Aorus X7 v6 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 v6 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 686:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440 | Aorus X7 Pro v5 LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 7% | 3% | 35% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 60.9 | 66 8% | 68 12% | 66.6 9% | 90 48% |
sRGB Coverage | 84.2 | 83.4 -1% | 87.5 4% | 84.1 0% | 99.9 19% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.2 | 61 0% | 64 5% | 61.5 0% | 83.6 37% |
Response Times | -67% | -82% | -80% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31 ? | 35 ? -13% | 33.6 ? -8% | 37 ? -19% | 28 ? 10% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 22 ? -120% | 25.6 ? -156% | 24 ? -140% | 9.6 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 22% | 18% | 24% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 343 | 271 -21% | 329.2 -4% | 362 6% | 337.2 -2% |
Brightness | 312 | 257 -18% | 321 3% | 342 10% | 315 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 91 14% | 93 16% | 87 9% | 86 8% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.23 54% | 0.267 47% | 0.31 38% | 0.308 38% |
Contrast | 686 | 1178 72% | 1233 80% | 1168 70% | 1095 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.33 | 4.14 44% | 5.93 19% | 4.5 39% | 2.96 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.79 | 8.11 25% | 11.07 -3% | 9.31 14% | 5.45 49% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.6 | 4 47% | 6.72 12% | 3.48 54% | 2.57 66% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.12 104% | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 9024 72% | 6558 99% | 7611 85% | 6144 106% | 7114 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 55 0% | 57 4% | 55 0% | 74.3 35% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 83 -1% | 87 4% | 84 0% | 100 19% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
6% | -19% /
2% | -18% /
6% | 25% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
PCMark 7 Score | 5946 points | |
Help |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X7 Pro v5 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 10% | -59% | -27% | -71% | |
Read Seq | 1499 | 1736 16% | 481.7 -68% | 1156 -23% | 334.3 -78% |
Write Seq | 1411 | 1562 11% | 315.4 -78% | 294.9 -79% | 319 -77% |
Read 4k | 44.33 | 51.9 17% | 25.93 -42% | 42.7 -4% | 20.3 -54% |
Write 4k | 155.5 | 148 -5% | 84.6 -46% | 153.3 -1% | 42.51 -73% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17911 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 139648 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28781 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13761 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5337 points | |
Help |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 |
Battlefield 1 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
Aorus X7 v6 |
Doom | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
The Division | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 |
Far Cry Primal | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Aorus X7 Pro v5 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 111 | 97 | ||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 103 | 86 | ||
The Division (2016) | 99.8 | 80.2 | ||
Doom (2016) | 134 | 128 | ||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 74.1 | 41.1 | ||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 136 | 124 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33 / 35 / 40 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43 / 54 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK | Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 3% | 2% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 29.7 1% | 30 -0% | 28.4 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 34 -3% | 33.2 -1% | 33 -0% | 31.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 35 -0% | 33.2 5% | 34 3% | 32 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 39 2% | 33.2 17% | 35 12% | 34 15% |
Load Average * | 43 | 39 9% | 47.5 -10% | 45 -5% | 47 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 54 -0% | 52.5 3% | 52 4% | 49.4 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.5 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.5 °C / -18.9 F).
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK | Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -17% | -17% | 1% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47.5 | 55.4 -17% | 59 -24% | 45 5% | 50.8 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 54.5 | 62.4 -14% | 66 -21% | 54.3 -0% | 60 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.6 | 33.6 -17% | 33.2 -16% | 29.6 -3% | 27.4 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.8 | 34.6 -20% | 30.6 -6% | 28.6 1% | 28.8 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X7 v6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 29 / 31 / 38 Watt |
Load |
111 / 253 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK | Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 10% | 23% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 32 -10% | 18.4 37% | 19 34% | 22.6 22% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 37 -19% | 22.8 26% | 25 19% | 32.7 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 38 | 42 -11% | 24 37% | 31 18% | 32.8 14% |
Load Average * | 111 | 101 9% | 175.5 -58% | 90 19% | 114.7 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 253 | 245 3% | 229.5 9% | 193 24% | 167.9 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X7 v6 94 Wh | Aorus X7 Pro v5 94.24 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 75.81 Wh | HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh | MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 182 | 152 -16% | 201 10% | 247 36% | 213 17% |
Pros
Cons
首先最重要的是,技嘉没有坐吃山空的打算。这家生产商仔细分析了前代产品的不足,并为新的X7 v6带来了诸多改进。它的输入设备得到了重新设计,可以和同类产品平起平坐。触控版更可靠,并采用了磨砂表面。它的键盘也有所改进,提供了更高的稳定性和更舒适的反馈。
它的出色屏幕具备高速响应,120赫兹刷新率,并支持G-Sync技术。这些出色的功能都会为热爱游戏的玩家带来更佳流畅的游戏体验。生产商为这台设备装载了强劲的8GB GDDR5显存GeForce GTX 1070,它可以在3K或4K分辨率流畅运行游戏。
实际上, X7 v6也有几个不足,如电池续航和音响品质都不是它的长项。在其他的方面,这台设备都得到了“优秀”或“非常优秀”的评分。它十分适合推荐给热爱游戏的玩家。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Aorus X7 v6
- 08/18/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser