.374.9160017.472.9200016.774.9250017.275.8315018.276.6400017.976500017.672.3630017.761.2800017.856.21000017.9571250018.163.71600018.252.7SPL3085.8N1.359.8median 17.9median 62.5Delta1.414.931.635.125.433.525.334.832.93433.629.431.629.628.424.92731.220.834.72239.821.348.320.855.321.259.519.462.219.567.117.77017.973.617.874.217.373.217.472.716.773.217.272.118.269.717.96917.666.317.766.917.86717.951.618.145.218.247.73082.41.354.8median 17.9median 66.91.411.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAGM A8Samsung Galaxy S8
AGM A8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.97 / 2.04 Watt
Load midlight 4.86 / 6.43 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
AGM A8
4050 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Power Consumption
0%
-6%
1%
39%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.65
24%
0.93
-8%
0.62
28%
0.6
30%
Idle Average *
1.97
1.9
4%
2.31
-17%
1.43
27%
1.2
39%
Idle Maximum *
2.04
2.05
-0%
2.35
-15%
1.48
27%
1.3
36%
Load Average *
4.86
6.14
-26%
4.57
6%
5.52
-14%
2.6
47%
Load Maximum *
6.43
6.54
-2%
6.1
5%
10.47
-63%
3.6
44%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 54min
AGM A8
4050 mAh
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
654
832
27%
973
49%
692
6%
503
-23%

Pros

+ 非常坚固的机身
+ 出色的电池续航
+ 纯净的安卓Vanilla

Cons

- 前置相机效果差
- 音响效果较差
- 相对迟缓的处理器
In Review: AGM A8. Review unit courtesy of AGM.
In Review: AGM A8. Review unit courtesy of AGM.

AGM A8的最大卖点在于售价:这款智能手机在网店的售价约150美元。尽管它售价低廉,却运行谷歌的最新安卓7.0操作系统,支持4G/LTE双SIM卡,和一块不错的明亮防划5寸高清屏幕,以及大容量电池。不像其他智能手机对所谓防水防尘功能的大肆宣传,AGM A8是一款能够真正带着在野外徒步或在建筑工地工作的坚固设备。

三防功能也让它不得不在其他方面作出取舍。如果用户想要更换MicroSD卡或SIM卡,需要打开它的整个后盖,这绝不算方便。同时相对较低的整体性能,较差的相机和一般般的音响效果也都是低成本所带来的遗憾。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

AGM A8 - 05/18/2017 v6 (old)
Thomas Meyer

Chassis
76%
Keyboard
64 / 75 → 85%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
35 / 60 → 58%
Weight
87%
Battery
94%
Display
85%
Games Performance
4 / 63 → 6%
Application Performance
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 64%
Camera
51%
Average
66%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > AGM A8 智能手机简短评测
Thomas Meyer, 2017-05-20 (Update: 2017-05-20)