Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 880M

AMD Radeon 880M

AMD Radeon 880M是一款功能适中的 RDNA 3+ 架构 iGPU,于 2024 年 6 月首次亮相。它配备 12 个计算单元(768 个统一着色器),运行频率高达 2,900 MHz;就像它的前身 Radeon 780M一样,它支持多达 4 台分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60 的显示器。只要使用 1080p 分辨率和尽可能低的预设画质,它的游戏性能足以应付大多数 2023 或 2024 年的游戏。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameStrix Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines768 - unified
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
CPU in Radeon 880MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 9 36510 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3608 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4.1 pt (12%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
3.59 -13%
3.65 -11%
3.74 -9%
3.74 -9%
3.77 -8%
3.85 -6%
3.96 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 -1%
4.09 0%
AMD Radeon 880M
4.11
4.11 0%
4.23 3%
4.28 4%
4.39 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.46 9%
4.51 10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
4.53 10%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
4.57 11%
4.61 12%
...
20.4 396%
max:
33.3 710%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2575     avg: 3461     median: 3604.5 (10%)     max: 3856 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2300     avg: 3110     median: 3232 (9%)     max: 3464 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2805 -10%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -9%
2864 -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -6%
2993 -4%
2995 -4%
2998 -4%
3075 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -1%
AMD Radeon 880M
3110
3123 0%
3139 1%
3155 1%
3224 4%
3259 5%
3269 5%
3306 6%
3324 7%
3364 8%
...
19434 525%
max:
36259 1066%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 29760     avg: 36151     median: 37724.5 (36%)     max: 39393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46354     avg: 53127     median: 54310.5 (13%)     max: 57533 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6861     avg: 8109     median: 8553.5 (14%)     max: 8919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7404     avg: 8774     median: 9295.5 (10%)     max: 9651 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
325996 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
7133 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12015     avg: 13932     median: 14674.5 (19%)     max: 14998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12321     avg: 14478     median: 15386.5 (13%)     max: 15744 Points
171.8 -99%
...
13515 -7%
13524 -7%
13581 -6%
13714 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 -2%
14147 -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 -1%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 0%
14428 0%
AMD Radeon 880M
14478
14692 1%
14725 2%
15135 5%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15223 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
15433 7%
15592 8%
15642 8%
15823 9%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
15837 9%
...
59943 314%
max:
104201 620%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 39128     avg: 44987     median: 44986.5 (59%)     max: 50845 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
30.8 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 22668     avg: 22959     median: 22959 (16%)     max: 23250 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 143.3     avg: 219.5     median: 241 (14%)     max: 257 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28.7     avg: 34.5     median: 36.4 (15%)     max: 38.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 67.1     avg: 74.6     median: 73.3 (13%)     max: 83.5 fps
3.3 -96%
...
62.7 -16%
62.7 -16%
62.8 -16%
63.8 -14%
64.7 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -13%
65.5 -12%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -3%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 0%
AMD Radeon 880M
74.6
78.8 6%
80.5 8%
84.6 13%
87.1 17%
87.5 17%
89.3 20%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 22%
93.2 25%
94.7 27%
...
536 618%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 159.4     avg: 177.2     median: 178.3 (13%)     max: 194 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 174.5     avg: 199.3     median: 199.3 (21%)     max: 224 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 237.4     avg: 267.7     median: 267.7 (6%)     max: 298 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 303.6     avg: 343.8     median: 343.8 (14%)     max: 384 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 522.8     avg: 634     median: 634.4 (5%)     max: 746 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 174.7     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 27595     avg: 33008     median: 33147.5 (10%)     max: 37458 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 36750     avg: 39729     median: 40478 (11%)     max: 42000 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 825     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (4%)     max: 1235 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 801     avg: 1072     median: 1072 (2%)     max: 1343 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6533     avg: 7730     median: 7730 (8%)     max: 8927 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32     avg: 60.5     median: 67 (10%)     max: 71 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
72 Watt (10%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.5 fps per Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 44.6     avg: 59.3     median: 61.8 (20%)     max: 79.8 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.4     avg: 60.4     median: 61.5 (8%)     max: 77.5 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3226     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (60%)     max: 0.504 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080 cinem.
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
57.2 63 81.2 95.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 54.7 69.9 82.7 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 50.8 50.8 59.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11.8 12.1 14.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
168.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
128.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
59.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
83.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
37.2 39 41.4 42.6 48 49.5 50.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.1 30.8 32.4 33 38.1 38.3 39.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.9 24.2 24.6 25.5 30.1 30.1 30.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4 20 20.9 21 25.8 26.1 26.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
81.8
79.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
22.7
23.4
17.9
24.8
22.4
25
low 1920x1080
31.1 32.7 41.1 41.9 44.1 45.9 49.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23 24.4 32.7 33 34.2 36.1 38.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.6 20.3 27.2 27.7 27.9 29.9 31.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.6 19.7 26.6 27 27.1 28.9 30.9 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.3
63.2
68.3
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
79.9 94.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.7 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.1 61.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 14.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
101.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
162.1
low 1920x1080
84.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
167.2
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
156.1 175.5 177.5 191.4 192.9 196 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.2 72.8 73.8 77.4 79.7 80.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.7 60.6 62.9 66 67 68.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.2 49.9 52.9 55.7 56.7 57.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
69 76 90 95 102 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36 43 54 58 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32 40 49 53 53 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30 37 46 50 50 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
59.1 64.1 70.4 75.7 79.9 82.5 86 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.2 51.2 55.5 56.4 63.1 65.9 67 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.3 39.8 41.6 44.2 48.8 49.5 50.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66.5 78.1 79.7 83.1 87 90.5 91.8 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.3 34.6 39.8 42 43.7 46 46.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1 27.8 28.7 29.4 31.4 32 32.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
131 147.1 156.7 160.8 164.8 167.9 168.3 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
103.3 109.3 125 132.6 133.6 137.4 137.5 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1 38.7 47.2 47.7 90.8 101.2 110.8 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 41.3 45.9 46.2 80.6 90.5 92.5 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
156 176 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 34.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
142.9 148.5 159.5 164.2 166.1 170.6 173.3 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132 132.3 148.3 160.9 165 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.9 62.7 73.8 76.9 80.5 81 81.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.5 27.5 30.6 31.2 32.5 32.7 33.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
116
117.9
141.6
150.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
121.4
116.8
148.8
144.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Star Wars Outlaws14.713.211.58.52
Once Human36.125.322.820.6
The First Descendant37.623.417.314.7
F1 2474655012
Senua's Saga Hellblade 214.612.39.2
Ghost of Tsushima29.323.720.216
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West18.816.612.512.4
Last Epoch53.841.334.724.9
Skull & Bones33292317
Helldivers 23224.622.721.1
Enshrouded18.41713.89.73
Palworld54.942.123.821.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown168.5128.6120.5
Ready or Not59.447.333.721.6
The Finals60.743.338.528
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora1916148.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202356483431
Alan Wake 215.313.812.2
Lords of the Fallen19.617.115.210.9
Total War Pharaoh83.354.630.823.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage41353425
Counter-Strike 2957045.632.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty4434272319.1
Baldur's Gate 341322625
Lies of P4337.530.128.3
The Crew Motorfest32302420
Armored Core 637.132.726.126
Atlas Fallen
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart24.82117.515.7
F1 2387875913
Resident Evil 4 Remake
Company of Heroes 361.246.236.536
Atomic Heart46.23420.515.2
Returnal27262319
Hogwarts Legacy32.42519.312.3
F1 22101.192.570.318.311.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands84.961.440.231.9
Strange Brigade18275635335.7
Far Cry 586504543
X-Plane 11.11745844
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark82413023.2
Dota 2 Reborn1571266761
The Witcher 31665333
GTA V161148733022.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
16
11
4
15
17
6
3
21
16
4
1
28
8
1
1
4
1




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 19. 20:04:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 05:35:02 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12526 +0.029s ... 0.062s

#9 got single benchmarks 12526 +0.025s ... 0.086s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.666s ... 0.752s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.752s

#13 Got 362 rows for game benchmarks. +0.067s ... 0.819s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.819s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.03s ... 0.849s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.862s ... 2.71s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.715s

#18 return log +0s ... 2.715s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 880M graphics card

微星 Summit A16 AI Plus 评测:功能强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 可折叠电脑

微星 Summit A16 AI Plus 评测:功能强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 可折叠电脑

在处理器性能方面,微星的这款机型是目前市场上速度最快的 16 英寸可折叠电脑之一。不过,由于缺乏独立显卡选项,它在与惠普 Spectre x360 16 等其他主要竞争对手的竞争中处于劣势。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 16.00" | 2.1 kg
联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代笔记本电脑评测:AMD 版 Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 回归

联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代笔记本电脑评测:AMD 版 Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 回归

在阔别联想高端办公产品 ThinkPad T14s 系列一年之后,AMD 携 Strix Point 回归。搭载 Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 的全新联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代 AMD 在性能和效率之间实现了极大的平衡,在这两方面均优于 ThinkPad T14s 5 代 Intel。...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | AMD Radeon 880M | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 120Hz OLED 的强大多媒体笔记本电脑

联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 120Hz OLED 的强大多媒体笔记本电脑

联想为其 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 配备了全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器和高分辨率 120Hz OLED 屏幕。它的性能非常出色,画质也是如此,不过笔记本的风扇声音可能会很大。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 14.50" | 1.5 kg
华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED 笔记本电脑评测:Ryzen AI 9 365 和 Radeon 880M 的首秀

华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED 笔记本电脑评测:Ryzen AI 9 365 和 Radeon 880M 的首秀

ZenBook S 16 OLED 是市场上首批配备 AMD 全新 AI 9 处理器的设备之一。在测试了基于 HX 370(Radeon 890M)的机型之后,现在轮到 365 机型(Radeon 880M)了。与竞争对手和上一代产品相比,这款 16 英寸机型的表现如何?...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 16.00" | 1.5 kg

MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-61T: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-61T

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9

Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
Radeon RX 8060S *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Radeon RX 8040S *
Arc 140T *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Arc 130T *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter