Notebookcheck Logo

技嘉Aero 15-XB笔记本电脑评测：引领OLED科技

钻石般明亮。

在我们最近给编辑部门使用了Aero 17 HDR之后，该是新版本的Aero 15 OLED展示其功能的时候了。它装有八核处理器，Super Max-Q显卡和出色的UHD显示屏。
Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Aero 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 930 MHz, RAM: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.53, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200，双通道
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, UHD/4K, X-Rite Pantone, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB 
, Slots: 2x M.2 type 2280
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 组合音频端口, Card Reader: SD卡读卡器（UHS-II）, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 250
Battery
94.2 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD网络摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2 W立体声扬声器, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W充电器, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.175 kg, Power Supply: 690 g
Price
2600 EUR
Links
Gigabyte homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.8 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
82.8 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
84 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2019
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.4 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2019
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size comparison

❌
362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1310 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s +16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1170 MBit/s
ColorChecker
20.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP: 10.3 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 21.2 ∆E
394
cd/m²		378
cd/m²		377
cd/m²
407
cd/m²		385
cd/m²		384
cd/m²
406
cd/m²		393
cd/m²		390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDCA029 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 390.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-19%
-25%
-25%
-26%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
69.5
-30%
64.6
-35%
66.2
-34%
64
-36%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.6
0%
92.6
-7%
92.3
-8%
90.3
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.2
70.8
-28%
66
-33%
67.2
-32%
65.4
-33%
Response Times
-485%
-10%
-329%
-546%
-452%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
14 ?(6.8, 7.2)
-536%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
-9%
5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6)
-136%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-591%
9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8)
-336%
Response Time Black / White *
1.8 ?(1, 0.8)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-433%
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
-22%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-522%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-500%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-567%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(80)
60 ?(80)
0%
Screen
-34%
-31%
-34%
-67%
-31%
Brightness middle
385
316
-18%
373
-3%
288
-25%
324.8
-16%
313
-19%
Brightness
390
311
-20%
375
-4%
265
-32%
316
-19%
295
-24%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
93
0%
84
-10%
84
-10%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
0.22
0.26
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.46
3.03
-23%
3.98
-62%
3.22
-31%
4.96
-102%
3.33
-35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.01
7.32
-83%
6.28
-57%
6.26
-56%
8.95
-123%
6.25
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.6
1.1
58%
1.5
42%
3.23
-24%
1.77
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.39
3.9
-181%
2.81
-102%
3.43
-147%
5
-260%
3.1
-123%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.42 91%
2.62 84%
2.41 91%
2.21 100%
2.51 88%
CCT
6395 102%
7439 87%
6434 101%
7290 89%
7742 84%
6930 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
98
65
-34%
78
-20%
60
-39%
59.8
-39%
59
-40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
97
-3%
93
-7%
91.8
-8%
90
-10%
Contrast
1505
1309
1249
1043
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-179% / -95%
-21% / -26%
-129% / -74%
-213% / -126%
-170% / -90%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
511 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points -15%
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
3801 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points -37%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points -40%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
213 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1818 (1544.4min - 1818.6max) Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1253 Points -31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points -35%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points -42%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
285 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
5457 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS -4%
7z b 4
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
47170 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS -7%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1347 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
8087 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points -6%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
13 fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps -6%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s * -0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.4 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.547 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1818 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
146 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
213 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3801 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6580 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
5439 Points -17%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
1877 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
62%
34%
62%
70%
28%
Write 4K
127.4
131.3
3%
126.7
-1%
108.8
-15%
137.4
8%
108.7
-15%
Read 4K
147.5
45.84
-69%
66.1
-55%
40.31
-73%
41.37
-72%
41.4
-72%
Write Seq
485.9
2370
388%
1538
217%
2488
412%
2500
415%
1083
123%
Read Seq
1352
1509
12%
2269
68%
1916
42%
1576
17%
917
-32%
Write 4K Q32T1
476.5
481.5
1%
456.7
-4%
382.4
-20%
446.7
-6%
468.5
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
531
560
5%
554
4%
421.8
-21%
522
-2%
530
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
1061
2392
125%
1541
45%
2542
140%
2796
164%
3057
188%
Read Seq Q32T1
2552
3232
27%
2567
1%
3320
30%
3415
34%
3422
34%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2552 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1061 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 531 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 476.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1352 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 485.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 147.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
24383 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47119 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18947 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8066 points
Help
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4693 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4280 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points -21%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
21121 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
18992 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18117 Points -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points -18%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7829 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7084 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6526 Points -17%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28900 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
25135 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
23133 Points -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points -24%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points -36%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
152 (119min) fps
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
136.6 fps -10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
131 (109min) fps -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
116 (97min) fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
113 (95min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
79.1 (64min) fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
70.5 (55min) fps -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
69 fps -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.4 (54min) fps -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
63.5 fps -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (49min) fps -24%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182 176 161 91.3 73.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 152 79.1 52.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 157.8 148.3 140.9 132.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 122 106 89.3 67.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 110 100 68 35
Battlefield V (2018) 139 130 100 58.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 110 98 80 45
Metro Exodus (2019) 75.4 60.4 46.7 29.1
The Division 2 (2019) 105 77 54 29
Anno 1800 (2019) 84.2 46.8 37 21.5
Control (2019) 60.2 40.6 23.8
Borderlands 3 (2019) 84.4 64.8 45.6 24.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 92 69 50 29
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 65.7 42.4 34.3 22
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.13633.632.632.541.82541.541.338.442.837.446.83134.537.630.83231.936.14039.735.232.6353242.85033.829.134.929.727.3366341.227.42928.627.131.48028.627.926.926.227.538.810026.925.927.22623.628.712531.425.72826.224.630.716030.136.62930.72634.420031.925.528.224.822.934.825032.624.928.423.521.335.831533.926.329.824.519.939.540035.726.430.224.819.240.150036.226.530.825.11941.963036.425.630.92418.141.780037.725.431.12418.142.5100036.925.230.623.117.543125036.524.329.722.51943.1160037.324.830.622.71944.5200037.124.230.522.417.544.6250036.124.629.924.917.742.631503624.331.121.417.742.2400036.519.829.718.717.841.3500034.519.724.118.818.142.5630030.518.622.21817.740.2800025.818.119.617.917.734.21000022.918.318.917.917.7311250020.71818.217.917.628.11600021.71818.317.917.623.5SPL47.635.941.334.330.454.1N6.22.53.82.11.49.7median 34.5median 24.8median 29.7median 23.1median 18.1median 40.2Delta4.53.23.63.11.35.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP

Noise Level

Idle
34 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
Load
48 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise
1%
-1%
5%
9%
3%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
34
32
6%
34
-0%
30
12%
30.5
10%
31
9%
Idle Average *
36
34
6%
35
3%
33
8%
31.5
12%
34
6%
Idle Maximum *
41
39
5%
45
-10%
39
5%
31.5
23%
37
10%
Load Average *
48
53
-10%
43
10%
45
6%
40.6
15%
47
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
52
-8%
49
-2%
49.5
-3%
50
-4%
Load Maximum *
54
53
2%
54
-0%
51
6%
53.4
1%
54
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 45 °C49 °C45 °C 
 38 °C45 °C43 °C 
 35 °C36 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
59 °C61 °C45 °C
57 °C58 °C40 °C
39 °C38 °C37 °C
Maximum: 61 °C
Average: 48.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat
-1%
-7%
-0%
-25%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
53
-8%
49
-0%
49
-0%
48.8
-0%
60
-22%
Maximum Bottom *
61
55
10%
59
3%
59
3%
55
10%
66
-8%
Idle Upper Side *
27
28
-4%
33
-22%
28
-4%
41
-52%
30
-11%
Idle Bottom *
29
29
-0%
32
-10%
29
-0%
45.6
-57%
32
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.533.92537.437.43131.937.5403232.85027.332.56327.134.28027.531.510023.630.412524.632.9160264120022.946.725021.35531519.958.340019.265.85001965.963018.169.880018.176.5100017.57812501976.916001973.2200017.570.2250017.770.1315017.771.4400017.866.4500018.170.4630017.771.6800017.767.71000017.766.31250017.671.31600017.667.9SPL30.484.6N1.460.7median 18.1median 67.9Delta1.37.333.636.339.142.833.236.532.339.92936.526.93725.136.225.136.726.240.426.844.223.644.321.953.920.557.92069.418.378.81883.417.886.117.482.619.680.71881.217.879.917.976.717.873.717.972.118.170.517.969.517.971.617.962.517.955.717.849.830.591.11.483.5median 18median 71.61.212.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SPMSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18 / 21 / 38 Watt
Load midlight 113 / 256 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption
15%
-2%
34%
-65%
28%
Idle Minimum *
18
13
28%
23
-28%
7
61%
46
-156%
11
39%
Idle Average *
21
16
24%
25
-19%
12
43%
59
-181%
15
29%
Idle Maximum *
38
27
29%
33
13%
22
42%
65.5
-72%
21
45%
Load Average *
113
109
4%
96
15%
86
24%
99.8
12%
94
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149
155
-4%
168
-13%
144
3%
154.1
-3%
143
4%
Load Maximum *
256
236
8%
197
23%
177
31%
222.7
13%
173
32%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 46min
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-1%
6%
-58%
-25%
Reader / Idle
518
505
-3%
591
14%
666
29%
221
-57%
439
-15%
WiFi v1.3
364
364
0%
342
-6%
478
31%
129
-65%
340
-7%
Load
166
102
-39%
149
-10%
96
-42%
80
-52%
79
-52%

Pros

+ 轻巧的外壳
+ 坚固，优质的材料
+ 出色的图像质量
+ 雷雳3
+ 强劲的续航

Cons

- 次要功能键缺少背光（键盘）
- 负载下噪声大
- 非常反光的显示屏
技嘉Aero 15-XB笔记本电脑评测. Review device provided by Gigabyte Germany.
技嘉Aero 15-XB笔记本电脑评测. Review device provided by Gigabyte Germany.

如果您非常重视笔记本电脑的图像质量，那么Aero 15 OLED就是正确的选择。

如果排除反光表面和刷新率，则4K显示屏有利无弊。 除了高亮度，出色的对比度和较短的响应时间外，还有X-Rite Pantone带来的高色域。

由于Aero 15 OLED没有什么明显的缺陷，因此所有想用它来打游戏的游戏玩家和创作者都可以使用。

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 87%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
69 / 95 → 73%
Display
90%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
79 / 95 → 83%
Noise
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
77%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
76%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉Aero 15-XB笔记本电脑评测：引领OLED科技
Florian Glaser, 2020-06-19 (Update: 2024-11- 4)