Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365是一款功能相对强大的 Strix Point 系列处理器，于 2024 年 6 月首次亮相。该 APU 配备 10 个 CPU 内核，运行频率为 2.0 GHz 至 5.0 GHz，12 个 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 880M图形适配器和 50 TOPS XDNA 2 神经引擎。其他值得注意的功能包括 PCIe 4、USB 4 和 LPDDR5x-7500 内存支持。

在 10 个 CPU 内核中，4 个是完整的 Zen 5 内核，6 个是较小的 Zen 5c 内核。后者的运行时钟速度可能略低于前者。速度更快的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370拥有更多的 CPU 内核和 16 CU 集成图形适配器。

架构和功能

Strix Point 系列 APU 采用 Zen 5 和 Zen 5c 微架构内核，后者是前者的一个稍慢、更小、更节能的版本。Zen 5 和 Zen 5c 的区别之一是缓存大小；Zen 5 内核拥有更大的缓存。据 AMD 称，由于分支预测的改进和其他改进，Zen 5 的 IPC 比 Zen 4 提高了 16%。

在其他方面，Ryzen AI 9 芯片支持 LPDDR5x-7500 和 DDR5-5600 内存，并原生兼容 USB 4（因此也兼容 Thunderbolt）。它支持 PCIe 4.0，每个通道的吞吐量为 1.9 GB/s，就像其 8000 系列的前代产品一样。集成的 XDNA 2 NPU 可提供多达 50 个 INT8 TOPS，用于加速各种人工智能工作负载。

性能

考虑到 IPC 的提升，我们预计 4 个 Zen 5 内核与 6 个 Zen 5c 内核的性能至少可以媲美 12 个 Zen 3 内核，这意味着 365 的性能应该可以超越 Ryzen 9 5900X.一旦我们拿到搭载 Ryzen AI 9 365 的笔记本电脑，我们将确保更新本节内容。

图形性能

显卡 Radeon 880M的直接继承者 780M.它拥有 12 个 RDNA 3+ 架构 CU（768 个统一着色器），运行频率高达 2,900 MHz。我们预计这款图形适配器的游戏性能足以在 1080p （低或极低细节设置）下玩大多数 2023 和 2024 游戏。

当然，880M 能够驱动四台 SUHD 4320p60 显示器。它还能高效地编码和解码最流行的视频编解码器，包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是，它不支持最新加入的 VVC 编解码器。

功耗

365 的基本 TDP 为 28 W，笔记本电脑制造商可将其调高至 54 W。

CPU 内核采用 4 纳米台积电工艺制造，从 2024 年中期开始，能效还算不错。

CodenameStrix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3602 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate2000 - 5000 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)54 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
GPUAMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date06/02/2024
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
41.9 pt (70%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
40.4 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
40.6 -3%
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.9 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
41 -2%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
41.1 -2%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 3%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
43.2 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.2 5%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 6%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 7%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.2 8%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 13%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 43%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 112.4     avg: 113.9     median: 113.5 (64%)     max: 115.8 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 590     avg: 846     median: 888 (17%)     max: 1029 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11462     avg: 16878     median: 18069 (17%)     max: 18748 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1942     avg: 1981     median: 1992 (85%)     max: 1998 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 758     avg: 779     median: 782 (87%)     max: 787 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5247     avg: 6847     median: 7284 (18%)     max: 7346 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1950     avg: 2652     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 2855 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 293     avg: 301.8     median: 303 (85%)     max: 306 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
302.8 s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.7 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47754     avg: 62627     median: 65071 (37%)     max: 70309 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5790     avg: 5967     median: 6012 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
96.8 fps (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
258.7 fps (60%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.7     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 269     avg: 320.4     median: 300 (4%)     max: 429 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 203.4     median: 194 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4142     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (31%)     max: 15034 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
415.6 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17153     avg: 18389     median: 18677 (47%)     max: 18873 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61739 Points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19564     avg: 26677     median: 28848 (51%)     max: 29541 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7753     avg: 10038     median: 10635 (45%)     max: 10783 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2778     avg: 2804     median: 2814 (72%)     max: 2830 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 12627     avg: 13942     median: 14189 (55%)     max: 14513 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2072     median: 2066 (81%)     max: 2095 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9599     avg: 12311     median: 13009 (23%)     max: 13172 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8159 points (81%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43651 points (44%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 430     avg: 442.7     median: 440.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 106359     avg: 108558     median: 108558 (90%)     max: 110756 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 255     avg: 271.2     median: 260 (71%)     max: 330 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 309     avg: 320.5     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 336 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1658     avg: 1719     median: 1737.5 (65%)     max: 1743 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.9     avg: 68.6     median: 74.9 (13%)     max: 80 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.1     avg: 78.5     median: 79.3 (14%)     max: 83.2 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.47     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (4%)     max: 8.39 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.86     avg: 8     median: 7.3 (8%)     max: 10.4 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 34.2     avg: 36.2     median: 35.6 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 19. 20:04:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 05:33:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.016s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.018s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.022s ... 0.056s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.07s ... 1.126s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.126s

#12 return log +0s ... 1.126s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 processor

微星 Summit A16 AI Plus 评测：功能强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 可折叠电脑

微星 Summit A16 AI Plus 评测：功能强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 可折叠电脑

在处理器性能方面，微星的这款机型是目前市场上速度最快的 16 英寸可折叠电脑之一。不过，由于缺乏独立显卡选项，它在与惠普 Spectre x360 16 等其他主要竞争对手的竞争中处于劣势。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 16.00" | 2.1 kg
联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 120Hz OLED 的强大多媒体笔记本电脑

联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 120Hz OLED 的强大多媒体笔记本电脑

联想为其 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 配备了全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器和高分辨率 120Hz OLED 屏幕。它的性能非常出色，画质也是如此，不过笔记本的风扇声音可能会很大。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 14.50" | 1.5 kg
华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 365 和 Radeon 880M 的首秀

华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 365 和 Radeon 880M 的首秀

ZenBook S 16 OLED 是市场上首批配备 AMD 全新 AI 9 处理器的设备之一。在测试了基于 HX 370（Radeon 890M）的机型之后，现在轮到 365 机型（Radeon 880M）了。与竞争对手和上一代产品相比，这款 16 英寸机型的表现如何？...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Radeon 880M | 16.00" | 1.5 kg

MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-61T: AMD Radeon 880M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-61T

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVFG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVFG

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WU

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9: AMD Radeon 880M, 14.50", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9

Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16 M5606W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W: AMD Radeon 880M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
   6x 3.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   16x 4.4 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12850HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) Ryzen AI 9 365 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-06-21)