Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarAlienware m15 R6笔记本电脑评论。效率更高，但RTX 3080比前代更慢
令人惊讶的是，戴尔在这么短的时间内推出了这么多型号的m15。我们已经测试了m15 R4、m15 R5和现在的m15 R6--它们都是在今年推出的。
令人困惑的是，由于R6现在包含一个Tiger Lake CPU，它确实是采用Comet Lake CPU的R4的继任者，更像是采用AMD处理器的R5的兄弟姐妹。机箱和许多其他特征与m15 R5相对应，这就是我们不讨论机箱、输入设备、连接设备等特征的原因，除非有一些变化。你可以在我们对Alienware m15 R5的评论中找到这些方面的信息。 对Alienware m15 R5的评论.
当然，我们也将英特尔m15 R6与 AMD m15 R5和 m15 R4 Comet Lake的前身，此外还与 Aorus 15P YD的Razer Blade 15 pro模型，以及 申克XMG Neo 15.
m15 R6 (m15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 125 W TDP ( including 10 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 466.85, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB PC4-25600 DDR4 SDRAM SK Hynix
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO9092 (B156HAN), IPS, glossy: no, 360 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB
, 2 x PM9A1 NVMe Samsung 1024GB = 2 TB, 1782 GB free
Weight
2.529 kg, Power Supply: 955 g
Price
3049 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Possible competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Aorus 15P YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | ||
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例 - 知名设计
Alienware笔记本电脑以其背后的大型冷却系统而闻名，因此，目前的模型也明显比其他制造商的竞争对手更深，这并不令人惊讶。但至少它比Schenker或Aorus略微轻薄，尽管在这方面没有一个型号能够击败Razer Blade。
Alienware笔记本电脑的重量为2.5公斤（约5.5磅），也比对比设备重200-500克（约7-18盎司）。
连接设备 - 带有Thunderbolt的Intel Alienware
与m15 R5 AMD版本相比，由于采用了英特尔CPU，m15 R6现在支持Thunderbolt 4，相应的USB-C端口也支持USB 3.2 Gen 2而不是Gen 1。此外，USB-C端口现在还支持Power Delivery，这意味着它可以用于充电，但最多只能使用15瓦。除此之外，连接方式保持不变。
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (758 - 1514, n=10) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (887 - 1670, n=10) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 receive AX12: Ø982 (889-1036)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (864-1763)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1009 (520-1143)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1517 (1451-1574)
网络摄像头
15 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
显示 - 速度增加到360赫兹
据HWinfo报道，该显示器与m15 R5一样，采用了友达光电的哑光FHD面板。然而，目前的模型提供了一个快速的360赫兹的刷新率，而AMD m15的刷新率 "只有 "165赫兹。另外，你也可以购买带有相同的165赫兹面板的R6，此外，还有240赫兹的QHD面板可供选择。但为什么没有配备RTX 3080的游戏笔记本的4K选项？
尽管共享相同的标签，但两个面板的数值也不同。虽然亮度稍好，但其分布更差。黑值和对比度也比兄弟姐妹的型号略差。
这两块面板的反应时间非常短，因此也很出色，这是积极的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO9092 (B156HAN) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 370 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 343.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 1026:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.28
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 AU Optronics AUO9092 (B156HAN), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 LG Philips LGD066E (156WFG), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15P YD BOE09B9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -3% | -5% | -7% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 74.1 | 70.1 -5% | 70.2 -5% | 68.6 -7% | 66.9 -10% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.8 0% | 98.5 -1% | 98.6 -1% | 97.1 -2% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75.7 | 71.5 -6% | 72.4 -4% | 69.3 -8% | 69 -9% | |
| Response Times | -47% | -121% | -236% | -293% | -65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 | 4 ? -43% | 7.6 ? -171% | 14 ? -400% | 16 ? -471% | 4.2 ? -50% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 | 8.4 ? -50% | 9.6 ? -71% | 9.6 ? -71% | 12 ? -114% | 10 ? -79% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 15% | 24% | -9% | -8% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 359 | 329 -8% | 347 -3% | 337 -6% | 324 -10% | 353.4 -2% |
| Brightness | 344 | 321 -7% | 318 -8% | 316 -8% | 307 -11% | 340 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 86 1% | 85 0% | 91 7% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.27 23% | 0.31 11% | 0.31 11% | 0.27 23% | 0.31 11% |
| Contrast | 1026 | 1219 19% | 1119 9% | 1087 6% | 1200 17% | 1140 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.78 16% | 1.68 49% | 3.87 -17% | 3.36 -2% | 2.17 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.84 | 4.88 -1% | 3.03 37% | 8.09 -67% | 9.87 -104% | 5.69 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.28 | 1.63 50% | 1.08 67% | 1.15 65% | 1.23 62% | 1.05 68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.66 | 2.5 32% | 1.8 51% | 6.1 -67% | 5.8 -58% | 3.4 7% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.106 104% | 2.262 97% | 2.132 103% | 2.311 95% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 5896 110% | 6201 105% | 6592 99% | 6891 94% | 7087 92% | 6830 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76 | 71 | 72 | 69 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 94 | 94 | 93 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
4% | -34% /
-3% | -83% /
-40% | -102% /
-48% | -20% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
几乎100%的sRGB和大约76%的AdobeRGB，色彩空间的覆盖率非常好，而许多竞争对手却没有完全达到这些数值。
显示屏在交付状态下已经被校准得相当好，手动校准在色彩偏差方面几乎没有明显的改善。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在这次测试中，没有太多的阳光，这有助于Alienware的显示内容更容易阅读。即使在陡峭的视角下，哑光和相当明亮的显示屏也能确保良好的可读性，至少在阴天和阴暗处是如此。
作为IPS屏幕的典型，可视角度的稳定性是一个较小的课题。然而，仍然可以注意到，直视屏幕时的亮度比从陡峭的视角看要好，但这种轻微的下降仍然可以接受。
性能 - RTX 3080的功率只有125W
凭借其英特尔酷睿i7-11800H和 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080移动GPU我们的测试单元代表了配置的最高端。另外，你也可以配置Alienware，它显然可以被认为是一个游戏笔记本电脑，与RTX 3070或RTX 3060，甚至与一个较弱的 英特尔酷睿i5 11400HCPU。
测试条件
Alienware指挥中心提供了许多名称不太直观的风扇配置文件，而模式描述也只是通过一个小星星的系统来实现。性能"、"完全性能 "和 "冷却 "之间可能有什么区别？由于在这三种模式下，即使在空闲运行时，风扇也总是发出噪音（"全性能 "甚至比 "性能 "模式下的噪音还要大），我们在 "平衡 "模式下运行基准测试和噪音测量。尽管这与我们使用最高性能模式测试游戏笔记本的方法相矛盾，但至少这样的噪音测量会有意义。
在每次系统启动时，Alienware指挥中心（ACC）也需要特别长的时间来完成加载。即使在主观上所有其他Windows进程都完成了加载，ACC仍然需要更多的时间。虽然你已经可以启动它了，但在相当长的一段时间内，你仍然无法在概览中选择风扇模式。
Alienware开机时的行为也很奇怪。当你按下电源按钮时，它会亮起几秒钟的蓝灯，但随后就没有其他事情发生了。只有当你第二次按下该按钮时，笔记本电脑才会真正启动--非常令人讨厌
安装了Windows 11作为操作系统，这可能仍然会导致一些基准测试的问题。
处理器
的英特尔酷睿i7-11800H来自Tiger Lake 系列，其8个核心的时钟速度可以达到2.3和4.6 GHz之间（单核涡轮增压）。
在Cinebench循环中，我们测量到前四次运行后，性能略有下降。之后，其性能与Aorus中的英特尔酷睿i7-11800H相当。在前四次运行中，TDP约为90瓦。之后，它开始变得有限，在每一次新的运行中，TDP只会短暂地达到最大值，然后下降到大约50瓦。
在直接比较中，Schenker的Core i7-11800H提供了最好的性能，但在大多数情况下，Alienware落后5%左右。
在电池模式下，Cinebench R15的CPU性能与开始时的性能相比只下降了约10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1804 (1720.8-2133.9)
Aorus 15P YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1808 (1756.39-1935.92)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2153 (2123.03-2172.97)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -2! | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H | |
| Aorus 15P YD -2! | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6508 - 14088, n=48) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1386 - 1522, n=45) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=50) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=46) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (33718 - 56758, n=46) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (5138 - 5732, n=46) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD -9! | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake -9! | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -9! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (8772 - 15961, n=20) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (39404 - 65636, n=20) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2599 - 4439, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (85233 - 91941, n=20) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6420 - 9792, n=20) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (23365 - 39464, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (74617 - 149388, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (461 - 830, n=43) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4545 - 8717, n=21) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (11898 - 26757, n=21) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
系统性能
PCMark 10基准测试并没有很好地将竞争对手区分开来，至少在总分上没有。Razer Blade在次级测试中似乎略微领先，但Alienware正在挑战它，仅在Essentials基准测试中仍落后约5%。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6673 - 7470, n=11) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9862 - 11064, n=11) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (8278 - 9803, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9881 - 11323, n=11) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7177 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (24508 - 48144, n=21) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (25882 - 50365, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (22240 - 46214, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-11800H (71.9 - 104.1, n=44) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
LatencyMon工具没有检测到任何明显的延迟，无论是在打开几个浏览器标签时，还是在流媒体视频或通过Prime95的CPU负载期间。另一方面，我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频被复制，总共有68个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
戴尔为m15 R6配备了两块来自三星的1-TB NVMe固态硬盘，因此有充足的存储量，总容量为2TB。尽管三星PM9A1在我们的SSD数据库中占据了第三位 SSD数据库的第三位但在R6中，它甚至无法接近其理论上的高速度。这里有一些浪费的潜力，但速度仍然不差。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3552 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3174 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
755 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
544 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
83.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
225.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
1414 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2823 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080: Ø3453 (3146.36-3468.67)
图形卡
R6包含一个 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080移动GPU它能够消耗125瓦，包括10瓦的动态提升。考虑到一些RTX 3080笔记本电脑的配置高达165瓦，这似乎相当低，特别是对于Alienware笔记本电脑而言。例如，即使是带有RTX 3070选项的R6也能使用130瓦的功率。
在3DMark测试中，就其RTX 3080而言，Alienware的性能与平均水平相当完全对应。然而，配备RTX 3080和Intel Core i9-10980HK的 "老 "R4彗星湖CPU在大部分时间里明显更快。这并不奇怪，因为R4的GPU能够使用140瓦。
在电池模式下，运行3DMark 11的结果只有16,083分，而不是之前的30,178分，这相当于减少了47%。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (31288 - 43744, n=40) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (38816 - 192950, n=35) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (16455 - 32366, n=46) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6407 - 13210, n=45) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 30178 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 53399 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24014 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10763 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
尽管RTX 3080略有节流，但Alienware能够以最大的细节和全高清分辨率显示所有现代游戏，甚至应该有足够的储备用于4K分辨率。
总体而言，R6的性能又相当接近我们数据库中其他配备RTX 3080的笔记本电脑的平均水平。然而，它的大多数直接竞争对手仍然更快，老式的m15 R4处于顶端。与前代产品相比，限制性能似乎有点奇怪，可能是为了能够为系统提供更好的冷却。
风扇模式似乎只对性能有很小的影响。在性能模式下，许多游戏几乎不会受益于理论上的额外冷却（GTA V），但在一些游戏中，我们可以看到最小的优势（Strange Brigade，+ 3-5%）。
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (38 - 248, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (84 - 162, n=26) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (79 - 155, n=28) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (75 - 146, n=33) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| New World | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Video Quality | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (80.8 - 105.4, n=4) | |
| 1920x1080 High Video Quality | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (75.1 - 96.7, n=4) | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Video Quality | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (71.5 - 90.4, n=4) | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (58.5 - 508, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (186 - 306, n=29) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (49.4 - 465, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (165 - 248, n=30) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (117 - 219, n=34) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 244, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (108.1 - 161, n=45) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (98 - 156, n=45) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (36.5 - 193.1, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (80.6 - 139, n=44) | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 | |
| Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 | |
| Aorus 15P YD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (65.6 - 113, n=44) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
在运行《Witcher 3 》的一个小时内，帧率只略微下降，因此性能相当稳定，异常值或下降仍然是例外。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø107.9 (95-115)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183 | 177 | 166 | 99.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 312 | 276 | 149 | 108.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 168 | 151 | 144 | 135 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 127 | 110 | 87.9 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 132 | 126 | 119 | 113 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 424 | 261 | 216 | 190 |
| New World (2021) | 115.5 | 95.7 | 91.3 | 84 |
排放 - 比大多数竞争对手更热
噪声排放
在空闲运行期间，6号机的风扇经常保持关闭状态，至少在平衡或安静模式下是如此。在性能模式下，它们在怠速运行时也很响亮，同样在 "冷却 "模式下也是如此。在完全性能模式下，它们变得更加响亮。
在平衡模式下，风扇甚至可以在最大空闲运行时不时地转动起来，噪音水平大约为30dB。在平均负荷下（3DMark06，第一个基准），R6现在仍然比它的一些竞争对手更安静。
另一方面，在重载情况下，风扇的转速相当高。但至少它们在这里也不比Aorus或Schenker的声音大。然而，当你使用全性能模式时，情况就不是这样了。因此，每个用户都必须自己决定，多做几帧是否也值得增加噪音水平。
在某些类型的负载下（3DMark06），我们可以听到以嗡嗡声为形式的电子噪音。可能只有在中等负荷水平下才能注意到，之后它就会被风扇的噪音所淹没。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.26 / 53.37 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G (RAID 0) | Aorus 15P YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -7% | -10% | -11% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 25.1 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 26 -13% | 27 -17% | 25.3 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 25 -9% | 29 -26% | 30 -30% | 30 -30% | 25.3 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 35 -17% | 33 -10% | 34 -13% | 32 -7% | 25.3 16% |
| Load Average * | 41.26 | 44 -7% | 48 -16% | 43 -4% | 46 -11% | 42 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.4 | 48 10% | 46 14% | 50 6% | 52 3% | 45.6 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.37 | 50 6% | 49 8% | 57 -7% | 55 -3% | 51.6 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在怠速运行时，R6现在仍然比R4冷。然而，在负载情况下，它又变得同样热，虽然至少3D性能略低。
在重压下，顶部和底部的表面可以达到约60°C（140°F）的温度，这绝对不适合在人的腿上操作。另一方面，那些住在寒冷的花园小屋里的人可以从R6的一些其他方面获益。在游戏时，WASD键周围的温度仍然达到舒适的40-45°C（104-113°F），但至少掌托仍然相对凉爽。
有趣的是，配备较弱的RTX 3060和Ryzen 7 5800H的R5也变得同样热。然而，其余的竞争对手仍然明显较冷。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15P YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -7% | 9% | 15% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 61 | 62 -2% | 59 3% | 49 20% | 39 36% | 51 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 61 -5% | 61 -5% | 57 2% | 50 14% | 52 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 38 | 36 5% | 43 -13% | 33 13% | 34 11% | 35.2 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36 | 33 8% | 41 -14% | 36 -0% | 37 -3% | 37.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在长达一小时的压力测试中，核心开始时的频率约为4.2GHz。不到半小时后，时钟速度只有2.7GHz。直到最后，它在2.7和2.9GHz之间略有变化。
在此期间，核心温度保持在完全不临界的80°C（176°F），即使它们可以暂时上升到98°C（208°F），这将触发热节流。
同时，在整个测试过程中，GPU的时钟速度在1.3和1.7GHz之间变化。它的温度在77℃（171°F）左右，热点达到85℃（185°F）左右。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.7 - 2.9 | 1,395 - 1,710 | 80 | 77 |
发言人
积极的方面是，该扬声器可以变得相当响亮。但不幸的是，它们缺乏低音，而且我们还听到了在中音方面更好的型号。由于风扇的声音很大，建议无论如何都要使用耳机，而且有一个音频端口。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 比上一代产品更有效
消耗功率
由于采用了Optimus开关，R6现在的耗电量明显低于R4，至少在空闲运行时是这样。在负载情况下，消耗也略低于竞争对手，但这也可能是由于较低的3D性能。
我们测量的最大消耗量略高于200瓦，这意味着240瓦的电源应该足以在任何情况下能够为设备可靠地充电。
Power Consumption
| Idle | 14 / 18 / 29 Watt |
| Load |
93 / 203 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15P YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -70% | -29% | -0% | -18% | -24% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14 | 11 21% | 37 -164% | 23 -64% | 15 -7% | 19.5 -39% | 19.8 ? -41% | 13.5 ? 4% |
| Idle Average * | 18 | 14 22% | 40 -122% | 25 -39% | 17 6% | 23.3 -29% | 24.3 ? -35% | 18.9 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 25 14% | 53 -83% | 35 -21% | 22 24% | 40.1 -38% | 33.3 ? -15% | 26.7 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 93 | 123 -32% | 121 -30% | 101 -9% | 101 -9% | 98.9 -6% | 108.1 ? -16% | 106.6 ? -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 190 | 176 7% | 193 -2% | 190 -0% | 195 -3% | 174 8% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 203 | 226 -11% | 246 -21% | 280 -38% | 230 -13% | 214 -5% | 230 ? -13% | 249 ? -23% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø189.5 (186.24-224.97)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø182.9 (172.59-196.01)
Power Consumption with an External Monitor
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø116.8 (113.4-118.73)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø138.8 (135.59-146.6)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.7 (162.79-168.85)
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø178.5 (174.14-184.42)
电池寿命
尽管有更强大的GPU，R6并没有配备比R5的RTX 3060更大的电池。然而，这似乎不一定对电池寿命有负面影响，因为在我们的电池测试中，集成的GPU大部分时间都在活动。WLAN测试结果是在眼睛的位置，只有在播放视频时，R6的持续时间明显比R5的8小时少，只有5.5小时。
| Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080 i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Aorus 15P YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | -61% | 18% | 27% | 17% | 12% | |
| H.264 | 333 | 525 58% | 114 -66% | 352 6% | 408 ? 23% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 302 | 306 1% | 110 -64% | 319 6% | 338 12% | 353 17% | 376 ? 25% |
| Load | 98 | 55 -44% | 45 -54% | 126 29% | 161 64% | 85.3 ? -13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 881 | 448 | 565 ? | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 96 | 46 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
+ 具有良好色彩空间覆盖的360-Hz显示屏
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 霹雳火4
+ 广泛的照明
Cons
- 负载下表面比竞争对手更热
- RTX 3080的TDP只有125W，所以它在3D方面比前代产品要慢
- 吱吱作响的机箱盖，显示框架太容易松动了
- 恼人的风扇配置文件没有负载控制
- 固态硬盘没有接近使用其全部潜力
结论 - 为什么这么热？
与R4相比，Tiger Lake ，更新后的R6主要是更加高效和节俭，但不一定更快。即使CPU性能提高了，但由于TGP的降低，3D性能也下降了。这也降低了消耗。冷却模式似乎只对性能有很小的影响，RTX 3080仍然没有得到更高的功率分配。
CPU的性能与Ryzen m15 R5相当。此外，还有支持Thunderbolt的优势。但除此之外，R5和R6极为相似。所以你应该根据价格和Thunderbolt对你的重要性来选择。
冷却系统仍然显示出需要进一步优化。尽管RTX 3080的功耗很低，但Alienware的表面比大多数竞争对手的表面更热，其中一些竞争对手的3D性能更高。
m15 R6比它的前辈R4更加高效和节俭。然而，RTX 3080在这里被扼杀了，Alienware的表面仍然变得非常热。
这款Aorus 15P YD产生了最低限度的更高的性能，同时仍然保持更低的温度，但它也有更高的消耗。这款申克XMG Neo 15也提供了明显更高的3D性能，而且还能保持更低的温度。此外，它还提供更长的电池寿命，但另一方面，它的声音也更大。
价格和可用性
m15 R6的各种配置目前可从戴尔公司，起价约1200美元。.亚马逊提供一个更高端的 配置，价格为1783美元.
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
- 11/25/2021 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
