Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 880M

AMD Radeon 880M

AMD Radeon 880M是一款功能适中的 RDNA 3+ 架构 iGPU,于 2024 年 6 月首次亮相。它配备 12 个计算单元(768 个统一着色器),运行频率高达 2,900 MHz;就像它的前身 Radeon 780M一样,它支持多达 4 台分辨率高达 SUHD 4320p60 的显示器。只要使用 1080p 分辨率和尽可能低的预设画质,它的游戏性能足以应付大多数 2023 或 2024 年的游戏。

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameStrix Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines768 - unified
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
CPU in Radeon 880MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 9 36510 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3608 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
3.3 -12%
3.36 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -9%
3.44 -8%
3.5 -6%
3.53 -6%
3.59 -4%
3.65 -2%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.74
3.74 0%
3.78 1%
3.85 3%
3.96 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 9%
4.09 9%
4.11 10%
4.23 13%
4.28 14%
...
20.4 445%
max:
33.3 790%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3272     avg: 3541     median: 3541 (10%)     max: 3810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2970     avg: 3197     median: 3196.5 (8%)     max: 3423 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -9%
2993 -6%
2995 -6%
2998 -6%
3075 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -3%
3123 -2%
3139 -2%
3155 -1%
AMD Radeon 880M
3197
3231 1%
3242 1%
3269 2%
3324 4%
3364 5%
3430 7%
3492 9%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 10%
3526 10%
...
19434 508%
max:
36259 1034%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 29760     avg: 34145     median: 34145 (32%)     max: 38530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46354     avg: 51662     median: 51661.5 (13%)     max: 56969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6861     avg: 7789     median: 7788.5 (13%)     max: 8716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7538     avg: 8463     median: 8463 (10%)     max: 9388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
325996 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
7133 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12375     avg: 13616     median: 13615.5 (18%)     max: 14856 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12439     avg: 14014     median: 14014 (12%)     max: 15589 Points
171.8 -99%
...
12479 -11%
12583 -10%
12797 -9%
12801 -9%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 -6%
13515 -4%
13524 -3%
13581 -3%
13714 -2%
AMD Radeon 880M
14014
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 1%
14147 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 2%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 3%
14428 3%
14692 5%
14725 5%
15135 8%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
15223 9%
...
59943 328%
max:
104201 644%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 39128     avg: 44987     median: 44986.5 (59%)     max: 50845 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
30.8 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 22668     avg: 22959     median: 22959 (16%)     max: 23250 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 179.4     avg: 217.2     median: 217.2 (13%)     max: 255 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 36.4     avg: 37.4     median: 37.4 (15%)     max: 38.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 73.3     avg: 78.4     median: 78.4 (14%)     max: 83.5 fps
3.3 -96%
...
62.7 -20%
62.7 -20%
62.8 -20%
63.8 -19%
64.7 -17%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -17%
65.5 -16%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -8%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -5%
AMD Radeon 880M
78.4
78.8 1%
80.5 3%
84.6 8%
87.1 11%
87.5 12%
89.3 14%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 16%
93.2 19%
94.7 21%
...
536 584%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 178.3     avg: 186.2     median: 186.2 (14%)     max: 194 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
224 fps (25%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
298 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
384 fps (22%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
746 fps (6%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 209.8     median: 209.8 (1%)     max: 315 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 27595     avg: 30726     median: 30725.5 (9%)     max: 33856 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 825     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (4%)     max: 1235 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 801     avg: 1072     median: 1072 (2%)     max: 1343 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6533     avg: 7730     median: 7730 (8%)     max: 8927 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32     avg: 51.5     median: 51.5 (7%)     max: 71 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
72 Watt (10%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.5 fps per Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 44.6     avg: 53.8     median: 53.8 (17%)     max: 63 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080 cinem.
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
63 81.2 95.2 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 69.9 82.7 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 50.8 59.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 11.8 14.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
168.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
128.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
59.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
83.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
37.2 41.4 42.6 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.1 32.4 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.9 24.2 25.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 20.9 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
22.7
23.4
low 1920x1080
31.1 41.1 41.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.4 32.7 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.6 27.2 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.6 26.6 27.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
79.9 94.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.7 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.1 61.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 14.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
156.1 177.5 191.4 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.2 73.8 77.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.7 62.9 66 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.2 52.9 55.7 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
76 90 95 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 54 58 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 49 53 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37 46 50 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
64.1 70.4 82.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.2 55.5 65.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8 41.6 49.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66.5 83.1 90.5 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.6 42 46.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1 29.4 32 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
147.1 164.8 168.3 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
109.3 125 137.4 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1 90.8 101.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 80.6 90.5 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
156 176 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 34.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
148.5 159.5 173.3 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132.3 148.3 165 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.7 73.8 81.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.5 30.6 32.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
116
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
121.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Star Wars Outlaws14.713.211.58.52
Once Human36.125.322.820.6
The First Descendant37.623.417.314.7
F1 2480695011
Senua's Saga Hellblade 214.612.39.2
Ghost of Tsushima29.323.720.216
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West18.816.612.512.4
Last Epoch53.841.334.724.9
Skull & Bones33292317
Helldivers 23224.622.721.1
Enshrouded18.41713.89.73
Palworld54.942.123.821.3
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown168.5128.6120.5
Ready or Not59.447.333.721.6
The Finals60.743.338.528
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora1916148.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202356483431
Alan Wake 215.313.812.2
Lords of the Fallen19.617.115.210.9
Total War Pharaoh83.354.630.823.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage41353425
Counter-Strike 2957045.632.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty40322521
Baldur's Gate 338302524
Lies of P4337.530.128.3
The Crew Motorfest32302420
Armored Core 637.132.726.126
Atlas Fallen
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart24.82117.515.7
F1 2387875913
Resident Evil 4 Remake
Company of Heroes 361.246.236.536
Atomic Heart46.23420.515.2
Returnal27262319
Hogwarts Legacy32.42519.312.3
Strange Brigade175726151
Far Cry 587524744
X-Plane 11.11725844
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark804129
Dota 2 Reborn1601247467
The Witcher 31665333
GTA V1601497330
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
16
9
4
15
17
4
3
22
14
3
1
27
7
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 13:20:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12526 +0.029s ... 0.058s

#9 got single benchmarks 12526 +0.014s ... 0.072s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.67s ... 0.742s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.742s

#13 Got 239 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.772s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.772s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 0.805s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.615s ... 2.42s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 2.424s

#18 return log +0s ... 2.424s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter