AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170是一款功能强大的 Strix Point 系列芯片，预计将于 2024 年 6 月亮相。该 APU 配备 12 个 CPU 内核（24 个线程），运行频率高达 5.1 GHz，一个 16 CU RDNA 3+ 图形适配器和一个 45 TOPS XDNA 2 神经处理单元。
架构和功能
Strix Point 系列 APU 将采用 Zen 5 和 Zen 5c 内核，后者是前者的一个稍慢、更小、更节能的版本。从 Zen 2 到 Zen 3，IPC 提升了近 20%，而 Zen 4 也有类似的逐代提升，因此可以肯定的是，Zen 5 将带来至少 15%的 IPC 提升。
HX 170 预计将配备超快的 LPDDR5X-8533 内存控制器、令人印象深刻的 36 MB 三级缓存和 PCIe 4.0 支持，每通道吞吐量可达 1.9 GB/s。它还将拥有一个非常强大的人工智能引擎，并且很可能与 USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4 原生兼容，就像其 8000 系列的前身一样。
性能
12 个尖端架构的 CPU 内核应能媲美高功耗台式机芯片，如 酷睿 i7-13700在多线程和单线程工作负载中均可媲美。一旦我们拿到搭载 HX 170 的笔记本电脑，我们将确保更新本节内容。
图形处理
Ryzen AI 9 芯片预计将配备由 RDNA 3+ 架构支持的 16 CU 集成图形适配器。显卡 Radeon 780M是 AMD 目前提供的最强大的 iGPU，具有 12 个 RDNA 3 架构 CU（768 个统一着色器）作为参考 - 这对于在 1080p / Low 下玩 2023 和 2024 游戏绰绰有余。
当然，新的图形适配器至少可以驱动三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器，而且还能对 AVC、HEVC、AV1 等流行视频编解码器进行硬件编码和硬件解码。
功耗
据传，HX 170 的基本 TDP 为 55 W 或 65 W。这样的芯片需要一个相当大、相当重的机箱，并配备强大的冷却解决方案，才能避免发热问题。
预计该芯片将采用 3 纳米台积电工艺制造，以实现较高的能效（截至 2024 年上半年）。
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c) |
| Clock Rate | 2000 - 5100 MHz |
| Level 2 Cache | 12 MB |
| Level 3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Number of Cores / Threads | 12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c |
| Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power) | 28 Watt |
| TDP Turbo PL2 | 54 Watt |
| Manufacturing Technology | 4 nm |
| Max. Temperature | 100 °C |
| Socket | FP8 |
| Features | DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| GPU | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
| 64 Bit | 64 Bit support |
| Architecture | x86 |
| Announcement Date | 06/02/2024 |
| Product Link (external) | www.amd.com |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.1 pt (72%)
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6 avg: 115.3 median: 115.5 (65%) max: 116 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 98% | 100% | 100% | 99% |
...
Apple M2
...
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621 avg: 1000 median: 1099 (20%) max: 1213 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 79% | 78% | 93% | 97% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435 avg: 19869 median: 21625 (20%) max: 23786 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 77% | 70% | 91% | 97% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1953 avg: 2009 median: 2018 (86%) max: 2049 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 95% | 98% | 98% | 98% |
...
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 772 avg: 789 median: 790 (88%) max: 804 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 97% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6469 avg: 8515 median: 8843 (22%) max: 9246 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 70% | 92% | 97% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13 avg: 3275 median: 3371 (21%) max: 3498 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 72% | 95% | 99% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø2407 (2382.65-2498.13)
Beelink SER9: Ø3253 (3218.02-3282.46)
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: Ø2944 (2602.98-3345.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø3338 (3327.79-3370.98)
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø3426 (3408.61-3447.98)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø3138 (2901.49-3483.11)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø3476 (3466.5-3497.73)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 298 avg: 305.7 median: 306 (86%) max: 315 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 96% | 100% | 98% | 98% |
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 67615 avg: 79123 median: 81175 (47%) max: 83572 MIPS
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 81% | 94% | 100% | 99% |
...
...
max:
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6063 avg: 6137 median: 6127 (72%) max: 6208 MIPS
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 98% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
...
max:
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3 avg: 24.5 median: 26 (46%) max: 26.9 fps
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 76% | 89% | 100% | 95% |
...
...
max:
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø20 (0.55-23.7)
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: Ø21.1 (0.46-23.2)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø24 (0.97-27.3)
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø24.3 (0.53-25.9)
Beelink SER9: Ø25.4 (0.84-29.7)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø24.8 (0.45-26.4)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø25.5 (0.54-27.3)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 214 avg: 240.2 median: 225 (3%) max: 306 Seconds
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 101% | 101% | 101% |
...
...
Intel Celeron J4125
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 140 avg: 154.3 median: 148 (1%) max: 192 Seconds
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
...
AMD E1-2100
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4041 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4257 sec
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
...
AMD E1-2100
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16380 Points (35%)
...
...
max:
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75346 Points (58%)
...
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17749 avg: 20033 median: 20777.5 (52%) max: 21393 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 91% | 84% | 92% | 100% | 99% |
...
...
max:
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61220 Points (50%)
...
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Intel Core i7-1265U
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18549 avg: 19406 median: 19409.5 (49%) max: 20255 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 54 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 95% | 94% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918 avg: 29536 median: 29812.5 (53%) max: 31549 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 94% | 79% | 93% | 96% | 100% |
...
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866 avg: 10447 median: 10657 (45%) max: 11495 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 96% | 80% | 91% | 100% | 98% |
...
...
max:
Intel Core i9-14900
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2785 avg: 2854 median: 2860 (73%) max: 2884 points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 99% | 97% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
...
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 13648 avg: 14838 median: 15140 (60%) max: 15367 points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 89% | 98% | 100% | 95% |
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
...
max:
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957 avg: 2053 median: 2066 (81%) max: 2108 points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 98% | 99% | 99% |
...
...
max:
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12487 avg: 14252 median: 14516 (26%) max: 15012 points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 85% | 99% | 100% | 99% |
...
...
max:
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 433 avg: 441.6 median: 439 (1%) max: 460 ms
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
...
Apple M2
...
AMD A4-1250
max:
Apple S7
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079 avg: 95447 median: 105054 (88%) max: 107598 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 98% | 100% | 60% |
...
...
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 231 avg: 251.1 median: 252 (71%) max: 266 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 92% | 95% | 93% |
...
...
max:
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 282 avg: 295 median: 288 (53%) max: 321 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 89% | 88% | 91% |
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
...
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1692 avg: 1758 median: 1767 (68%) max: 1819 Points
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 97% | 94% | 100% | 97% |
...
...
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6 avg: 90.8 median: 100.3 (17%) max: 128.6 Watt
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 117% | 112% | 104% | 100% |
...
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
...
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø45.6 (43.8-50.9)
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: Ø53.5 (53.1-54.5)
Beelink SER9: Ø80.8 (79.9-81.3)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø100.3 (96.6-110.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø108.9 (102.5-111.6)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø117.6 (115.3-121.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø128.6 (122.8-130.1)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47.4 avg: 98.6 median: 111.1 (20%) max: 125.3 Watt
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 118% | 111% | 103% | 100% |
...
Intel Core i5-11500B
...
max:
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø47.4 (44-50.3)
Beelink SER9: Ø75.5 (75.3-75.7)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø111 (95.7-121)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø111.2 (110.5-111.7)
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø121.3 (121-122)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø125.3 (114.5-131)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.14 avg: 8.3 median: 6.4 (4%) max: 16 Watt
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 104% | 105% | 100% | 103% |
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
...
max:
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: Ø5.14 (3.28-13.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø5.47 (3.86-8.36)
Beelink SER9: Ø6.02 (5.77-7.59)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø6.42 (5.8-7.3)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø8.57 (7.83-11)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø10.2 (7.74-13.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø16 (15.2-20.7)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31 avg: 8.8 median: 8.8 (10%) max: 10.9 Watt
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 54 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 102% | 102% | 100% | 101% |
...
Intel Core i5-1240U
...
max:
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: Ø6.31 (3.93-23)
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: Ø7.66 (5.94-13.7)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: Ø8.36 (7.65-9.94)
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: Ø9.21 (6.19-11.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: Ø10 (7.83-13.5)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: Ø10.9 (7.36-16.9)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 27.9 avg: 34.6 median: 30.3 (23%) max: 54.9 Points per Watt
| CPU TDP 28 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 80 W |
|---|
| 100% | 56% | 51% |
...
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
v1.28
log 16. 23:34:51
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:31:01 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.018s ... 0.028s
#7 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.031s ... 0.059s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.668s ... 0.727s
#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.727s
#11 return log +0s ... 0.727s
Reviews for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor
Beelink SER9 评测：AMD Zen 5 让这款迷你电脑比以往更快
Beelink 在大多数竞争对手之前就采用了 AMD 最新的 Ryzen 9 CPU，从而提升了迷你 PC 领域的竞争力。不过，价格也相应上涨，使其成为该制造商推出的价格较高的产品之一。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 814 g华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现
在 Zenbook S16 内的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 仅在有限的范围内发挥了性能潜力之后，我们大胆地再次尝试，看看 VivoBook S 14。这样一来，也就引出了 Radeon 890M iGPU 能否接近英特尔 Arc 8 的问题。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 14.00" | 1.3 kg华硕 TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV 评测：Zen 5 Ryzen 9 继续给人留下深刻印象
华硕 TUF 系列又添新成员，它是搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 处理器的最小机型。只要你能忍受高温和风扇噪音，它就是目前最快的 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.5 kg华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 的超薄游戏笔记本电脑
华硕现在也推出了搭载 AMD 最新 Zen 5 处理器的 ROG Zephyrus G16 游戏/多媒体混合机型。我们测试了配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和专用GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的版本。它继续采用同样出色的 240-Hz OLED 屏幕，以及恼人的第三个风扇。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg华硕 ProArt P16 笔记本电脑评测 - AMD Zen 5 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 4K OLED 的完美结合
华硕发布的 ProArt P16 是一款功能强大的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，它结合了全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器、专用GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 64 GB 内存，不过，其高分辨率 4K OLED 触摸屏的频率仅为 60 Hz。...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kgAsus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Radeon 890M
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU 分析 - Radeon 890M 与英特尔 Arc Graphics、Apple M3 和高通 Adreno X1-85 的比较
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU 分析 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra、Apple M3 和高通骁龙 X Elite 的比较
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
Review » 华硕 ProArt PX13 评测--搭载 AMD Zen 5 和 RTX 4070 的全球最快 13.3 英寸二合一笔记本电脑
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
Review » 华硕 Zenbook S 16 笔记本电脑评测--首款在 1.3 厘米厚的外壳内搭载 AMD Zen 5 的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306, RTX 4060
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Radeon 890M, 14.00", 1.3 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Asus ProArt P16 H7606: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
External Review » Asus ProArt P16 H7606
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Radeon 890M
» Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 13.30", 1.4 kg
» Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W
»
Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Radeon 890M, 16.00", 1.5 kg
» Strix Point APU 掌上电脑性能模拟：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在游戏中大放异彩，即使测试功耗仅为 17 W
Please share our article, every link counts!
Other CPUs of the series Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Surrounding CPUs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-06-21)
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
